Why has the media been giving the election to Obama, they want Mac.


Maybe some of you noticed that back in December or around then of 2007 that the mainstream media started turning on Hillary, and supporting Obama. They began attacking her credibility and honesty, like when they kept running that story about her planting questions in the audience. They also wanted to make the voters believe that she was taking their votes for granted. And it worked like a charm. Obama took nearly all of the early primary states, almost swept Super Tuesday, swept the Potamac, etc.  He's basically had the nomination locked up since Super Tuesday.

So why is the media backing Obama so hard ? Because they know that he will be very easy to beat in Novermber. Simply put, they want John McCain to be the next president.

You may point out that the media has been pretty tough on Obama the past few weeks with the constant talk about  Reverend Wright’s words or the bitter voters gaffe Obama made. But it’s very evident that has not , and will  not hurt Obama with Democratic primary voters, not that it would even make a difference because he essentially won the nomination before the media started attacking him. They just wanted to put all of this in the minds of general election voters right now, the more often you hear a lie or smear the more likely it will resonate with you. Whether it be subconsciously or consciously.

McCain will easily destroy Obama. I think it will be at least a 10 point margin. The reason being that most Americans are such brainwashed sheep. They really do believe that McCain will protect them better from the threat of radical Muslim Islamic Jihadist Islamofacism. They like having a “tough guy” as president. A lot of people honestly believe that Obama is a Muslim, even those who say they don’t, and that he will be soft national defense and the “war on terror”. And the Republicans are going to talk about that non stop during the general election. Just imagine what would happen if another tape from “Osama Bin Laden” surfaces right before the election, or something happens with Iran. Obama stands no chance.

McCain’s so called “maverick” status is going to help him a lot too in winning the votes of “sane minded” Independents and Democrats.  

Why is the media backing John McCain ? Well it’s no secret that our mainstream media is fully controlled by Zionists. They want the most blood thirsty  candidate to win, one who will do Israel’s bidding with a huge smile on his face, and can be fully trusted to be as ruthless as possible. That man is John McCain. He was lobbying for an attack on Iraq back in the 90’s. He even wrote a letter to Bush in 2001 asking him to take down Saddam. This man literally sings about nuking another country, Iran. He’s one of the biggest supporters of the Iraq war today and wants to fully carry out the Zionist plan of carving Iraq up into smaller states, even committing to stay there 100 years to get it done. Don’t forget that back when McCain was running for president in 2000, that all the neocon Zionists such as Bill Kristol were backing McCain, and not George Bush. McCain is the best possible candidate for Israel.

Why don’t they trust Obama ? It’s no secret that Zionsts are the most paranoid people on earth. They see that he has surrounded himself with many “anti Semites” AKA people who are honest and close to being objective about Israel. I’m not just talking about Rev Wright and Louis Farrakhan. I’m talking about some of his actual policy advisers, such as Samantha Powers, Merrill 'Tony' McPeak, Zbigniew Brzezinski, etc. Even though Obama has gotten on his knees and pleaded with the AIPAC crowd to give him a chance, they still don’t trust him. Israeli newspapers like to give ratings to the presidential candidates that they believe will be most favorable to Israel and Obama usually scores relatively low. Obama also has a history of supporting the Palestinian cause back in his days as an Illinois legislator. Don’t get me wrong though, Obama  is no savior. He has declared his full pledged support to Israel and has promised to do their bidding. All that talk about nuking Iran, protecting Israel, etc, it means something. Obama should be taken at his word, even though some of us may believe he’s just saying those things to get elected. But they’re not buying it. What if, in the unlikely event, Obama tries to take a near even handed approach to solving the Palestinian Israeli conflict. Near even would be 80% in favor of Israel 20% Palestine, as opposed to the current 100 to 0. What if Obama says he’s drawing the line at Iran and doesn’t want to carry out Israel’s plan of “democratizing” the entire Middle East. That’s unacceptable.

McCain is their man. He would enjoy drinking the blood of everybody who poses a security “threat” to Israel. Clinton, who is hawkish too, still wouldn’t be as hawkish and blood thirsty as McCain. Plus they know she could beat McCain in a general, so the Zionists wouldn’t want to risk having a political Zionist like Hillary in office rather than an ideological one like McCain.

 

John McCain is going to be the next president. God help us all, especially all of the soon to be dead Iranians.

 

Posted in

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Hilary is a KNOWN commodity as was Bill.....

 

 

Ognir | Wed, 2008-04-23 01:21

and you KNOW how long a black president would last, right?

and you KNOW how long mccain would last?

howabout the klingon?

Face_i_t.

Grim Reaper | Wed, 2008-04-23 01:26

And Bill Clinton didn't take out Saddam, and he also had Netanyahu so angry one time , over I think it was settlements , that he said he would "burn Washington"

Muhammad Ali | Wed, 2008-04-23 02:01

ooh oh.

Grim Reaper | Wed, 2008-04-23 03:23

If Israhell did blow D.C. off the face of the map, it would be the only thing I would ever forgive them for. (Hopefully D.C. would return the favor, sionce they're in the habit of bending over and blowing one another anyway.)

Nonesuch101 | Wed, 2008-04-23 04:01

will surely get us nuked. He's a follower of Kahn and Kahn believed that nukes could be used tactically. Oh Lord have mercy on this nation of nuclear knaves!

Ehud Olmerts Wo... | Wed, 2008-04-23 04:25

With something like 70+ percent of Americans against the war, Bush's approval in the 20s & the WMD lies told by the neocons being common knowledge. & with a huge amount of people questioning 9/11 now.

Infinite | Wed, 2008-04-23 17:18

unclesam wakeup

How much “MONEY” exists on Earth?
Take a WILD guess!

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator