Ron Paul delegates pull an upset in the Northwest. 107 delegates pick Ron Paul while 4 chose McCain
Well, I didn't expect this. It makes me feel the tinge of hope.
I still have not removed Ron Paul bumper sticker from the back of the vehicle. It will stay there as long as Ron Paul is in for the long haul to Republican National Convention.
John McCain's reputation as a temperamental, megalomanical lunatic (not to mention traitorous bastard) should give conservative voters a pause. Ron Paul is the choice; otherwise McCain will carry out a third Bush term -- more wars, economic disaster, fiscal crush and worsening crises. The United States cannot afford another disastrous administration.
F*ck McCain and his hanger-on former bitter rival and now sycophant Mitt Romney who hope for a veep spot. Ron Paul is the way to go because he will initiate the executive orders to end the war, eliminate the IRS, repeal unjust and unconstitutional laws and make the government smaller & more transparent in accountability.
_______________
DailyPaul: Something Significant Happened in Spokane
Posted April 22nd, 2008 by Goodbytes
Despite the siren call of the warm spring weather last Saturday, a record number of hopeful Republicans turned out for the 4/12/08 Spokane County Republican Convention held at Lewis & Clark High School. Though disappointed that I was unable to participate as a delegate due to a prolonged, out-of-state work commitment during our February Caucus, I knew it would be instructive to see first-hand how the process worked and so I volunteered at the Ron Paul information booth. I figured that even if I couldn't sling a ballot, at least I could show up to discuss the issues with the curious and uninformed - and maybe even help sway a vote or two.
With people arriving at 7:30am and some staying past 9pm to finish counting the ballots and conclude the work, few could have predicted that this event would turn into the marathon that it did. Approximately 540 delegates showed up to vote for 111 delegates and a platform to take to the upcoming WA State convention. There were many young people in attendance and amazingly, over half of the delegates were first time participants which is a promising sign of renewed participation in our political process. It is a common story that many new people decided to get involved after years of apathetic inaction. They cite an escalating sense of alarm and frustration over the Iraqi War debacle, unprecedented deficit spending, porous borders and a general sense that we have lost control over our party and our country.
Listening to the morning speeches from WA State gubernatorial candidate Dino Rossi and others was both informative and reassuring that we’ve got some talented people running for various offices. One of the highlights of the morning was a rousing speech by Rob Chase that echoed the themes of Ron Paul’s candidacy. Yet as the day wore on and the platform was debated and voting ensued, it became increasingly apparent that what I was witnessing was something far more significant than what I expected. This was no ordinary, pre-ordained, rubber-stamp-the-party-line-and-get-out-before-lunch kind of an affair. What was unfolding through the arduous and combative convention process was nothing less than a stunning GRASSROOTS REVOLT!
It was obvious from the beginning that the McCain campaign came prepared to win by trying to dominate the event. In the basketball stadium where we met, one certainly couldn’t miss their HUGE 40'x10' McCain For President sign that took up half of a wall and dwarfed all other signage from other campaigns (I wonder how much that must have cost?). Even though they brought in professional hired guns in the form of well-paid staff (that nobody seemed to recognize as being from our community), the day was carried by the passionate, well-organized and extremely dedicated Ron Paul campaign.
In the 6th District meeting that represented the largest delegate total, it was decided that each delegate publicly declare their preference for a Presidential candidate before the voting could actually began (not sure which camp asked for that). Throughout the day we witnessed the McCain team doing everything within their power to try to dominate the agenda and sway the voting (as expected). Their tactics were both subtle and overt as they tried to confuse the newbie Ron Paul conventioneers by quoting obscure rules and procedures. At other times, they used heavy-handed, authoritative sounding directives and gamesmanship in attempts to promote their chosen delegates and derail the Ron Paul delegates and positions. At one point, Yoko managed to prevent one of them from trying to steal an unattended Ron Paul delegate list.
Also notable in the 6th District meeting, the McCain people employed a multi-media projector that prominently displayed on the front wall exactly which (McCain) delegates they expected everyone to vote for. After another round of protests and debate, their projector was eventually turned off (almost by force) and their subsequent attempts to dominate the process were systematically beaten back as we fought steadily throughout a very long and exhausting day of arguing, motioning and voting. This meeting eventually concluded well into the evening after three time consuming rounds of voting and hand counting.
In the 3rd District meeting, a female delegate became disruptive which temporarily brought activities to a halt while a search ensued for the Sergeant-at-Arms to bring the meeting back to order.
In several of the instances mentioned above, the only thing that saved the day were some alert Ron Paul people who were willing to display some intestinal fortitude by literally standing up and questioning authority and/or challenging the status quo. Courage is what it takes to be successful in a political process where the war of ideas can inflame emotions and sometimes manifests as a verbal boxing match. Convention politics is a forum where big egos try to dominate the discussion and silence dissent. Small, organized groups promote their agendas and sway the votes through a Byzantine set of rules that few people know and understand. Those in powerful positions don’t hesitate to use those rules to their advantage, even squelching debate at times.
So the fact that the upstart Ron Paul camp was able to pull it all together in a relatively short period of time to upset the status quo and soundly defeat the McCain contingent was an astonishing achievement. We should all be extremely proud of this recent success, as it is the latest and most tangible example to date of how far we have come in taking back our party.
Still, we would do well to remember that much of the drama was primarily an expression of multiple passionate viewpoints. This cathartic process strengthens our local Republican Party and proves to the skeptics that we have a vibrant and evolving, non-monolithic group of thoughtful people that is capable of self-reflection and change.
Here are some of the most important accomplishments that came out of this Convention:
1) 107 out of 111 delegates were elected who favor Ron Paul and his positions. Only 4 delegates were elected who favor McCain. This was a HUGE and unexpected upset that surpassed the wildest expectations of everyone in our group.
2) Perhaps the most far-reaching and controversial platform position originated from the grass roots organization. It was a statement under the National Sovereignty And Defense heading, “Limiting the executive privilege of committing troops to police actions to a duration of 180 days, without a Congressional Declaration of War” (as the Constitution mandates). The McCain people fought this plank VERY hard and tried to add an amendment gutting the intent of this position by changing the language to a simple statement to "support our troops". After approx. 30 minutes of back and forth arguments, motions and multiple votes, the McCain amendment was soundly defeated 280 to 170. As stated in the Spokane Spokesman Review, "The platform statement on the use of troops didn’t specifically name Iraq, but County Chairman Curt Fackler and representatives of the McCain campaign agreed it was essentially a repudiation of the current war policy and the course that McCain has said he would take if elected".
3) The overwhelming nature of our victory suggests the strong possibility for future changes in our local area. Indeed the groundwork has been laid to influence future leadership and platform direction as we have successfully outmaneuvered and overturned the status quo in our County and helped shape the debate moving forward.
We have proven once again that a small group of dedicated, organized and tenacious people can make a huge difference, the end result of which was a dramatic tipping point that happened right here in our own backyard. If similar stories can successfully play out in other parts of America, it would mark the beginning of the end of the Neo-Con grip on the Republican Party and a chance to return to the traditional core values and principles that made our country great.
John Zimmerman
Spokane, WA




Thanks for posting it. The least I expect from this campaign is an opportunity for Ron Paul to give a speech at the convention. Of course the best thing that could happen is for McTraitor to fall off a cliff or be prosecuted for breaking his own fascistic campaign rules or be disqualified for not being a natural-born citizen. Fat chance, but wtf else do we have to look forward to, eh? Take care.
AIPAC
Apartheid Israel Placing America in the Crosshairs
–or–
American-Israeli Pimping-America Committee
Nothing personal, but to quote from something I read today by Dick Eastman, and happen to agree with:
"You may want to ask Hillary Clinton or John McCain or Barrak Obama or Ron Paul if they know what M3 is. (Note to suckers for Ron Paul -- the adoption of a gold standard is not going to affect the advantages of the money of the super rich -- they will not use the gold except as a speculative commodity (they have all the gold now --and so they want Ron Paul to fix it for them so that American debt slaves have to pay their debts in gold (gold which must be borrowed from the super rich in order for the American debtor to pay back in gold -- and of course the debtors will charge an inflation premium added to any debt payed in paper (checkbook paycheck money not backed by gold.) "
Last comment was mine, btw. And, like I said, nothing personal intended, I assure you, &C.
DOESN'T THE LACK OF CHOICE BOTHER YOU AT ALL?
..even a little? Figure it out.
Nonesuch; you are right about the gold-scamdard.
Might be able to make teeth out of gold; but it really ain't food.
Or salvation. More like another american revultion/civil war.
in order to reinstitute a true Constitutional gold standard I think, which would mean a real revolution.
I think the rot has advanced so far that neiher gold nor silver can save this system.
Looks like anything new will have to be built on the ashes of the old system.
Oh yeah. The same mental giant who said all this stuff, all in the same rant:
"Ron Paul's libertarian attack on the Federal Reserve is part of the conspiracy to impose the Amero."
"Also Ron Paul is the one man keeping the American people from raising up a really good independent candidate who would landslide McCain-Hillary-Obama."
Ron Paul is a liar on a level with Bush and Cheney and Clinton and McCain and Obama because he's not a 9?11 truther.
"Ron Paul is a fraud -- a quack."
Judging from the plausibility of his charges, if we were to put our economy on an "irony standard," Mr. Eastman would be sleeping behind a soup kitchen for a good spell.
Do you agree with Mr. Dick on all those absurdities as well?
If a gold standard is so inescapably advantageous for the bankers—and if the rest of us would suffer unduly—then why do you suppose those bankers aren't too keen on Ron Paul's free-market version of it?
The problem with folks like Mr. Eastman is that they never take the time to read Ron Paul's philosophical writings: they just hear the term "gold standard" and "abolish this," or "cut that," and they assume he wants to just flip a switch and institute such things under the current conditions of huge central planning; notions which Paul has always said would be disastrous. That would indeed hurt the people. Mr. Eastman and other hacks know this, but they apparently have an agenda other than honest critique of Paul's economic philosophy.
Dick-E-Dick should read this article from 1985, on Ron Paul's theory on how to transition toward a commodity money system.
Mr. Tool should also watch this debate from 1983, where Paul absolutely levels FedRes governor Partee in a debate on monetary policy. It's the same video where he predicts the 1987 crash. (Yeah. Ron Paul, the fraud—always predicting all these economic crises, like a kook!)
Until he provides a scholarly argument to support his ludicrous character assasinations disguised as honest aversions, Mr. Dick is just another zero-credibility prick.
Oh yeah, I forgot this doozy from The Dickster:
"The Fed is an institution that the US still has the ability to bring under control and use for our good."
Yeah, Dick. Let's keep trying to make this square-wheeled go-cart roll up that hill! The government is doing it all for our own good! PFFFTTT!!!!
BTW: No offense taken, though next time you should consider citing a scholarly source to your arguments in these areas. You said it's nothing personal, but by merely bringing a kiddie-pool pisser like Eastman into the discussion with Ron Paul is an insult from the get-go. And I don't mean to be a jerk: I have just been battling malevalently-calculating Paul-bashers for about 13 months now, and make no apologies for tearing into folks over the BS. I take the Constitution and the Republic very seriously; frauds like The Dickster don't.
Apartheid Israel Placing America in the Crosshairs
–or–
American-Israeli Pimping-America Committee
Yes, I personally would agree with all of those 'absurdities' as well, tho' I don't always agree with Mr. Eastman's commentaries, sources and perspectives. He's a very prolific writer and poster of Constitutional, Financial/ banking/ Govt. fraud, &c.material at the two sites of his I'm aware of :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/frameup/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RichardKoshimizu-topics/
and with his email lists. From all I've ever seen or could keep up with, I find the overwhelming majority of his views to be correct, self-evident, and perfectly coherent and compelling.
I should have added that, obviously, Dick Eastman is no more a proponent of the FED than you or I-- and a warning to those who click the detainthis link: it's a .pdf file, so you might want to 'right-click and save' if you intend to peruse it, so as to not freeze up your 'puter.
"Dick Eastman is no more a proponent of the FED than you or I am-- of the FED as it exists and stands", that is. He apparently advocates the american people co-opting it... just reading your file now, and thanks.
Contributed by Dick Eastman
Wednesday, 16 April 2008
Ron Paul's libertarian attack on the Federal Reserve is part of the conspiracy to impose the Amero. We must nationalize
the Fed. The Fed is an institution that the US still has the ability to bring under control and use for our good. Under
national control and with nationalist policies the Feds powers could serve us well, where in the past it has served those
using it to plunder us. But we must not allow it to be destroyed and monetary power given to an international central
bank over which the American people and their goverment have absolutely no control. Let the people take over the FED
and use it for the good of the people as it has never been used because of those who owned and controlled it in the past.
Talk of eliminating the FED and going on an international gold standard is a proposal of the the shearest ignorance of
what is really wrong and of what is really needed to set things right.
Ron Paul is a fraud -- a quack. The Federal Reserve System, if nationalized and run as a branch of the Treasury for the
good of the people of the US instead of for the good of international bankers is all that is needed. For the US to go on a
gold standard when the bankers have all the gold is shearest idiocy. Also Ron Paul is the one man keeping the American
people from raising up a really good independent candidate who would landslide McCain-Hillary-Obama.
And don't think for one second that Ron Paul is not exactly the liar Bush and Cheney and Clinton and McCain and
Obama are when he says that 9/11 was not a false-flag frame-up. That alone should have been enough to tell you what
he is from the very beginning.
Related Articles:
Ron Paul never ceases to disappoint me: The 'threat of a recession'
Immigration, Multiculturalism, U.S. Elections and Jewish Gatekeepers
Ron Paul’s 'Permanent Revolution'
Ron Paul Quotes Leon Trotsky to Declare that the Jewish 'Ron Paul Revolution' Is 'Permanent'
5 Reasons Why I Don’t Support Ron Paul
On Ron Paul and the Orwellian Doublethink in the Zionist Controlled 'Alternative' Media
Why Ron Paul won’t object to the NH election fraud
Another Fools' Revolution
The 'Ron Paul Revolution' Post 'Super Tuesday'
Source: ZioPedia.org
ZioPedia - All There Is To Know About Zionism
http://www.ziopedia.org Powered by Joomla! Generated: 25 April, 2008, 05:52
At the risk off pissing off our friend Andrew Winkler, of www.ziopedia.org, here's the full text of your attachment:
Ron Paul is a fraud
Except that didn't come out right:: my introduction and it's title ended up at the bottom.
Okay. You agree with all those sophomoric charges and ad hominems. So this is not a serious discussion.
But just in case there is hope for those who are mystified by all these self-styled truth policemen with a rock's sense of irony, consider this minor logical detail:
If Ron Paul is a liar on par with those war criminals because he does not trumpet a 9-11 conspiracy theory, then you're saying that he actually knows what we know—or, he knows who did it—and is concealing it. Now, all you and Mr. Dick have to do is reason that away.
You also have to accept the notion that, according to Eastman's logic, all the people in the world who aren't 9-11 truthers are also "liars" because of it. See how ludicrous the charge is now?
"I don't think the refs conspired to rig all the NBA games last season," opines Joe Public.
"Oh yeah?" It's obvious that you're lying, because all MY evidence points to a conspiracy!" replies Jane Doe.
Mr. Eastman has not even approached the start line; he hasn't gotten up off the floor yet since wiping it with himself and whatever is remaining of his credibility. This is not a serious discussion.
Also: The empty charge that Ron Paul is trying to slip the Amero (and the NAU, I would presume) under the doorway is one for the satire section. It's not serious.
AIPAC
Apartheid Israel Placing America in the Crosshairs
–or–
American-Israeli Pimping-America Committee
You're awful naive if you don't think Ron Paul knows precisely who perpetrated 9/11. He knew the day it happened (if not beforehand), I positively assure you.
And you're right: this is not a serious discussion therefore.
100% TRAiTORS; lest they SPEAK OUT.
Receiving a taxpayer subsidy is no excuse for selling out.