BBC (Biased Broadcasting Corporation) -- "debunking" 9/11 Conspiracy 'theories'
As EXPECTED by everyone here, the BBC (aka Beeb) has "debunked" the 9/11 'conspiracy theories' just like POPULAR MECHANICS 'did'.....
EXCEPT THEY DON'T.
They "claimed" to have debunked the CONTROLLED DEMOLITION as well....
EXCEPT THEY HAVEN'T.
They "claimed" that it was the conspiracy to 'frame' the 'jews' (AshkeNAZI KhaZars)....
EXCEPT THEY DIDN'T.
The "jews" must REALLY BE PANICKING by now, to make such a 'counter-move'... they sense A-HELLUVA-LOT of the SHEEPLE are WAKING-UP-TO-THE-FACTS.
Not only about who ORCHESTRATED 9/11 (and NO, it was not the 19 Ay-Rab NINJA WARRIORS hiding in the overhead glove compartment, that Zionist 'Jew' Media is using as a SCAPEGOAT), but also about the Rothschilds, Holohoax, Henry Kissinger, Larry Silverstein Controlled Demolition confession video, the TRUE origins of the Ashkenazi Khazars, the orchestrators of the Vietnam/Korean/Yugoslavia/Latin American/Iraq/Afghanistan/etc Wars.....
.
.
.
.
.
KHAZARS! YOUR GIG IS UP! WE DON'T WANT YOUR SHIT ANYMORE!!!
The "DIGG.COM" SHEEPLE ... yeah, I'm a geek, but I'm not a STUPID AMERICAN SHEEPLE ;-)
For the best Evidece, you only need to look at the "BURIED" comments.
They are FILLED WITH OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE, and the rest of the comments just 'attacks' the burried evidence WITHOUT giving justification.
Sometimes I wonder HOW HIGH A % of the posters on Slashdot and Digg are Zionist agents/sympathizers?!!!
The Beeb's (BBC) 9/11 "debunking episode" was a 'calculated' and 'coordinated' action.
Something this large and important of a decision is not made just by anybody. The DECISION to spew out more DIS-INFORMATION and PROPAGANDA can ONLY be done at the Highest Echelons.
Nothing less.
Understand this.
Such a high-level decision requires coordinated effort, executive board "meetings", "studies and statistics" on what the 'sheeple' are currently thinking, etc.
In short, THEY felt a dire NEED for countering the RISING TIDE of 'dissidents' to their OFFICIAL THEORY of 9/11.
In other words, WE are having a positive effect on the people. We are waking them up.
Just like the banner and logo on this website states:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"The Truth will set you Free"
"I want YOU to wake up
To wake others up
To know that you are free
To think for yourself
To protect your rights
and to resist tyranny"
Is just another arm of the state, any supposed 'differences of opinion' with the ruling elites are merely cosmetic and surface.
The ruling elites decide what is aired and what line it will take and what line it will not take. Only a fool would pay money to the BBC (in licensing costs collected by the State for the BBC)to receive their propaganda, all clear sighted people will have already turned the idiot box off and in fact removed it from the house.
All TV does is turn your brain into mush, a unthinking, easily controlled robot.
Only a fool could believe we can all be fooled, all the time.
I did not bother watching but will catch it some time. I did however reply to George Monbiot's desperate piece a few days ago as I couldn't resist. One thing I did not say was, I wonder in some ways if the Zionists would be better off keeping quiet as every time they make a desperate attempt to support the hoax, they expose their agents and make things worse for themselves perhaps?
Here is a true story about the BBC documentary. A teenager I know, did watch it, and commented to me that the more he has seen about the "conspiracy theories" the less he has believed the official account. He now utterly discounts the official explanation. So the BBC failed to convince him and tipped him the other way. I wonder what net effect they did have.
I think the Zionists under-estimate people, they believe their own lies so much and live in their own bubble they think that others will just accept their lies. This is why they shoot themselves in the foot all the time.
People are not stupid, they know when they are being made fools of, gone are the days when some Joe would watch the TV and accept all the crap uncritically and be in awe of 'authority' figures. People are more sophisticated and they can see the obvious distortions and disinformation.
When I argue with crypto Zionist on the BBC MB, they just make themselves look stupid with their non arguments , red-herrings and ad hominies, makes one wonder that they can be so stupid as to think their words with obvious stupidity are going to convince anyone. They are so fearful of the Truth coming out and that people will discover their lies that they say the stupidest things and shoot themselves in the foot. They don't realize that when the time arrives their lies will be exposed and their fortress will crumble, it is not in their hands...they think that it is and they fear the creation....but it is God who deserves to be feared, for He is the Master and He will Bring them low and He will debase them, it is inevitable.
Palestine IS at hand. Palestine is coming HOME!
Frack you if you don't like it.
they had 2 versions and should have shown the balanced version, instead they were probably threated if they revealed the truth..Google; loose change
Truth Seeker
Loose Change,
does a dis-service for the fact that ANY reference to "jewish" or "Israeli" involvement is over-looked and ignored. When it does mention it, it does so in passing by, like they were 'mere observers'.
Furthermore, they totally ignore the BEST HARD EVIDENCE and instead focuses on the WHO-GIVES-A-SHIT-ABOUT-PENTAGON-CRASH bullshit.
Those two facts alone, indicate 'Loose Change' is full of Loose Screws.
The first time I saw that was years ago, before much evidence came to light, and right then and there I noticed that it was a dis-information service....
....let's see who is actually behind producing that video, who provided the 'footage', etc....
They took the article off of DIGG.COM main page.... ;)
Couldn't handle the pressure from us ;)
For those of you who missed it, here's the whole BBC bunk, billed here as a "Sophisticated hit piece on the 911 Truth movement". Viewer discretion advised, may be flagged for lack of false flag connotations. Draw your own conclusions. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7621076970651593769
The Conspiracy Files - 911 - Google Video
I did bother to watch it on google late last night and it was embarrassing. It is not currently available! Look at what 95% of people thought of it on google video. A real own goal as we say in Britain.
This BBC farce is history already, but for all you masochists out there, here is a remaining 'trailer'. Oh, by the way, the best part, for me, is in the very beginning, a brief clip, ( for all you "planers" ), of the "plane" approaching the South Tower, which I have never seen. Once again, stop the film, in the full screen mode, and toggle it for a while. Then tell me what you DON'T see ! Anyone else hadenuf ? Real 'own goal' indeed ! http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=8331629640228117189&q=911+bbc+dur...
There is a common theme in documentaries on 9/11:
Suppose the Italian Mafia had conducted a trillion-dollar operation involving the killing of nearly 3,000 people, in order to manufacture a pretext to exterminate hundreds of thousands as part of a program for establishing a world dictatorship. We then find that, in documentaries and broadcasts that are supposedly questioning anomalous historical events such as this "new Pearl Harbor", the presenters are Italian, the discussion panel are Italian, the series producers are Italian, and most of the 'skeptics' calling for further investigation are Italian. They suggest that if the Muslims didn't do it, it was probably the Jews. But anyone who says it was the Italian Mafia is an anti-Italian "racial supremacist".
At least the BBC showed the WTC 7 collapse, and I was pleased that they mentioned Fox TV's "The Lone Gunman". There is an excellent article by Christopher Bollyn, dated October 2003, about Rupert Murdoch's connections and 9/11 foreknowledge. However, the BBC carefully avoided mention of the molten steel or iron, and the five "dancing Israelis" who, by setting up their cameras to "document" the first plane to hit the Towers, demonstrated prior knowledge. As Bollyn points out here, prior knowledge is proof of involvement.
The BBC knew WTC 7 had fallen 30 minutes before it actually fell. Live TV - It's a bitch!
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=49f_1172526096
It really has been an interesting week for leaks with the OK city three bombs broadcast and the Kennedy / Oswald green sweater thing. Looks like Big Dick's in a pickle, may even be running from military arrest. We can hope.
Oh by the way, you do know that the Loose Change Boys are all jewish. It's called getting control of the opposition by controlling the initial "leak".
That came out when they bailed from RBN last week. Headed over to the friendly ground at Genesis. NICE!
That video above has been yanked from Google, YouTube, and I suspect that LiveLink won't last long. Not to worry, here is the link to the MPEG in the good Ol' U.S. Archives from whence it came:
http://ia311517.us.archive.org/2/items/bbc200109111654-1736/V08591-16.mp...
It's a gig, but worth stashing.
In their response to charges of 20 minutes' advance knowledge of the WTC 7 collapse, the BBC have not denied that they might have announced the collapse before it actually happened. Their excuse is that it was "an error"! Conveniently, the BBC have lost the relevant tapes. At least, they seem to have taken a cue from police handling of the de Menezes affair with the "mysteriously erased" videotapes. But there is no explanation of the 1 in 24 chance of being accurate to within 20 minutes over an 8-hour period, multiplied by 1 in the number of qualifying buildings.
Jane Standley was also on hand to report the crash of AA Flight 587 on November 12, 2001. (That was another of Israel's dirty deeds to get a commitment from their satellite states on Iraq. The CIA was well pleased with getting back into the Afghan opium trade; organized Jewry wanted Iraq to be "disabled".) Standley has reported on the World Jewish Congress' attempts to blame the Vatican for events of WWII, and has assisted in Zionist efforts to obtain a casus belli for military intervention in the Sudan.
As for Richard Porter, he is well regarded by Zionists:
Carole Solomon, from “New York and Herzliya Pituach,” is chairman of the board of governors of the Jewish Agency. She chose to go on one tour on the itinerary that looked at the BBC and Israel’s media image. “All the molecules were in the air,” reported Ms Solomon, as the group posed some tough questions to Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen, the BBC’s head of world news, Richard Porter, and Steve Herrmann from BBC News Interactive. “I respect the intellectual level of the BBC,” she said, “but I worry more about inaccuracies than bias. Certainly, however, I appreciated the level of people who received us.”
Source: http://www.jewishchronicle.com/home.aspx?ParentId=m11s19s116&SecId=116&AId=47119&ATypeId=1
How do you keep track of them all???
Amazing. Keep 'em coming!
You should consider posting some blogs and tagging them for easy reference.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.
I mostly find links from Google searches. With so many things going on, research on some story of the day will often throw up a few interesting links.
I got the BBC response from whatreallyhappened, and they also linked to the Prison Planet article:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/270207trustanything.htm
For once, the skeptics who talk about "globalists" can (partly) unite with anti-Zionists. But it looks like Alex Jones & Co will suggest that the attacks were run by Silverstein, Giuliani, Cheney and Rumsfeld, in spite of all the evidence linking Israel, and Silverstein's connections with Netanyahu, Sharon, Barak, etc. The criminals are particularly anxious to conceal the news about the "dancing Israelis" and Dov Zakheim's links to SPC.
The planners do get things wrong from time to time, such as failing to check that the bribed AA officials had falsified the records at the Bureau of Transportation Statistics on-time database to make it look as if Flights 11 and 77 had been scheduled. (And then having to take the database down for months in late 2003 / early 2004, until it came back up showing the AA flights!) And overestimating the effect of the exercises (wargames, NRO in Chantilly, etc) and so letting the Air Force shoot down Flight 93 before Zakheim's men could steer it into WTC 7. And igniting the thermate in the WTC 2 impact zone hollow perimeter columns from the bottom of a 3-story section, because Fuji Bank only covered 4 floors and the operatives couldn't be bothered to get access to IQ Financial Systems and Euro Brokers on floors 83 and 84.
Here is an excerpt from my latest piece:
Masher1 asked (see node 586) about the amount of thermate needed to maintain 3 major pools of molten steel for several weeks. It would certainly take many tons, but at least thermite or thermate is capable of melting steel, in contrast to hydrocarbon combustion yielding CO2 and H2O gaseous products in a non-oxygen-enhanced, ventilation-limited compartment fire.
The hollow perimeter columns consisted of 3-story-long sections that were closed off at each end. And each end featured an access hatch already cut into the inner web (ostensibly to allow access to the four bolts), enabling the thermate to be pumped into the hollow interior. See bottom two images here, Fig. 3.7 at this link, or this image, or several pictures here. With the column splices staggered mid-floor, two adjacent 3-story sections for one-third of the columns could have been accessed from a single floor, and all exterior columns in the targeted impact zone could have been covered by treating every third column over three adjacent floors. Hence, this "fireproofing upgrade" or "measuring and documenting" work could have been limited to the offices of a single company if need be, such as Marsh (WTC 1) and Fuji Bank (WTC 2).
Ideally, the powder would be remotely ignited at the top end of each 3-storey section shortly before the intended collapse time. If the treatment had been applied to two 36-feet sections of column, that would require the perpetrators to have carried out the relatively easy job of planting detonators in another 3 floors above. Marsh occupied 7 or 8 adjacent floors at WTC 1, and Fuji Bank had 4 floors at WTC 2 which would allow a third of columns to be treated over a 72-feet length. If they detonated from the bottom, it would increase the risk of too much molten iron collecting at the bottom and
prematurely melting its way through the ¼ inch thick steel in the minutes prior to collapse, as happened with WTC 2 where Fuji Bank had only 4 floors. However, melting 72 feet of every exterior column would have been overkill, especially considering that the perpetrators would have also targeted box columns in the core, down in the basement. They probably omitted some columns and / or mostly limited themselves to 36 feet of column.
The mixture would already contain all the oxygen it needed, and, once ignited, would burn along to the other end. The temperatures reached, and energy available, would be more than ample to melt the column. Before this occurred, however, the loss of strength would have had devastating consequences for the building - and its occupants. After global collapse, the thermite reaction would continue to produce molten elemental iron and melt structural steel in the debris pile.
This is available at:
http://www.takeourworldback.com/wtcdemolition.htm
The current version needs much updating. My latest findings are that a one-meter deep pool of molten iron at 2,500 C (from a thermate reaction), insulated by debris approximating the thermal characteristics of lightweight concrete, could be sustained for about 7 weeks according to a square law. Doubling the depth would quadruple the time to solidify. On the other hand, with no surrounding insulation, radiated heat losses would be at around a thousand times the intensity. The longest-lasting pools would have been those from the thermate that was put into the core box columns in the basement...