Pro-Israel group plans to rewrite history on Wikipedia, Palestinian history, Middle East,
To think that they dare call themselves the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America... It's like the Committee to Free Lebanon (designed to assert US/Israeli domination) or the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq... and we all know how Iraq was 'liberated'...
http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article9474.shtml
EI exclusive: a pro-Israel group's plan to rewrite history on Wikipedia
Report, The Electronic Intifada, 21 April 2008
A pro-Israel pressure group is orchestrating a secret, long-term campaign to infiltrate the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia to rewrite Palestinian history, pass off crude propaganda as fact, and take over Wikipedia administrative structures to ensure these changes go either undetected or unchallenged. A series of emails by members and associates of the pro-Israel group CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America), provided to The Electronic Intifada (EI), indicate the group is engaged in what one activist termed a "war" on Wikipedia. A 13 March action alert signed by Gilead Ini, a "Senior Research Analyst" at CAMERA, calls for "volunteers who can work as 'editors' to ensure" that Israel-related articles on Wikipedia are "free of bias and error, and include necessary facts and context." However, subsequent communications indicate that the group not only wanted to keep the effort secret from the media, the public, and Wikipedia administrators, but that the material they intended to introduce included discredited claims that could smear Palestinians and Muslims and conceal Israel's true history. In the past, CAMERA has gained notoriety for its tactic of accusing virtually anyone who does not toe a right-wing pro-Israel line of bias. The group has even accused editors and reporters of the Israeli daily Haaretz of being "extreme" and participating in "radical anti-Israel activity." Jeffrey Dvorkin, the former ombudsman of National Public Radio (NPR), frequently criticized by CAMERA for an alleged pro-Palestinian bias, wrote on the web publication Salon in February 2008 that "as a consequence of its campaign against NPR, CAMERA acted as the enabler for some seriously disturbed people," citing persistent telephone threats he received in the wake of CAMERA campaigns. Need for stealth and secrecy Throughout the documents EI obtained, CAMERA operatives stress the need for stealth and secrecy. In his initial action alert, Ini requests that recipients "not forward it to members of the news media." In a 17 March follow-up email sent to volunteers, Ini explains that he wants to make the orchestrated effort appear to be the work of unaffiliated individuals. Thus he advises that "There is no need to advertise the fact that we have these group discussions." But stealth and misrepresentation are presented as the keys to success. Ini suggests that after volunteers sign up as editors for Wikipedia they should "avoid editing Israel-related articles for a short period of time." This strategy is intended to "avoid the appearance of being one-topic editors," thus attracting unwanted attention. A veteran Wikipedia editor, known as "Zeq," who according to the emails is colluding with CAMERA, also provided advice to CAMERA volunteers on how they could disguise their agenda. In a 20 March email often in misspelled English, Zeq writes, "You don't want to be precived [sic] as a 'CAMERA' defender' on wikipedia [sic] that is for sure." One strategy to avoid that is to "edit articles at random, make friends not enemies -- we will need them later on. This is a marathon not a sprint." Zeq also identifies, in a 25 March email, another Wikipedia editor, "Jayjg," whom he views as an effective and independent pro-Israel advocate. Zeq instructs CAMERA operatives to work with and learn from Jayjg, but not to reveal the existence of their group even to him fearing "it would place him in a bind" since "[h]e is very loyal to the wikipedia [sic] system" and might object to CAMERA's underhanded tactics. "Uninvolved administrators" The emphasis on secrecy is apparently not only to aid the undetected editing of articles, but also to facilitate CAMERA's takeover of key administrator positions in Wikipedia. For Zeq a key goal is to have CAMERA operatives elected as administrators -- senior editors who can override the decisions of others when controversies arise. When disputes arise about hotly contested topics, such as Israel and Palestine, often only an "uninvolved administrator" -- one who is considered neutral because he or she has not edited or written articles on the topic -- can arbitrate. Once these CAMERA operatives have successfully infiltrated as "neutral" editors, they could then exercise their privileges to assert their own political agenda. Gilead Ini's 17 March email provides specific advice on how to pass off pro-Israel propaganda or opinion as fact meeting Wikipedia's strict guidelines:

(EI illustration)
With over two million articles in English on every topic imaginable, Wikipedia has become a primary reference source for Internet users around the world and a model for collaboratively produced projects. Openness and good faith are among Wikipedia's core principles. Any person in the world can write or edit articles, but Wikipedia has strict guidelines and procedures for accountability intended to ensure quality control and prevent vandalism, plagiarism or distortion. It is because of these safeguards that articles on key elements of the Palestine-Israel conflict have generally remained well-referenced, useful and objective. The CAMERA plan detailed in the e-mails obtained by EI appears intended to circumvent these controls.

Download CAMERA's emails [PDF - 2.7 MB]
Anticipating possible objections to CAMERA's scheme, Ini conjectures that "Anti-Israel editors will seize on anything to try to discredit people who attempt to challenge their problematic assertions, and will be all too happy to pretend, and announce, that a 'Zionist' cabal (the same one that controls the banks and Hollywood?) is trying to hijack Wikipedia."
Ini counsels that volunteers "might also want to avoid, for obvious reasons, picking a user name that marks you as pro-Israel, or that lets people know your real name." To further conceal the identity of CAMERA-organized editors, Ini warns, "don't forget to always log in before making [edits]. If you make changes while not logged in, Wikipedia will record your computer's IP address" -- a number that allows identification of the location of a computer connected to the Internet.
Hence, Zeq advises in a 21 March email that "One or more of you who want to take this route should stay away from any Israel realted [sic] articles for one month until they [sic] interact in a positive way with 100 wikipedia [sic] editors who would be used later to vote you as an administrator."
In addition, Zeq suggests making deliberately provocative edits to Palestine-related articles. He hopes that editors he assumes are Palestinian will delete these changes, and then CAMERA operatives could report them to administrators so they could be sanctioned and have their editing privileges suspended.
Passing propaganda as fact
"So, for example, imagine that you get rid of or modify a problematic sentence in an article alleging that 'Palestinian [sic] become suicide bombers to respond to Israel's oppressive policies.' You should, in parallel leave a comment on that article's discussion page (either after or before making the change). Avoid defending the edit by arguing that 'Israel's policies aren't 'oppression,' they are defensive. And anyway Palestinians obviously become suicide bombers for other reasons for example hate education!' Instead, describe how this sentence violates Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. One of the core principles is that assertions should adhere to a Neutral Point of View, usually abbreviated NPOV. (The opposite of NPOV is POV, or Point of View, which is basically another way of saying subjective statement, or opinion.) So it would be best to note on the discussion page that 'This sentence violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy, since the description of Israel's policies as 'oppressive' is an opinion. In addition, it is often noted by Middle East experts that one of the reasons Palestinians decide to become suicide bombers is hate education and glorification of martyrdom in Palestinian society ...'"
In fact, there have been numerous studies debunking claims about Palestinian "hate education," or "glorification of martyrdom" causing suicide bombings (such as Dying to Win by University of Chicago political scientist Robert Pape) though this claim remains a favorite canard of pro-Israel activists seeking to distract attention from the effects of Israel's occupation and other well-documented and systematic human rights abuses in fueling violence.
Zeq specifically names articles targeted for this kind of treatment including those on the 1948 Palestinian Exodus, Causes of the 1948 Palestinian exodus, Hamas, Hizballah, Arab citizens of Israel, anti-Zionism, al-Nakba, the Palestinian people, and the Palestinian right of return.
Interestingly the CAMERA editors also target the article on the early Islamic period concept of Dhimmi, a protected status for non-Muslims which historically allowed Jews to thrive in Muslim-ruled lands while other Jews were being persecuted in Christian Europe. Pro-Israel activists have often tried to portray the concept of Dhimmi as akin to the Nuremberg laws in order to denigrate Muslim culture and justify ahistorical Zionist claims that Jews could never live safely in majority Muslim countries.
Also among the emails is a discussion about how to alter the article on the massacre of Palestinian civilians in the village of Deir Yassin by Zionist militiamen on 9 April 1948. Unable to debunk the facts of the massacre outright, the CAMERA activists hunt for quotes from "reputable historians" who can cast doubt on it. Their strategy is not dissimilar from those who attempt to present evolution, or global climate change as "controversial" regardless of the weight of the scientific evidence, simply because the facts do not accord with their belief system.
Zeq has already made extensive edits to the Wikipedia article on Rachel Corrie, the American peace activist murdered by an Israeli soldier in the occupied Gaza Strip on 16 March 2003. As a result of these and other edits Zeq has himself been a controversial figure among Wikipedia editors, suggesting his own stealth tactics may not be working.
"We will go to war"
Zeq, however, counsels CAMERA operatives to be patient and lie low until they build up their strength. "We will go to war after we have build our army, equiped it trained [sic]," he wrote on 9 April. "So please if you want to win this war help us build ou[r] army. let's not just rush in and achieve nothing, or abit more than nothing [sic]."
- Download CAMERA's emails [PDF - 2.7 MB]




Truth Seeker-- as long as the USS liberty is never forgotten, the America first citizens will have justice on the murderers of our sailors one day hopefully sooner than later..
Interesting article, thanks Cherifa.
CAMERA already has at least 50 operatives "improving" articles with their hasbara on Wikipedia:
No wonder Wikipedia is so biased. There is a discussion going on here, on Wikipedia's Administrators Noticeboard. CAMERA has set up a Google group called Isra-Pedia where the Zionists can plot their Wikipedia assault.
The Wiki Admin Noticeboard page is interesting reading. Thankfully, most Wiki editors are outraged.
A senior Wiki editor has proposed a ban on the user named Zeq, but he refuses to admit that he was involved:
Also, someone has proposed that CAMERA be blacklisted as an unreliable source:
Since Zeq refuses to admit that he was involved in an orchestrated Zionist 'POV' assault on Wikipedia with CAMERA, one of the Wiki editors has done a linguistic analysis of the emails and Zeq's posts. Conclusion:
In your face propaganda, and to be honest I don't think they care if we know or not
Just more Israeli/Jewish lies
Because truth is such a commodity to be traded and debased, Wikipedia is subject to the furious bias of Zionist editors providing historical revisionism and propaganda views blessed with approval by the Zionist headquarter in Tel Aviv, fanatically Zionist Jewish professors and Foreign Minister.
About three years ago, I was stripped of my editing privilege by an oversensitive admin over my satirically ironic username "SiegHeilNeocon" which he considers inflammatory. I left the talk page created with substantive links to articles on Fascism and Neoconservativsm.
Currently I edit quite a few pages sparodically from time to time on non-political pages such as confidence trick and film trivia under another username.
Wikipedia is sometimes a good source of information, but for reliability consulting the encyclopedia in physical form is preferred -- at least it's "neutral". And the research at the library after obtaining the references on the Web.
Wikipedia is already compromised and undermined by the influx of Zionist megaphone morons with their historical revisionism and barely concealed racial hatred of the Arabs and Persians.
This is why its founder "Jimbo" can do nothing to quarantine the parasitic pests -- he let them be because Jews are Jews as he is 'deaf' to the complaints of respective Wiki administrations who believe truth and accuracy matter more than false, slanderous, revisionist anecdotes and propaganda.
the trees in this forest?
(we're outnumbered)
It's obvious Hebrew is Zeq's tongue language.
He would have flunked TOEFL exam. Apparently he does not care how he mangles English.
Zeq would have disguised the Trojan Horse attack on Wikipedia in conforming articles of interest to Zionist perspective if he simply compose the e-mails in Hebrew so they won't catch him consiring with CAMERA to vandalize the sensitive articles they consider antagonistic to their version of history from the point of "socio-cultural heritage" view in defense of racial supremacism.
I thought about leaving a comment on Wikilobby talk page to offer my view on the controversy ruminating about the true nature of a Zionist agenda, but decided not to because offering my opinion, even if stripped of choice "biased and inflammatory" words, will lead to my IP ban. The admins, pretending to be neutral, just despise the mention of "Zionist agenda" as though it's a conspiracy theory, making it automatically anti-Semitic, despite the evidence to the contrary (e-mail leak).
Wikipedia is an asinine waste of time trying to tell the truth of history on the Middle East on the state of Israel and Palestine, Iraq and Iran in edits only to be repeatedly reversed, resulting in edit wars leading to bans, because Wikipedia itself knows it is compromised by political correctness in service of nationalistic biases.
- good versus evil, covert activity, a [partially] thwarted Zionist conspiracy, allegations and denials, a forensic [linguistic] investigation,, a gallant 'expose', and even a lynch mob - what more could you want?