The Insane Zionist Masterplan - Pitting Hindu India against Islam
Don't make the mistake of assuming that because India is not in the Middle East that it's not an integral part of the Zionist master plan.
This opinion piece by Maryum Saifee published in the Columbia Spectator Online is crucial reading for anyone who wants to understand the latest horrific developments involving Pakistan and India and to figure out who is behind them.
Last Monday, a number of organizations convened a panel at Columbia University law school to celebrate emerging relations between India and Israel. As a person of Indian origin with a Middle East regional focus at SIPA, I was particularly intrigued by the subject matter of the talk and wanted to learn more about this budding relationship.After attending the talk, I realized that much of the content was not academic in nature and was politicized to the point of propaganda.
The panelists included members of the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the former Indian ambassador to Israel, and the United Nations Development Programme. By the end of the talk, I found the panelists to collectively reflect a very biased and unrepresentative point of view that is not shared by the majority of moderate-minded Indians and Israelis.
The AJC, one of the lead organizers, recently endorsed an article by Indiana University professor Alvin Rosenfeld conflating Jewish criticism of the Israeli state policies with anti-Semitism. The AJC's decree has sought to silence a constructive debate on Israeli state and foreign policies by labeling any dissent as falling inside the category of anti-Semitic hate speech.
Although the panelists harked back to long-time relations between India and Israel and glorified India as one of the only nations with no traces of "anti-Semitism," the two nations only established normalized diplomatic relations in 1992, coinciding with the rise of a Hindu nationalist-led Indian government. The talk offered little convincing substance that the two countries shared much in common aside from rising Hindu nationalist and intolerant AJC-style fundamentalisms.
The theme reiterated throughout the talk was that both India and Israel are democracies under attack by a Muslim fundamentalist threat-both internal and external. This rhetoric of fighting a common war on terror against an Islamic enemy serves to fuel a rising Islamophobia that has become mainstreamed in Israeli, Indian, and even American discourse. We can see manifestations of these policies in Israel to justify the occupation of the Palestinian territories, in India to create a motive for the state-sponsored pogrom against Gujarati Muslims in 2002, and in the United States with Guantanamo Bay and a wide array of civil-liberties infringements against Muslims/ Muslim-Americans.
Rather ironically, the panelists invoked the rhetoric of both Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru to illustrate Indian and Israeli commitments to nonviolence and plurality. Nehru never supported the creation of a nation-state based on religio-political nationalism and I am confident that if Gandhi were alive, he would not have endorsed the Israeli occupation and apartheid wall as part of his definition of ahimsa (nonviolence).
The panelists described both Indian and Israeli principles guiding state policies by referring to Nehru's famous words that "the only alternative to coexistence is codestruction." While this is predominantly true in the case of India (with the exception of episodic outbreaks of politicized Hindu-Muslim violence, India's one billion plus do live in harmony), I do not believe this analogy extends to the state of Israel, as both Desmond Tutu and Jimmy Carter have analogized Israeli treatment of Palestinians to that of the South African apartheid system.
Another disappointing aspect of the talk was the perpetuation of the model-minority myth to describe Indian-Americans and Jewish-Americans. The AJC representative talked about the commonalities between both groups as being peoples tied by cultural ethics-such as hard work, family ties, and an emphasis on education. She identified cultural reasons as lending to the success of these two groups. As an Indian-American, I know that one of the main reasons I and my compatriots were able to succeed in this country had less to do with inherent cultural superiority, and more to do with immigration policies of the late 1960s.
During my parents' generation, the United States had an aggressive policy of recruiting skilled professionals (engineers and doctors) to come to the United States in response to a labor shortage. Most sociologists and historians who study the period would agree that the success of Indian-Americans in the United States context has to do with filtered immigration policies rather than cultural/racial superiority.
Aside from the racially charged content and questionable historical accuracy of the talk, I was most surprised by the fact that the Earth Institute, which generally sponsors events and conferences of high academic caliber, was included as one of the co-sponsors for an event promoting right-wing fundamentalists on both sides of the Indian and Israeli spectrums.
When I made an inquiry to professor Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute, he stated that the talk was never approved by the Earth Institute and that an individual must have used the logo without the permission of Earth Institute's senior management. While Sachs is making a concerted effort to find out exactly what went wrong, it seems clear to me that at least one individual within the Earth Institute must have been aware the event took place as an announcement was circulated to the Earth Institute list on Friday, Feb. 9.
Whatever the case may be as to how and why the Earth Institute was involved in the talk, I was relieved to hear from Sachs that the Earth Institute had no intention of sponsoring such a talk. I was particularly concerned that the Earth Institute's sponsorship of such an event would not only lend credibility to such propaganda, but also tarnish the Earth Institute's reputation for rigorous academic standards.
The talk ended in a rather tasteless display of solidarity with participants indulging in spicy Kosher Vegetarian Indian cuisine. I left the talk depressed, but not discouraged. Despite the offensive nature of the content, the event has opened the door to what will hopefully be a more constructive debate on campus that will critique this one-sided Hindu nationalist/ right-wing AJC-style narrative of Indian-Israeli relations predicated on a common Muslim enemy.
To further understand the insane zionist masterplan, that involves pitting the Hindu world against Islam, I urge readers to review the maps in Redrawing Borders (to get at the oil) and israeli pipedreams.
Excellent QRS, you're on the ball!!!
Let's keep this up!
Would do well to be weary of Israel and Zionists, they have everything to loose if they get into bed with them...without hesitation the Hindus would be dropped if the Zionists want.
Pakistan better wakeup....and recognize that cozying up with Bush and letting Musharraf rule is a recipe for disaster, they will be handed over on a plate to Israel. The Zionists have made their hatred of Islam and Muslims clear and unequivocal, allowing them to dictate and to gain control of Pakistan would be a disaster.
Zionist terror? If so , here we go with the scenario above. Good catch, qrswave.
Firebomb attack kills 67 aboard India-Pakistan train
Terror blast kills 66 on India-Pakistan friendship train
I lived in India three different times, and witnessed the ravages of the IMF and World Bank firsthand. My ex-wife is Indian. Her father was India’s Minister of Agriculture. He told me what really goes on inside the Indian government. A few members of the Indian government espouse Zionist views for personal gain, but most Hindus regard Israel as evil. Therefore it is comical (but typical) for the AJC to evoke Gandhi and Nehru.
India is no “third world” country. It has nuclear weapons, a huge army and navy, an advanced space program, and one billion people. India and China are the two most powerful forces in Asia. (Japan is not in the same league. I‘ve lived in Japan too.)
India has 150 million Muslims. (Trivia: there are more camels in the state of Rajasthan than in all of the Middle East.) Thus, the Zionist plan is to engage in false-flag bombings of India, and blame it on Muslims in order to exploit Hindu anger.
Their plan will not work, for reasons I cannot detail in this short space. However the Zionists will try, since a lot of money and power are up for grabs.
For a couple of months I’ve considered writing a lengthy treatment of Zionism and India in my blog -- but I refrained, thinking no one would be interested. Maybe I’ll write one now.
A crucial factor in the game is Iran -- or more specifically -- control of Middle Eastern oil. On one side of the gaming table are Bush and Israel. On the other side are Europe, Russia, China, and India, all of whom want access to Iranian markets and / or oil. If these four team up, they could easily cow Bush and Israel. Already the combined GNP of India and China dwarfs that of the USA.
Do not be fooled when you see these four powers give lip service to sanctions against Iran. All of them except Russia need oil. Russia keeps checkmating Bush’s attempts to impose true sanctions against Iran. This is easy. Russia says it will agree to sanctions in exchange for a guarantee of Iran’s security, knowing that Bush and his Zionist masters will never give any guarantee. Thus, the game continues for now.
In the meantime, Bush and Israel maintain instability in the Middle East in the hope of effecting regime change in Iran. (They want a new pro-USA regime). They do this by maintaining the war in Iraq, and by maintaining an image of Bush as insane, which causes everyone to keep guessing.
Bush and his handlers are not sure how Europe, Russia, China, and India will react if Iran is attacked. However, Tony Blair is supposed to leave office by April, so Bush may roll the dice and unleash the bombers.
When that happens, we can expect to see simultaneous bombings in India and elsewhere by “Muslim terrorists” (i.e., Mossad).
The WZO, AJC and other Zionist organizations was a big instigator of pushing to move out the Ottoman Empire from the desired Zionist land since the inception of the organization. They also helped push for WW-II as well as finance the NAZIs & Fascists through their international connections of wealthy central banksters, financiers and other elite to make Israel become a reality. The slaughter of 90 million was to create the state of Israel of which, it is g-d that serves the Zionist elite but not the other way around. It MUST be remembered that Zionism is only 110 years old and was created, organized and financed by an extremely militant group of wealthy Jews to create their own country regardless of their religion, which is used as a front to keep herd their own sheep, just as many other religious and political organizations have done throughout the centuries.
The world is now in the first stages of a truly global war that could easily slaughter billions of people for the expansion of Israel, just as mercilessly the Zionists worked during "Hunting Season" to eliminate the Palestinians out of their own land. The AJC and Zionist organizations are once again playing the divide and conquer method of splitting the peoples of the Indo-Persian region that have a history that is a few thousand years older than Judaism. The best thing for any country to do when confronted by Zionist flattery and invites is to reject them.
Indoctrination and dogma are strong agents of forming people's minds. Pharisaical (Talmudic) Judaism is a philosophy of men and not of g-d as the Essenes and Nazarenes pointed out. Judaism is based upon earlier philosophies, religions and ideologies which has been modified substantially by oral interpretation of opinion by Pharisees (Judaic Rabbis). It's design is for giving a sense of superiority of Jews that supposedly was identified by g-d 4000 years ago as his elect and true man. All the rest of man is nothing more than to serve them as the beasts that gentiles are considered by their religious doctrine. Zionism is an extremely militant group using Judaism as a front for expansion and power which didn't exist until the 1890s which has led to the death of almost 100 million based on creating conflict and war.
It is time to put an end to these criminal organizations and put the central bankers, financiers, military industrialists and politicians that support this activity as policy in front of an international criminal court in the light of day while eliminating and auditing the central banking systems around the world which run through the Bank of International Settlements. The names of the families and organizations that run this scam of usury against the stolen wealth of nations should be made available for every nation and person to see. Organizations such as the FED or Bank of England should be eliminated and the wealth returned back to the people.
er...the book. Oops.
King Leopold's ghost must be busting a gut laughing at the stupidity of it! I just hope he doesn't get the Last Laugh, because if India & Pakistan go at it again, this time with nukes, we're all dead from the catastrophic climate disruption of even a 'limited' exchange.
P.S. Was any one else bothered by the sentence:
'The talk ended in a rather tasteless display of solidarity with participants indulging in spicy Kosher Vegetarian Indian cuisine.'?
Kosher Vegetarian Indian cuisine?? Doesn't 'kosher' mean ritually slaughtered meat? Or did the author mean that the lentils and curry were bled and brined before serving? LOL
I am not sure what else kosher means - I thought it meant what you said. But, it probably entails more than that.
I have no problem with any customs that do not harm people. But, from what I heard, the 'kosher' 'trademark' is abused like some sort of racket.
That's not good.