Thanks for this. Long but worth it. Pretty interesting to say the least.

What I find amazing is that the whole modern Zionist induced mess has it's root's in revolutionary 1917 Russia with Putins' core statist idealogical beliefs molded by the early rule-buttressing CHEKA at the same time the Bush family has it's root's tied to financing that same revolutionary 1917 Russian period.

Today before our very eyes we see puppet V. Putin dancing, on a global stage, alongside puppet G.W. Bush, the controlling strings of which lead up to the same puppetmasters hand (Rothschild?).

And just like Putin's reborn KGB Soviet state and Bush's new "war on terrorism" state, both have an internal and external enemy which they rely on to fabricate the necessary propaganda to stay in power.

Interestingly it appear's that the string pulling controlling hand - the puppetmaster - must continually keeps it's global puppet show administered with a continual "enemy" whether it be the cold war or, more in the present, the new balancing act of power using the tug-o-war of controlling energy resources, etc. In other words it's not so much the ambition for oil or gas but the maintenance of the animosity between the parties (the US and the USSR) who are after control of that oil and gas which the puppetmaster must insure carries on.

While the video allows us to see what appear's to be a ruthless leftover KGB agent rising to a new Soviet leadership role consolidating a vertical state power stance as well as glimpses of vertical powermongerers Bush and Cheney, it is careful to leave out any glimpse or reference to levels of power above (Rothschild?) these two seemingly idealogically different national entities which we know has to exist because both of these entities have common denominator ties to that 1917 Russian revolutionary era. That common denominator doesn't make sense otherwise.

Without the idealogically opposed standoff between "capitalism" (US) and "communism" (USSR), the powers level above this scenario have no "enemy" player with which to empower their own position.

Does this explain then the perpetual chaos and bewildering so-called "spontaneous" conflict that continually afflicts societies everywhere? For instance didn't "Perestroika" seem like a weird era? Referring to the teary-eyed Russian "activist" interviewed toward's the end of the clip, devastated, barely able to talk, when it became apparent that what looked like the demise of Soviet communism and the perhaps beginning of a true liberty based Russian era was all of sudden gone with the turn of events leading up to Putin becoming Russia's leader.

The prospect of a tranquil liberty based society where prosperity and individualism are allowed to flourish are NEVER allowed to blossom. These conditions are the arch-enemy of criminal politicians who can only consolidate power through chaos and criminality whether it be spontaneous or artificially induced in origin. If there is little or no criminality then the criminality is blatantly invented and carried out or the social conditions modified to create criminal behaviour. Either way it has to exist and perpetuate for the statist to assume, maintain and expand control.

This is just part of the formula. The global puppetmasters must have individual nation players who through internal destabilization are predictably controllable AND the relations between nation entities must be kept destablized for the grand puppet show to go on.

It explains the bewildered look i got from a person who just watched it, and told me about it (how terrible Putin is); when i explained that he's just like the rest; the other side of a coin.

!!!NOW WHO TF CONTROLS THE MINT!!!

That is the $100,000 question when you get to the point of seeing well past the puppet's and the tired old propaganda.

Who can place, persuade and dismiss the puppet's? It's simple to declare "it's a Rothschild" or the NWO or the "global elite" or the "illuminati" but those are not satisfying answer's.

The layer between the puppet's at the nation-state level and those who produce and direct the global puppet show is what is carefully cloaked and guarded at seemingly all costs.

Is it personalities that attend Bilderberger including Zionist Likudians as well as "lords" from the banking dynasties who control the MINT? Is "Bilderberger" just distraction?

The Rothschild's have designed, chosen the land and underwritten the Supreme Court in Jerusalem: www.planetquo.com/Illuminati-Design-And-Symbolism-In-The-Israeli-Supreme-Court-Building

One of the Rothschild's is featured on a circulating commemorative Israeli coin for his participation in early Zionist settlements and on which is engraved "Father of the Jewish Settlement": www.commem.com/prod02o.htm 

These are interesting marriages between a banking dynasty and Zionism. After all Zionism is just  relabeled communism, an idealogy which ironically, would be sold to the masses as incompatible with a "banking dynasty".

The following is a conversation with Mr. Ron Supinski of the Public Information Department of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank.

CALLER - Mr. Supinski, does my country own the Federal Reserve System?

MR. SUPINSKI - We are an agency of the government.

CALLER - That's not my question. Is it owned by my country?

MR. SUPINSKI - It is an agency of the government created by Congress.

CALLER - Is the Federal Reserve a Corporation?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes...

CALLER - Does my government own any of the stock in the Federal Reserve?

MR. SUPINSKI - No, it is owned by the member banks.

CALLER - Are the member banks private corporations?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes.

CALLER - Are Federal Reserve Notes backed by anything?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, by the assets of the Federal Reserve but, primarily by the power of Congress to lay tax on the people.

CALLER - Did you say, by the power to collect taxes is what backs Federal Reserve Notes?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes.......

CALLER - What are the total assets of the Federal Reserve?

MR. SUPINSKI - The San Francisco Bank has $36 billion in assets.

CALLER - What are these assets composed of?

MR. SUPINSKI - Gold, the Federal Reserve Bank itself and government securities.

CALLER - What value does the Federal Reserve Bank carry gold per oz. on their books?

MR. SUPINSKI - I don't have that information but the San Francisco Bank has $1.6 billion in gold.

CALLER - Are you saying the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has $1.6 billion in gold, the bank itself and the balance of the assets is government securities?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes.

CALLER - Where does the Federal Reserve get Federal Reserve Notes from?

MR. SUPINSKI - They are authorized by the Treasury.

CALLER - How much does the Federal Reserve pay for a $10 Federal Reserve Note?

MR. SUPINSKI - Fifty to seventy cents.

CALLER - How much do they pay for a $100.00 Federal Reserve Note?

MR. SUPINSKI - The same fifty to seventy cents.

CALLER - To pay only fifty cents for a $100.00 is a tremendous gain, isn't it?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes

CALLER - According to the US Treasury, the Federal Reserve pays $20.60 per 1,000 denomination or a little over two cents for a $100.00 bill, is that correct?

MR. SUPINSKI - That is probably close.

CALLER - Doesn't the Federal Reserve use the Federal Reserve Notes that cost about two cents each to purchase US Bonds from the government?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, but there is more to it than that.

CALLER - Basically, that is what happens?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, basically you are correct.

CALLER - How many Federal Reserve Notes are in circulation?

MR. SUPINSKI - $263 billion and we can only account for a small percentage.

CALLER - Where did they go?

MR. SUPINSKI - People's mattress, buried in their back yards and illegal drug money.

CALLER - Since the debt is payable in Federal Reserve Notes, how can the $4 trillion national debt be paid-off with the total Federal Reserve Notes in circulation?

MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know.

CALLER - If the Federal Government would collect every Federal Reserve Note in circulation would it be mathematically possible to pay the $4 trillion national debt?

MR. SUPINSKI - No.

CALLER - Am I correct when I say, $1 deposited in a member bank $8 can be lent out through Fractional Reserve Policy?

MR. SUPINSKI - About $7.

CALLER - Correct me if I am wrong but, $7 of additional Federal Reserve Notes were never put in circulation. But, for lack of better words were 'created out of thin air' in the form of credits and the two cents per denomination were not paid either. In other words, the Federal Reserve Notes were not physically printed but, in reality were created by a journal entry and lent at interest. Is that correct?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes.

CALLER - Is that the reason there are only $263 billion Federal Reserve Notes in circulation?

MR. SUPINSKI - That is part of the reason.

CALLER - Am I mistaking that when the Federal Reserve Act was passed (on Christmas Eve) in 1913, it transferred the power to coin and issue our nation's money and to regulate the value thereof from Congress to a Private corporation. And my country now borrows what should be our own money from the Federal Reserve (a private corporation) plus interest. Is that correct and the debt can never be paid off under the current money system of country?

MR. SUPINSKI - Basically, yes.

CALLER - I smell a rat, do you?

MR. SUPINSKI - I am sorry, I can't answer that, I work here.

CALLER - Has the Federal Reserve ever been independently audited?

MR. SUPINSKI - We are audited.

CALLER - Why is there a current House Resolution 1486 calling for a complete audit of the Federal Reserve by the GAO and why is the Federal Reserve resisting?

MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know.

CALLER - Does the Federal Reserve regulate the value of Federal Reserve Notes and interest rates?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes.

CALLER - Explain how the Federal Reserve System can be Constitutional if, only the Congress of the US, which comprises of the Senate and the House of representatives has the power to coin and issue our money supply and regulate the value thereof? (Article 1 Section 1 and Section 8) nowhere, in the Constitution does it give Congress the power or authority to transfer any powers granted under the Constitution to a private corporation or, does it?

MR. SUPINSKI - I am not an expert on constitutional law. I can refer you to our legal department.

CALLER - I can tell you I have read the Constitution. It does NOT provide that any power granted can be transferred to a private corporation. Doesn't it specifically state, all other powers not granted are reserved to the States and to the citizens? Does that mean to a private corporation?

MR. SUPINSKI - I don't think so, but we were created by Congress.

CALLER - Would you agree it is our country and it should be our money as provided by our Constitution?

MR. SUPINSKI - I understand what you are saying.

CALLER - Why should we borrow our own money from a private consortium of bankers? Isn't this why we had a revolution, created a separate sovereign nation and a Bill of Rights?

MR. SUPINSKI - (Declined to answer).

CALLER - Has the Federal Reserve ever been declared constitutional by the Supreme Court?

MR. SUPINSKI - I believe there has been court cases on the matter.

CALLER - Have there been Supreme Court Cases?

MR. SUPINSKI - I think so, but I am not sure.

CALLER - Didn't the Supreme Court declare unanimously in A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. vs. US and Carter vs. Carter Coal Co. the corporative-state arrangement an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power?

("The power conferred is the power to regulate. This is legislative delegation in its most obnoxious form; for it is not even delegation to an official or an official body, presumptively disinterested, but to private persons." Carter vs. Carter Coal Co...)

MR. SUPINSKI - I don't know, I can refer you to our legal department.

CALLER - Isn't the current money system a house of cards that must fall because, the debt can mathematically never be paid-off?

MR. SUPINSKI - It appears that way. I can tell you have been looking into this matter and are very knowledgeable. However, we do have a solution.

CALLER - What is the solution?

MR. SUPINSKI - The Debit Card.

CALLER - Do you mean under the EFT Act (Electronic Funds Transfer)? Isn't that very frightening, when one considers the capabilities of computers? It would provide the government and all it's agencies, including the Federal Reserve such information as: You went to the gas station @ 2:30 and bought $10.00 of unleaded gas @ $1.41 per gallon and then you went to the grocery store @ 2:58 and bought bread, lunch meat and milk for $12.32 and then went to the drug store @ 3:30 and bought cold medicine for $5.62. In other words, they would know where we go, when we went, how much we paid, how much the merchant paid and how much profit he made. Under the EFT they will literally know everything about us. Isn't that kind of scary?

MR. SUPINSKI - Yes, it makes you wonder.

CALLER - I smell a GIANT RAT that has overthrown my constitution. Aren't we paying tribute in the form of income taxes to a consortium of private bankers?

MR. SUPINSKI - I can't call it tribute, it is interest.

CALLER - Haven't all elected officials taken an oath of office to preserve and defend the Constitution from enemies both foreign and domestic? Isn't the Federal Reserve a domestic enemy?

MR. SUPINSKI - I can't say that.

CALLER - Our elected officials and members of the Federal Reserve are guilty of aiding and abetting the overthrowing of my Constitution and that is treason. Isn't the punishment of treason death?

MR. SUPINSKI - I believe so.

CALLER - Thank you for your time and information and if I may say so, I think you should take the necessary steps to protect you and your family and withdraw your money from the banks before the collapse, I am.

MR. SUPINSKI - It doesn't look good.

CALLER - May God have mercy on the souls who are behind this unconstitutional and criminal act called the Federal Reserve. When the ALMIGHTY MASS awakens to this giant hoax, they will not take it with a grain of salt. It has been a pleasure talking to you and I thank you for your time. I hope you will take my advice before it does collapse.

MR. SUPINSKI - Unfortunately, it does not look good.

CALLER - Have a good day and thanks for your time.

MR. SUPINSKI - Thanks for calling.

(the above found about three quarters of the way down this page: www.planetquo.com/The-Rothschilds)

Actually took the time to view the video and found it to be well worth it.  Not only did it allow for a keener insight of Putin but, as has been noted by Mr. Perth, he IS the other side the two headed beast.

Amazing how so many 'enlightened' websites fawn over Putin/Russia and hope for Russia to stick it to Bush (us).  Perhaps more people need to not only view this but also think about the puppetmasters behind both Putin and the US.

Yeah, you can tell the Polish dude is a human being too.
One might say it's too bad he works for the devils,
but then we wouldn't have this interview; now would we?
We'd better get it together before people like him are replaced with machines that just send a flying terminator when you say any of the key words.

iT^iS+Good to see you!!