"weird" things happening here?
The Great Revealer left this comment comment in a post. I did catch my attention though I am not a very 'technical' person and therefore don't probably appreciate his message as much as I should.
This is an opportunity for me however to bring up another problem which I have noticed lately here and which I also don't understand. Maybe someone could help me understand.
Lately I found out from a message that mparent777 left inside my blog (and I don't know how it is possible for him to write inside my blog...?) that the material I had placed about the so-called Saudi hijackers, had somehow been removed. How is that possible?
About 3 weeks ago I placed some good pictures I received from Gaza. I placed them in the blog.. and a day later they also disappeared.
Yesterday, I placed some pictures from the injured in Gaza in my post entitle "We will never forget or forgive" and today I found messages from friends telling me that there were no pictures. I checked the blog and indeed only the picture of the mortuary refrigerator was left. The awful pictures of the injured were blank. I placed them again in the blog... and still some of my friend across the world are unable to see them although I now can. I had to send to them the pictures as attachements.
What is all this??? Can anyone help me understand.
One more point I would like to ask Qrswave about. A few months ago, the info posted on this blog used to come out on Google search and distributed actually quite well. This is no longer happening. What is the reason?
This is the message that The Great Revealer also posted. Equally interesting.. but needs English translation for me...:(
Do any of you notice your email/IM getting censored????
Lately, as with Khanverse, I have been "filtered" by email providers (i.e. MSN, Yahoo, Google are ALL OWNED by zionists).
Also, I've noticed that they have put in place 'interceptors' for digg.com and slashdot.org.
Interceptors lie BETWEEN you and the server and are basically programs that 1) scan, 2) read, 3) analyze, and (possibly if "warranted") 4) filter.
??????????????????
Let me know if others have noticed "wierd" things happening!
The Great Revealer | Sun, 2008-03-02 11:50
about your posts, cherify. But, I will be looking into it carefully.
I have nothing to do with it. And to the best of my knowledge, something like this has never happened before.
Please, tell me as soon as you notice something like this happening again.
In the meantime, I will look into it.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
change your password; alpha-numeric MuLT1PL3 CaSe.
serve your own pictures (photobucket etc), as they may disappear if you don't. Always save the good ones to disc.
oh, and try not to be too paranoid =P
This place is under some unknown control and has been for some time now.
We have had a wall around us for over a year.
timed with the flood of Shilly Crap from the NSA Information Roadmap program.
If you sift through and find a MSG from me saying 'All else beyond is monsters' comment THAT is about when i saw for SURE that the blog was being fucked with.
It will NOT do you ANY good you stupid Usury doofusses.
We are BETTER.
You are playing on the WRONG side.
First you take D.C. Then you take New York
Is also serving up some interesting thoughts about our visitors from NSA land.
First you take D.C. Then you take New York
Can you be more specific about which post it was? It is worth noting that mparent7777 is an administrator and it is possible for administrators to edit posts although they rarely do more than add the <!--break--> code at the top if it has been omitted. I don't think any administrator would even consider deleting portions of a blog post, let alone actually do it.
As WUFYS does not host images, it is probably the case that you added to your posts a reference to the location of the images on another site. If they are deleted from the site you found them on, then they will cease to appear here.
See above. This has nothing to do with WUFYS, and is the result of action taken by the site hosting the images... the site you found them on. They may still exist on that site, but the site owner may have banned other sites from linking to them, as it is sometimes considered 'bandwidth theft'.
I think the reason starts with G, ends with e and has oogl in the middle!
If you are talking about MSN then we had it happen to us at ConCen about 3-4 months ago, if you posted the URL for the tracker, we got a Message Failed to Send error, lasted about 4-5 days
Have you hard evidence to back that up? Come on! This site is no more under 'unknown control' than I am a reincarnation of Elvis Presley!
The reality of sites like this, based on complex content management systems like Drupal, is that they go wrong sometimes. There are so many factors at play, including dodgy broadband or dial-up connections, that things can and will go wrong sometimes. There is little point in reading some sort of conspiracy into every little glitch. It doesn't do our credibility any good and we come off looking like a bunch of chicken littles.
Sure, sites like this are under attack and have been under attack for some time, but the more technical attacks generally take everything down and the 'hasbara', megaphone-induced attacks just pollute the comments sections of every post with pro-Israel, pro-Zionist garbage until everyone gets so frustrated they leave.
out of all your ConCen Radio shows, which ones would you want EVERYONE to hear?
portions are acceptable too =P
perhaps you could recommend some other good propaganda to put into this groovy jukebox i'm mixing up..
Strange to hear info was removed from your blog with my mparent7777 attached. I certainly did not remove any material.
what's the password?
;-P
No idea, tonight, just finished another show about 5 minutes ago, was show number 49 or 50 and I rarely listen to myself, so I'm the wrong person to ask.
As for this site, it was down several times this week and I let her goodself know about it.
Also during the week, when the site was down, I got the SQL login to the site, as it showed the name the database being used and all I needed was a password !!!
Sorry girl, should have taken a print-screen, wilco the next time
You are going to think that I am crazy.. but this is what happened as I went to fish out the post on which pictures “disappeared” to show it to you. As I entered the post at http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/5733 Only 2 of the pictures appeared. I checked if the pictures were still on the net via their web address and they still were. I was going to save a “copy” of my post with the blank or shrunk picture frames to send to qrswave by email to show her what I meant, but I was surprised to see that when I “pasted” the “copy”, all the pictures appeared on my document. On the post they were still blank or shrunk. I left my computer for an hour or so because I had to attend to something else.. and when I came back to continue, what did I see? The pictures were all appearing again on the post. I am obviously not a wiz on the internet... and I don’t understand where the problem is.
++
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1023
The truth about the 9/11 Hijackers - Blow your mind!
This is the link in which I posted for the first time the translation of Al Jazeera’s interview with Sheikh Ahmad Zaki Yamani on the 9/11 “hijackers”. I never looked back at it except lately during a Google search and I was astonished to find a note from mparent777 saying that
http://100777.com/node/237
(This page was active until very recently as I checked and posted it to friends about 2 weeks ago. It seems however to have disappeared now and in timely manner with the distribution of the translation of the words of the Saudi Minister of Petroleum)
This comment caught my attention because I knew that it wasn’t anything I wrote so I went into the blog where I found that same comment written by mparent777 and I was astonished… but then I didn’t know that mparent777 was an administrator in this blog. Sorry. .
Indeed, I didn’t find my translation of the Arabic program. I found only some of the English media references to the Saudi hijackers that had also mostly gone ‘unnoticed’. I replaced the Arabic translation… and I created a second post for it… thinking stupidly that it might be somehow ‘safer’:) I kept mparents comments. Were it not for them, I wouldn't have noticed. You know mparent777, this translation made it into an article all the way into The Nation:)
That’s the story. Is it just a problem of password? Anything else? What about distribution of this blog?
This is the second post which I created for the so-called Saudi Hijacker
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/5872
The Truth about the "9/11 Hijackers" Reposted
to the Pakistani Nation...
http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/mar-2007/11/columns1.php
America’s bizarre yarns
Humayun Gauhar
They tell us the most bizarre stories and expect us to believe them, our American friends do, yet when we ask questions they call us gullible and stupid. They told us that Saddam Hussein was connected to Osama Bin Laden but it turned out that he was not. They told us that Saddam had WMD, but the moment America occupied Iraq the WMD did a disappearing act. (They had actually fabricated the evidence!). They told us that they would hold elections in Iraq and Afghanistan and democracy and freedom would jump out of the ballot box. What jumped out instead were the Grim Reaper and a bunch of jokers to halt him. They told us that they would attack Afghanistan and get rid of the Taliban. They could not. Instead, the expected ‘spring offensive’ is causing America to make false accusations against Pakistan. They told us that they would bring democracy and stability to Iraq. Instead, there is civil war, for which Iran is blamed. Why should we believe anything that America says?
I have said lately that “things are not always what they seem”. Some time ago I wrote an article in this space entitled ‘Loose Change’ based on a documentary by the same name which fairly credibly shows that the events of September 11 were not all that the Bush administration and media have made them out to be. The documentary showed slow motion flashes in descending order coming from floors of the Twin Towers just before each collapsed and claimed that these came from controlled detonations – the two fuel-laded Boeings could not have caused them to fall. Similarly, the film demonstrated quite credibly that the attack on the Pentagon could not have been from a huge commercial airliner but a missile.
The reaction, needless to say, was predictable: ‘Humayun Gauhar is so naive that he has fallen for this amateur film’ was the general refrain. I, however, stick to my doubts until someone cogently argues otherwise and not depends simply on trashing the producers’ professionalism and questioning my credulity. There have been stories in the Daily Telegraph, the BBC and Al Jazeera that some of the 9/11 hijackers are alive and well. I recall having written this in one of my articles, perhaps the same one. I have now come across the transcript of an interview that Saudi Arabia’s former oil minister Zaki Yamani gave to Al Jazeera in September 2006. I don’t normally quote at length, but I feel that if I paraphrase the relevant portion of the interview that too will be questioned. An Arab has translated from the Arabic original.
Interviewer: “Where were you when 9/11 happened?”
Yamani: “I was in Boston... having my yearly medical check-up. It was a Tuesday and I was planning to take an easy morning in the hotel room... reading newspapers and drinking tea with my wife until it was time to go down. I remember that the telephone rang relatively early and I wondered who that could possibly be. The television was turned on and CNN was broadcasting, but we had lowered the volume. My friend, who was a Harvard professor, asked me if I could see what was happening on CNN. So I looked and said... yes. There is a commercial for a Hollywood feature probably... whereupon he told me what was happening... and of course I raised the volume of TV and realised that it was for real.”
Interviewer: “And did you know from the beginning that they were Saudis that hit the towers?”
Yamani: “Well listen to me brother... I frankly still have questions around this issue...for example, this Bukhari fellow (this is how his name is written in the text and I would have to hear the interview again to confirm. In Arabic, the difference of one dot on a letter can change the pronunciation)... one of the ‘suicide pilots’ ... whose name was revealed called the Saudi embassy in Washington... and told them that he can see his name... and that he is a person living in Oklahoma and didn’t commit this act. He was told by the embassy to call the FBI. He also told them that he could see the name of his brother who died 2 years ago. This is one issue. There are also other Saudis whose names appeared... and even the Middle East published their names... and they are alive... One of them was in Tunisia and some of them were is Riyadh... and one of them in Mecca. These are questions for which I would like to see answers. The official version of the story requires answers... and these are some questions. The other issue that drew my attention was Mohammed Atta with other persons who they also described as ‘suicide pilots’ and who were staying in a hotel not far from where I lived in Boston. The day after the attacks, reporters went to his hotel to enquire about him. The hotel confirmed that he was staying there. When the reporters asked what he was doing the day before, the hotel told them that he had asked for a booking in a restaurant, which the hotel had booked for him. The reporters went to the restaurant and asked what Atta ate and drank... and the waitress that served him informed them... and also added that Atta and his friend drank a lot of Vodka and were enjoying themselves and laughing a lot... This news was published in an American newspaper. This means that this Mohammed Atta, who wants to enter paradise and to become a martyr to enjoy what God promised him..., decides to get drunk on the eve of his martyrdom?”
Interviewer: “Sir, you also questioned whether the Jews were aware of the operation...?”
Yamani: “No sir... these are truths... published in newspapers... in New Jersey... which you can refer to. There is a building that looked upon the 2 towers and from which you could see the Israelis who had their cameras ready on top of another building and they filmed the first tower being hit. They are the only people to have filmed the first tower being hit. They then waited for the second tower to be hit. After that, they started dancing and singing... and showing their happiness... The neighbours were disturbed and called the FBI who surprised the Israelis. They were working for a moving company in New Jersey. When asked why they were happy, they responded by saying, ‘so that you can finally understand the pain we feel at the hands of Palestinian terrorists’. That was all that was published and then they were of course moved far away to Israel.”
Interviewer: “Yes... all that you say is true... but OBL confessed on video tapes... and was proud of it.”
Yamani: “I really don’t know brother... if he confessed to the attack on New York in order to become a ‘star’ or whatever... Is he at all involved? I do know that a complicated operation of this size cannot be conducted from a cave in Tora Bora... The second or third day of the attack, a Canadian commander came on TV and explained how it was impossible for normal civilian pilots to conduct such an operation... It is impossible. I have many questions regarding this issue... I do not deny that Al Qaeda is involved, but I also cannot prove it.”
So there you have it. Sheikh Zaki Yamani is one of the best-recognised and well-respected Saudis in the West. The Bush administration is a marauding horde of liars – if they could fabricated evidence about the WMD, why not about 9/11?
E-mail: hgauhar@nation.com.pk
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/5903
Here is another post which is new and which seems to be "losing its pictures too. This morning, friends told me about it but I could see the pictures. Now I can only see one. The pictures are still available on the net however and you can check them on http://palestinianpundit.blogspot.com
this GR is no joker.
Cherifa,
In the comment above where you mention disappearing pics, I have looked at the blog post you provided a link to and I noticed that the images are linked to blogger.com
For instance, several images you added can be found at bp0.blogger.com or bp1.blogger.com
As far as I know, blogger do not allow image hotlinking, and many sites follow suit, as they consider it bandwidth theft (you are using their servers to provide images for your posts here). The best thing to do is to set yourself up an account with the likes of imageshack, download the images to your computer and then upload them to imageshack. Then you can include the images on imageshack in your posts here.
I only see one image in your We will never forgive or forget (reposted) blog, and its source code is
http://rafah.virtualactivism.net/newsphotos/08/february08/6/NI2N0988.JPG
Nothing from palestinianpundit.blogspot.com.
The best thing to do in your case would be to upload the images you use to an image hosting site. Open a photobucket account.
The other day I noticed that all the images in my blogspot.com blog were missing except the ones that I hadn't uploaded myself to photobucket. Friends of mine could see them, but I couldn't. This was because my computer wasn't connecting to photobucket.com for some reason. The problem was fixed simply by rebooting my computer.
I think Google lists/ranks blogs at this site quite well, or highly. When I post the same blog here and at my blogspot.com blog (which is a Google site), the WUFYS blog always lists above my own, and I often come across WUFYS blogs at Google whilst researching matters related to Zionism. I've always thought WUFYS does quite well in that respect.
Be very, very careful where you get your images from. A couple of well-known stock photo houses have been pursuing those who (in many cases in all innocence) have ended up using their images on their web sites. The fines they seek to impose are not pleasant. Hobbiest sites have ended up with bills of up to $10,000.
Try to ensure that the images you use either have a Creative Commons license or can clearly be deemed to come under an intpretation of 'fair use'.
In the blog post http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/1023
this text seems to have been added. Was it something you added?
It is the only reference to mparent I can find in the whole piece.
Sullivan and COZ, thanks for your comments and advice. I didn’t know that I shouldn’t be linking to such blogger sites. I assumed that the reason a blogger posts pictures is for them to get distributed. I never thought of ‘bandwidth theft’ and other servers. It seems that I will have to learn how to upload pictures. 24 hours in the day are not enough.
Sullivan, I have no idea what you are talking about. I feel that I need to hire a lawyer to post a picture from now on:) What for example is a ‘fair use’ interpretation? It sounds like something easier to get through than the Creative Commons license…
Yes, I did ad this portion in response to the comments mparent777 had left in the blog. They are written over my comment. Can’t you see them? This is how the comments are laid out:
I didn’t write that first paragraph and the title of my blog didn’t contain “Blow your mind!” To make sure I am not mixing you up, this is the paragraph that I didn't write:
I'll try to write a guide to posting images to one of the photo-sharing sites, like Photobucket or Imageshack and post it up here.
Creative Commons is probably best, as it is designed to encourage the sharing and distribution of work. As for fair use, I take your point, but I just thought it best that everybody here know the possibility of either Getty or Corbis coming after this site if they feel the copyright of one of their photographers has been violated. It ain't pretty.
Ok, I see what you mean now. I have no clue how it came to be edited in that way.
It could just be Micro$oft and their crappy software.
If you're running VISTA, that program has more bugs and problems than previous M$ software.
As far as being watched, hell, i'd be more concerned with NOT being watched.
If this site is under surveillance, then it means some blogs and bloggers are hitting the right notes.
If their's one thng they hate, it's the TRUTH, so keep punching away.
You have a point Greg... Better to be watched then not:) As for Vista, no, I'm not running it. I was told from friends who understand more then I do, not to use it... so I didn't.
yea, i mean they are REALLY stopping it for me, i can put in the whole address on some of my indexed links and it WILL NOT SHOW UP:
ESPECIALLY THIS ONE
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=http%3A%2F%2Fkhanverse.blogspot.com...
So PLEASE do the best you can to help spread the website, because JOOGLE is blocking it OFF completely:
http://khanverse.blogspot.com
http://www.myspace.com/khanverse