The country could break up. If so, it could involve the region and possibly the entire world. Who was behind it? Washington, Israel, Britian, the Taliban, Bin Laden, tribal factions, India, Mushariff, Pakistani military, Pakistani Intelligence, none, or all of the above?! It has the potential of bubbling over to the point it is not able to be controlled. I believe Washington's greasy, bloody mitts (foreknowledge) are all over this. The Pentagon reached out to an opposition leader to her weeks ago, and now there is talk of U.S. troops possibly going there (FOX NEWS- 12/27/07). This is disasterous.

How funny! A suicide bomber shot her twice before blows him self!

I call it so funny! He just want her to feel pain before she dies!

what type of anger is this?

The funny part that we are watching more and more and more people dies everyday for something called sacrifice for the(Gods)and as for everyone it feels like watching a Hollywood action movie!

My advice for everyone enjoy your time will you are watching! because i see fogs and lots of them when i look for future!

And stop asking me, whats wrong? Chillax!

Watch Pakistan fall, it's going to be a doozy.

It's definitely Mossad/CIA operation. It can't be possible to blame on Al-Qaeda, the "fictional" terror group created by the CIA in the 80's or early 90's as disinformation campaign for U.S. and allies to intervene under the banner "War on Terror".

If Pakistan do fall, the nukes will fall into the hands of the so-called terrorists and this will be seen as a justification to attack Pakistan by the U.S. and its imperial allies.

Pakistan is one of the most populated nations besides India and China. If Pakistan is attacked from the air, Pakistanis will rise in anger and outrage that their way of life is disturbed and sovereignty violated. Russia and Iran should help Pakistan kick ass.

Don't have any clue who did it but it could be anyone or a combo of groups.

It could have been Musharaf. Him seeing the west trying to double crossing him by switching puppets like they do diapers, might have pushed it to far.
On the other hand I don't see anyone committing suicide for Musharaf. Assuming it was a suicide.

Western news here has been pro-Bhutto 100%. Saying she was in exile while leaving out the self-imposed part was very funny. Their constant blabbering about democracy dying was like a broken record.

Did she really have such a large following? I just don't see "Mudjahedeen" accepting a female western puppet as a political leader.
Or did Musharaf mess up Pakistan that bad, the people will just take anyone else?

I would caution against claiming CIA or mossad for this assassination in Pakistan.

First of all, there is no EVIDENCE of this, we can only speak on who would benefit and such, but there really is no hard evidence for this claim.

Also Pakistani politics and society is very convoluted, lots of different players and the tribal pashtuns (my people, yea, i'm ashamed) are going crazy, chopping heads off of the Pakistani army and such. They have proven to be barbarians who only accept their own rule and oppose all other rule even where they don't have a right.

Benazir was also gonna be a better puppet for the west than anything else... I believe she had some good ideas for bringin peace but overall there was a significant opposition to her from the illiterate, radicalized tribal taliban types who are esconsced in the NWFP and are slowly spreading like a disease throughout Pakistan.

Trust me, I'm the first to make the claim when some crazy shit happens in Lebanon that Mossad was involved, WITHOUT evidence but that's because they are the prime suspect and they have a documented history of doing false flags there

In Pakistan, you don't have that with the CIA or Mossad... The ISI is full of covert taliban supporters/enablers/sympathizers and also the choatic nature of these attacks suggest locally planned/organized attacks that are successful because of porous security and Pervez being a big wuss.

I'm not questioning your motives, I'm just saying nuclear armed Pakistan is just totally out of control and a lot of irrational acts of terror occur that don't benefit western intelligence, nor reveal 'the hidden hand' in subsequent investigations.

http://www.myspace.com/khanverse

You are all right, more often than not.

The conflict is between seemingly incompatible ideologies; encouraged by design of another, much more insidious beast.

Look at the bigger picture.

Mossad and Bush had nothing to gain from this. Bhutto was one of their puppets, and helped sustain the illusion of an “opposition.”

The assassination probably involved rivalries between the various supporters of Musharraf, Bhutto, and Nawaz Sharif.

The rally was the first public appearances of Bhutto and Sharif (in Rawalpindi anyway) since they returned to Pakistan.

Last week, Musharraf banned Nawaz Sharif from running in the upcoming elections. Hours before Bhutto was assassinated in Rawalpindi, there was a political rally for Nawaz Sharif in neighboring Islamabad. Sharif's supporters were getting ready to begin a protest march, when unknown attackers opened fire on them. At least four of Nawaz Sharif’s aides were killed, and 12 wounded. Nawaz Sharif himself was headed to a public rally in Rawalpindi.

Nawaz Sharif's party blames Musharraf’s party for the shootings.

Musharraf’s party denies any involvement.

So who killed Bhutto? Even if Musharraf’s Quaid-i-Azam party was behind the earlier shootings, why did the assassin hit Bhutto, and not Musharraf?

Here’s a thought: Bhutto talked about letting India invest in Pakistan (currently Pakistan bars Indian investment because of the Jammu & Kashmir conflict). She said that if Pakistan and India enter into economic cooperation, then the J & K issue would eventually resolve itself. Maybe Bhutto’s assassin hated India, and was unhappy about the J&K issue. That’s just a wild guess. Nawaz Sharif has also talked about the need for greater cooperation with India, but he is politically weak.

Bush will send in U.S. troops to help prop up Musharraf.
Naturally the Bush regime says, “al Qaeda did it.”

Meanwhile I’m waiting to see something ridiculous like this...

the haaretz article explains it all, AAZ!

we have two issues here, one: who did it and why.
two, and much more important is: WTF is gonna happen now!

CIA/Mossad Did it.

Khanverse, You may call yourself a Khan but you are no tribal Pashtun. Your view of Pashtuns is plucked right out of CNN’s description of these folks. Either you are an imposter to your
claim of being a tribal Pashtun or you are
very, very ignorant of your own ways. Though I
suspect the former.

For one, if you were a real Pashtun you would
know that the tribals don't chop heads (leave that
to the Taliban and Saudis) The tribals of NWFP
prefer guns as their means of vengeance and punishment.
(They have their own jirga system of trying criminals and death sentences are carried out by shooting) No chopping heads or hands. In that they are different from the
Taliban.

Second you say that "they have spread in
Pakistan like a disease" Excise me, the
Tribals have lived in the NWF province since
before the British left Pakistan and they have been
administering themselves ever since. If they
or their ideology was so wide spread then how
come there wasn't any nationwide riots like
those after Benazir's death after the tragedy of the Red Mosque? (According to a
former ISI member, more than 1000 people
were killed in that slaughter.) And what did the tribals do? They came, picked up their dead, hung around the mosque for a time, voiced their protests and went. (The bomb that went off at the time in Islamabad was the govt’s handiwork. If the tribals had decided to bomb someplace they would make sure their target was a military one and people who had angered them would get hurt not innocent civilians. Any tribal knows killing another muslim who has not harmed him is haram (forbidden in case you don’t know what the term means)

Third you would know that Pashtuns would never
kill a women it is below them and honor is very dear to every Pashtun. Besides their leader Baithulla
Masud has denied they killed her.

Musharaf destroyed the red mosque and murdered
their kids, Musharaf and his army are
responsible for the daily destruction upon
tribal hearths and homes. Wouldn't they choose
to knock him instead of a female who was just a
contender?

You talk of motives and benefits. Plain as
day.

The US needs to destroy the Pashtuns; needs
them to be put under control before they can
Actually invade the place. They know that the furiously freedom loving
pashtuns played a big roll in defeating the
British and the Russians and they don’t want to make the same mistake. The Red Mosque was
destroyed to provoke them into open war but
they stayed in their area and preferred to fight
on their own battleground. Which being mountainous
will make a terrible battleground for ground
troops. And the Americans know it. They want Musharaf to bomb the place but he needed a better excuse to do that. The isolated (supposedly suicide) bombs here and there were not convincing enough to warrant an ethnic cleansing

But now they can use the death of Benazir, a big figure in Pakistani politics, as a
good excuse to blanket bomb the area.

Benazir was the PM not just a candidate when the Taliban came into power, why didn’t they kill her then? They went so far as to challenge Iran and did nothing to Benazir? If these extremists are so powerful and well organized and they had/have people even in the ISI wasn’t that their best chance to get rid of a female ruler and take over Pakistan ( the notion, though, makes me laugh)

Musharaf killed her with the help/ knowledge
of CIA/Mossad. Being a very loyal lap dog, he would not go against any of Washington’s plans, even for his own benefit.

Also her police escort vanishing at
the time of the attack and her standing up in
the bullet proof car and exposing herself to danger
exactly where the bomber stood is just too
convenient. The crime scene was also hosed down the minute the bodies were removed.

And like all false flag ops, there will be no investigations and no
trials. Just like Zial-ul-Haq’s assassination and countless
other leaders assassinated by the CIA, the case will be
closed-just like that. When that happens, here,
in Pakistan even a retard will shake his head
and say America did it and resigns to the fact that justice will not be served.

Grim reaper said
‘we have two issues here, one: who did it and why.
two, and much more important is:

The ten million dollar question. The conspiracies within conspiracies and plots within plots make it very, very difficult for those outside the club(meaning regular folks) to actually guess the real path this is all leading to.

Add to that the conflicting reports, all coming from all sides. (usually they all sing the same tune. But now its the aim is to confuse and scare the public, keep the riots fired up)

WTF is gonna happen now!’

All hell will break loose. People in Karachi are preparing for the worse and hoarding up. There is a rotten feeling in my gut, the kind that wrenched my innards the day I saw the twin towers falling. Many people are going to die. Hope I’m wrong