Why a "two-state solution" in Palestine is absurd
The map below shows why all talk of a "two state solution" in Palestine is absurd. The red areas are where Palestinians live in the occupied territories. These areas are not accurate, and not to scale. Around each red area is a gray line representing apartheid walls, plus other barriers – again, not to scale.
The Israeli plan is to restrict Palestinians to these isolated ghettos, and starve them inside. Isolation is achieved by the apartheid walls, plus the other barriers, fences, Jews-only roads, and so on.
The walls and barriers have nothing to do with Jewish “security.” They are designed to squeeze Palestinians into oblivion.
Whenever Jews talk about a “two-state” solution, the red areas you see here are literally what Jews mean by a “Palestinian state,” namely a patchwork of prison-ghettos. How would Palestinians move back and forth between the red areas? Answer: they wouldn’t. Each area is cut off from all other areas.
Is that a "state"?

Incidentally, in a “two-state solution,” all Palestinians outside the occupied territories would have to move into the tiny red zones. This is what the collaborationist Abbas is pushing for.
But wait . . . wouldn’t the Jews tears down the walls between the Palestinian ghettos?
What do you think?
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
Haaretz document confirms Jewish plan for Palestinians
I thought this was interesting from a historical perspective.
You know that Israeli “peace processes” are meant to distract everyone while Jews continue to push all Palestinians out of Palestine.
You also know the Palestininians were wrongly blamed for the breakdown of the Camp David "peace" talks in 2000.
Jonathan Cook wrote a piece at Electronic Intifada that mentions some interesting things.
He notes that former prime minister Ehud Barak dreamed up the whole process of “separation” as you see in the map above. The main designer was Barak’s deputy defense minister, Ephraim Sneh.
Even before the Camp David “peace talks,” the Israelis planned to isolate Palestinians in ghettos, exactly as was done in South Africa with the Bantustans (black ghettos). Barak used the Camp David talks to concel this fact.
Cook says that Haaretz recently published a document that reveals this Israeli plan, and shows that the Israelis deliberately checkmated the Camp David talks.
This document was presented to Ehud Olmert to prepare him for the Annapolis farce. (It ignores the fact that in the late 1980s, the PLO offered to accept a Palestinian state in the two separate territories of the West Bank and Gaza -- on only 22 percent of historic Palestine. The Israelis rejected that offer.)
The Annapolis farce was identical to the Camp David farce. In both, an outgoing U.S. president made a sham attempt to broker “peace.” In both, the Israelis used the talks as a distraction. In both, Jewish proposals were intended to ultimately remove all Palestinians from Palestine.
The document says that in 2000, Barak insisted on the following principles before he would talk about establishing a “Palestinian state”:
1. All illegal Israeli housing (400,000 Jews) would remain on land stolen from Palestinians in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Jewish housing units would be connected by Jewish-only roads, guarded by the Jewish army. Any Palestinian “state” would look something like the map above. In return, Palestinians would be given a tiny wedge of worthless land in the Negev desert.
2. Israelis would retain the most fertile area in Palestine: the area along the Jordan Valley in the West Bank, from the Dead Sea to the northern Jewish settlement of Meholah. This is a fifth of the West Bank. Today only Jews may enter it.
3. Jews would claim most of East Jerusalem, and cut it off from the West Bank. (250,000 Jews already live in East Jerusalem, in violation of numerous U.N. resolutions.)
4. In the old city, Jews would claim everything except the Muslim quarter. Jews would also claim most of the "sacred basin" outside the walls.
5. Jews would place the Temple Mount (with the al-Aqsa mosque and all the other buildings) under an "ambiguous" sovereignty in preparation for Jewish theft.
6. Palestinians would no longer call occupied territories “occupied territories.”
7. All Palestinians would move out of Jewish areas.
8. Palestinians would recognized Israel as a “Jewish state” -- thus relinquishing their right of return.
9. Palestinians would live in isolated ghettos on an area that was 14 percent of their historic homeland.
These Israeli demands were non-negotiable.
What did the Palestinians ask for in return? (1) that Israelis not steal more than 2.3 percent of the West Bank, (2) that any land swap be based on the principle of equality. (3) That Palestinians have a corridor through which they could move between Gaza and the West Bank: the two halves of their “state.”
The Israelis rejected all these conditions.
And so the Camp David talks collapsed.
And the world blamed the Palestinians.
The document confirms that Ehud Barak intended for the Camp David talks to collapse. He used them as cover for the separation plan that we see today in the apartheid wall, plus all the other barriers designed to squeeze Palestinians out of Palestine.
Moreover in 2000 the Jewish terrorists quietly demanded that Palestinians recognize Israel as a “Jewish state,” but now the Jews are open and blatant about this. They would not meet with the collaborator Abbas at Annapolis until Abbas first recognized Israel as a “Jewish state,” which Abbas did.
Back in June 2000, a month before the Camp David talks started, Barak already had his separation plan ready to go, and had no intention of honoring any peace agreement. The Jews began implementing this plan in October 2000. The result is the apartheid wall, etc.
After the CAMP David charade, Barak’s military mentor Ariel Sharon became prime minister, and did not like the separation plan at first. Sharon wanted to exterminate all Palestinians. Gradually, however, he realized this would be too obvious, so he agreed to the West Bank wall in summer 2002, and to disengagement from Gaza in early 2004. The Jews left Gaza in 2005, and then built a prison wall around it.
AND YOUR POINT?
Simply that the Haaretz document confirms that Jews have one goal: to get all Palestinians out of Palestine.
All talk of "peace" or a "two-state solution" is lies, lies, and more lies.




because people really have to understand that a two-state solution really not as innocent or benevolent as it sounds. Especially when you are in dialogue with the israelis.
---
I don't have much time to comment, and I really didn't read your post above - I will read it later, for sure.
---
Once upon a time when I was not so courageous or sure of myself, I decided to be generous and entertain the idea of communicating with the israelis on Mirvat's blog about the two-state solution.
It was Mirvat's idea, I believe.
Well you know the israelis, they love to play headgames so they were all for this communication.
My gut was telling me to be blunt and to tell Mirvat not to waste her time.
Ha! And so the games began. Everything was all nicey, ricey and dicey until I put in my ideas:
"Let the Palestinians run things for a while, because "israel" has been doing a lousy job of it. And there must be the Law of Return recognized and activated. Palestinians must be allowed to go home."
Well all hell broke loose. The israelis turned into a bunch of foul old ladies with rocks up their butts.
It would have been hilarious if it hadn't been so sad.
ThePeoplesVoice.Org has published this piece, AZ.
..inside my_helly_precious_ca$h_machine..

http://www.paperthinwalls.com/singlefile/item?id=30
Thanks!
I used a map to clarify why the Israeli "two-state" solution is nonsense. The map also shows why the apartheid wall has nothing to do with Israeli "security." The barriers are designed to fragment and isolate Palestinians.
For Israelis, a Palestinian "state" is a patchwork of isolated ghettos, walled in like prisons.
This is not a "state." It's a network of jails.
_________________________________________________
The USA did the same thing with Native American "reservations -- although the reservations were far larger, involved many different tribes, were not physically walled in, and did not prohibit Indians from moving between them. This patchwork was called the Indian "nation."
Today Native Americans use their reservations for fun and profit. They fill them with casinos. They require payment if you want to take photos of places like Monument Valley Arizona. Thus the Indians are taking revenge in the USA, and they're quite rough about it.
It would have been far better if the Indians had been treated fairly, and had been integrated into white society.
Now the racism of whites has come back to haunt them.
_________________________________________________
This is one reason why Jews own the USA. To a large extent, the average American thinks like a zionist.
Within the American zio-mind-set are several divisions. White liberals don't care how high the the non-whites rise, so long as the non-whites stay in their own neighborhoods. Right-wingers don't care if non-whites move out of segregated neighborhoods; they just don't want non-whites to rise too high.
Jews straddle both camps. They don't want to be around non-whites, and don't want non-whites to have too much power.
You're welcome. It's always a buzz to see your work published online. ThePeoplesVoice.Org always does a good job of reformatting articles, often adding their own images, which are usually a nice touch. Your article looks good on their site.
They also published Detain This' new blog, Conjecture, Fallacy, Ignorance, and the Internet.
Comments are enabled for DT's article, but not yours, I'm not sure why.
AZ your article describes it very clearly. Of course a viable 2-state solution would be where the Palestinians actually had any land to be a foundation for a state.
However anyone who believes that is truly an idiot, and probably also believes Bush and Blair will keep their promise of bringing peace to the Middle-East.
Ok the media are just mouthpieces for the criminals, but their recent blabbering about Bush trying to bring peace to the ME is just... unbelievably arrogant. Just when you thought they couldn't stoop any lower.
Man I have seen some crappy movies with bad scripts but this is truly amazing.