"They (the Jews) work more effectively against us, than the enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in... It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pest to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America."

(From The Maxims of George Washington by A. A. Appleton & Co.)

This is a little confusing. Often there is the distinction made between the "truer" biblical Judean descended Sepharic Jew who, as it may be historically shown, made their way to inhabit Portugal, Spain, etc. as opposed to the Ashkenazi Jew known to have descended from the Khazarian/Mongolian region, the latter of which is most often attributed to giving rise to modern Zionism. Unless I'm grossly mistaken, naive, etc., it seems the Sepharic Jew has not the same vampirical reputation as the Zionist/Ashkenazi/occupational Jew yet in Mr. Franklin's quote he refer's to the Jewish "vampires" who, financially and otherwise decimated Spain and Portugal, to be "Asiatic"? I would have attributed "Asiatic" as being regionally associated to the Khazarian region. Are both Khazarian (non-Judean Talmudic converts) and Sepharic (Judean descendent's) equally troublesome?

When Jesus declared to the Jewish leaders . . You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father's desires” (John 8:42-44), it would seem then that this was the spirit carried through to the descended modern Sepharic Jews who found their way through time to Spain, Portugal, etc., and is who Mr. Franklin appear's to be speaking of when referring to "Asiatic's". But again "Asiatic's" seems more descriptive of the converted Talmudic Ashkenazi Zionist Jews, who have simply exploited and applied to themselves the "Chosen One's" title in which to be propped up, underwritten, etc., by sympathetic Christendom.

Is it simply following the Talmud then that causes the vampirism Mr. Franklin speaks of irregardless of whether your "Jewishness" is descended Sepharic or phoney-baloney converted caucasian/mongol inbred Ashkenazi?

Sephardics are medeterranian jews dispossessed by the Roman empire. Mizrahis are Semetic jews - one of the sons of Abraham. Ashkanaz are khazar yhidi imposters.

From wiki - Jewish ethnicity

Historically, the ethnic divisions among Jews have been dominated by two major groups: the Ashkenazim, or "Germans" (Ashkenaz meaning "Germany" in Medieval Hebrew, denoting their Central European base), and the Sephardim, or "Spaniards" (Sefarad meaning "Spain" or "Iberia" in Hebrew, denoting their Spanish and Portuguese base). The Mizrahim, or "Easterners" (Mizrach being "East" in Hebrew), that is Middle Eastern, Central Asian, Caucasusian, and North African Jews, could constitute a third major group.

So prophetic and on target, it's absolutely creepy.

Much doubt exists as to whether Franklin actually said the above. Anyone have a genuine source?

THE STATEMENT OF BENJAMIN FRANKLIN at the CONVENTION CONCERNING JEWISH IMMIGRATION.
Taken from a copy of the original from the written records of CHARLES PICKNEY of South Carolina, of the PROCEEDINGS during the drafting of the United States Constitution at the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION in 1789.
--------------------------------------------------
Claimed by Franklin biographer Carl Van Doren and other jews to be a 'forgery', yet, given the well-known and documented pattern of judeo/ zionist duplicity, subterfuge, chaos, destruction and historical revisionism, and that the sentiment expressed could not have proven more wise and true, I'm willing to believe what this fellow named Jack Rauber had to say:

"There is only one slight problem in refuting the statements Franklin supposedly made. Excerpts from Pinckney’s book were part of the Franklin Museum in Philadelphia until the 1960s. In fact, a person I know well and trust, as a young man was so struck by some of the words he read while visiting the Franklin museum that he wrote them down in his own hand. He showed me those notes about 15 years ago. He is now 81. Now, either the museum was fooled or a more powerful force had those quotes removed. But all or a portion of what Pinckney recorded at one time did exist at the Franklin Museum."
http://www.newsnet14.com/2003/12/11/benjamin-franklin-on-jews/

I'll search, but can anyone provide a copy of Pinckney's "PROCEEDINGS during the drafting of the United States Constitution at the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION in 1789." ?

"When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house,
his possessions are safe." Luke 11:21

The late Carl Van Doren, a biographer of Benjamin Franklin made this report:

The speech against the Jews which Benjamin Franklin is alleged to have made the Constitutional Convention of 1787 is a forgery, produced within the past five years [1933-38]. The forger, whoever he was, claims that the speech was taken down by Charles Pinckney of South Carolina and preserved in his Journal. The forger presumably knew that, in a letter to John Quincy Adams dated December 30, 1818, Pinckney said he had kept a Journal of the proceedings at the Convention. But this Journal, if it ever existed, has never been found. The forger claims that Pinckney ‘published’ the Journal ‘for private distribution among his friends’ with the title Chit-Chat Around the Table During Intermissions. No copy of any such printed Journal has come to light. Not content with these two claims, the forger has further asserted that the original manuscript of Franklin’s speech, apparently from Pinckney’s Journal, is in the Franklin Institute, Philadelphia. The Franklin Institute does not possess the manuscript.

The forger’s authority for his document is nearly as mythical as could be imagined. He cites a manuscript which does not exist, a printed book or pamphlet which nobody has seen, a Journal which has been lost for more than a hundred years. There is no evidence of the slightest value that Franklin ever made the alleged speech or ever said or thought anything of the kind about the Jews.

Charles Pinckney National Historic Site Information

Address: 1214 Middle St., Sullivan's Island, SC
Telephone: 843/883-3123
Hours of Operation: Open daily 9 a.m. - 5 p.m. except Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year's Day
Admission: Free

This comment from 'Mohammed' on that same page we're both referring to also rings true, to my taste (Van Doren being a jew and all that):

".. there is only collusion brought forward by Jewish intellectuals to its authenticity.."

(You will, um, forgive me if, after devoting myself to a careful and assiduous study of real history over the past year or so, I've managed to develop a rather healthy distrust of the jews, in particular..)

Surely, if there is such a thing as Pinckney's journal, we should be able to see a copy?

"When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house,
his possessions are safe." Luke 11:21

Although a desultory and cursory internet search by me has failed to turn up any evidence one way or t' other as yet, it does call to my mind the figure of Aaron Burr, whose character and person have been vilified and (undoubtedly) misrepresented in nearly everything (at least contemporary) I've ever read about him. I'm of the opinion now that he was probably what should be called a true patriot: at least, his having shot and killed the Rothschild/ central bank agent Alexander (Levine) Hamilton makes him a real American hero in my book.

I would certainly like to know if Benjamin Franklin really said these things. If he did, it would be quite extraordinary.

---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.

Nonesuch: I've been re-thinking just about everything I 'learned.'

"When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house,
his possessions are safe." Luke 11:21