9/11 - What Really Happened Wiki - a Wikia wiki

The September 11, 2001 attacks, commonly referred to as "9/11", consisted of a series of supposed suicidal attacks, even though there is no evidence that there were any Arab hijackers aboard the planes.

The false flag attacks on World Trade Centre Buildings 1,2,7 and the Pentagon marked the start of the War On Terror, and the crackdown on civil liberties world-wide that were made possible by legislation brought in to combat terrorism. Although the 911 Commission blamed "Al Qaeda", the FBI admits to possessing no hard evidence to corroborate this assertion and many people from all walks of life have found a plethora of circumstantial evidence to put serious doubts on the official version of events. Mainstream Media have unfortunately stuck to this version, completely ignoring legitimate questions and often portraying the questioners to be part of a lunatic fringe.

For devout Muslims, like Mohammed Atta was supposed to be, to be seen frequenting strip bars and drinking heavily is an oxymoron. Not only was Atta seen at these flesh palaces, he was loud and unruly, drawing attention to himself.
Yet, this is the story that was plugged endlessly on American MSM, that the 9/11 hijackers were devout Muslims.

What kind of devout Muslim drinks like a fish and just happens to leave a copy of the Koran on a barstool?

One that was in the pay of the Israeli MOSSAD.

It's more than a coincidence that H.R, 1955: The Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Act that will suppress free speech and effectively shut down the last source of pure news available to us GOYIM, the Internet is about to be passed into law.

HR 1955 was egged on by reps from the RAND Corporation, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and Rita Katz's S.I.T.E. Institute. All urged passage of this "Thought Crime" law by giving as examples of "Homegrown" terrorism the 9/11 Truth movement and what they called the growth in "Anti-Semitic" thoughts and writings.

Strange bedfellows are these, the 9/11 Truth Movement and the alleged instances of "Anti-Semiticism." How can these two be related if what the government has told us is true?

Posted in Submitted by Greg Bacon on Mon, 2008-01-14 17:13.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

And remember, HR 1955 (sponsored by Jane Harman, zionist Jew) passed the House, and is now on the desk of ultra-zionist Jew Joe Lieberman, chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

(Ron Paul voted against it in the House.)

A Committee vote is expected any day now.

Then it will go to the Senate floor for a final vote.

Then Bush will sign it.

Harman's personal friend Rita Katz will have a guaranteed income for life.

Abdul Alhazred | Mon, 2008-01-14 20:45

..would be like taking away a homicidal_infant's soother.

..the holocaust is a distorted lie for the zoopremite_cult.

Survivors of the SHOW! Hey 300,000 is still alot of people, but what kind of sick_fucks would try to say it's_millions?!!

The real_holocaust will commence forthwith.





http://www.danskundergrund.dk/images/Bitsch_the_real_holocaust_s.jpg

Dresden, Germany

Japan
[insert endless, unreported genocides formented by zoopremite bastards]

Grim Reaper | Mon, 2008-01-14 21:23

"The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" is a book that clocks in at over 1,000 pages.
The book was published in 1960.

i've been reading that book the last few weeks and brother, the Germans and the Nazi's were sticklers for setting down every little detail in writing.

The author had access to over 200 TONS of documents from the fallen 3rd Reich, like notes, diaries, telegrams, newspaper articles, military dispatches, treaties, secret protocols in the treaties, messages delivered by dispatch riders, etc.

The Nazi's would go into minute detail about what might seem to the reader to be inconsequential details, but probably not to the Germans.

Yet, with all of those documents available and all of the situations that the author explains and backs up in the extensive bibliography, there is very little if any documentation of the Holocaust©.

There were a few paragraphs of this or that minor Nazi official making comments about what to do with the Jews.
But in the same breath, they also questioned about what to do with the clergy and the intelligentsia of occupied countries.

For an operation that we've been repeatedly told is as big as the Holocaust©, you'd think the Germans would have had extensive documentation to keep an operation of that size running smoothly.

Out of 200 TONS of captured documents, very little if any can be found about the Holocaust©?

Something doesn't add up.

Greg Bacon | Tue, 2008-01-15 00:32

unclesam wakeup

Meet The Greatest President


...we never had

Navigation

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator