I agree with you that, "Before we give any stranger our trust or whole-hearted support in his fight against the conspiracy, we must question their sincerity - are they who they claim to be?" In all honesty, to the majority of the people on the internet, every one of the so called “Truth tellers” are strangers. I am a relative newcomer to the "truth" having been reading and researching a bit on my own for two to three years. I first became involved after finding the "Hunt the Boeing" site and through various links wound up as a follower of Alex Jones. His side of the story didn't make total sense to me, because in my mind, I always believed there was a "shadow government" that controlled the figure heads that were put in front of us. The fact that Bush was a complete buffoon and a total idiot made my suspicions that much clearer.

After stumbling across the French Connection site, I listened to DBS, Hufschmidt and Bollyn in various interviews along with a multitude of other guests. What they were saying made much more sense that anything Jones was saying and I started to migrate over to The French Connection on a daily basis.

After the Bollyn incident where he was attacked at his home, DBS and Hufschmidt continued to work together, calling for people to look into the case and insisting that something had happened to Bollyn. Then Bollyn popped up again, this time denouncing DBS, telling everyone he was fine and they shouldn’t listen to what DBS and Eric were saying about him at The French Connection. He and his family were fine. He had been beaten by police, arrested, charged with assaulting a police officer, but that he and his family were traveling or on vacation or something. No, that’s not suspicious at all.

Then Hufschmidt turns on DBS and these recordings you linked to turn up online and DBS is attacked again, this time by his webmaster.

It's no secret that DBS, Hufschmidt and Bollyn worked together for quite some time. The files are still available to prove this. There was a mutual working relationship. Whether these guys liked each other makes no difference. They were brought together for a common goal to spread the truth about Zionism and Israel’s stranglehold on world. It's no secret that when Bollyn disappeared after his arrest, DBS was sincerely concerned about his wellbeing and the wellbeing of his family from the standpoint of Bollyn's personal and journalistic freedoms. He may not have cared for the guy as a person, but it was still Bollyn's Constitutional right and his right as a journalist to get the truth out. After Bollyn's sabbatical he was suddenly courted by the very websites and radio shows that had ignored him, Hufschmidt and DBS for years. Coincidentally, the same thing happened with Hufschmidt after he, too, changed his alliances.

I guess the most obvious response to your post, in my opinion is, until some evidence is provided to prove otherwise, The French Connection’s server and domain issues must have had something to do with Hufschmidt. He was DBS' webmaster for a long time and it would be common sense to consider him suspect number one.

Second, the fact that DBS doesn't provide original "ground breaking journalism" doesn't make him a covert agent. He has said countless times that his area of expertise is in finance and that his main interest is getting the information OUT. There are plenty of journalists out there digging and putting out fantastic information. DBS' role is as the mouthpiece. He's the guy that is talking about the news. He's taking all of this information that is available, sifting through it and verbally presenting it so that the average person in America and the world can make sense of it.

I’ll admit that I didn't get any of this when I was first exposed to it. I was one of those people who thought, “My God, this guy is racist!” It took several listens and several files to open my eyes that the “catch phrases” of "anti-Semite" and "conspiracy theorist" were associated with negative connotations due to the media and TV programming me to think that way. Those labels had nothing to do with the true meaning of the words themselves or with the issues that they were associated with in reality. I can say that, personally, DBS has helped me make sense of the things I read, hear and see going on around me. Through my 20s and 30s I was never interested in politics, because I was part of the problem. I was watching TV to be informed and just living day to day with the knowledge that America was free and the best place in the world to live and it would always be that way. After I listened to a few of The French Connection broadcasts my eyes were opened up and I started seeing things as they really were, but thought, like most other Americans, "They wouldn't do that to us." Now when I try to discuss this with friends and family, they look at me like I’m insane. They won’t even talk about it. I have a friend that started working with an investment "cult" for lack of a better term. She and her husband had three kids and he was leaving his job to work for this financial group that "recruits" people to go out and sell insurance policies to people, refinance their homes, set up investments for them, etc. and this whole operation was backed by CitiBank. When the sh*t started hitting the fan, DBS started talking about it last September and I forwarded the articles to my friends to warn them to be careful. What they told me was, “I can’t spend every day waiting for something bad to happen. My kids will make their way in life just like I did.” I had another friend who was a tried and true Fox News follower and whenever I send him a link he replies, “You need to take a Prozac and have a beer.” Most people, at least most of the people I know, think the Zionist conspiracy is too far out there and it’s simply an impossibility and that we're all crackpots. Bollyn has done great work and has exposed us all a lot of this Zionist/Israeli information, but something obviously changed after his arrest. The Hufschmidt situation was very similar. Because it was their actions that stirred up all of this discontent between themselves and DBS, I see them as the problem. This leads me to my next point.

Hufschmidt was DBS' webmaster and DBS basically trusted him with his site and his information. That was DBS' fault, BUT if we were friends and you are secretly recording our conversations and then use them against me I would consider that sabotage, too. Haven’t we all said things in private to friends when we’re frustrated or angry that are just a way of venting our frustrations? A good example is when people say, “I’m going to kill him!” They’re not really going to kill anyone. It’s a figure of speech. I know I have been angry with people and said, “I hate that so-and-so”. I don’t really hate them. I am just really upset at them at the time and then it passes.

Now, with that said, I haven't listened to the recorded conversations yet, since every time I try to access the page you linked, my PCs lock up. I have tried it on two different PCs so far and both computers freeze when I click the link you provided.

Again, my point is that Bollyn and Hufschmidt worked with DBS. Then they both split and started badmouthing DBS while showing up in interviews on radio shows and websites that, for the most part, had no interest in the two of them until they broke away from DBS. DBS is focused on exposing the public to the information that already exists and, in my honest opinion, the current news is very informative, but the problem is that sometimes, stories change, because new information comes out later on. By providing us with the books and articles from the past, The French Connection is exposing that fact that this criminal element has existed for hundreds and even thousands of years. This provides a very solid, stable foundation for people like Bollyn and Hufschmidt to provide their information and compare it to the information that DBS is providing to the public. DBS is leading people to the truth without trying to TELL people what to believe which I believe is the only way people will come around. The people that need to be told everything with keep watching Faux News. Everyone else will open up to the truth in good time.

I agree that all of this bickering about personalities needs to stop. DBS has moved away from issues like the 9-11 debate and the Holocaust to focus specifically on the root of the problem: Zionist Criminality. 9-11, the bogus Holocaust Revisionist laws, the fraudulent elections, the wars in the Middle East, MSM control, the Jewish domination of politics, news media and entertainment, the global economic collapse, the Kennedy assassinations, MLK assassination, Vietnam, Dresdin, Hitler, all of the World Wars, slavery, religion and on and on and on. All of these problems are rooted in one place: Criminal Zionism. DBS is focused on getting the information on this criminal element out to the world. From there, the people will go to Bollyn, Hufschmidt, WUFYS, WRH, etc. Time will tell who the true "agents" are and I think DBS, Hufschmidt and Bollyn have all done they fair share of attacking one another. The day I see Hufschmidt's site or Bollyn's site suddenly disappear I'll be suspicious. Isn’t it odd that, out of all of the people with "truth" sites out there, The French Connection is attacked routinely? He had several problems receiving his PayPal donations which, from what I understand, was proven to be the result of Hufschmidt’s interference. DBS has had his audio files deleted and the only ones that remained were the ones that Hufschmidt and or Bollyn were involved in. DBS’ streaming servers were attacked as well. Now his website, again, has been shut down. It seems obvious who is standing alone and who is very well supported.

DBS is providing, free of charge, a wealth of books from authors from the past that WARNED US ALL about what was to come if we allowed it to happen. How else would the general population have access to these books or even know about them? The French Connection provides not only information, but also clear explanation of the facts for those who aren’t politically or financially savvy and I think his work and his site is extremely important in letting the world know how we got here and who has been responsible since day one.

Pete, wondering what the fuck you're talking about with "The charges by Smith about Bollyn being a changed man after his mysterious disappearance cannot be substantiated." If you can't find substantiation, you ain't trying. Excited, however, to see that you're reintroducing the "he can't be trusted because he curses" line of crap. It was by far one of the most popular lunges and repeated for weeks, but sadly just as lame and transparent as ever. The gem-quality bromide you close with was also great. Really.

I'm gonna go "cult" here and repeat that NO other site on the web has the collection of historical works detailing THE problem or an archive of INTERVIEWS with authorities on the subject of Zio-criminality.

Their split was unscheduled and unavoidable damage control.

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/3057

How could EH or CB have gotten the new passwords for the Cpanel?

Bullshit

DBS was hit with a virus recently, could easily have been a keylogger installed.

I finally listened to the phone calls from DBS to Hufschmidt. All I can say is...wow.

When I posted my previous comment I assumed that Daryl had said something to the effect that he would "kill" Eric, but I didn't know that he made such violent and horrendous statements.

Up until that last file Daryl just seemed like a guy who was pushed over the edge and was furious. He said some things that were threatening, but if he felt he was being backed into a corner, it could have just been Daryl over reacting.

When he threatened to "decapitate" Eric and he threatened to "fly to the US and ring his neck" and to back up his threats he told Eric to "check my criminal record"...wow.

Now, I have a friend who lives in Rhode Island and he and Daryl speak with the same accent and they have the same general disposition. I have heard this friend of mine speak about people he doesn't like in this manner. "I'll break his f'n neck, the scumbag piece of sh*t m**********r!!" Now, I know he never would do that, so maybe...MAYBE this is just something relative to the East Coast attitude, I don't know.

The one thing that caught my ear (and I only listened to all of the files once) was when Daryl said to Eric, "You know me better than my own family" and that they had been so close for almost 5 years. He said this to contradict Eric's comment to Bollyn that to Eric, Daryl, "...was just a voice on the phone." Then later in this same call, when Eric is laughing at Daryl's threats, Daryl tells Eric, "You don't know me. You don't know anything about me!" and then he proceeds to threated to kill Eric.

This whole "truth movement" is a nightmare. It's all one guy against another. This guy talks about this and not that. This guy talks about that and not this. It seems like everyone who has a following is trying to out "traffic" the other guy, so they feel they need to discredit the other guy. Eric says Daryl is a Zionist puppet. Daryl says Eric and Bolly are Zionist puppets. I guess we just take it all as a collective and not think about the individuals who provide us with the information as regular people. They're just "sources of information".

Regardless of these phone recordings, I still feel that The French Connection is the best resource for Criminal Zionist information both current and historical. Daryl has done an amazing job of providing us with interviews with experts as well as unearthing a wealth of books and articles from the past that expose the entire criminal network from its evil beginnings to the current “end game” that is playing out in the world around us.

Anyone doing what DBS is doing at the sacrifice he is making is all right in my book.

Both Bollyn and Hufschmind stuck DBS in the back.

With a background in economics and many of the same books in my library since the early 1980s - that TFC provides FREE - I can say categorically that no one else on the web is detailing what has happened, why it is happening and what is quite likely about to happen and who is responsible than The French Connection.

We should expect such a site to be attacked. I've never heard of Alex Jone's site having problems, have you?

I'm making it a point to both support DBS financially and to download and store all the information I can from his site just in case it is needed in this Brave New World we live in.

Anyone who is involved in web development, web hosting, web maintenance, content development, content maintenance, web support and on and on and on as well as maintaining relationships in collaboration in the bringing together of all of the above, know's keeping a portal current is a freaking nightmare. Not only are all these activities happening and in a constant state of flux but creating live content on the fly, recording interviews, scheduling broadcasts, responding to feedback, dealing with flame, threats, typos, plagiarism accusations, ego's, financials, legalities, BS anti-semitism laws.....it's a wonder any real end result culminates. Despite the personalities the referenced, substantiated content is still there and whether or not EH, CB or DBS are crypto's, the bottom line is that the content is still there and I CAN STILL RESEARCH the historical timeline of the Rothschild's and their lineage connection to the Khazarian era, etc., etc., IF I don't fall for the tricks of the lurking provacateur, WHOEVER that may be - IT DOES NOT MATTER - provoking the petty arguments, bickering and bombastic nonsense. The trick in play is that very legitimate, relevant, substantiated information is there to be had but is being marginalized by the distraction, a technique perfected by the Zionist rabble rousing provacateur and in motion before our very eyes.

This whole fixation on Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn is all about people who are engaging more in hero worship than a stoic dedication to the truth. The 'truth movement' should be about decentralised, leaderless resistance, and the focus should be on the message, not the messenger. I see a lot of people in 'the movement' with stars in their eyes when they should be more concerned about the bigger picture.

This whole "truth movement" is a nightmare. It's all one guy against another. This guy talks about this and not that. This guy talks about that and not this. It seems like everyone who has a following is trying to out "traffic" the other guy, so they feel they need to discredit the other guy. Eric says Daryl is a Zionist puppet. Daryl says Eric and Bolly are Zionist puppets. I guess we just take it all as a collective and not think about the individuals who provide us with the information as regular people. They're just "sources of information".

If you look closer, you'll see that most of that bullshit comes from Smith, Hufschmid and Bollyn. I don't see Mark Glenn, Mike Rivero, Ted Pike, Justin Raimondo, Qrswave, Ry Dawson, or any of the other prominent voices in the movement wailing on about each other being "Zionist agents". For the most part, it's quite sane. But according to Smith and Hufschmid, "99% of the truth movement are Zionist agents", and we're all "guilty until proven innocent". Hufschmid has actually, literally claimed this. When these two argue and accuse each other and carry on like this, people should ignore it and concentrate on the information. It's all a big load of wank.

We should expect such a site [TFC] to be attacked. I've never heard of Alex Jone's site having problems, have you?

Rupert Murdoch's Myspace actively censors hyperlinks to InfoWars.Com and PrisonPlanet.Com, but as far as I know, Smith's site is not interfered with. I don't support Alex Jones, I'm just saying that even the level of enlightenment that Jones peddles is too dangerous for the controllers. They'd rather keep us fixated on CNN and Fux Jews. Of course, if TFC isn't being blocked by Myspace now, it soon will be. Myspace also censors links to ICH and a few others. They do this by redirecting links to these sites to their homepage.

Bottom line is, there's no superheroes. It's the message, not the messenger.

I love your graphics man, they're superb.

I actually tried my hand at becoming a cult leader once myself. Needless to say, it didn't quite take off, and I failed to attract the harem of female devotees I was hoping for.

Here it is, for your amusement. First I'll post The Conception of Paramentalism, which I dreamed up spontaneously whilst typing away to a friend on Yahoo instant messenger when he was offline, and then I'll post a more succinct definition of Paramentalism:

The Conception of Paramentalism

( A slightly edited transcript of a yahoo message sent to my good friend Henry, while he was offline )

J L: Henry, I have become the esteemed founder of a new religion, a totally dogma-free religious doctrine that is undeniably a bastion of Ultimate Truth.
J L: I shall call it Absolutism, but I'm not sure yet. The tenets are as follows;
J L: All beliefs are ultimately 'wrong'. Everything is subjective, and high priests of Absolutism do not argue staunchly for their beliefs, for the very nature of their philosophy is the profound awareness that their minds are not adequate vessels for Ultimate Truth.
J L: Truth lies beyond the mind; the mind is simply a tool with which the human being is able to make sense out of physical reality. The mind's medium is time and space; Ultimate Truth is timeless and spaceless. Of course, the mind can travel somewhat into the realm of the metaphysical, but it can never be aware of all levels of reality simultaneously, which is necessary in order to fully grasp the infinite enormity of Ultimate Truth.
J L: Beliefs are wrong, Henry. We are updating them with each new piece of information we find, and with each new worldview we adopt, we make the previous one, the one we choose to discard, obsolete. Thus, we are trapped in a never-ending cycle of delusion, assuming that with every new realisation, we are closer to the Truth. Absolutism transcends this process, and refuses to give credence to any intellectualisation of the Truth, out of the simple wisdom and logical sensibilities of it's tenets. Who can argue with that? Who can claim to know the Truth? Absolutism knows that the Truth is unknowable, only experiencable through Being. Which, by it's very nature, is a process independent of the mind.
J L: I hereby anoint you as the second High Priest of Absolutism. Take it or discard it as you please, it matters not to Me. Their is no ranking system or hierarchy in Absolutism, for no one's beliefs are superior to another's, given that all are illusion, no matter the complexity, logical credibility, rhetorical beauty, or perceived accuracy of the beliefs they hold. No belief is superior to another; in fact, it stands to reason that the more a particular belief strays from simplicity, the more complex and convoluted it is, the more 'wrong' it is likely to be.
J L: Your first task as an ordained High Priest of Absolutism is to help the philosophy evolve, articulate the premises and foundations of it in simpler and simpler ways, come up with catchphrases and maxims and parables, to explain our pseudo-Truth to the more dogmatic members of the belief-stricken Collective. Together, we will free humanity of their erroneous beliefs, and liberate them from the shackles of this psychopathological cycle of delusion that has befallen them since the dawn of time. Of course, we know we are wrong, but Henry...
J L: Therein lies our power.

Postscript:
J L: Actually, namechange - I made up a screen name for myself a while ago that I never used - Para Mentis. Para in latin, and also I think Hindi, ( hence paramahansa yogi etc ) means "beyond", and mentis means mind. Thus, beyond the mind. So, Henry, we are high priests of Paramentalism.
J L: Take my anthem, Henry. It's yours. Their is no ownership in Paramentalism. We just strut around being proud about our wrongness, and admonish others about their beliefs. We are effectively invincible, because people are welcome to tell us we're wrong - we thrive on it, and we embrace it. We love and respect the Truth, therefore we refuse to reduce the enormity of it down to a mere belief system. It's an insult to the divine nature of reality to claim to know it, and quite obviously, the height of arrogance. We don't believe shit, we discipline ourselves to reject the temptation to, although we are free to speculate. The difference is, it's just a frivolous thing to us. We can imagine and intellectualise and perambulate, but we will ultimately discard all beliefs for our Paramental reverence for the Great Mystery. It is true wisdom Henry, no?

The Definition of Paramentalism

I Am.

I will tell you what I am.
I am a belated revolution and a new paradigm.
I am one and all of the pallbearers that have come to carry the coffin of the last of your broken liberties.
I am a heretic of your old doctrine, for I came to worship deadseed dogmas at your church, only to burn it on my way out, but you will love me for what I plant in the ashes of it's stead.
I am the hand and blade that cuts the strings at your porcelain limbs and closes tattered curtains on the puppet show inanimate.
I am the harbinger of freedom, Absolute, such that I will even let you choose to have no choice.
I am:

Paramentalism:
1. a doctrine/philosophy created to annihilate (limiting, erroneous) belief systems, based on the premise that reality is infinite and unlimited. Being that that's the case, beliefs are a hindrance to the creative power of the natural human being, because no matter what belief one holds to be 'true', the very nature of that same belief necessarily requires everything else not covered therein to be 'not true'. That Which Is Not True defines That Which Is True, and by way of being stuck in the dualistic, black/white up/down paradigm, reality is undermined by belief. So you see, beliefs are the intellect limiting the multidimensional, unlimited, infinite, omnidirectional absolutism of ultimate Truth. Which of course, shouldn't surprise anyone, that's what the intellect does - it reduces and separates everything, the smaller the pieces the better - we're all pretty stupid. Gotta digest that reality in convenient, bite-sized chicken nugget units.

The fact is, consciousness will manifest whatever it truly believes. Faith in God is rewarded, not necessarily because God is a 'reality', but because faith (belief) gives consciousness permission to create. Really it can create anything and everything, but the mind seems to require a logical basis for any given belief, it's very hard to force yourself to believe in everything for no good reason. Paramentalism is that belief in everything, and for no good reason.

Actually, there are plenty of good reasons to believe in everything. It's only the mind that disagrees, with it's pesky 'reasoning' and 'rationale'. Paramentalism would seek to annihilate beliefs, do a Bush and say to the mind "you're either with us or with the beliefs (terrorists)", and in the event that the mind resists the imperial ambitions of Paramentalism, Paramentalism would be quite happy to nuke the whole mind. Fuck it. Unlimited power (unlimited truth) is worth it.

So the Paramentalist has no use for the mind, and will transcend it at any cost in order to source out that which it hides, and shed the larval skin of the intellect, which was necessary to the human momentarily, but is now obsolete. Consciousness thereby learns the truth of itself, and returns to itself by the truth of itself, which is that it's the source of itself, and all there really is.

2. a doctrine/philosophy designed to annihilate all religious dogma and all religion, before turning on itself and imploding, leaving an unlimited non-dual Holo-whole which no longer relies on logic, reason, intellect, mind or even thought to determine itself. There is now no idea at all, just Truth.

Thus, the Conception of Paramentalism, the first writing I did on it, and A Revision of Paramentalism, the only other writing I did on it was to lead eventually to the Death of Paramentalism (after a great deal of posturing and pomp, of course), whereupon I would decide to give up on thinking altogether, and just jump. Mindless and free, I would know and be the Truth of my Self, taking as many as I could with me.

Thus, Paramentalism will have facilitated our ascent into Godhood.

Hey, fuck you, it was worth a try.

So that was my attempt at becoming a cult leader. To this day, I'm still baffled as to why it didn't take off.

Aheh, heh..

There is certainly a limit to the mind. For example, when we say all beliefs are ultimately “wrong,” what about the belief that all beliefs are ultimately “wrong"?

Is everything a yes-and-no situation? Well, yes and no.

Is there no such thing as absolutes? Absolutely.

“The very nature of their philosophy is the profound awareness that their minds are not adequate vessels for Ultimate Truth.

The mind cannot grasp all the truth, but it can work with some of it. The mind is necessary in the realm of thoughts and ideas, as the body is a necessary in the realm of physicality. Of course, we are more than the body or the mind.

The mind is okay as a tool. Unfortunately most people don’t know how to use it. Hence, we might say the mind is an excellent servant, but a harsh master.

The mind's medium is time and space; Ultimate Truth is timeless and spaceless.

That’s the mind speaking again. The mind makes distinctions. It says things like “beyond” time and space. This thing is beyond, that is not beyond, and so on. Round and round we go. Is it correct to say the mind is beyond time and space? Yes and no.

Of course, the mind can travel somewhat into the realm of the metaphysical, but it can never be aware of all levels of reality simultaneously, which is necessary in order to fully grasp the infinite enormity of Ultimate Truth.

Agreed, just as the physical body cannot encompass all of physical space. The mind cannot grasp Truth, but the Self can.

Beliefs are wrong, Henry.

Do you believe that?

We are updating them with each new piece of information we find, and with each new worldview we adopt, we make the previous one, the one we choose to discard, obsolete.

Yes.

Thus, we are trapped in a never-ending cycle of delusion, assuming that with every new realisation, we are closer to the Truth.

Yes, we keep establishing sandcastles of “ultimate truth,” only to have them washed away when we have a glimpse of the next step. Each “ultimate truth” is but a temporary delusion. It’s just a lens we look through for the time being. Whatever lens you look through determines what you see and don’t see. It determines your entire intellectual world. And each person insists that his lens is the only correct lens. Our modern lens enables us to travel to the moon. Are we therefore more “advanced” than cave men? No. Their lens did not allow them to go to the moon, but it did allow them to see things we cannot see.

Absolutism transcends this process, and refuses to give credence to any intellectualisation of the Truth, out of the simple wisdom and logical sensibilities of its tenets. Who can argue with that?

Ah. We’re back to the mind again. This is transcendent. That is not. It is slippery, aye?

Who can claim to know the Truth? Absolutism knows that the Truth is unknowable, only experiencable through Being. Which, by its very nature, is a process independent of the mind.

Once again we get trapped. This can be grasped, and that cannot. Zen Buddhism says there is no difference between “enlightenment” and “ignorance.” Everyone is already “enlightened," and has already achieved Nirvana. The trick is to realize this.

There is no ranking system or hierarchy in Absolutism, for no one's beliefs are superior to another's, given that all are illusion, no matter the complexity, logical credibility, rhetorical beauty, or perceived accuracy of the beliefs they hold.

We’re still stuck in the hall of mirrors. “No one's beliefs are superior to another's.” Does that include the belief that for no one's beliefs are superior to another's?

It seems our only recourse is to meditate, using whatever technique one prefers. But why the hell does it take so damned long to have any glimpses?

It’s annoying. ;-)

The recurring theme throughout your comment is that of the paradox, which is what gave rise to the whole concept of Paramentalism in the first place. For example, I used to ponder the idea of a predetermined destiny vs. free will. Logic mandates that if our lives are determined by free will, a predetermined destiny is impossible, because free will is running the show. Reality is thereby a linear timeline of events created by each decision borne of free will. The free will and destiny concepts would appear to be contradictory, diametric opposites.

But I don't believe (there's that word again) that free will and destiny are mutually exclusive. I favor the idea that somehow, inexplicably, free will and destiny operate in our lives simultaneously.

When I contemplate higher level concepts, I usually come to a point where I hit a paradox, which forces me to abandon dualistic thought. This why I now believe that God is both real and unreal, ie- present and anti-present. It comes down to the whole yin yang thing in the end.

I would discuss this in more detail, but other things require my attention right now.

That was a great comment, and I agree with you on all points. Thanks for getting back to me.

To Peter Chamberlin: My apologies for bringing up this unrelated subject matter in your thread. I hope you don't mind.

Good post. We've all heard the premise: "The only absolute is that everything changes."

So logically that must apply also to the premise. So how many way's can the premise change? How many way's can the premise change and still make sense?

1. The many absolutes is that everything changes.
2. The only absolute is that nothing changes.
3. The only change is that everything is absolute.
4. The only change is that nothing is absolute.

1, 3 & 4 appear to be nonsensical.
2 seems absurd to mere mortals.

But if the premise: "the only absolute is that everything changes" MUST also include applying to the premise itself, it changes the idea of the premise thereby locking itself out of itself nullifying absolutely the premise that "change" is absolute.

Item 2 then seems to apply but not yet?

There is nothing new under the sun?

This time this song IS specifically directed at you-- because you are a disingenuous IDIOT.. cheers.

You've changed your mind three times about Eric Hufschmid, at least twice about Bollyn, three times about Ron Paul, and three times about me. You've attacked me on numerous occasions, usually using an unoriginal nickname dreamed up by someone else ["Chimp of Zion"], and then apologised to me on three occasions for doing so. And you call me disingenuous, and an "idiot".

If you deny any of this, I'll take the time to link to the comments I'm referring to, to prove my case. These are indisputable facts.

The only thing you've never changed your mind about is Smith, because you're a Smith devotee, a cultist. And the only time you ever attack me is when I voice my opinion about Smith or TFC. You just can't fucking hack it. An opinion about Smith is an attack on you.

You've never written a single original article, and you've never contributed anything that can't be found elsewhere on the internet (usually iamthewitness.com) - all you've done here is plug Smith's site like you're fixin' for a mention on his show or a kiss on the lips. This is a typical example of one of your contributions, a brainless "blog" that features nothing but a link to your hero's website and a photo from the same site. Your latest "blog" is almost identical to the one I just linked to, except it specifically plugs a particular TFC audio broadcast. This is the text of your "blog" in its entirety:

I believe most anybody (and everybody) here (and everywhere) who listens to 't, will agree that today's (23.Jan.08) French Connection free .mp3 broadcast was nothing less than exceptional. www.iamthewitness.com

And this is the text of the other one I linked to, in it's entirety:

Audio Files + Literature = TRUTH

www.iamthewitness.com

These are the last two contributions you've made to WUFYS, and you call me an "idiot"?

It's interesting that you decided I'm an "idiot" based on this comment in the thread above, when I didn't even mention your name. I didn't attack you, and yet you come here with some bullshit video to attack me with because you can't articulate in your own words whatever the fuck it is you want to say. I haven't watched either video, by the way.

Now kindly explain exactly why I'm "disingenuous", Nobodaddy, in your own words, and why you've got your little pink knickers in a twist. After all, you're no "idiot", so you should be able to intelligently back up your assertions.

Attack and apology, attack and apology, it's all I ever get from your monosyllabic arse, and I never respond. Now I'm responding. You're the most indecisive moron I've ever come across. Now, either do what I've told you to do, or don't address me again, &c, &c, &c.

=P

Look, I tried to be friendly and supportive, that's all there is to it.. but after reading your little billet doux to makow i believe it's evident to any sentient creature that you're decidedly as cracked as any other scion of judah.. and so farewell.

"Flash Gordon's Ape-- you're today." Pull a knife on ME mf.

Btw, I easily detect at least two lies in your latest CONFUSED commentary to me-- you've ALWAYS responded heretofore, with the exception of my last attempt at reconciliation and understanding; I'm sure you checked out the video (unless unable); and, though I do consider Smith to be a hero of sorts, and I appreciate his honesty, effort and information, I certainly don't worship him, &c. It's because of frauds like you that I take it upon myself to advertise his site. Without it we're left with such imitative, unimaginative drivel as chimpsozion.com. Have a nice day dwarf.

Anybody who cannot reflect and see through the lies and basic purpose of that lying and fraudulent ninnyhammer needs to try a little harder.

Transformers.WAV - 5Mb

Sept 9, 2007: neo-nazim go-rabbid..

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/3409

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,2165880,00.html
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/903536.html
http://thezohn.wordpress.com/2007/09/15/israeli-neo-nazi-ring-busted-2/
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=296114&sw=neo-Nazi

It is a matter of fact that I have made quite a few admittedly insufficient, more than slightly anemic efforts to TURN PEOPLE unfamilar with it ON to Smith's site (I not possessing the resources, knowledge or talent to presume to create one of my own, esp @ present); and that I have also attempted to provide some other worthwhile sites and information I've stumbled upon as well, &c.; so you, on t' other hand, have ALWAYS had something negative to interject in EVERY blog that so much as mentions Smith's name and/or site (to my almost certain knowledge), and have striven equally hard (or harder) to TURN PEOPLE AWAY FROM that powerful font of information.. Now, whether that be because Hufschmid and he once hit your boy Glenn or ? where it hurt, or that you are a crypto-zoo who has adopted an English 'hero's' name, I cannot truly say-- but I do verily believe the latter, &c.

And though it did not really affect or concern me in the slightest bit, you and I both know whom you were accusing of hero worship and fanaticism in the inane and futile banter previous to my special 'Dizzard of Gog' song dedication-- so I'll even leave it at that (but you won't).

There you go again in typical indecisive fashion, Cultoduddy: five impertinent, nonsensical, disjointed non-sequiturs in succession, as per usual. If you had the foggiest clue about what you wanted to say, you'd get your ducks in a row and put it all in one comment.

I won't address you again, but you're welcome to babble away ad nauseum, &c, &c, &c.

Infeces Mentis and Gerald Posner.. couple of hucksters, to be sure..

Matter of fact, I've been wondering where O'Connell disappeared to.. it would not surprise me i' th' least if this little jewish twat coz had him arrested or ?