Interview With a Vampire
The ongoing saga of using the holocaust to puff one’s “jewish” self into “cherished chosen” status, regardless of what any crime a jew commits, their reputation is to be untouched, untainted, unblemished.
By all means, let us play the game of the innocent child that doesn’t know right from wrong, that didn’t mean it, that didn’t know any better.
[polanski] - "at the time I didn’t think it was wrong. I don’t think anyone was hurt"
A brilliant career was shattered???
Polanski won a few awards and continued to make movies [abroad] …oh!….and earn a living, as well.
A career based on the horrors of the holocaust?
All those dark, sub-human stories, inspired by holocaust nightmares? I am not going to even link his movies from YouTube - there are plenty of them out there – but how does he get all his ideas from the holocaust?
His movies are just plain gruesome and sadistic.
Sure he has all the timing, vision, and knowledge of angle shots and lighting – like any great director would have - but his content, is a bit sick and morbid. And that is EASY! Anyone interested in sociopathy can write about this kind of stuff.
Seems to me the jews demand the world to see the horse pulling the cart, that is, the holocaust drove the jews. After what happened in Lebanon and what has been going on Palestine – I think not! I KNOW not.
So things really are not as they seem.
In the twisted, grotesque world of the Zionist jews the CART [the zio-jews] is pulling the HORSE [holocaust]. The Zionist jews DROVE the holocaust.
Now things fall into place concerning Iraq, Palestine and Lebanon, and other countries, as well.
Again with this “holocaust cushion”. Let the repugnant rapist smooth his way out of public damnation with his own personal sordid tales of the holocaust.
Such convenient excuses.
Schindler did not rescue little roman and his family from the nightmare. But there are plenty of young girls, under the age of 18 to kiss those “nightmares” away and make it ALL better.
Did the Fates send Charlie to Polanski?
… or did polanski, through and by his own disgusting machinations, his womanizing, his own sub-human thoughts and lifestyle, attract Charlie?
Like does attract like.
And after all, Roman's people [ancestors] did create Charlie.
Why would polanski become involved with much younger women…er, girls… just because of Sharon’s death?
How is this a viable excuse for rutting with prepubescent females.???
Oh….I forgot. Those holocaust nightmares. The Vampire needs young American flesh to help him forget.
Nevermind that he raped a girl at the age of 13. [Shades of the Talmud, shades of the Protocols in proclaiming his “innocence, his reasoning”].
If Sharon Tate never died, would “loving” Roman be the attentive and thoughtful husband all their years?
No.
Because even at that time, before Sharon’s death, he was caught ogling other women, and quite brazenly so, especially during her pregnancy.
Just goes to show…when you are in company with the daemon, terrible things can happen to you.
Did Diane Sawyer think she was doing polanski a favor?
With such concern for his "dignity" Sawyer gently questions polanski about the crimes he committed.
I think the smart audience can decipher one clear and important thing: The Demon tells on itself.
He posed in a magazine, in front of the crime scene. He took money for having his picture taken in front of the bloody door of his house, 10050 Cielo Drive; he certainly didn’t deny it.
His excuse?
He needed money to clean the blood out of the carpets.
He gave away Sharon’s things, he sold her car. He needed the money.
How… So soon after death does a partner give the deceased’s things away?
Sharon Tate was an exceptionally beautiful woman – stunning.
But the day she met the daemon, her butt and brains must have switched places, instantly.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/2793465.stm
When the courts do mete out justice and common sense, it is sad to see the victim become the fool and the idiot.
Please! Somebody! Tell me!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/5339408.stm
How is his career destroyed???
This post ties in nicely with Marc Parent's post:
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/5247
THE VICTIMIZERS with their forever, hysterical slogan: NEVER FORGET!
The great question is...Will Lebanon, Palestine, and Iraq FORGET?
The much bigger question is...will America's people FORGET when they find out they have been duped out of freedoms and a secure and stable standard of living they were raised to believe was theirs if they worked an honest job.
What is at hand is a tribal belief system that disregards age, gender, and kinship that human civilization has come to recognize as a minimum standard for a healthy life style.
What continues to amaze me is that nobody (that I have come across) puts Warren Steed Jeffs' picture next to those of Roman's, Woody's, Menendez's, .... What Jeffs (and his father Rulon) has done is industrial mass production scale of all these individuals combined, while all you need to 'know' to relate them is to look at his face:
http://www.answers.com/warren%20jeffs
.. very informative, entertaining and (of course) true.
Wow...I guess he does deserve a whole post.
Okay...I still always wanted to hone in on Polanski. I read the Helter Skelter book when I was 13.
I was never able to get Polanski out of my mind because, even in this book, he did not appear to be so heartbroken over his wife's death.
Years later he rapes a 13 year old girl. And the excuses he yammers on about to weasel himself out of any sick crime he's done - it is so like his breed in everything and anything his tribe does.
The things he says in the video:
---She was not a virgin
---She consented to have sex
---She was known as a drug user
HOW did he know? How does any of that make it right?
And he gets a nice cushy interview with Sawyer - and he even get's to put on his acting "skills".
uh huh.
============
THANKS nobodaddy!
By no stretch of imagination I meant Roman Polanski deserves less attention than anybody else. I believed his wife's story at that time, not knowing who he was 'culturally'. When he didn't show up to pick up his Oscar for The Pianist because of an arrest warrant on him, then the whole story unraveled for me.
I think the reason Warren Jeffs eludes radar screens of even ardent scavengers is that online searches on him based on 'jew' go blank.
That's why I think Judaic name or genealogy and obvious zionistic politics, are not enough compass indicators, as was/is not communism. Today's anitcommunist so called neocons are yesterday's communists. Most hollywood directors and producers involved in destroying american life style don't easily fit into any of these categories. They can fake a lot of these attributes (remember late pope).
But they all share one thing; they are all xazar mongurks.
That's why I think Judaic name or genealogy and obvious zionistic politics, are not enough compass indicators, as was/is not communism.
Kat's I really don't know what you mean by this.
Could you please clarify?
A PhD in electronic engineering friend of mine once in explaining electromagnetic waves (emw) in nontechnical layman language (with a smirk on his face) said: suppose its something like X, generated at point A, travels through route B, and is identified at point C (like sound on a radio). However, we only can see the effect (not X itself) at point C (radio, tv, cellphone, pager, ...). We don't know where point A might be on earth or in space and we don't see route B.
Now if we use his analogy (without a smirk), X in this case is this criminal group of people we talk about all the time. The effects we identify at terminal points C are communism, feminism, sexualism, zionism, jewdaism, antisemitism, global warming, Israel, ... Using these terms as indicators of X is fine as long as we keep in mine not to equate them. Radio and TVs are indicators of emw, but not IT. You can smash your radio and TV with no effect on emw.
I think jewdaism (not judaism) is an invention just like antisemitism as a facade for distraction. It's a hologram enemy given to us to waste our energy and time fighting it.
The power of X comes from two things: virtual money system and hiddenness. This hiddenness makes it difficult to identify them with a credible name. To me at this given time, xazar mongurks (Khazar Mongoloid Turks) is the most accurate and reliable name. Xazar indicates their cultural background and mongurk their ethnic background.
Describing them as 'Jew' has two major hazards: you identify them as a religious group and that they are middle easterns. Former makes it difficult to connect them to a criminal life career and decadent social life, and latter uncannily gives more credibility to the existence of Israel.
It is no surprise that even today it is so improbable for even an educated person (not a reference to you) to see a connection between bolsheviks and Israel and Armenian genocide and abortion clinics, ... and guess what else, Warren Jeffs.
"I think jewdaism (not judaism) is an invention just like antisemitism as a facade for distraction. It's a hologram enemy given to us to waste our energy and time fighting it."
Well who knows? Maybe it's just a big game we play on earth, and whether we like it or not, whatever action we choose, we are participants.
I was thinking that power X could also come from the zionist/khazar media. Look how it mollycoddles poor roman, sad little guy, leave the little gargoyle be, you big, bad world. And yes...Warren Jeffs was indeed hidden. I never heard of him, til you brought him up. That creep should be front page news all over America.
Anyway, I was thinking the media would be the 3rd thing. Unless, you meant that the hiddenness was part of the media?
Perhaps you did.