Why I don't support Paul, NOR ANYONE ELSE
I posted this as a comment in the other thread I started but none of the links would work in there so I'm posting this here.
I don't want to to occupy your time with my UTTERLY MEANINGLESS opinions on Paul but no one else was saying it so I WILL:
---------------------
WOW.
Some insane amounts of idiocy here.
First of all, you folks need to check that cute self-importance at link before you click. Your opinions don’t matter, you are no more than bits that float down the memory hole in a vast universe of interconnectedness. No one cares about your flip-flopping or how you feel about individuals.
Let’s stick with “facts.”
I don’t SUPPORT anyone. I like Gravel because he’s the only one to do this but why waste my time?
As far as this stuff goes, I PREFER OBAMA to Paul.
I know you’re gonna hit me with those adorable mantras about CFR and AIPAC speeches but if you’re willing to overlook Paul’s problems:
‘blame the Muslims and Mexicans’ Zionist propaganda his economic policy, encouraged and endorsed by the CFR in bringing gold back to run a global system and collapse the fed, which CJB warns us endlessly about because ZIONISTS own almost ALL THE GOLD, his ‘arab hijacker’ conspiracy theory belief of 9/11 , HIS SUBSEQUENT VOTE TO GO TO WAR WITH NO FUCKING EVIDENCE , his opposition to impeaching Cheney and Bush , him ADMITTING that he’s running on the same platform as Bush did (wow, politicians lie? Imagine that! Texas republican YOU IDIOTS), him CO-authoring a book on giving ZIONIST bankers more CONTROL by getting back TO GOLD which THEY OWN with a ZIONIST MONSTER involved in Iran/contra , (you don’t just co-author with anyone), being ENDORSED by ultra-right wing STOOGE Fucker Carlson being promoted by Zionist Beck , Zionist King , Zionist Blitzer , and Ultra-rabid Zionist MONSTER Pat Robertson
(^You think if he was a threat to them they would EVER pass an opportunity to slime him???
You think they would EVER promote him if he was against them?
ARE THEY IDIOTS? Do they control the globe by accident?
Are they gonna let a Fossil waltz in and wave his magic wand, making them disappear?)
SO, If you can overlook ALL of Paul’s problems,
THEN I can overlook barack’s weed smoking, CFR membership, AIPAC pandering, and MIDDLE NAME.
He’s way more energetic, has a MUCH better shot at winning, UNITES PEOPLE, doesn’t whine about Mexicans and terrorists in his campaign ads, is a million times more charismatic and better speaker than Paul, is way more intelligent, and actually seems more honest to me than Paul.
Hey, he was anti Iraq war, and he can speak sweet nothings to the monsters.
And just like ya’ll believe Ron is gonna flip the script and tell the whole truth about 9/11, (despite looking genuinely shocked when Beck suggested his evangelist followers thought he might) and all the other stuff you think he really cares about UPON ELECTION, I believe OBAMA will do the same thing.
There, beat that.
Before you mental midgets get it twisted as you’re apt to do, I STILL DON’T SUPPORT HIM, nor anyone for that matter. I like Gravel, but why waste my time?
I don’t choose between terd burgers and shit sandwiches.
Paul is no panacea. Def not Superman, or even Huey Long or Hugo Chavez for that matter.
But of course I’m not emotionally invested in this latest controlled and fraudulent election unlike most of ya’ll.
Maybe because I’ve actually paid attention to the last 100 years of American history.
-Me
http://www.myspace.com/khanverse




As I said before, I am calling SOME of you idiots and mental midgets for not critically assessing every candidate incluiding the ZIONIST media promoted Ron Paul when you condemn others for far less.
http://www.myspace.com/khanverse
In a Southern State, Louisiana, arose a politico of Mr. Roosevelt's type. Mr.Huey Long, a young demagogue with a fleshy face and curly hair from a poor hillbilly home, grew popular (like Mr. Wilson and Mr. Roosevelt) by attacking "the interests" (in his particular countryside, the oil interests in general and Standard Oil in particular). The idol of the poor whites, he was elected governor in 1928 and at once tried to raise money for building schoolhouses by putting a tax on oil, whereon at the opening of the Louisiana Legislature one Rabbi Walter Peiser refused to invoke a blessing, calling him "an unworthy governor".
Mr. Long grew more popular and was elected to the United States Senate where (March 1935) he devoted "a large part" of a speech to "an attack on Mr. Bernard Baruch", in whom he apparently saw the supreme representative of the "interests" (about the only charge never made against Mr. Long, who had many Jewish associates, was that he was "anti-semitic"). Mr. Long was becoming a force in the land and wrote a book called My First Week in the White House, containing illustrations which showed Mr. Roosevelt, looking much like the Roosevelt of Yalta, listening humbly to the wisdom of a hale and ebullient Huey Long.He set out to undo Mr. Roosevelt by outdoing him in Mr. Roosevelt's especial skill: lavish spending and lavish promises. He did this in an ingenious way (he was possibly trickier than even Mr. Roosevelt). Mr. Long, with his "Share the Wealth" and "Every Man a King" programme, controlled the political machine in Louisiana. When the Roosevelt money began to flow into the States (for expenditure on all manner of crisis "projects", and incidentally on votes) Mr. Long calmly diverted it to his own similar ends. He forced through the Louisiana Legislature a law prohibiting local authorities from receiving any Washington money without the consent of a Louisiana State Board. As he controlled this board, he intercepted the cornucopian stream and the money was spent to enhance his, not Mr. Roosevelt's voting strength. He did with public money what Mr. Roosevelt was doing, but for his own political account.
In 1935 Mr. Roosevelt's second election campaign loomed ahead. Suddenly his advisers became aware that Mr. Long was popular far beyond his native Louisiana; he was a national figure. The Democratic National Committee "was astonished when a secret poll revealed that Long on a third-party ticket could poll between three and four million votes and that his Share The Wealth plan had eaten deeply into the Democratic strength in the industrial and farm States" (Mr. John T. Flynn).
Therefore Mr. Long, although he could not have become president at that time, certainly could have prevented Mr. Roosevelt's re-election, and the ruling few suddenly beheld a disturber of their regime. However, as Mr. Flynn says, "Fate had gone Democratic and remained so"; on September 8, 1935 Mr. Long was shot in the Louisiana State Capitol by a young Jew, Dr. Carl Austin Weiss. The motive will never be known because Dr. Weiss, who might have explained it, was shot by Mr. Long's tardy bodyguard.
****
The political effect was c1ear; Mr. Roosevelt's re-election was ensured. The usual suggestion of "a madman" was conveyed to the public mind and various other motives, not entailing insanity, also were suggested. No public investigation was made, as in the cases of other political assassinations of the last hundred years, in respect of which investigation was denied or curtailed. Such investigations as have been made (for instance, in the cases of President Lincoln, the Archduke Franz Ferdinand and King Alexander of Yugoslavia) have never supported the theory (always put forward) of the lonely "madman", but have revealed thorough organization with powerful support. The removal of Mr. Long determined the pattern of events for a decade, so that it was as important inits effects as the murders of more highly-placed men.
Mr. Roosevelt was re-elected in 1936. His allotted task evidently was to reinvolve his country in the "foreign entanglements" of Mr. House and Mr.Wilson, and, like Mr. Wilson, he promised from election to election to keep it out of these.
****
Mr. Long had foretold his assassination in July, saying in the Senate that enemies bad planned his death with "one man, one gun, and one bullet" as the medium. He said that a dictograph, concealed in a New Orleans hotel room where his "enemies" had met, recorded this conversation. A contemporary writer who claims to have been present at the meeting, Mr. Hodding Carter, says, "The 'plotting' was limited to such hopefully expressed comments as, 'I wish somebody would kill the . . . .' ". p318-320 "Controversy of Zion"
Paul wants to stop putting people in jail for that btw.
Why would anyone smoke weeds? Sounds kinda rough on the lungs.
My dog likes to eat grass. I tell him that everyone knows you're supposed to smoke grass, not eat it, but he don't pay any attention.
A new false hope
It's more than just Ron Paul. How can people still believe voting in the US will make any difference?
Not only is the entire system so corrupt, the majority of the people in the US are a bunch a losers who still believe it will someday work after all those decades it didn't. Yeah someone has to protect them from those evil terrorists right?
Seriously discussing who to vote for is really like choosing which corrupt traitor is going to be the next puppet. I guess some people never get too old for playing with puppets, and khanverse is trying to slap some sense into them.
Then what should you do?
But if voting for Ron Paul, won't work what can we do? You have to inform as much people as possible of this corruption and convince them not to participate in it and to stop supporting it especially with their wealth. Without drugs users there are no drugs dealers! However with all those wage-slaves still having faith in the system I don't really have much hope for an easy solution.
The puppet masters have already shown us who they think are (one of) their greatest enemies and what seems to be the best group for resistance. It is the group they are now bombing and are calling terrorists.
THANK YOU..
that's what I've been saying man... people have a hard time understanding that..
the rapid spread of truthful information is the ONLY antidote
http://www.myspace.com/khanverse
The most salient feature of modern corrupt democracies today is choosing leaders that will not challenge the fundamentals of the ruling (political and financial) apparatus.
The most recent example was throwing reps out and replacing them with dems in congress, not one or two, dozens of them. The changes they made were not enough to scare even one sparrow jump off a tree.
Discussing the differences are good, but it is not worth losing cocombatants in a bigger fight. We might look like horses of the same carriage that start biting each other when the road goes uphill.
If Paul was a Zionist backed politician, he would have a less difficult time obtaining equitable 'air' time on mainstream news channels. Don't you think?
Sure he has his issues, but one thing he is staunch on is NOT supporting the war mechanization that assists Israel in so many ways.
______________________________
"Hey you, Whitehouse. Ha ha,.. charade you are" Pigs/Animals/Pink Floyd