Yet again zionists attack free speech
Once again zionists are on the war path, in their never ending struggle against free speech...
Background
England’s University and College Union is the largest higher education union in the world, with 117,000 members.
Last year (May 30, 2007) the union voted to have a debate on whether to boycott israeli universities. Actions were planned to help local branches consider the arguments for and against a boycott, with the participation of invitees from israel.
Despite the union's openness to both sides of the issue, and despite steps it took to ensure an even-handed debate, zionist groups such as the Simon Wiesenthal center condemned the union as “anti-semitic.”
After the motion to hold a debate was carried, a meeting was held in June 2007 to determine how best to stage the debate. Jewish attorneys attacked the union, saying any debate would be unlawful.
(Notice that the issue was not a boycott, but merely a proposed debate about a boycott.)
The union's own attorneys decided not to fight the zionists, and the proposal for a debate was dropped on 28th September 2007.
The union's own attorneys decided not to fight the zionists, and the proposal for a debate was dropped on 28th September 2007.
====================================================
On 28 May 08, union members voted to “consider the moral and political implications of education links with Israeli institutions.”
This is not a call for a boycott, although every zionist blog and newspaper uses the word “boycott,” because they constantly fear a boycott. (Among other things, a boycott fosters solidarity among the Goyim.)
Some zionist blogs say the British union has been “hi-jacked” by far-left militants. Other blogs say it's far-right militants. All zionist blogs say 90 percent of the union is opposed the motion (known as Motion 25).
In reality, 90 percent of the union's 500 delegates supported the motion at the union’s conference in Manchester. In fact, many of the supporting delegates were Jewish. Said Jewish Professor Haim Bresheeth, an Israeli-born member of the British Committee for Universities for Palestine: “All this rubbish about anti-Semitism is really annoying, and I disagree that a boycott adds to anti-Semitism.”
Zionist leaders say the union is shunned by British society, and is not supported by any other group.
In reality, the union is supported by many other groups, including the Boycott Israel Campaign, the Boycott Divestment Sanctions Campaign, the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, the British Committee for Universities for Palestine, the Academic Friends of Israel in the UK, and the US-based group Scholars for Peace in the Middle East.
Tom Hickey who proposed the motion emphasized that it does not call for a boycott. He said the motion is designed to urge union members to reconsider their personal links with israeli institutions.
Sally Hunt, general secretary of the union, said: “We have passed a motion to provide solidarity with the Palestinians, not to boycott israel or any other country’s academic institutions. The motion does not discriminate against Jews, and the union will defend its right to debate this issue. It is not anti-Semitic to question Israeli policies. Implementation of the motion will now fall to the National Executive Committee.”
British and German zionist groups angrily condemned the union. Jeremy Newmark of Stop the Boycott Campaign said: “UCU has again demonstrated how out of touch it is with the vast majority of its membership and with the wider academic community. This motion does nothing to help the Palestinians.”
zionist lawyer Anthony Julius threatened to bring criminal charges against the union. He said he is acting on behalf of what he called a “growing number” of Jewish and non-Jewish union members. He wrote to the union’s general secretary Sally Hunt, setting out four areas where he said the union could be challenged legally.
1. The motion, despite the union’s denials, is a boycott motion
2. It is anti-semitic
3. Therefore the union and its trustees can be sued according to a legal opinion produced for the Stop The Boycott campaign
1. The motion, despite the union’s denials, is a boycott motion
2. It is anti-semitic
3. Therefore the union and its trustees can be sued according to a legal opinion produced for the Stop The Boycott campaign
4. Jewish members of the union could also bring criminal claims for harassment under England’s Race Relations Act.
Julius also threatened Bill Rammell, England’s Minister for Higher Education. Mr. Rammell promptly condemned the British union, saying any boycott of israel would be “the complete antithesis of academic freedom. There is no evidence that such a strategy would further the cause of peace in the Middle East.”
(If it’s so ineffective, then why do zionists scream so loudly?)
The israeli Knesset declared that any boycott of israel would be illegal. Four days later, the Knesset considered whether to mount an israel-wide consumer boycott of all British goods. An israeli bill is aimed at punishing all of England for the UCU union’s motion, even though the union’s motion does not call for a boycott.
Leading Israeli commentators said Britain has become Nazi Germany.
Danny Yatom, a member of the Knesset, said: “If any state boycotts any products of Israel, there will be retaliation the exact same way! This is not a one-way street!”
Israeli lawmakers demanded that the musical Mama Mia! be cancelled. The British production is due to open in Tel Aviv this month.
Source:
They wanna SUE the union, for intelligent debate about israel; yet at the same time they want to boycott British production!!
The zeronites are on the fast track to nothingness*0.
There is no such thing as a world-wide Zionist conspiracy to control not only thought, but actions of the GOY.
And if you continue on with this line of thought, you will be branded as being "Anti-Semitic" and faced with loss of job and or income, harrassed and hounded by loyal Zionists, stalked and assaulted by members of our Hasidic community or arrested and tossed in prison for "Thought Crimes" or get a visit from on of our MOSSAD teams.
So, as you can see, there is no Zionist conspiracy to run the world, GOY, now return to your pasture and peacefully chew your cud.
Signed
Alan DIRTBAGOWITZ
I think you give the zion chaser too much credit...
Who here is serious in thinking this Zionist crap is going to continue?
Palestine is the issue of import in our time.
Looking away to some masturbatory boycott of these schools thinking your moving the ball forward is not going to help any at all...
One has to remove the boot before one can negotiate with ones own voice. israeli boots be damned the land of Palestine will overcome AND the complicit will be stuck neck deep in there own shit sucking on 14 different shotgun barrels.
I see israeli power and i think there own hate will destroy them faster than any ANTI-SEMITIC action.
as long as the israeli continue to move towards DEATH for LEGITIMACY and STATEHOOD this WHOLE planet is going to be sucking the shotgun RIGHT ALONG WITH ZIONISIM.
Who here thinks israel is going to stop?
What will happen as a result?
More WAR?
More DEATH??
I would THINK very hard this day.
First you take D.C. Then you take New York
Big things often have small beginnings. If the USU union were to eventually cut ties with zionist institutions in Palestine, then more and more unions would feel safe to cut their own ties. zionist power is extreme, but fragile.
Most people consider a boycott to be a weak approach to stopping the genocide, but then, most people underestimate the devastating effects of boycotts.
Jews understand those effects. That’s why they called for a global boycott of Germany in 1933. It’s why they’re so terrified of boycotts now.
When a boycott starts, it is difficult for zionists to force ordinary people to sell to israel. A boycott is not an armed attack, and thus cannot be opposed by guns. If it is opposed by guns, then the zionists become obvious aggressors.
A boycott is not a clear and definite opponent. It is quiet and pervasive. The people of India were easily controlled when they used guns and violence to fight the British Raj, but when they started to call nationwide strikes, they brought the British to their knees.
The French in Algeria retaliated for all resistance attacks, but were especially brutal when the resistance called nationwide strikes.
Strikes, boycotts, and divestments shut down the machine.
Granted, this takes time, but we have to start somewhere.
SO THERE!!! (&!
Britain has become Nazi Germany ?? I have to ask, what was it that jews were demanding of Germany in 1933 that Germany refused to give, resulting in that famous boycott of Germany as trumpeted by the Daily Express of London on 24 March 1933 with the headline, Judea Declares War on Germany ? As this wouldn't be enough to bring Germany down as it's economy prospered in spite of the boycott, jews finally succeeded more than six years on in marshalling the combined military might of the US and Britain to destroy Germany. That the demands made on Germany if publicised would universally be seen as extortion of Germany's wealth is proven by the fact there is no mention of the reasons for the boycott, but lots of detail as to what and how - but no why. This means the jews wanted to retain their ownership of the issuance of money and the charging of interest on loans and debts. Mr Hitler would have declined the request on principle even though the jews were significant funders of the Nazi Party from Oct 1928 on. Surely, that flow of money would have had to have finished in January 1933. It's obvious to me that with the change of rider of the horse in January 1933 they wanted to have continued control over the issuance of money, which was denied, and that to them was intolerable ! A further indication that this was about the control of money was that under the Nazis the inflation was negligible, under 2% until 1941 - Operation Barbarosa - when it spiked to 4% and then dropped to 2% until wars end. The reason was three fold, no excessive printing of money, no interest on loans, no interest on debts. Compare that with the riotous jew banker inflation leading to collapse in Nov 1923. Hence war without end against the German people even to the present day has to be waged by the jews lest the threat of the no interest payments economic model becoming international were Germany to once again throw off the jewish yoke of servitude. In addition to the lurid charge of Britain becoming Nazi Germany there is the threat of boycott by Israel, which is echoic of 1933, and so deserves the headline in a Israeli paper, Judea Declares War on Britain. Were Israel to do that then many surviving Brits of that war against Germany might well loudly mutter, `Those ungrateful bastards, we fought on the wrong side, just so 63 yrs later those we supposedly rescued can boycott us, like they boycotted Germany`. Something that is important to mention; as Germany did not want to irritate international jewry overmuch, Goebbels, to placate a seething nation, declared a symbolic boycott of jewry lasting just one day, 1 April 1933.