Clinton Is The WorId's second Leading Active War Criminal

I use war crimes to encompass the commission of all acts declared illegal under international rules of war as enumerated in the various Hague and Geneva agreements and conventions and pronounced in the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals. Among these acts are the carrying out of wars of aggression, the use of poison gases and other inhumane weapons, deliberately killing and starving civilian populations, and the use of force beyond military necessity. War crimes can be carried out directly or through proxy forces that are funded, encouraged, and protected in their own war criminality. This means that inaction-failure to discourage or prevent the carrying out of war crimes known to be going on, planned for enlargement, and preventable-is itself a form of war criminality. Thus, if the Clinton administration knew that Indonesia was killing large numbers of East Timorese and planned to ravage East Timor on a larger scale if it lost an independence referendum, and did nothing to prevent the crimes, Clinton and associates were guilty of war crimes by inaction.

http:// www.thirdworldtraveler.co...nal_Herman.html

Posted in Submitted by Truth Seeker07 on Mon, 2008-01-28 03:19.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

"Filipino Monkey Boy" Bush has to be the leading war criminal still at large.

As for #2, that's a close race.

There's Kissinger, Wolfowitz, Feith, Rice, Rumsfeld, Albright... and Cheney, who should be tied for first.

This list could encompass a number of war criminals, both in the present and past administrations.

Greg Bacon | Mon, 2008-01-28 17:30

unclesam wakeup

Meet The Greatest President


...we never had

Navigation

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator