The Fix Is In: Superdelegate loyalists will choose Clinton for nomination that may culminate in DNC riot a la 1968
Reference: Wealthy Elite invest in Hillary Clinton for Prez campaign to protect Aristocracy
10 Things I Hate about Liberty, starring Hillary Clinton
The humiliating defeat of Zionist traitor Hillary Clinton in primaries
[Ultra-wealthy ruling elite family] Rothschilds funding Hillary's campaign
Presidential candidate Mike Gravel rebukes Hillary Clinton for her evil chortle
Keith Olbermann: Hillary Clinton pushing for superdelegate strategy (6:23)
1968 Chicago police riot at Democratic National Convention (YouTube, 4 min)
Let's be clear that if Hillary Clinton is crowned with the nomination by the overwhelming majority vote of the superdelegates at Democratic National Convention in Denver, Colorado the last week of August, it will swing the moderates, hostile towards Hillary's "socialist agenda" (mandatory health care, economy micromanagement, etc) to cast the ballot for McCain (if chosen by RNC hacks), ensuring the win for McCain in fulfilling his quest to become the next "war president" eager to order the attack on Iran/Syria should Bush back out.
Obama, if nominated, will triumph over McCain in a landslide election. Because Obama spoke to the audience with the "heartfelt" appeal to reason, as far as Obama's campaign run is interpreted, which Hillary criticize with the air of elitist arrogance in her steadfast refusal to believe she could lose - "It's about picking a president who relies not just on words, but on work, hard work, to get America back to work...someone who's not just in the speeches business."
I checked out 2008 Democratic Convention Watch on the number of delegates compared to superdelegates collected by Clinton and Obama. Here's what I found as of 2/19:
Delegates
Obama - 1112
Clinton - 979"Pledged" superdelegates
Obama - 162.5
Clinton - 240Total: Obama - 1274.5; Clinton - 1219.0
(Delegates needed: 2024.5)
Naturally, Clinton, serving two terms as a junior senator for the express promotion of her White House bid, owns New York state in sheer number of pledged superdelegates numbering over 30 while Obama had a measly one.
And one of the NY superdelegates has declared her choice of Hillary is final, as New York Sun article reports.
While unpledged superdelegates will make their choice for either candidate depending on the result of the candidates which gain the most votes, Clinton campaign refuse to take the loss at face value and insist on staying in the race with fierce determination, counting on the loyalist superdelegate people (the most gain she has over Obama in number) to extinguish Obama's chance of winning the nomination at DNC.
The fact that Clinton campaign have decided they can count on superdelegates to erase Clinton's continuous loss of the subsequent states to Obama post-Super Tuesday in order to secure the presidential nomination isn't surprising, because it's about ambition for the wrong purpose -- consolidating more power in upholding status quo as the left-wing Zionist Neocon hawk backed by the military-industrial complex compared to McCain.
Should the "loyalist" and "free agent relenting to pressure & corrupted favor by Clinton camp for vote" superdelegates crown Hillary with the nomination at DNC that contradict Obama's lead in the number of delegates, there is a possibility that Democratic National Convention will see the powder keg of a riot like in 1968 for a similar reason over the question of party control of delegates that contradict the voting majority's preferred choice.
Hillary Clinton must be stopped by denying her the nomination as superdelegates go with the wind of the Democratic base that chose Obama as the leading contender. Obama's popularity cannot be underestimated, and if the loyal Clinton supporters who cast the ballot for Clinton only to win the coronation, then they can expect the overwhelmingly negative response from the shocked and dejected Democratic supporters who want Obama as the viable opponent to defeat John "Third Bush Term" McCain.
By the way, why was superdelegate created in the first place? Because Democrat Party's overwhelming loss in 1972 presidential election combined with the political calamity at Chicago DNC in 1968 led to the creation of the conception, which is fundamentally undemocratic presuming the intent of superdelegation is to "party loyalty" and "sycophancy of the Elite-preferred candidate". Superdelegates are comprised of senators, representatives, DNC members and even former presidents (Bill Clinton, veep Al Gore & Jimmy Carter).
It is highly ironic the Democrat Party isn't really democratic when it comes to the dictation of the oligarchy as the decider. It's about as populist as Liberal Democratic Party of Japan.
(p.s. - cross-posted on Community Blog section of Obama's campaign web site, until they censure/kick me out. Cross-posted the diary entry at DailyKos as well. Cool web site Obama is Winning with facts and figures on delegates & superdelegates)
Excuse my misspoken term "Democrat Party" when it should mean "Democratic Party". I got mocked for the flub, because they assumed I don't know the whole lot about Democratic Party (that may be true, because I've lived in the red cities/states where Democratic Party presence is frowned upon most of my life)
No surprise some DailyKos members called my diary a "troll post" with tone of derision because I referred to Hillary as "Zionist Neocon" (despite updating in a new edit to add three links for proof).
Guess most DailyKos members are brainwashed when it comes to reactionary self-denial of American-Israeli alliance in facilitating Zionist expansionism.
Fun fact: qrswave's account was suspended after posting the diary "Imagine a world without Israel" (qrs's subsequent post on being banned from dailykos)
Thanks for the post, Nepos.
In my opinion, speculation about who'll get the Democratic nomination is almost a complete waste of time, because Hillary has already been chosen. I'm that sure of it that I'll bet $100 on it. Any takers?
The media carnival over this election is all for show. Hillary will be prez.
The Clinton's are taking no prisoners on their demented march to retake the White House.
If in the process, they destroy the Democratic Party, they don't give a damn, since their true loyalties lie elsewhere, with the CFR and Israel.
They're morally corrupt people who have no conscience or empathy for America.
They're addicted to power and like true junkies, will kill anyone who gets in their way of their next fix.
Long ago, HRC lost any interest in grabbing hold of "Slick Willie's" uhhh, love handle, so she'll try and replace that misguided spirit with the phallic symbolism of grabbing hold of some ICBM's, the feeling of which will give her thrills and chills.
The Clinton's are also working overtime to get the Florida and MIchigan delegates seated--in definace of the rules in place--to give her the edge over Obama.
Well, CoZ, I might take up on the betting offer, even though I believe gambling is against the law where I live (other than Hawaii). Not sure about Internet gambling, though.
I wrote the post because I wanted to express the concern that superdelegates will decide to, uh, make Hillary 'queen' of the DNC that, after coasting over Obama despite him being the contender in lead, might pave to riots and thousands of Democrats quitting the party and switching parties. As I reiterate, some Republicans despise McCain but will cast the vote for McCain to crush Hillary. Either way, it's a disastrously weak election that provide more-of-the-same outcome to repeat and expecting different results.
Despite Obama's pledge to support Israel, I consider Obama "less evil" because McCain and Clinton are unrepentant die-hard Zionist tools, like this idiotically obvious column "McCain versus Clinton - which is better for Israel??"in Haaretz. The chief U.S. correspondent for Haaretz Shmuel Rosner couldn't be obvious as a Zionist fanatic who write about the American presidential candidates' degree of loyalty to a foreign power as though complete subservience matter.
Here are the amusing gems from dailykos comment section:
This is a classic concern troll diary in format...Thanks for your Republican concern and advice over something that will never happen.
to which another replied - It is almost the platonic ideal of troll diaries
Referring to the quote "consolidating more power in upholding status quo as the left-wing Zionist Neocon hawk backed by the military-industrial complex compared to McCain," a vacuous moron sarcastically asked Is that what that's called? I could barely identify it as English.
It's my first time I posted to dailykos, even though I don't read it much anymore since it went into adamant self-denial mode regarding the inconvenient truth of Zionist problem and corrupt Washington politico related to Democratic Party. The majority of the posters that responded to the diary with cleverly worded jeers reflect the majority of the users at DailyKos -- hopelessly brainwashed idiocracy just like Little Green Footballs with both "here or the highway" mental midget partisans' constant bickering and childish jokes as though their 'reasoning skill' brains are left behind in the grade school.
Too bad, because I thought Democratic Party represent the progressive agenda, but it operates on the basically the same level as the GOP -- ostrich heads in the sand pretending danger of inconvenient truths will go away.
Sixty comments? Looks like your blog's had quite a few views.
You're not wrong about the intellectual caliber of those DailyKos posters - most of them sound like they wouldn't know shit from clay. I was tempted to register there myself just to respond to a few of them, but I can think of better ways to spend my time, like taking to my face with a cheese grater.
All I've ever heard about DailyKos is that qrswave was banned for being critical of Israel, so I've always assumed it was a Zionist site. Besides that I don't know anything about DailyKos, don't read it, never go there, and don't quite get what it's all about, but when I went there and saw your links to WUFYS and WRH, for a minute there I thought they were DailyKos's links, and that it might be worth more of a look. Alas, it wasn't to be.
Anyway, don't be irritated or belittled by those 'mental midgets'. Fuck 'em.
DailyKos is certified kosher. I'm registered over there but rarely post because it's a pedestrian site. Pure Establishment members who fancy themselves original thinkers. It's mostly middle aged and younger types who are locked into mom and dad's dogma that America should be sticking its nose into the latest jewish, media-created crisis around the world rather than minding its own business and fixing the United States.
The American political and election systems are completely corrupted but for those who chooses to participate anyway:
Barack Obama and Ron Paul should be alerting their respective supporters to the same thing:
Many Americans are under the mistaken impression that they are restricted to voting for the official nominee of the democrat, republican or other parties.
In fact, in most states (forty-two states) voters can "write-in" the name of whomever they please for president. The person they write-in does not have to be the official nominee of any political party. They can write-in anybody.
Listed below are the eight states that do not permit write-in votes for President. All states not on the list DO allow write-in votes.
Write-in votes NOT permitted in
1.) Hawaii
2.) Louisiana
3.) Nebraska
4.) Nevada
5.) New Mexico
6.) Oklahoma
7.) South Carolina
8.) South Dakota
Ref:
http://www.fec.gov/pubrec/2000presgeresults.htm
- - - - - - - - -
Jeder war ein großer Krieger
Hielten sich für Captain Kirk
I was glad to come
I'll be sad to go
So while I'm here
I'll have me real good time
Both of you are right that DailyKos is garbage, but I was so amused by the reactionary morons mocking the diary out of disbelief that I might write another diary, with substance in thoughtful analysis, and then post to verify the large percentage of commentaries are hostile/asinine.
Surely it's a time-wasting venture, but since qrswave was banned, I figure it would be fun to write a "perfectly vetted" diary related to Hillary Clinton's absurd chicanery and Democratic Party's relationship with Israel Zionism only to be condemned as troll post and booted off.
The founder 'kos' is a snooty reactionary Zionist liberal who condemned Ron Paul by smugly captioning the headline "Yup, Ron Paul is still a racist" in the attempt to discredit Paul as the "fringe" contender.
The effectuating pomposity and proud "mob mentality" ignorance of DailyKos bloggers truly do not represent the progressive cause of the Democratic Party ideology. If anything, such elitist mentality would turn off enough ordinary, unassuming citizens to register Republican. DailyKos, considering its obnoxious army of smarmy "I think, therefore I'm a liberal" emo morons, is on level with Little Green Footballs, Powerline, RedState and other nauseating far right-wing blog sites.
I was so amused by the reactionary morons mocking the diary out of disbelief that I might write another diary, with substance in thoughtful analysis, and then post to verify the large percentage of commentaries are hostile/asinine.
By all means, do it Nepos. I gave up arguing with those Establishment Babies, in fact I gave up arguing with blockheads in general a long time ago. I refuse to spend any valuable time exchanging debating points with people who refuse to see. It's pointless. But if you have the inclination to do it, please do. DailyKos is like many other forums in the fact that the loudest idiots take over, and the people who agree with the loudest idiots set the tone of the forum. Soon afterward all opinion that doesn't fit their common point of view is ridiculed and attacked.
They'll probably ban you but big deal. As I always tell the mods at those self important chat boards, I've been banned from a lot better forums than [fill in the blank].
The effectuating pomposity and proud "mob mentality" ignorance of DailyKos bloggers truly do not represent the progressive cause of the Democratic Party ideology. If anything, such elitist mentality would turn off enough ordinary, unassuming citizens to register Republican. DailyKos, considering its obnoxious army of smarmy "I think, therefore I'm a liberal" emo morons, is on level with Little Green Footballs, Powerline, RedState and other nauseating far right-wing blog sites.
Yep, exactly. Well said.
- - - - - - - - - -
Jeder war ein großer Krieger
Hielten sich für Captain Kirk
I was glad to come
I'll be sad to go
So while I'm here
I'll have me real good time
By the way Nepos, with regard to the DailyKos poster's comment below:
Your use of that phrase was perfectly legitimate in the context it was used in. It's generally accepted to be a derogatory phrase, but given what you wrote, it was perfectly justified.
It was "UntimelyRippd" that didn't know what he was talking about.