Jewish group sues Google over Nazi YouTube content


Online: http://www.thelocal.de/10827/

The German Jewish Council is seeking a court order to force Google and YouTube to remove neo-Nazi and anti-Semitic content from the web.

Jewish Council Secretary General Stephan Kramer called the US search engine giant and its video platform “accomplices in racial hatred and discrimination,” the German press agency DPA reported on Friday.

The council filed a preliminary injunction against Google, which owns YouTube, in a Hamburg court. Kramer said the companies should hire staffers to police content and ensure extremist videos are removed immediately.

“The far-right scene uses YouTube massively as a platform,” Kramer told DPA.

A video that used swastikas as a backdrop for a burning photo of former Jewish Council president Paul Spiegel stayed up on YouTube for months, he said.

“We are aware of our responsibility,” Google spokesman Kay Oberbeck said at an anti-Nazi event in Hamburg.

Oberbeck said Google has worked for more than three years with a German volunteer oversight group to sift out content harmful to minors. YouTube also relies on users to report inappropriate content.

Publishing Nazi symbols and right-wing extremist materials is illegal in Germany, but the global nature of the internet has posed problems for the country's authorities.

 

http://www.thelocal.de/10827/20080321/

Posted in

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

they have a right to an opinion, as it is: just an opinion.
so there ARE neo-nazi rallies!! go figure! are they not allowed to make a video and share it? fucking talmudic zoos think that we have to swallow only their version of crap??
THEY ARE THE ULTIMATE HYPOCRITE WHINERS.
You like their little conference, supposedly discussing holocost, yet nobody from the other side is allowed to attend, lest they be arrested!! besides the fact that they weren't even invited!!

To hell with them. I'm not neo-nazi, and don't agree with their message at all, but they wanna share their video, as long as it's not heinous crimes, GO FOR IT.

Grim Reaper | Sun, 2008-05-18 19:53

..what they REALLY want to do, besides the fact that they're already doing it by whining about any copyright violations they see on our videos: is to silence ANYONE who isn't THEM.

Grim Reaper | Sun, 2008-05-18 19:56

This ought to shut Grim up for good. Why the hell would Jews have such a shyt-fit over 'Nazi' material if they were Zionist? I could just as easily ask why "Nazism" (a Jewish anti-German hate term) is so popular (as evidenced by the amount of it on YouTube) while Jewry and Zionism is not? Notice the Chinese are fascist and blowing America's shytty "capitalist" economy away? Just a nation of "bartenders and waitresses" as Paul Craig Roberts has said. Indeed!

Yeah, I know it's a good point, Grim. ;)

These supposed Nazis, however, are brainwashed to accept Jewish shyt no matter what. How pathetic. They're probably Jewish like the American Nazi Party. What a joke. They need to be sent to frontline duty in Iraq.

Ehud Olmerts Wo... | Mon, 2008-05-19 04:21

I think I understand your point, but I also understand why some people compare zionists to Nazis. Such people seek to expose zionist hypocrisy.

I don't use that approach, since I think it’s a double-edge sword that helps zionists and distorts the truth about Germany.

If we say zionists are as “bad” as National Socialists, then the rest of the world only hears that National Socialists are “bad.” Therefore logically, according to average people, zionists are “good.”

Even worse, when we equate zionists with National Socialists, we suspect that they supported each other, that Hitler was a Jewish agent, and so on.

That’s why I never put swastikas on israeli flags when I used to do artwork for this web site. It’s an insult to the National Socialists.

zionists stand alone in their evil. In some ways they are unique. I don’t compare them to “fascists,” or Nazis.

Unfortunately we here at WUFYS sometimes become annoyed, and argue about what we fundamentally agree on. Indeed, we cannot argue unless we fundamentally agree in the first place. If we do not fundamentally agree, then we simply pull out guns to exterminate the other side.

It's like those cheap action-adventure movies where team members argue, and someone says, "Save your energy; the fight's out there."

Perhaps you find my tone patronizing, but that's not my spirit at all. I just want to avoid giving aid and comfort to the zio-creeps.

They truly deserve extermination.

 
 
 
 
 

 

Abdul Alhazred | Mon, 2008-05-19 05:02

Yes, I know. But peeps like grim grate on me. The damndest thing is they stalk, as opposed to just dropping it. It gets annoying and causes the resort to such tactics. I absolutely agree with you though. Problem is, no one reads about NS because they automatically expect to find "evil" there.

Ehud Olmerts Wo... | Mon, 2008-05-19 05:18

..even though i don't agree with it, and you imagined some kind of argument: your purpose here?!

Grim Reaper | Mon, 2008-05-19 06:16

Actually, you are much easier to contend with now that I know you're a pacifist. You're like my liberal niece...always trying to secure peace and equal rights for all. Good luck with that grim. In the meantime, I'm going to kill those who try and kill me first.

Hitler said:

... "First the occupation of - then we had the task in Norway - at the same time we faced - I can frankly say it today - a grave misfortune, namely the - weakness of, Italy. Because of - first, the situation in North Africa, then, second, because of the situation in Albania and Greece - a very big misfortune. We had to help. This meant for us, with one small stoke, first - the splitting of our air force, splitting our tank force, while at the same time we were preparing, the, tank arm in the east. We had to hand over - with one stroke, two divisions, two whole divisions and a third was then added - and we had to replace continuous, very severe, losses there. It was - bloody fighting in the desert.

This all naturally was inevitable, you see. I had a conversation with Molotov [Soviet Minister] at that time, and it was absolutely certain that Molotov departed with the decision to begin a war, and I dismissed the decision to begin a war, and I dismissed him with the decision to - impossible, to forestall him. There was - this was the only - because the demands that man brought up were clearly aimed to rule, Europe in the end. (Practically whispering here.) Then I have him - not publicly...(fades out).

Already in the fall of 1940 we continuously faced the question, uh: shall we, consider a break up [in relations with the USSR]? At that time, I advised the Finnish government, to - negotiate and, to gain time and, to act dilatory in this matter - because I always feared - that Russia suddenly would attack Romania in the late fall - and occupy the petroleum wells, and we would have not been ready in the late fall of 1940. If Russia indeed had taken Romanian petroleum wells, than Germany would have been lost. It would have required - just 60 Russian divisions to handle that matter.

In Romania we had of course - at that time - no major units. The Romanian government had turned to us only recently - and what we did have there was laughable. They only had to occupy the petroleum wells. Of course, with our weapons I could not start a, war in September or October. That was out of the question. Naturally, the transfer to the east wasn't that far advanced yet. Of course, the units first had to reconsolidate in the west. First the armaments had to be taken care of because we too had - yes, we also had losses in our campaign in the west. It would have been impossible to attack - before the spring of 1941. And if the Russians at that time - in the fall of 1940 - had occupied Romania - taken the petroleum wells, then we would have been, helpless in 1941." ...

Source: http://www.wargamer.com/articles/bdvisit2.asp

Ehud Olmerts Wo... | Mon, 2008-05-19 06:33

..maybe hitler should have thought about that before he lost the entire war; had he known the outcome, do you think he would have done the same things?

(don't bother answering)

When the fifth seal is opened, people like you will march to their deaths; the blood of your enemy, and all their envy; will be upon your soul.

I wish i had an answer for you that you would accept.

Grim Reaper | Mon, 2008-05-19 06:53

Grim...do you remember that video with Al Jazeera interviewing Norman Finkelstein? 

What I find fascinating about Jews / Zionists who say such profound truths [but mostly for the wrong reasons] can be echoed for other people, can be used by other people to make their points.

I believe someone called Ron Paul a zionist servant because he quoted Trotsky in a speech.  I don't agree, not that I know that much about Ron Paul, and I am really not discussing Ron Paul.

I think people nitpick too much, not seeing the big picture.  It's not so much the singer but the song, that matters.

For example:  Norman Finkelstein made it clear, that Hezbollah, Hamas, and their supporters would rather die on ther FEET, than crawl on their knees living like slaves.  Here Finkelstein is not saying this for the wrong reason, Finkelstein clearly admires Hezbollah.  [Of course he doesn't say much about Hitler because he is a Jewish zionist.]

This is what Ehud is talking about on this thread and at node 6840.

Norman Finkelstein made it clear:  He is not judging people harshly who want to live.  Because there are people who just want to live.  And naturally you can't blame them for that.

But you also can't blame the ones like Hezbollah, Hamas, and yes even Hitler, who refused to live like slaves and preferred to die on their feet fighting a vicious enemy with no morals - the zionist bankers who made these wars happen for their own profits.

This is what Ehud means.  As long as you die to defend your children, your people,  and yourself, then death must be worth it.  It has to be for some people at certain times. 

In California, several years ago, a father died of stab wounds fighting off a would be pedophile/rapist who was trying to get a hold of his 4 year old son.  This is just 3 people, but it is no different from bigger scale tragedies.

And that is a fact, historically and today.

Rhiannon | Mon, 2008-05-19 09:22

Only a female mind can truly comprehend. I really do have reason to doubt male superiority. lol

Grim said, "..maybe hitler should have thought about that before he lost the entire war; had he known the outcome, do you think he would have done the same things?"

How can anyone think about something that has not yet been apparently revealed or has not yet happened, Grim? His intelligence apparatus thought it had correct data and stats...so, not his fault. It was a gross and condemnable failure of German intel and counter-intel across the board, not a failure on Hitler's part (other than he didn't exterminate insubordinate or inefficient personnel like Stalin did, which maybe can be seen as a fault by some.)

Ehud Olmerts Wo... | Tue, 2008-05-20 05:02

...more stereotyping?

It is much different; the father defending his family from the rapist, than a hypothetical hezbollah attack on azrael, with nazis in ehud's mind.

One is purely defensive, and not associated with ORGANIZED WAR; an offensive war that has YET to take place.

As for hitler's foresight, it still sucked regardless, and is a different issue that yehudi keeps bringing up on every blog, regarless of the issue.

Still think that hezbollah started, or was responsible for the occupation that was the reason for their forming in the first place?? can it shill.

Grim Reaper | Tue, 2008-05-20 05:11

fuck yerself. Your dick should reach if you're well endowed. lol

Ehud Olmerts Wo... | Tue, 2008-05-20 05:18

unclesam wakeup

It ain't racism when it's the truth!

by Grim Reaper

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator