Iran, NIE, Pre-Emptive Strikes, Ron Paul, Controlled Oppostion and Disinformation
I've been watching the monsters as they've been itching to attack Iran for several years now. Despite Iran's unequivocal and complete denunciation and condemnation of the 9/11 attacks, Son of a Bush named Iran as part of an "axis of evil" in '02.
The Khatami administration tried its very best to reach out to the US and normalize relations from 2001-2005. The Iranian leadership helped the US, through conduits and weak covert diplomatic relationships with intelligence and logistics on the Taliban as admitted freely by the puppet Karzai. However, despite these attempts to coax the US into a renewal of diplomatic relations, Iran only drew attention to themselves as they were starting to become a strong regional force, with a slowly but steadily growing economy, by increasing defense spending, and by strengthening ties with noted competition for America's unipolar hegemony like China and Russia.
Because of the extensive Zionist influence on America, all efforts at overt diplomatic relations were squashed before they materialized and propaganda about Iran's nuclear intentions was steadily increased on ALL levels in the media.
It's important to understand that for the Zionist Mafia to remain in power there is to be absolutely no media beyond their control. They could never hope to do false flag terrorism like 9/11 and commit other seditionist crimes without almost perfect control of ALL media: mainstream, alternative, or hyper-alternative. They just have to keep it in perspective of its audience and be aware of what is already known so as to keep their cover.
Several "useful idiots" or "puppets" in the "truth movement" exemplify this science in operation; Alex Jones, Webster Tarpley, "Birdman" Bryant, are just a few. As long as they offer sufficient amount of factual or "inside" information, spin it, and pepper it with outright lies and disinformation they can keep unsuspecting mildly cognizant, partially aware, "seekers" at bay from an accurate understanding and effective activist opportunities.
We highlighted the Ron Paul issue on this website, and while I certainly don't feel the need to expand on that any further, I will say, there is NO WAY, the Zionist media would allow a potentially harmful threat, as his most die-hard fans fancy him, to ever get so much positive and EXTENSIVE coverage in the media.
I view this now as an elaborate psy-op to diffuse the potential of a mass populist awakening into an irrelevant self-replicating support system for one man who is NOT A THREAT. This has soaked up money, time, effort and energy while the criminals who are ensconced in the most insidious ways in all key positions forming the cohesive networked structure of our country, will NOT be IDENTIFIED and will GAIN power and INFLUENCE as they diminish the effectiveness of the masses by providing them an avenue to express their disgust with the status quo, through the FLAWED system of vote fraud and puppets making promises, ENABLING the status quo.
This is undeniably, PRECISELY, what occurred on a smaller scale last November, when a populous thoroughly disgusted by the war and encouraged by the Democrats vow to “end the war” voted the Democrats into Congress again falling for the myth of “the lesser evil” or as I like to call it, the khancept of terd burgers tasting better than shit sandwiches.
Unbeknownst to the voting populous it elected in MORE Zionist Israeli dual-citizens, the sources of our problems, into Congress. The treasonous ideological zealots have mastered the art of controlled opposition and thoroughly control both Democrans and Republicrats with equal perfidious zeal and we were tricked into a SURGE to the war along with an indefinite time-table of withdrawal and MORE FUNDING. This is by design while the incompetence excuse so illogically and often used by Paul for 9/11, is used in their case to excuse their behavior and seeming inability to stop the almighty Puppet in Chief, Son of a Bush.
Quite ominously, Paul is praised in the “patriot” community as the anti-thesis to Bush despite connections with the same Texas gangs and an eerily similar message prior to election; a brave, greater than life Superhero who will resurrect the constitution and restore the Utopia this “great country” aspired to be, fresh off the Native American and African genocides.
Paul has all corners of the alternative media, bloggers, and radio hosts really believing his magic stick will scare away the mean ol’ bad guys. This is exactly what was expected out of the democrats last year and will continue to fool the ignorant into picking someone they feel is “different”, as they’ve done in the past with the likes of Perot, Buchanan, and Nader, who I personally feel is far better than Paul and whose track record shows strict alliance with the people over several decades.
Despite the fact that I don’t believe Paul to be a genuine threat in spite his cute vocal renunciations, nor a panacea, like most of his rabid evangelist fans, when I overhear conversations about the election and people talk about Hillary, Giuliani, Romney or Obama, I mention Paul as the one they should look into. I do this not in the hope that Paul will necessary win but rather in the hope, perhaps naively, that research on Paul and interaction with his fan club leads to more important research on why we are at this impasse which will help educate the millions who eventually join his campaign or vote for him. If this occurs the movement can transcend Paul as a figurehead and no matter if he wins, loses, gets killed, or has the election stolen, we will have an army of very educated individuals with a resolve to excise the criminals from government.
But I digress. This issue of controlled opposition is very closely related to what we are hearing about the Iranian nuclear issue since the NIE has come out with its report stating that an Iranian weapons program has not existed since 2003.
Most of us welcomed this news with a feeling of accomplishment rather than further galvanizing opposition to the Elite’s desire for illegal war on Iran. However, the NIE report, it is claimed by some alternative media sources, “might strengthen the case for military action against Iran.” If we are to believe this author, Simanowitz, the NIE admitting that there WAS a nuclear weapons program might provide the justification for the Zionist warmongers. This idea that an illegal “preemptive” strike on Iran is still likely is also espoused by Scott Ritter in this audio file .
“This concept that the Iranians were pursuing a nuclear weapons program that was shut down in 2003 continues to be only an assessment, not a statement of fact… because the Bush administration continues to pound away at the notion that Iran had a nuclear weapons program. That it may be shut down today but that they could restart it… Now their big contention is that Iran must come clean about the program they had. Well what if Iran had a program? How can you clean about something you never had”
We can view this in a couple of ways.
1) They feel that we should not let down our guard and continue to oppose any encroachment, in rhetoric or political strangulations via tougher sanctions, on Iran.
Or
2) They want us to get used to the idea that nothing will stop the “Bush administration” from going forward with military force pursuing “regime change” in Iran.
I feel it is the latter. It seems to me like they want us to feel it is hopeless for us to impede the progress of the Warmongers in attacking Iran and just as they were successful in forging the evidence and forcing Iraq to prove a negative, so will they be successful in pursuing the same course of action in Iran.
The NIE was a tiny victory, admittedly. It still operated on the unproven notion that Iran ever wanted nuclear weapons as Ritter pointed out. However this attack on the NIE by many quarters, including several key Zionist democrats in congress like Feinstein, Schumer, and Lieberman, is highly coordinated and transparent in its ulterior motives.
The pink elephant dances naked in the room and most folks are still arguing about whether there is anything there, whether it’s really an elephant or if it’s really pink.
-Khanverse
Thank you for your thoughtful post. I wish to respond….
“Paul has all corners of the alternative media, bloggers, and radio hosts believing his magic stick will scare away the mean ol’ bad guys. This is exactly what was expected out of the democrats last year, and will continue to fool the ignorant into picking someone they feel is ‘different,’ as they’ve done in the past with the likes of Perot, Buchanan, and Nader, who I personally feel is far better than Paul, and whose track record shows strict alliance with the people over several decades.”
I personally have many doubts about Ron Paul, but I will not discuss them here. I will say I agree with you about Ralph Nader, and I wrote a post about him last October. A lot of people don’t realize how openly anti-Zionist Nader is.
Second, I doubt anyone thinks the NIE report made an Iran strike unlikely. Zionists totally control the USA, as I showed again with my post Who run Bartertown? The Jews will have their Iran strike one way or another.
Nonetheless, I think the NIE report has made it more difficult for the Zio-media to spew its lies. The NIE report was also the final nail in the coffin of Bush’s attempts to get China and Russia to agree to a third round of major sanctions against Iran.
An Iran strike is certainly not “off the table,” but I think the NIE report has made it more difficult. Otherwise we wouldn’t be having wave after wave of Israeli teams visiting the USA and threatening everyone they meet. The little worms are scared. Some of them talk about Israel “going it alone” and attacking Iran, which makes me laugh.
I think we’ll know more In January when the recession starts to hit everyone. At that point the American Goy-slaves will want nothing to do with war, or else they’ll be so anxious about their finances that they’ll be ripe for a false-flag attack, followed by martial law and an Iran strike.
The main point of your post, as I interpret it, is that devotees of Ron Paul display the same kind of manipulability we saw in the past with Perot. I agree. In fact I have suggested here at WUFYS that one reason Ron Paul has been allowed to keep going is that when Hillary gets the Democratic nomination, Paul’s followers will feel all the more helpless and alone. It’s all a set-up for a crash.
I imagine the elite are laughing as they watch the Ron Paul rallies on TV. “Poor slobs,” they say as Paul's supporters cheer on the TV screen.
“We’ll let them have their fun for a while.”
On the issue of Ron Paul, I can't put it any more eloquently than geeez did here.
Khanverse, you say in your myspace blog:
You seem to think supporting Ron Paul and fighting the information war are mutually exclusive activities, but of course, they're not. Supporting Ron Paul doesn't have to cost anything, and it needn't be a distraction.
Methinks the lady doth protest too much.
Maybe I should've typed in a ';)' after that last remark. It's not an attack or an accusation, just a comment.
There's no way that this is the case. Anyone that's been following the Ron Paul phenomenon (for lack of a better word) knows that it's been a spontaneous, decentralised display of people power, happening on an individual level. Ron Paul's popularity is not a manufactured event - it happened independently without any help from the MSM.
I mischaracterised your position on that; you didn't say it was a manufactured event, you said it was allowed to keep going. But I don't think anything has been "allowed" by anyone - to think like that is to attribute too much power to the controllers, in my opinion.
It wouldn't be in the best interests of the Powers That Be to deliberately work everyone up into a frenzy with the Ron Paul thing (“We’ll let them have their fun for a while”). All this energy that's been accruing has to go somewhere after Ron Paul loses (and there's a 99.9% chance that he will), and when that happens, it won't help the Man.