It's kind of obvious that it's not the action but the reaction that is important.

Something as dramatic as 911 required the application of the dialectical (action + reaction = new outcome) to fan out a timeframe sufficient enough to make a quick culpability case nearly impossible.

The principle of the dialectical has and continues to serve it's purpose as here it is 7 years later and we're still coming to "smoking gun" conclusions.

Keeping in context of Flight 93,  it seems like it would have made more sense to simply down the actual passenger jet with passengers and luggage leaving limbs and DNA soaked soil, box cutters and chaff blowing all around the fields. But this was not the way it was allowed to play out because it would have led the  objectivity of the popular opinion to a nearly immediate conclusion thereby freeing up critical analysis to move on to culpability way way too soon. The "reaction" to the "action" would be unuseable in any real sense and is bad "false flag business".

The "action" (the part of the event that is so held by the unsuspecting mass conscience as the most important) involved a combination of the heroic "Let's Roll!" sentiment yet there is only a crater in the ground. Huh? The "reaction" to that "action" is still in the "reacting" phase 7 years later.

Every knuckleheaded fiction and theory has been written and debunked, we've looked at Cleveland, white Lear jets, doctored photo's, and just recently the US Geological Service all of a sudden has us with a pre-existing, pre-911 "scar" that was "bullseyed". Imagine that. After 7, nearly 8 years we now "know" Flight 93 did not crash in a field in Pennsylvania.

But in those 8 years while we've been postulating and debunking, factioning and fighting, in other words: "reacting", presto-change-o! we are truly domestically enslaved, our existence yoked like cows forced to underwrite the permanent full time occupational/colonial presence in Iraq, preparing for the same in Iran, Syria and Pakistan.

And this psyop control through the "reaction" to the action of Flight 93 is duplicated in it's own version for the Pentagon, the Twin Towers and Building 7.

The "reaction" has stalled things just perfectly long enough that even when we know that the culprits know that we now know who they are and how they did it, we also know that they also know that they, with arrogant smirks, can simply say "so what". (I personally believe this is even intentional and was expected and is why something so obviously staged and then so ridiculously explained away could be so callously flaunted, flaunted in the sense by the sheer media blackout of any questioning of it, in front of that sector of the population who they had to know would know better from the start.)

The "dialectical" as translated into a political dynamic has been used successfully by that historical group executing the Zionist/Communist nation/state destabilization and overthrow scheme in modern times since the French Revolution, it's most spectacular test being the Jewish led Bolshevik uprising, culminating in 911. It's been used in the countless often bewildering "national liberation" movements you've undoubtedly been made aware of in the last 50 years from Northern Ireland to El Salvador to South Africa and more recently East Timor.

The history of the application of the dialectical on influencing the outcome of a predetermined desire by the powerful entities shaping contemporary times is a fascinating study and those conditioned to recognize the dialectical in its expression in most of what is sold to us as "spontaneous" uprisings and events, etc. (the "action") by the MSM can skip quickly through the reactionary phase and begin targeting where the culpability lies and quickly begin informing, educating and taking even physical leadership action if required.

..that melts steal, yet pockets papieren bitte!
..crummyz losin' it; must be all the senseless murders.
..what are the chances that he uses fluoride toothpaste?