Now the Jews are Trying to Claim Richard Wagner!
According to Jewry:
Hitler was Jewish, Napoleon founded Israel in the late 1700s, Christopher Columbus was Jewish, Hitler founded Israel, Josef Stalin was NOT Jewish, Vlad Lenin was NOT Jewish, Prescott Bush was a genuine National Socialist, Henry Ford was a racist, anti-Semitic, Nazified lunatic, God is Jewish, and Satan is Jesus Christ (the Talmud, oh glory, glory, states that Jesus is burning in hell in a boiling vat of feces).
Needless to say, I see the pattern emerging here. Yhwh's little 'do gooders' also claimed Schopenhaur (a known anti-Jewite) and Goethe. WTF? Don't Jews know that Faust is really about "the Jew" and not "Satan"? lol
BTW, I researched the Germanic version of "Bjerknes" and found a Jewish surname of "Birgnes." The "J" in German is pronounced like a "Y" and the "G" would sound like a "K" in English. I already read in one of his posts that he was Jewish--I was correct that he has admitted to it. It wouldn't be a problem other than his agenda is a bit too 'obvious.'
As far as Condit, the Jewish-Germanic surname "Kundit" may well be in his "roots." Roosevelt, after all, was really a "Rosenfeld."
I wouldn't trust any Jews myself. I noticed that Ben Stein took charge of the growing reaction against "science" (i.e., creation and creative design). Hitler warned of this problem. He said that the Jews had a "sixth sense" and would sieze each and every opportunity open to them in order to control every front and faction which might turn against them or expose them. This is the very reason why Jewry MUST claim Hitler: they have to control the pro-Hitler movement because it is GROWING and getting out of control. They hate losing grips on anything. The same is true of the explosion of Islam. Too many are figuring out Jewry's little tricks. I find my own line of thinking to be much more in line with Arabs than Jews. Thank Jesus for me.
Anyway, here's the article on Wagner. Enjoy!
"As a composer, I find all of this troubling, since the music of Wagner as is inescapable as the music of other musical geniuses of the 19th century, and to ignore it totally is to ignore not only the music itself, but the seminal changes which Wagner wrought in the nature of music, its composition and its performance.
"To compound the irony, Wagner's influence is to be found in the work of many fine Jewish composers of the early twentieth century, including those who suffered persecution under the Nazis, and whose work is currently being re-discovered, performed and recorded, notably in the Decca Records "Entartete Musik" series. Wagner's influence is also to be heard in the work of the many accomplished Jewish composers who escaped from Europe, many of whom went to America to work in Hollywood, in the film industry. Wagner effectively "invented" many of the devices which found pertinent application in the creation of the great symphonic film scores of the 1930s, and the decades following. The controversy is not going to die quietly, and, as part of my own process of coming to terms with Wagner, I wish to explore further aspects of the various issues which arise in considering the place of Wagner's music in world culture.
"One aspect of Wagner's life keeps being mentioned, in passing, by writers and commentators, but it is always in passing, often literally in a footnote by biographers, and I have come to think that it deserves much more serious attention. The question arises: was Wagner Jewish ? Or, to be more accurate in terms of the facts, did Wagner think he might be Jewish? Or, to be even more specific, did Wagner think he might be of Jewish descent? From which arises the even more germane question, was Wagner afraid that he might be thought to be Jewish? While the probable answer to the latter question is "yes", a definite answer to questions relating to his parentage could only be provided by conducting a DNA testing, were this possible, on both Wagner himself, and his step-father, the successful actor and painter Ludwig Geyer (or on their descendants?)"
Hitler was a jew who was completely funded by the bankers who control the zionist entity-- get over it a'ready.*
*See Sutton's 'Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler'.
It's unconvincing. He cites too many Jewish sources.
I was listening to a recording yesterday and Lady Michele?? was going on about the Jews accusing Wagner of being Anti-S
http://www.tellingfilms.co.uk/audio/michele_renouf_april_2004.mp3
Fascinating presentation by Milady (I wish) Renouf, Og, and thanks for sharing that.
And EOWN-- how about we just dump controversial, incendiary Hitler (except as an object of historical study), and get with a modern, contemporaneous world objective that everyone can agree with (most, if not all of those neo-nazi groups are ashkenazi fronts), Truly, &C.
That's no big discovery. Condit's not. It's not inherantly pro-Jewish to say that Hitler was Jewish! Or that he supported Zionism. In fact I've been called an anti-semite for saying it. You only think it is because he seems to be your hero.
Thanks Infinite. Agreed (esp. about RP).
And Ehud's Worst, &c.: I certainly don't begrudge you your beliefs. An' if I'm not mistaken, there are more researchers perhaps nowworking at unraveling the ziddish Gordian Knot of history than ever-- yje puzzle gets closer to solving every day, and who knows what truths will yet unfold? I happen to think they're all carefully controlled, going way, way back-- but most especially since the start of the 20th century. (But, admittedly, I don't know too much.)
(And what I do know or posit I don't express too well, at that.)
Wait a minute here, you're the one that started this whole thing. I just throw up some posts and you accuse me of being some neo-nazi. I can tell you right now I do not "hang" with the red or white laces crowd and never will. They do not understand what it is they even believe in, so enough said on that point. I am far more Robert Faurissonian in my own viewpoint: I just want certain names historicallt cleared. If someone who I happen to like, it could have been naploeon had I been French, then I do not want to read fake sh*t and lies about him. That's all. Where would any of us be if historians and scholars weren't a bit fanatical with their research? We wouldn;t know sh*t, and we certainly wouldn't know anything about the ever-growing Zionist problem.
By far the most importnat thing is that you and I, and DBS and even Condit and perhaps even Bjerknes (an a-1 Jew?) have all arrived at the same conclusion: Zionism is bad for the world. Something obviously has to be done about it. But this problem goes way back to practically the beginning. You and Infinite both need to read Daniel Quinn's book Ishmael. It is very revealing in this regard.
Well, yes: and in addition to my not being a master of any particular or specific subject (but having a tenuous but determined grasp on many-- coupled, however, with a poor discipline, a lazy cow eye and the heartbreak of psoriasis), and not quite finding myself able to communicate with anyone on any meaningful level or in any cogent manner-- so I apologize for making my disagreement with yourself (half-nebulous to begin with) seem like a vitriolic attack.
Please accept my sincere apologies for anything I may have said to you that was not nice. Now lets get back to Zionist-bashing.