Rothschild's tell Dem Party to nominate their man, Hillary
Not only the Rothschild's, but others, with names like Schwartz, Schuman, Rattner, Pritzker and Aronchick...get the message, Dems?
Vote they way the LOBBY wants you to or see your donations dry up... and we'll also sic our friends in the MSM onto Obama, making sure the Republican nominee, "Maddog" McCain, gets the nod.
Either way, we're going to get an "Israeli-firster" into the Oval Office.
Clinton Donors Ask Pelosi to Back Off
By JEFF ZELENY
Twenty-one top contributors to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential campaign sent a letter today to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, essentially asking her to back off and keep out of the superdelegate fight.
“This dynamic primary season is not at an end,” the donors wrote in the letter. “Several states and millions of Democratic voters have not yet had a chance to cast their votes.”
The letter is the latest sign of a deepening rift inside the Democratic Party. The Clinton boosters were responding to comments Ms. Pelosi made 10 days ago on ABC News’ “This Week,” when she suggested it would be dangerous for the party if the superdelegates tried to take away the nomination from a candidate who had won the most pledged delegates. (And as of now, that is Senator Barack Obama.)
The letter carries an ominous tone, which stops just short of delivering a threat. The donors remind Ms. Pelosi that they are “strong supporters” of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. (A quick check, at least, shows that at least some of letter-signers have not given to the D.C.C.C.)
“We therefore urge you to clarify your position on super-delegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional independent actions of each of the delegates at the National Convention in August,” the letter stated.
We’ll no doubt be hearing more soon from the Speaker. Until then, here is a copy of the letter:
March 26, 2008
The Honorable Nancy Pelosi
Speaker of the US House of Representatives
Office of the Speaker
H-232, US Capitol
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Madame Speaker,
As Democrats, we have been heartened by the overwhelming response that our fellow Democrats have shown for our party’s candidates during this primary season. Each caucus and each primary has seen a record turnout of voters. But this dynamic primary season is not at an end. Several states and millions of Democratic voters have not yet had a chance to cast their votes.
We respect those voters and believe that they, like the voters in the states that have already participated, have a right to be heard. None of us should make declarative statements that diminish the importance of their voices and their votes. We are writing to say we believe your remarks on ABC News This Week on March 16th did just that.
During your appearance, you suggested super-delegates have an obligation to support the candidate who leads in the pledged delegate count as of June 3rd , whether that lead be by 500 delegates or 2. This is an untenable position that runs counter to the party’s intent in establishing super-delegates in 1984 as well as your own comments recorded in The Hill ten days earlier:
“I believe super-delegates have to use their own judgment and there will be many equities that they have to weigh when they make the decision. Their own belief and who they think will be the best president, who they think can win, how their own region voted, and their own responsibility.’”
Super-delegates, like all delegates, have an obligation to make an informed, individual decision about whom to support and who would be the party’s strongest nominee. Both campaigns agree that at the end of the primary contests neither will have enough pledged delegates to secure the nomination. In that situation, super-delegates must look to not one criterion but to the full panoply of factors that will help them assess who will be the party’s strongest nominee in the general election.
We have been strong supporters of the DCCC. We therefore urge you to clarify your position on super-delegates and reflect in your comments a more open view to the optional independent actions of each of the delegates at the National Convention in August. We appreciate your activities in support of the Democratic Party and your leadership role in the Party and hope you will be responsive to some of your major enthusiastic supporters.
Sincerely,
Marc Aronchick
Clarence Avant
Susie Tompkins Buell
Sim Farar
Robert L. Johnson
Chris Korge
Marc and Cathy Lasry
Hassan Nemazee
Alan and Susan Patricof
JB Pritzker
Amy Rao
Lynn Forester de Rothschild
Haim Saban
Bernard Schwartz
Stanley S. Shuman
Jay and Tracy Snyder
Maureen White and Steven Rattner
Source: NYT
It is now common knowledge now that the big zionists don't trust Obama, and more importantly, his handler and trainer, Zbignew Breziniski.
I've been trying to put this all together, because I know this is really nothing more than elitist factions vying for the chairmanship of U.S. inc. Then the key puzzle piece emerges from the pile - Jimmy Carter.
Brezninski was also Carters handler and the zionists took a chance on him. It went badly for them as Brezninski's focus , for familial reasons related to his family's dispossession in Poland by the Soviets, is always on overthrowing the Russian power block and ignoring the entity that I refer to as s.l.c.(shitty little country) ziostan.
Brezninski started this mysterious entity Al CIAda to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan. The Soviets used the most brutal tactics seen in modern warfare to nearly extinct the Afghan resistance, before William Casey decided to give Brezninski's Mujahadin stinger missiles to take out the supporting Soviet HIND helocopters. The rest is history.
Here is Breziniski with Osama Bin Laden giving the charge to the Mujahadin.
In this video which I hope you will watch, You see Brezninsi blow the whistle on a false flag terror event that will be blamed on Iran!
Long story short - the zionist central bankers soon saw that Brezninski's Carter was unconcerned about the goal of a greater s.l.c. ziostan and was promoting something called the Camp David Accords. He had to go and the best way to get rid of him was to raise the prime interest rate to 20%! That shot Jimmy out of office.
The long period of Bush/Clinton control began. Ronald Reagan was pretty much non-functional as a leader after his assassination attempt by Bush's friend's son, John Hinckley. The big zionists will not risk a repeat of th Brezninski / Carter years.
Which causes me to ask the question: Is the enemy of my enemy the best candidate?
Yeah they don't trust Obama to be a complete zioslave. This is the latest attempt to associate him with 'antisemitism'.
Obama advisor: US Jews hinder peace
More trouble for presidential hopeful: Inquiry by conservative US media outlets reveals that Obama advisor Merrill 'Tony' McPeak is a longtime anti-Israel critic who slammed American Jews for acting against US interests
etc etc.
Note: This report off a CIA/Mossad site profiles some co-donors, studiously avoiding any detaisl of der fuerher Rothschild.
Profiles of the Clinton Super-Donors Who Tried to Intimidate Pelosi