This video promotes the idea that mini-nukes (or hydrogen bombs) were used to bring down the towers, a theory that's been thoroughly debunked. The creator knows whodunnit, but not how they did it. At worst, it could be a deliberate disinformation piece, but I doubt it.

Thanks for posting anyway though, cheers.

My pleasure, I do assure you. His 'WTC nuke theory' is indeed among the only portion of his analysis and narrative that I had any doubt about, and will have to look into the 'debunking' evidence. That happens to be a relatively meager portion of his presentation, however, and I hope it does not deter people from looking at the video. I know they'll find it time well-invested. His final words are in fact the most compelling. Best wishes.

When I speculated that the video could be a deliberate disinformation piece, I was referring to the intentions of the creator, not the poster, who is in this case, NoneSuch101.

NoneSuch, you remind me of Nobodaddy. Can you confirm that you're not the same guy posting under another handle? Nobodaddy recently declared that he wouldn't be posting on WUFYS anymore, and seemed to be saying his goodbyes.

While I did have my beefs with Nobodaddy, I don't hope that he stops posting here. I never believed that he didn't mean well.

So,

To Nobodaddy

Why darkness & obscurity
In all thy words & laws
That none dare eat the fruit but from
The wily serpents jaws
Or is it because Secrecy
gains females loud applause?

Just seeking to make a clean break and start friend. I do agree, the video is (probably) not intentional disinfo, although it is necessarily speculative at times.

Fair enough, man. Cheers then, to new beginnings.

Why, thanks. Nobodaddy somehow managed to get himself involved in some inadvertent, unfortunate, unnecessary and anti-productive arguments with a couple of pretty good people here, which were undoubtedly due to his inability to communicate concisely, considerately and/or coherently-- faults which I possess myself, but which I hope to conceal by remaining mum unless I really have something I consider worthwhile to interject into the dialogue. He was prone, it seems, to use these blogs like they were some kind of instant messenger or something. A sad and lonely little man, I have no doubt (j/k). And so, for now, farewell.. and (oc), &c.

Richard Koshimizu does a workmanlike job of presenting the case. I don't usually save something like this, but he is so methodical that it forms a great outline.

The Moon information is good. I've firsthand got stories about CAUSA that would make your skin crawl. Creepy zionist organization.

He does a good job of fleshing out Rockefeller's role in Japan. SONY = Standard Oil of New York and has since the end of WWII.

His theory on the use of a pure hydrogen weapon is entirely possible, given the evidence. Combine those thoughts with Mashers information about the depleted Uranium Mass Damper weights in the WTC towers and there is something there for sure. Something along the lines of:

Samuel Cohen, the "father of the neutron bomb", has been claiming for some time that red mercury is a powerful explosive-like chemical known as a ballotechnic. The energy released during its reaction is enough to directly compress the secondary without the need for a fission primary. He claims that he has learned that the Soviet scientists perfected the use of red mercury and used it to produce a number of softball-sized "pure fusion" bombs, which he claims were made in large numbers

He stretches to claim OKC was a an unconventional bomb. Gen. Partin found the rebar welded inside toe severed concrete columns in the basement, consistent with det cord.

Good post and a good new start for you!

Richard Koshimizu does a workmanlike job of presenting the case. I don't usually save something like this, but he is so methodical that it forms a great outline.

He does a good job of fleshing out Rockefeller's role in Japan. SONY = Standard Oil of New York and has since the end of WWII.

Unforunately, like everything else, he offers no evidence to back up what is just speculation. Take the SONY example, for instance.

Sony was originally known as Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo, a company whose main business was the manufacture and sale of tape recorders and magnetic tape. When Akio Morita (later head of Sony America) returned from his first trip to the United States that year, he realized that the company needed a name that was instantly recognisable and universally pronounceable. "Tokyo Tsushin Kogyo" was an unwieldy name and had no particular meaning to the rest of the world; its translation, "Tokyo Telecommunications Engineering Company," wasn't much better. The three-letter abbreviation (TTK) was already used by the Japanese national telephone company.

The idea for the new company name came from the brand of tape TTK had been selling since 1950: Soni-tape. The "Soni" in "Soni-tape" was derived from the Latin sonus ("sound") and Morita created Sony from a combination of sonus and the English phrase sonny boy, which "conveyed to him the youthful energy and irreverence he wanted at the heart of the company."

Now it is possible that Koshimizu is right, and the official explanation is BS, but I would need more than the word of one person to discount the official explanation of the name.

Anyway, the name doesn't really matter and is a distraction from known and verifiable facts such as the connections Morita had with Rockefeller through the Trilateral Commission and the widespread belief that Rockefeller money helped build up Sony.

I added the SONY comment. I didn't see it on Koshimizu's website or in the video. I too would like to see lots more solid proof, but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for a certified copy of the official memo naming the company. In this case, make the accusation, look at the refutation and then decide.

I go with SONY as an acronym for Standard Oil.