King Solomon’s Temple: The Basis of Freemasonry

King Solomon’s Temple: The Basis of Freemasonry

 

By Fahim A. Knight

 

The Middle Eastern conflict and Freemasonry are uniquely tied together, it all evolves around and is correlated to King Solomon (1024-967 B.C.E), the son of King David (1107-1007 B.C.E), the Holy City of Jerusalem, and the Temple at Mount Moriah. Thus, over seventy-five (75) percent of the Freemasonic worldview and philosophy is constructed on the building of King Solomon's Temple. But the historical accuracy of the Masonic Solomon’s Temple does not totally lineup with secular history or biblical history as recorded by each school of thought, from the Masonic point of view part of this historical legend is based on mere allegory, symbolism, simile, metaphor, prototype, etc. However, King Solomon's Temple still remains as one of the most marvelous and fascinating topics of antiquity and in contemporary   thought; and is perhaps one of the most talked about edifices in the world and throughout human history. (Reference: Christopher Knight & Robert Lomas; “The Hiram Key: Pharaoh’s, Freemasons, and the Discovery of the Secret Scrolls of Jesus” pg. 26-35).

 

Thus, the Freemasonic worldview and philosophical (Speculative Masonry) justification to exist rest almost totally upon this ideological foundation, in which Freemasonry is structured on the Legend of King Solomon's Temple; looms high. The core tenets and beliefs that inculcate the Masonic allegories from top to bottom perhaps would have a difficult time existing without the legends, myths, and truths that are associated with the mythical and mystery of King Solomon's Temple, that once sits in the Holy City of Jerusalem and now forever buried due to human imperfection. (Reference: W.L. Wilmshurst; “The Meaning of Masonry” pg. 138-216).

 

The city of Jerusalem is deemed the city of peace, however, it has been quite to the contrary for the past 4,000 years; it has been defined by war and religious strife and political anarchy. The Jews, Christians and Muslims have fought bitter wars over the right to claim ownership and custodial entitlement to Mount Moriah. All three Abrahamic faiths have assembled theological and dogmatic authenticity to explaining why King Solomon’s Temple personifies a Jewish, Christian, and/or Islamic religious worldview. Freemasonry which incorporates the teachings of the Torah (Old Testament and the five books revealed to Moses), and the Gospel or Ingil (New Testament revealed to Yeshua Ben Yosef). (Reference: Mustafa EL-Amin; “Freemasonry: Ancient Egypt and the Islamic Destiny” pg. 96-115).

 

The Masonic claim to King Solomon's Temple is a lot less controversial and without the overt political and antagonistic contradictions that exist amongst the three major faith traditions, but nevertheless the sacred edifice of King Solomon's Temple lie the basis for Freemasonry to exist. The three Blue Lodge Degrees (Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft, and Master Mason) and this writer suspect the majority and subsequent degrees (4th-32nd and Royal Arch Degrees) to follow, will still adhere to the theory and philosophical trend of emphasizing the fraternal importance of King Solomon's Temple.

 

The Entered Apprentice is brought from “darkness to light” on the ground floor of King Solomon's Temple, the Fellowcraft after showing acceptable proficiency in the first degree is elevated to the Middle chamber and finally to the sublime degree of Master Mason, which is styled the Holy of Holies and the Sanctum Sanctorum. This is also related to the Guild workers, Stone Masons and the Operative Masons of old who took great pride in setting a workman's standard that each tradesman were neither received or passed without having the proper qualification because ones craftsman knowledge led to one being able to require higher wages for their knowledge and labor. (Reference: Barnes & Nobles Publishers; “Symbols of Freemasonry” pg. 6-30).

 

King Solomon's Temple was built on Mount Moriah in Jerusalem and some have maintained that the Ark of the Covenant where Prophet Moses (received the Ten Commandments is somehow connected to this land and Mount Moriah as it pertains to Moses and the Tabernacle. However, there is a much older civilization with a much more advanced culture and evolution that existed in Cush (Ethiopia), Africa, which were the Coptic Christians and Falasha Jews who were practicing a form of Christianity and Judaism long before Moses, Abraham and Yeshua bin Yosef (Jesus). (Reference: Ella J. Hughley; The Truth About Black Biblical Hebrew Israelites (Jews).

 

However, one must understand that the so-called Middle East is a misnomer and it is the man made Suez Canal that separates Africa from the Middle East, which was created to cause ethnic, racial and religious confusion and division. The Muslims and the Christian claimed that God (Allah, Yahweh, Jehovah, etc.) instructed Abraham (2078-1903 B.C.E) to sacrifice his son on top of Mount Moriah ; however, depending upon one's faith tradition will determine whether that son was Isaac (1978-1798 B.C.E) or Ishmael (1992-1855 B.C.E). These various interpretations led to biblical and Quranic elucidation, and justification of the rightful heirs to this church, synagogue, mosque, temple, etc., to claiming King Solomon's Temple as their own. Also, the descendants of Ishmael became those people known today as the Arabs (who occupies Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Libya, Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Morocco, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, etc; the Palestinians and the Israelis (Jew) have been fighting for centuries over a sacred strip of land called Israel by the Jews and is called Palestine by the Arabs , but the real owners of this land is the original man (the Nubian Hebrew Israelite) and he has yet to take his rightful place. (Reference: Drusilla Houston: “The Wonderful Ethiopians of the Ancient Cushite Empire)  

 

These two so-called Semitic People (Arab and Jew) are actually from one ethnic and/or biological linage which is the seed of Abraham—Isaac and Ishmael. They are newcomers to this ancient land and territory. Some scholars believe that the present day Al-Asqa Mosque, the Dome of the Rock, Temple Mount, etc., is built on top of the ruins of the original King Solomon's Temple site, which was built by King Solomon according to the Old Testament Bible in 975 BCE and when Jerusalem came under Babylonian ruler-ship in 586 BCE the Temple was destroyed. (Reference: John Michael Greer; “The Encyclopedia of Secret Societies” pg. 592).

 

The next Temple on this site was rebuilt in 515 BCE, by Zerubbabel who was politically tied to the Persian Empire and served as Governor of Judah. The third and the most magnificent of the three Temples was built by King Herod in 18 BCE and it to, was later destroyed along with the Holy City of Jerusalem during Jewish revolt against the Romans in 70 CE. (Reference: John Michael Greer; “The Encyclopedia of Secret Societies” pg. 592). The Israeli Government in 1967 granted the Muslims full custodial rights over this controversial piece of Holy Land and religious site, which was built by THE ORIGINAL HEBREW ISRAELITES (Africans) and later rebuilt as the House of Omar.

 

The Masonic scholar E.R. Johnston who authored a monumental two volume work titled, "Masonry Defined" stated: "Mosque of Omar, or the Noble Sanctuary--these splendid edifices on Mount Moriah covers portion of the space once occupied by the more brilliant Temple of Solomon. It is believed to have been commenced by Caliph Omar the first of that name, and father-in-law of Mohammed. Between the years of 638 and 644 and very much enlarged, beautiful and enriched, in fact, quite rebuilt by Caliph Abd-el Melek, in 686. It was seven years in building; the Muslims believe it to stand over the rock on which Jacob was sleeping when he saw the vision of the heavenly ladder, but it is still more sacred to them, as to us, from having been the sacred rock beneath the alter of Solomon's Temple, whereon the daily sacrifices was offered. During the time of the Latin kingdom in Jerusalem this mosque became a Christian cathedral, where the service was daily sung and an alter erected on the summit of the rock. The building was called by the Crusaders ' Temple of the Lord'." (Reference: E.R. Johnston; "Masonry Defined" pg 364). 

 

Al-Aqsa Mosque may-be splendid in design and architecture layout but it does not compare to the original King Solomon's Temple. Prophet Muhammad (570 -632 A.D.) (Peace and Blessings of Allah be Upon Him) in heavenly journey (physical or dream) is said to have traveled to Jerusalem and ascended to heaven. Islam considers Jerusalem the third holiest city in Islam. This writer can vividly recall in the late 1980s or early 1990s President Muammar Qadaffi and the Libyan Pilgrims were denied Hajj (Pilgrimage to Mecca) by the Wahabbi Muslims but the Zionist State of Israel granted the Libyans pilgrims permission to make pilgrimage to Jerusalem.

 

The Honorable Elijah Muhammad teaches that in the House of Omar is where the true body and tomb of Yeshua Bin Yosef (Jesus—7-127 A.D.) is housed. Muhammad also maintained that the Vatican, the Pope of Roman, and the High Imams in Jerusalem have an agreed pact with Freemasonry (this writer is not referring to your average rank and file Scottish Rite, York Rite members or my brothers of Prince Hall Order of Free and Accepted Masons). But a monetary fee is paid to the Pope and the Pope issues the Masonic Brother a traveling passing that is honored by the Imams of Al-Aqsa Mosque who in turn allow the Freemasons to physically see the well preserved body of Isa bin Yusuf (Jesus, the son of Joseph). (Reference: Nasir Makr Hakim: “The True History of Master Fard Muhammad” pg. 71-93).

 

Elijah Muhammad stated, "His body lies in a tomb in such manner that it reflects in four directions. This was done to keep the enemies from knowing just what direction the real body is laying. No Christian is allowed to see the body, unless they pay a price of $6,000 and must get a certificate from the Pope of Rome. The Tomb is guarded by Muslims. When Christians are allowed to see Jesus' body, they stripped of weapons, handcuffed behind their backs, and well-armed Muslims guards take them into the tomb. But, They leave the House of Omar without a doubt that the images portrayed of Isa Bin Yusuf (Jesus) are false and many learn for the first time that Isa Ben Yusuf (Jesus) was an original man. Muslims, the brothers of Jesus can go to see his body at anytime without charge." (Reference: Malachi Z. York; pg 289) 

 

Muhammad taught and wrote that "When Joseph heard of his son Jesus' death he came and got the body from the authorities. He secured some Egyptian embalmers to embalm the body to last 10,000 years. Joseph wanted the body to last as long as the earth (petrified) but was not able to pay for such embalmment. The Egyptian embalmers put the body into a glass tube filled with a certain chemical (known only to Egyptian embalmers) that will keep one's body looking the same as when it died, that is if they get the body at a certain time, for many thousands of years--as long as no air is allowed to enter the tube that the body is in. They buried the body in the old city, Jerusalem." (Reference: Malachi Z. York; "The Problem Book", which York compiled scattered Nation of Islam lessons given to Elijah Muhammad by W.F. Muhammad. This book contributes to the Original Five Percent Nation of Gods and Earth; pg. 288).

 

This writer was in communication with the secretary of the Southern California Research Lodge, in which he was trying to submit a Masonic research paper and secretary of the research society email back and said in essence, that the name of the research society was misleading; they were not involved in Masonic research because it is a dying discipline and ritual work is emphasized over the study of Speculative Masonry (Philosophical Masonry).

 

Secretary Norm Leeper who is a Past Master stated, “Freemasonry has largely lost it course.  It is steeped in a ritual that few know anything about.  There is no such thing as Masonic education in any meaningful degree. The roots of Masonry go back much further that the creation of the Grand Lodge in 1717 and has existed at least since 1390 the approximate date of the Regius Manuscript. My personal feeling (not necessarily a belief) is that concept of Freemasonry has existed probably from the beginning of man. The idea that men are brothers is not a concept exclusive to Freemasonry, yet it took the trade of stonemasons to give it formation. Freemasonry began losing its way when its teachings were ritualized -- that is when Preston worked up his lectures and elaborated by such as Webb and Cross.  We Masons have now taken a catechism to be an education.  Our teachers are parrots of ritual without explanation. (Reference: Norm Leeper Southern California Research Lodge; email message March 26, 2008)

 

This is why true Masonic learning in the Blue Lodges for the most part ends once a Masonic class is raised to the Sublime Degree of Master Mason (third degree), but one should understand there is no degree higher than the third degree. Albert Pike is one of the most celebrated Masonic historians in the United States and throughout the world; in his Masonic Treatise in his book titled, "Morals and Dogma" describes part of Solomon's Temple this way as it relates to the Entered Apprentice Degree, "You entered the Lodge between two columns. They represent the two which stood in the porch of the Temple, on each side of the great eastern gateway. These pillars of bronze, four fingers breadth in thickness, were, according to the most authentic account--that in the First and that in the second Book of Kings. Confirmed in Jeremiah--eighteen cubits high, with a capital five cubits high. That is, the shaft of each was a little over thirty fifty eight inches in height. . .The capital were enriched by pomegranates of bronze, covered by bronze net-work, ornamented with wreaths of bronze; and appear to have imitated the shape of the seed-vessel of the lotus or Egyptian lily, a sacred symbol to the Hindus and Egyptians. The Pillar or column on the right, or in the south, was named, as the Hebrew word rendered in our translation of the Bible, Jachin: and that on the left Boaz" (Reference: Albert Pike: "Morals and Dogma" pg. 8-9).

 

The majority of Freemasons do not have a clue about the allegorical and symbolic steps they took, but have become engulfed in the ritual and did not realize the building of King Solomon's Temple possess a duality of meaning and interpretations. The Masons marveled over the physical edifice and fail to realize that the true Celestial Lodge is a building of the spiritual Temple and if constructed properly will prove far greater than the physical structure of King Solomon Temple. Masonry is about character building that is imbued in Morality, Friendship, and brotherly love.

 

The ancient Egypt (Kemet) established the Egyptian Mystery Schools and gave the world the Seven Liberal Arts (Grammar, Mathematics, logic, Rhetoric, Music, geometry, and astronomy) the sciences, which stands as the basis to human development. The Egyptians gave the entire world enlightenment. King David and King Solomon conceived the building of Solomon's Temple by having full knowledge of the greatest Temples at Giza and Cheopa. The legend of Hiram Abiff of Tyre known in Freemasonry as the greatest Master Mason to ever live and was entrusted by King Solomon to serve as the superintendent and technical overseer to building and leading the workman in their building of King Solomon's Temple. (Reference: Rollin C. Blackmer: “The Lodge and the Craft” pg. 181-191).

 

Some Masonic historians maintained that Hiram Abiff worked with precious metals gold, silver, timber, stone, bronze, copper, etc., but the Square and Compass would be the working tools used in the Temple to determine plumb, level and square of the building, which is styled Wisdom (Worshipful Master), Beauty (Junior Warden, and strength (Senior Warden). (Reference: John G. Jackson: “Man, God and Civilization” pg 102-103).

 

Hiram Abiff, the Master Builder was prepared to complete the Temple and put his finishing touches on this sacred edifice, when a criminal conspiracy was hatched by fifteen (15) Fellowcrafts who were desirous of obtaining the Master Word that would allow them to enter other cities, towns, villages and foreign governments and qualify as Master Mason entitled to receiving higher wages. Moreover, after recognizing the danger and risk associated with a plot to murder Hiram Abiff and being fearful of the retribution coming from King Solomon, twelve (12) of the co-conspirators immediately recanted. (Reference: Malcolm Duncan: Duncan’s Ritual pf Freemasonry” pg. 103-114).

 

But three of these Ruffians used the same building tools that were employed to construct and beautify the Temple, but they were also utilized by the three Ruffians to cause a destructive end—death to Hiram Abiff. This is to teach the universal lessons of good and evil whether it is the story of Osiris and Seth or Cain and Abel man has the potential to vacillate between these two polarities—positive and negative. The three Ruffians did not desire to put forth the necessary work to acquire the proper signs, tokens and passwords which would allow them rightful entry. This writer heard Minister Farrakhan teach that jealousy and envy is the mother of murder. (Reference: Louis Farrakhan: “Self-Improvement: The Basis of Community Development” Study Guide for Registered Muslims).

 

The three Ruffians became envy and jealous that King Solomon did not choose them and chose to invest his trust in one of the most skilled builders of that day named Hiram Abiff in order to build the Temple. Yeshua Ben Yosef (Jesus) said the “Temple of God is within” They plotted to extort the master word from Hiram Abiff in order to commit forgery and deception, as well as obtained rights and privileges that were not earned or legally bestowed. (Reference: Malcolm Duncan: Duncan’s Ritual of Freemasonry” pg. 87-88).

 

This allegorical story or myth has played out in the legends of Mithra, Celtics Druids, Adonis, Apollo, Quetzalcoatl, Osiris, Jesus, Buddha, etc., in which the Hiram Abiff legend borrowed from much older civilizations and cultures. Kersey Graves in his book titled, “The World’s Sixteen Crucified Saviors” does a comparative study and analysis of the various Sun Gods and he concluded that most ancient civilizations were interdependent on older cultures; thus, Egypt (Kemet) may have introduced certain moral lessons to the world, but every culture of renown identified with these Solar Gods in some form or fashion—they understood the power of the winter and summer solstice—death and resurrection. (Reference: Anthony Browder: “Nile Valley Contribution to Civilization” pg. 53-72).

 

The ancients embraced phallic schools of thought and respected agriculture rites, i.e., solar ceremonies, rights of passages, and most of all systems of human morality and ethics were instituted long before the three major world religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam were established in their traditional forms. Reference: Yosef Ben Jochannon: African Origins of Major "Western Religions" ”).

 

The Master Builder Hiram Abiff legend should be viewed with much more significant than the Third Degree and Master Mason dramatization which is steeped in ritualism, but very few neophytes, Worshipful Masters and Grand Lodges truly understand all that this writer has written above. Many have never heard of Manly P. Hall, Albert Churchward, C. H. Vail, Godfrey Higgins, J.S.M Ward, Gerald Massey and have not taking the time to read and study Albert Pike’s treatise titled, “Morals and Dogmas” they ascend all the way up Jacobs latter (Masonic Travels) to the United Supreme Council of 33rd Degree, but it is only symbol without substance. Perhaps at some point this writer will tackle the Knights Templar and interpreted the 33rd Degree from Hiram Abiff, Jacques de Molay, Fredrick of Prussia, etc. (Reference: Alan Butler & Stephen Dafoe: “The Knights Templar Revealed” pg 207-214).

 

Hiram Abiff at High Noon became a victim of a horrid  crime carried out by the three Ruffians who hit Hiram Abiff in head, murdering the Grand Master, but he held on to the password and demonstrated his loyalty to King Solomon and the Grand Architect of the Universe. The Masonic obligation was binding even if it meant death to the Grand Master Hiram Abiff. “My word is my bond and my bond is my life and before my word shall fail, I should give you my life.” How many of us live by our word and truly walk upward, ninety degrees and perpendicular on the square? The Masonic allegory and teachings are steeped in universal principles of morality. The three conspirators lacked character, integrity, and moral fiber, which is to teach us ultimately something about wayward human nature, but inside all of us is the ability to potentially demonstrate unconstructive human conduct. (Reference: Martin Wagner: “Freemasonry Interpreted” pg. 230-247).

 

We must be mindful to guard ourselves against the internal and external enemies, which is correlated to understanding the macrocosm and microcosm universe. Hiram Abiff trusted his laborers (Fellowcraft—Master Masons in training), but his attackers were initiated, Entered, and Passed; they had just enough knowledge and enlightenment to get past the Tyler who had instructions to only allow entry into the Temple based on the work and labor being instructed at that time. Hiram Abiff had incomplete work on the Trestle board and after witnessing work stoppage and confusion King Solomon became concern. (Reference: Robert Lomas: “Turning The Hiram Key” pg. 161-176).

 

King Solomon summons Grand Master Hiram Abiff, but later to find out Hiram Abiff was missing and had unfinished work on the Trestle board; this conduct was highly unusual for the punctual and reliable Grand Master. King Solomon sound the alarm around the court that Grand Master Hiram Abiff was missing. The enemy could come in all four directions and we must-be prepared to ward off our external and internal enemies. We should never abandon our name of Caution, it was given to protect you from yourself and others because a little bit of knowledge can prove to be dangerous. (Reference: Born In Blood: The Lost Secrets of Freemasonry” pg. 215-234).

 

Moreover, at the death of Hiram Abiff his body was taking to the South Gate, West Gate and East Gate and finally buried in the Northwest corner in the Temple and in the rubbish heat where there was No Light. But his body was eventually taking to a hill and buried in a shallow grave. King Solomon sent trackers to find Grand Master Hiram Abiff and after days of search these trackers were resting and next to their resting place noticed that there was some disturbed earth; there lie the decomposed body of Hiram Abiff. The Trackers notified King Solomon of the death of the Grand Master. King Solomon wanted the Ruffians who committed this crime against Grand Master Hiram Abiff caught and executed. (Reference: Allen E. Roberts: “The Craft and Its Symbols: Opening the Door of Masonic Symbolism” pg. 67-90). `

 

King Solomon also wanted a proper interment service and burial for the Grand Master. This story resembles the Yeshua ben Yosef (Jesus) and Lazarus story in the Bible, which Lazarus had died and his sister Martha was lamenting at the death of her brother and when Yeshua Ben Yosef (Jesus) arrived she cried out to Yeshua Ben Yosef (Jesus), if you were present you could have saved my brother Lazarus; he told them to take him where the dead man lie. Lazarus had been dead in grave for three days and his body was decomposed and smelling. Yeshua ben Yosef (Jesus) commanded Lazarus to come forth from the grave and wrap in his grave garment Lazarus was resurrected from the dead. King Solomon used three grips (the eagle’s claw, the lions paw and the Master grip) and it was this grip that will not slip that raised Grand Master Hiram Abiff from a dead level to a living perpendicular on the square. (Reference: Gerald Massey: “Ancient Egypt the Light of the World” pg. 727-804)

 

The Master Word was lost at the death of Hiram Abiff, but King Solomon introduced a substitute word until future generations could find and ascertain the “real word” it is taught on the York Rite side in Royal Arch Freemasonry that only through these degrees that the “real word” is obtained. The Master Mason is given two words, but one should not be given but on the Five Points of Fellowship. The Hiram Abiff legend is also steeped and akin to the Ancient Egyptian Osirian myth, which is based on the fables of birth, death, resurrection and ascension associated with all Sun God cults and deities. (Reference: JSM Ward: “Who Was Hiram Abiff?” pg. 196-222).

 

Fahim A. Knight Chief Researcher for KEEPING IT REAL THINK TANK located in Durham, NC; our mission is to inform African Americans and all people of good will of the pending dangers that lie ahead; as well as decode the symbolisms and reinterpret the hidden meanings behind those who operate as invisible forces, but covertly rules the world. We are of the belief that an enlighten world will be better prepared to throw off the shackles of ignorance and not be willing participants for the slaughter. Our MOTTO is speaking truth to power. Fahim A. Knight can be reached at fahimknight@yahoo.com.

 

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,
Fahim A. Knight

 

Posted in Submitted by fahimknight on Thu, 2008-06-12 04:44.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

GARBAGE - Palestinians and the Israelis (Jew) have been fighting for centuries over a sacred strip of land called Israel by the Jews and is called Palestine by the Arabs , but the real owners of this land is the original man (the Nubian Hebrew Israelite) and he has yet to take his rightful place. (Reference: Drusilla Houston: “The Wonderful Ethiopians of the Ancient Cushite Empire)

--------------------- 

 Love is a rose but you better not pick it
Only grows when it's on the vine
Handful of thorns and you'll know you've missed it
Lose your love when you say the word mine

---Neil Young

 

Rhiannon | Thu, 2008-06-12 08:53

Nuttin's like the leaders and bigots of one people saying that the others don't exist, or haven't a right to be there.

All the people of Earth have always been everywhere.

People who think they're pure somehow, are more than likely just a bit dim, hateful, in-bred and jealous of those who aren't.

Grim Reaper | Thu, 2008-06-12 09:12

What? Are you saying that Elijah Mohammed is the “messenger” of Fard [God]? You are saying that God is BLACK?

"This writer heard Minister Farrakhan teach that jealousy and envy is the mother of murder. (Reference: Louis Farrakhan: “Self-Improvement: The Basis of Community Development” Study Guide for Registered Muslims)."

 Farrakhan is right. I agree. So WHY are YOU so envious and jealous, fahim? What’s with this Black God, Black Messenger, this… “Holy Land belongs to the Black man”???  It is clear that you need to get rid of your baseless ENVY and JEALOUSY.

Rhiannon | Thu, 2008-06-12 09:17

any one particular group of people the Holy Land.  God gave the Land to Everyone.

Rhiannon | Thu, 2008-06-12 09:21

The article is not about Farrakhan, Fard Muhammad, Elijah Muhammad, etc., I cited many sources and article is definitely not about race. FREEMASONRY!!!

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

fahimknight | Thu, 2008-06-12 09:26

No, doubt the Holy Land was stolen and its occupied by imposters. Historical fact.If not give me your historical proof to the contrary? Not Emotional response but historical citation.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

 

fahimknight | Thu, 2008-06-12 09:34

"ASHKENAZI ARE NOT JEWS"

In the Bible Abraham is called the father of nations. Thus, Abraham had two sons, Isaac and Ishmael according to both the Bible (Judeo-Christian) and the Holy Quran (Islam/Muslim). What people fail to understand about this conflict in Palestine is that it’s a theological conflict shrouded in political terms. Theodore Hertzl is considered the so-called father of modern Zionism and in 1880's and 1890's Hertzl began advocating that the so-called Jews were the chosen people of God and that in the book of Genesis there was a covenant so-called established between the people that called themselves Jews and God.

The call for ZION (a designated home) was a theological call justified in the Old Testament teachings of a so-called promise that God had made to a certain people (that promise was not to the Ashkenazi/Khazars nor to the so-called Semite). The disperse Ashkenazis of Eastern Europe took on another people's history and culture and remember most historians have documented that many nations ran the Zionist Jews out their country for various conduct unbecoming to those nations societies. Thus, as much as we want to believe that 1947/1948 represents the beginning of Zionism, in particular when the State of Israel was established or created by Ben Gourin, Moshe Dyane and the boys these converted Ashkenazi and Khazars were acting out of a so-called theological conviction (a 4000-6000 year promise) that God had promised them Palestine or the Holy Land/Jerusalem.

Now! How did a white (Eastern European) Ashkenazi and Khazar from Russia or Poland become Semitic? The Ashkenazi and the Khazar is of a Yiddish strain and have no genetic linage to the Semitic people. The term Semitic has very little to do with Race classification, it is actually more associated with a body of languages spoken in East Africa, and the Mediterranean region. So these Ashkenazis and Khazars of European descendent conveniently adopted a Race Classification and really adopted a religion (Judaism). Hertzl exclaim this so-called disperse people towards a political solution that was disguised in a theological solution and justified under Biblical Jurisprudence.

Lets go back to Abraham sons and for those who are not Biblical (Talmud and Old Testament) or Quranic scholars, it is important to remember that Isaac and Ishmael were blood brothers (kith and kin). Abraham is not tied to the Ashkenazi or the Khazars, but he is conveniently classified as a Jew (there is no theological bases), but this term is loosely used to classify ethnicity and is also conveniently used to indicate religion; maybe it is done as a means of deception. Jew can not be a Race because the original Jew lives in Ethiopia (jet black African) and he is known as the Beta Jews or the Falasha Jews. They have been practicing Judaism in its truest form for thousands of years before this European strain adopted this ancient religion.

Also, there are many other people of different ethnicities who are considered Jews from all seven continents and they are not all of one Race and they do necessarily look like the Ashkenazi or the Khazars and many of them are not Semites. This fact alone should disqualify that the Jews are a race of people. They are not.

The two sons Isaac became the Sephardic Jew (or Judeo-Christians) and the Arab became the Ishmaelites (Islam/Muslims), they are kith and kin. This land dispute in one sense are between blood brothers, THE JEW AND THE ARAB. BUT ZIONIST HAS CONFUSED THE MASSES OF THE PEOPLE.

The term and scare tactic of labeling Critics and critique of Zionist Jewish behavior as being anti-Semitic is a misnomer because these people are not Semites. I make a clear distinction between those Jews who practiced Judaism as their faith tradition and are good people, and denounces the political inspired movement of Zionism as being Fascist and racist. The occupation of Palestine is an outlaw act.You can not undestand the complexity of the Zionist issue because it is rooted in theological messianic terms and is guided by political and military machines.

You can not solve this riddle unless you know and understand, who is the original man? Because these two bastardize people are fighting over land that is not theirs and it will never be decided until the original man takes his rightful place Another subject for another time.

STAY AWAKE UNTIL WE MEET AGAIN
Fahim A. Knight

fahimknight | Thu, 2008-06-12 09:45

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:  From Node 7066

Judeochristianity is another of those political terms in the "language war".

It tries to imply a unity between jews and christians. While christians are taught a part of the jewish religious tradition, the Torah - the Pentatuch and the teachings of the Prophets, they are never taught the talmud. An official translation of the talmud is not even available. And for good reason.

If christians ever found out what the oral tradition of the jews says about, they would follow the advice of Martin Luther. The jews, on the other hand, are taught nothing but contempt and parasitism for christians and their beliefs.

There is no judeo christianity - there is judeo parasitism on christians.

Claymoremind | Fri, 2008-06-06 05:40

 

Rhiannon | Thu, 2008-06-12 09:52

That is not what I brought up!

Why do you keep bringing this judeochristianity nonsense up?

"Thus, Abraham had two sons, Isaac and Ishmael according to both the Bible (Judeo-Christian) and the Holy Quran (Islam/Muslim)."

You say this a lot throughout your posts, including this one.

------------------

And just what "certain people" did God promise the Land to?

 

Rhiannon | Thu, 2008-06-12 10:01
Rhiannon | Thu, 2008-06-12 11:00

In my opinion there is no need for so many words.

Talmud says goyim are worse than cattle, if the chosen have an opportunity to kill and cause harm to the cattle, they must...all is acceptable against mere cattle.

Goyim have no private property rights according to the Talmud, they are destined to serve their chosen masters the Jewish elite whether Khazar or not is irrelevant. The Jews will own and control everything and the goyim will serve the Jews.

Karl Marx had a similar idea with his Marxism, he was trained by Rabbis, his parents were Rabbinical.

Jewish bankers use the techniques of Banking, War, Revolution, Homosexuality, Multiculturalism, Immigration, Pornography, Drugs, TV and all sorts of other tools to undermine society, to create artificial social problems, debts and to take ownership and control of the Goyim. This can be researched and verified scientifically. There is no need for mystical or esoteric theories to find the truth.

The Black Muslims have some good teachings, some of them are very learned and know exactly what is going on and how to combat it, but in other ways they are stupid...their theories only serve to alienate them from other members of society, black and non black. Malcolm X was a clever guy, he had learnt alot from the Nation of Islam. If you shed your racist ideas you too would be a better person and your views and policies which you extol would be more conducive to overcoming the enemy. Black kids need discipline and intellectual food, so that they do not become stupid gangsta killers wasting their lives needlesly. The Nation offers that discipline...but you have to make it more appealing, get those kids and mold them before they become lost. Within 10 years if every black kid in the ghetto learnt what is happening and lived by the discipline of Islam there would be a revolution. The Hispanics and the Whites would become allies together with the blacks. This is what is needed, not some faction which creates more divisions and parochialism. Do you not have a desire to create freedom and liberty for your people?

====================================

Lying is their game, and Power is their goal. Make War By Way of Deception

Panic | Thu, 2008-06-12 22:54

Panic thank you for the compliment, I have read and met some real intelligent Nation of Islam and "Black Muslim" intellectuals, but I am going to reject the inference that they are stupid. They are one of the few Black organizations in America that understands what is going on. I respect the work of Minister Louis Farrakhan amongst African Americans. The Nation of Islam has always allied itself with progressive organizations and people. The historical complexities of race and class in America has at times "muddied" the water. I have been associated with the Black Muslims and Black Panther Party by Posters on this site, I wonder, Why?. I stand with progressive people; BAR RACE AND COLOR. I access this site, because there is a lot of TRUTHFUL information being given that you can not get in the mainstream mediiums.

Stay Awake Until We Meet again,

Fahim A. Knight

fahimknight | Fri, 2008-06-13 02:16

 The Hispanics and the Whites would become allies together with the blacks.  Please don't forget the Asians.

 

However, I doubt it could happen. But I dream about it everyday.

 

LatinAmericanview | Fri, 2008-06-13 02:32

Why is this? Are Jews genetically disposed to evil? If so why? Why do they seem to be display so much more wrong doing & sickness than any other ethnicity? Not all Jews are bad but it seems like there's more badness overall among Jews as an ethnicity than any other.

Infinite | Fri, 2008-06-13 04:10

Religions are sets of life instructions. According to the father of sociology Emile Durkheim societies create very specific types of peoples.  See his work on 3 types of suicide. Judaism thens to create more flexible moral codes and that is understandable since they are arbitrary. Christians have a submissive religion. Christians turn the other cheek when they should be rioting in the streets to bring change. What has always intrigued me is why Christians worship Jews? They have a Jewish savior! They worship a Jewish woman. And to top it all of the Jews are the chosen people. Jews could not have invented a more perfect religion!

LatinAmericanview | Fri, 2008-06-13 05:48

The father of sociology Ibn Khaldoun. Also LatinAmerican, I was not ignoring your previous request of appeariing on your radio program. I am not much of a verbal talking head. Thanks for the consideraton.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

fahimknight | Fri, 2008-06-13 06:23

Never.

I don't care how many sites you visit and tell you that Jesus was a jew. I don't care if you visit some Muslim sites that tell you Jesus was a jew.

According to Benjamin Freedman, they [christians and muslims] a great deal of them have been brainwashed...and for damn good reason. The zionists started this lie to further win over the Christian churches' support for "their holy land". Just like "judeo-christianity" is a hobgoblin of bigotry and racism to further isolate all Muslims, including Arab Muslims...their easiest target to oppress and isolate.

Divisions, Watson! Disvisions. The zionist jew's plan to divide and destroy.

I use the word "destroy" instead of conquer because "conquer" is too noble a word for these murderers and thieves.

Jesus was not a jew. You will actually find some Christian and Muslim and non-religious sites that explain this. These are the sites I agree with.

Rhiannon | Fri, 2008-06-13 07:06

And thank you for expanding my horizons.  I understand about the interview.

LatinAmericanview | Fri, 2008-06-13 07:16

Teenage settler [to Cameraman]: "You asshole!

You and your fucking Jesus can kiss my ass, ok?!!

[Not clear who says "Go away!"]

Teenage settler: "Screw you! Screw your mothers!

No camera! No camera! I break your camera - don't take pictures, okay?! Screw you, you Nazi!

You fuck - don't take camera! I break your camera; don't take picture. [something in Hebrew?] We don't want picture, no picture.

[teenage settler moves closer to Cameraman]

Cameraman: "Please, please, you need - you can't come in here, this is not your house."

Teenage settler [now walking away]: "We killed Jesus and we're proud of it!

This is our land! Get the fuck out of here!

This is my land, you fuck!"

Cameraman: "This is not your land - it belongs to these families."

Teenage settler: "You son of a bitch! We're going to kill you and the Palestinians! you . . . you Nazi, son of a shit!

[something in Hebrew?]

This is my land! God gave it to me!

FUCK YOU! Nazi! call everyone you want, I'm going to kill you!

Bastards! This is my house! This is my land! God gave it to me! and FUCK you!

 ------------------------------------------

ILLEGAL israeli squatters bragging....defiling the name of Jesus.  This is just one item of proof.  This was taken from the video from MonkeyZerg's  post.

Rhiannon | Fri, 2008-06-13 07:35
 
 

What Jewish prophets? There were no Jewish prophets.

How do Moses, Abraham, and Jesus embrace judaism? I don't believe they ever did. They were not Jews. It is practically impossible.

Ellendra Jane

Ellendra | Sun, 2007-02-11 06:22
 

 Esau of the Christians?? NO. Couldn't be.

 

MonkeyZerg "'sons of Esau' generally refers to Christians. 'sons of Ishmael' generally refers to Muslims........"

Esau? Christians? I don't believe this. Are you sure you are not mistaken??

Seems to me that Esau is the ancestor or ADOPTED ancestor of the warmongering tribe KHAZARS. I mean if the Khazars had to adopt a religion, they sure made it clear they were taking on the sins of Esau right along with it!

Therefore, Esau was the father of the pharisees and saduecees. Those hateful, bad seed, wicked strain of "jews" that wanted to kill Jesus Christ.

What do you say, MonkeyZerg?

Ellendra Jane

 

Ellendra | Sun, 2007-02-11 06:30
 

 In response to Ellendra re Esau, Jewish prophets

Hi Ellendra,

Sorry for not being nitty gritty regarding 'Jewish prophets'. I agree with you that I used an incorrect term that is popularly used. Moses, Jesus, and all the prophets in between that were sent to the tribe of Israel, can be described as being ethnically Israelite, and religiously monotheistic/God-fearing/etc. They weren't Jewish in the sense that Judaism is actually the religion based on the later teachings of the Rabbis, and not purely on the teachings of the prophets. That was my mistake totally, you caught me out.

As for Esau being the father of the Christians. If you're a Christian and have read the Bible and read all the stories about Esau, then its obvious he wasn't the 'father of the Christians'. Esau was Jacob's twin brother, and Christianity is based on faith, you don't have to be born Christian. Please realize that everything I was talking about in my comment was according to Judaic sources. It is Judaism that regards Esau to be the father of the Christians, which is something not supported by the Bible or by non-Jews. I was just pointing that out to explain why the Kabbalistic tract talked about Esau, Ishmael, then Jesus and Mohammed.

The Talmud says that the evil spirit of Esau entered Jesus:
"Furthermore, "In the secret books, which are not permitted to fall easily into the hands of Christians, they say that the soul of Esau came into Christ, that he was therefore evil and that he was Esau himself.""

Again, I'm not saying or agreeing with Christians being 'sons of Esau', just like I'm not saying or agreeing that Jesus and Mohammed are in hell.

You'll be surprised how often religious Jewish writers refer to the Biblical history of Esau, Jacob, and Ishmael, and say that these struggles continue today with Esau representing the Christian world, Jacob the Jewish world, and Ishmael the Muslim world. I've read these things many times over the years.

Here's just one example, from a Judaic article titled the Two Faces of Esau:

The entire history of confrontation between the Arab-Muslim, Western/Christian and Jewish worlds can be understood by tracing back to the roots of their conflict in Biblical times, the battles between Ishmael (father of the Arab/Muslim world), Esau (father of the Christian/Western world) and Jacob (father of the Jews) – as I discussed at length in my articles last year, following September 11th...

Many Jews use this lense to explain Christian and Muslim animosity to Jews as being something they inherited from biblical figures. It's poor little Jacob against 'hairy, cunning' Esau and 'wild, sword against the world' Ishmael.

I hope I made myself clear.

MonkeyZerg | Mon, 2007-02-12 16:04

----------------------------------------------------------------

I bolded the most important text from MZ

EXCELLENT!  Thank you MonkeyZerg!

-Rhi

Rhiannon | Fri, 2008-06-13 07:58

You write:

“King Solomon's Temple was built on Mount Moriah in Jerusalem and some have maintained that the Ark of the Covenant where Prophet Moses (received the Ten Commandments is somehow connected to this land and Mount Moriah as it pertains to Moses and the Tabernacle.   However, there is a much older civilization with a much more advanced culture and evolution that existed in Cush (Ethiopia), Africa, which were the Coptic Christians and Falasha Jews who were practicing a form of Christianity and Judaism long before Moses, Abraham and Yeshua bin Yosef (Jesus). (Reference: Ella J. Hughley; The Truth About Black Biblical Hebrew Israelites (Jews).”

 

 

What kind of messy statement is this?  You mix geographic areas, different civilizations and historical and archeological eras all together in one or 2 sentences like a combo meal.  In addition, you make sweeping statements for which there is no serious valid archeological proof.  You need to read what the head of the department of Archeology in the University of Tel Aviv says about “the temple of Solomon”… and he is an Israeli Jewish archeologist called Israel Finkelstein.  No archeological proof has ever been found of this famous “temple of Solomon” while there is plenty of proof of the existence of many other non-Jewish civilizations in the area.  Read his book:  The Bible Unearthed.  From Jerusalem's so-called temple of Solomon, you jump to Ethiopa’s “Falasha Jews”.  This subject in itself is also extremely disputable as the Falashas may well have been Christians, not Jews.  I also love your suggestion that Africans were practicing Judaism before Moses… and these were the black biblical Hebrew Israelites.  LOL!.  Do you work for AIPAC Fahim?  What will you come up with next?  That the “Israelites” built Africa?

 

You write:

“people known today as the Arabs (who occupies Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Libya, Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Morocco, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, etc; the Palestinians and the Israelis (Jew) have been fighting for centuries over a sacred strip of land called Israel by the Jews and is called Palestine by the Arabs”

 

A sacred strip of land called Israel”????

Only an ignorant (or a manipulator of facts) doesn’t know that the artificial state of Israel was established in 1948.. and that in fact most of the Arab states mentioned were also colonial artificial states.  What existed what Arabia, Syria, Philistine and Egypt… and more of course further from your darling Israel.  You need a serious lesson in History “Fahim”.

 

You write:

“but the real owners of this land is the original man (the Nubian Hebrew Israelite) and he has yet to take his rightful place. (Reference: Drusilla Houston: “The Wonderful Ethiopians of the Ancient Cushite Empire)”  

 

 

 

LOL!!!!!  Forget it Fahim.  Forget trying to fit the Jews in Ancient Egyptian history.  This is an old game which we know off by heart in Egypt.  Drussilla Houston can stuff it up.  There is no archeological proof of those damned Israelites except possibly one inscription (in all Ancient Egyptian History) which might possibly be referring to a troublesome tribe which the Canaanites asked the Ancient Egyptians to send forces to counter as it was trying to occupy their land in Philistine, not in Nubia!!!!

 

Sorry, but I can’t read anymore of this post...

 

 

 

Cherifa Sirry | Sat, 2008-06-14 04:31

Cherifa Sirry your comments are strictly westernized propaganda. I should not even address such ignorant comments, but it was to tempting not to address. You conveniently use some biblical history to make your argument, but in the same breath covertly rebuke me for using Bible History. You can not have your cake and eat it to. King Solomon Temple did exist both Bible and Quran bear witness to Prophet Solomon and Prophet David. You appear to be one of these westernized Eurocentric academicians who has a Eurocentric paradigm and worldviews of world civilization. You do not like the fact that I dispute that the people (Arab and Jew) are not the original people of North East, Africa that is conveniently called the Middle East, which was separated by the man made Suez Canal. There is little doubt that Original Hebrew Israelites were Nubians and not Semites--the Khazars and Ashkenazi and yes, the Arabs are a Johnnie-come-lately people. This not rhetoric this is historical fact, but you are blinded by your westernized education. I am a student of history, geography, Middle Eastern History, anthropology, archeology, Egyptology, and religion. Thus, you can not mix truth with falsehood and expect reasonable minded people to be persuaded by this simplistic ploy. History bears witness that beneath the site where Al-Aqsa Masjid sits today on Mount Moriah there were three prior edifices--one of them was proving to be the Ancient Temple of King Solomon. I clearly stated in the very first paragraph of my article that the Masonic version of this history does not square totally with the facts of pure history relative to King Solomon's Temple as we know it. But the basis of the article was written to give the Masonic version of this magnificent and mythical edifice, but I have given you a very interesting LINK that supports my contention relative to the existence of King Solomon's Temple. Muslim scientist not Israelis has discovered some interesting artifacts. Please review the link.

http://truthatlarge.blogspot.com/2007/10/solomons-temple-artifacts-found-by.html
 

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

 

 

fahimknight | Sat, 2008-06-14 08:22

Are we supposed to take your word for it?  Excuse me if I don’t.  I also don’t much like your sources because there are historically acknowledged academic sources, then there are the new fangled Christian Zionist & Zionist sources which you sometimes refer to especially when it comes to Jews.

 

What an earth do you mean by “Original Hebrew Israelites???”   Do you mean that there are some fake ones as opposed.  One ancient Egyptian inscription may possibly refer to an Israelite tribe which had attacked the Canaanites (in Asia) who were asking Ancient Egyptian to send troops  to oust them.  And that is what happened.  Today’s Israelis base their whole life on this inscription… only today’s Israeli’s have zero link to the Israelite tribe… that is if it existed

ISRAELITES WERE NEVER NUBIANS.  Give a credible scientific reference to read on that, but I doubt you will find.  By credible evidence, I need archeological finds.

 

In fact, there is one reference to the temple of Solomon which is the most important on of all.  But you haven’t mentioned it.  Find it and mention it because it will tell you that by the times the Arabs arrived to Jerusalem, the temple had been destroyed ages ago and there then was no trace of it.  It is the Romans who destroyed it.  When the Muslim built, there was absolutely nothing their.  Israel has been searching for 60 now and has still found nothing, but if keeps running into pottery and artwork from other civilization.

 

Nubian could have been Chritians at a time, but the are today Muslims. They were NEVER Jewish.  You don’t know how the Jewish community lived in Egypt… and in which parts of Egypt they stated.  Nuba was not part.

 

As for your “Muslim archeologists”… their names weren’t available so that leads to nothing.  None of those archeologist are known or have shining names in their field.  I can’t take them as a reference.

 

Cherifa Sirry | Sat, 2008-06-14 09:51

It is either:

1. Judean
2. Judaism
3. Tribe of Judah

The two tribes of Judah were a very dark skinned people.

The ten tribes of Israel were Naphilim - white/mix.

Grim Reaper | Sat, 2008-06-14 10:08

ONE of fahim's references:

The group moved to Georgia in 1993 from New York, where it had operated under other names, including the Ansaru Allah Community. A 1993 FBI report linked that group to a myriad of crimes, including arson and extortion.

''I am the lamb, I am the man,'' declares Dr. Malachi Z. York, 54, on his website. ''I am the Supreme Being of This Day and Time, God in Flesh.'' And by the way, says the native of the planet Rizq, a spaceship is coming on May 5, 2003, to scoop up believers. The believers have been making quite a spectacle in the tiny town of Eatonton, Ga. (pop. 5,000), seat of the not much larger Putnam County (pop. 17,000). There, the man born Dwight York, of Sullivan County, N.Y., decreed the founding of Tama-Re, Egypt of the West, a 19-acre evocation of the ancient land, complete with 40-ft. pyramids, obelisks, gods, goddesses and a giant sphinx. It is the holy see of the Nuwaubians.

But don't call them a religion. The Nuwaubians describe themselves as a ''fraternal organization'' of people of different religions, including Christians, Muslims and others who just happen to share a few extra tenets.

_________________________
All drivel & nonsense...

Rhiannon | Sat, 2008-06-14 10:13

I knew you would come up with another weak argument now it is my sources and references. But I guest if I was quoting Zionist scholars you would consider them credible references. Here is three more sources that points to the Nubian Hebrew Israelites, in fact Grim Reaper is absolutely correct. "\Ethiopia the Missing Link" by Sterlin Means; "The Black Man of the Nile and His Family"; byYosef Ben Jochannan and "Destruction of Black Civilization" by Chancellor Williams. All these sources verify my contentions. I got a real good one, if you are interested titled, "The African Origins of Modern Judaism: From Hebrews to Jews" by Jose V. Malcioln. But you sound like some emotional ASS WOMAN; just like that other female Rh who is a Muslim Zealot always trying to defend her Cult practices, that is all organized religion is. When you start SEEING LANGUAGE LIKE "WHY SHOULD WE TAKE YOUR WORD" You better believe it sounds like some emotional woman's perspective. Do not take my word read the HISTORY. Lets debate the issues minus crying.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

fahimknight | Sat, 2008-06-14 17:19

When you start SEEING LANGUAGE LIKE "WHY SHOULD WE TAKE YOUR WORD" You better believe it sounds like some emotional woman's perspective.

So not only are you a so-called 'professor' whose semi-literate screeds border on racist, but now you are also an unabashed misogynist? Where too next, Fahim?

Sullivan | Sat, 2008-06-14 17:24

It is only 80 pages. Iron Curtin Over America.  Or Just the frist 10 pages. 

 

here is the link:

ftp://truthdb.org/pub/lav/Iron.Curtain.Over.America.pdf

LatinAmericanview | Sat, 2008-06-14 17:36

Sullivan please. I have no respect for an Irish Jew like yourself. You have demonstrated your RACISM over and over again. Thus, if I am semi-literate you are still no intellectual match for me. But that is perhaps how you see all black people and people of color, as being "semi-literate" who does not accept your Eurocentric point of views. I have crushed your weak arguments over and over again. I am up for the challenge today. It is a 4000 word essay save the insults lets the focus be the article. But I do reject your racist insults. What you point of view? I think you are AIPAC agent provocateur because you have done and said enough that has brought me to that conclusion. What is  your first name or last name “Simon Roth” Sullivan---you sound like one of those Khazars. You need to at least change your name “Sullivan” (what is the origin).

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

 

 

fahimknight | Sat, 2008-06-14 19:17

Fahim, you are at least entertaining, even if you are a pompous buffoon with a monumental ego.

Sullivan please. I have no respect for an Irish Jew like yourself. You have demonstrated your RACISM over and over again.

I'll leave others to judge that - and your little 'contributions'.

Thus, if I am semi-literate you are still no intellectual match for me.

As I said, you are entertaining. I'll grant you that much.

But that is perhaps how you see all black people and people of color, as being "semi-literate" who does not accept your Eurocentric point of views.

Not at all, Fahim. Unlike you, I don't lump people together on the basis of their skin colour. I leave that to 'experts' like you. However, what I do expect is that people in academia are be able to write sentences that parse correctly - regardless of their race. Is it too much to expect from a supposed 'professor'?

I have crushed your weak arguments over and over again.

Have you indeed? You must point out where that was. Was it when you were pretending to be in Ghana when in fact you had not strayed outside of North Carolina?

I am up for the challenge today.

It doesn't seem that way.

It is a 4000 word essay save the insults lets the focus be the article. But I do reject your racist insults.

Can you point out where I made a racist statement? Is pointing out your racism - the various posts where you (attempt to) have a go at Arabs, Whites and sundry others as being the source of your woes - racism?

What you point of view?

Try that one again, Fahim.

I think you are AIPAC agent provocateur because you have done and said enough that has brought me to that conclusion.

Ok. You got me bang to rights there! Is it not a sign that you are losing an argument that has not yet begun when you start flinging 'Jewish' and 'AIPAC' accusations around?

Actually, Fahim, I just detest supremacism, whether it is white, jewish or your particular flavour - black supremacism. I also have no time whatsoever for your funny handshake/ rolled-up trouser-leg brigade.

What is your first name or last name “Simon Roth” Sullivan---you sound like one of those Khazars. You need to at least change your name “Sullivan” (what is the origin).

You really are hoot! Is this as good as you can come up with?

Sullivan | Sat, 2008-06-14 19:32

Thanks LatinAmerican I will access and read the link you recommended.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

fahimknight | Sat, 2008-06-14 19:32

I detest Eurocentrism that is the worst kind of supremacy; it suggests that no other people or individuals are capable or "literate" enough to make and/or have made a worth while contribution to civilization, culture and towards the advancement of human civilization. This has been a general point advocated by you as a Eurocentric proponent. This point of view is not only racist; it is part responsible for the mess that has been created on the other six continents for the people of color—along with your other family members the Khazars. Now! AIPAC agent you have to come better than that. You are a Eurocentric Racist hiding as the IP and probably monitoring the posters for your paymasters. "BY WAY OF DECEPTION"

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

 

 

 

 

fahimknight | Sat, 2008-06-14 19:51
Claymoremind | Sat, 2008-06-14 19:55

and some fresh air, Fahim.

You are a Eurocentric Racist hiding as the IP and probably monitoring the posters for your paymasters.

You're imagination is in overdrive.

Sullivan's professionalism and integrity makes him an ideal adminstrator at WUFYS.

___________________________

"Money" has no value - people do.

qrswave | Sat, 2008-06-14 20:11

I detest Eurocentrism that is the worst kind of supremacy; it suggests that no other people or individuals are capable or "literate" enough to make and/or have made a worth while contribution to civilization, culture and towards the advancement of human civilization.

Expecting a certain level of literacy from a university professor isn't Eurocentrism, despite your efforts to portray it as such.

This has been a general point advocated by you as a Eurocentric proponent.

Try again, Fahim. I have NEVER advocated a euro-centric viewpoint.

This point of view is not only racist;

And your afro-centric viewpoint isn't? For what it is worth, I have never advocated anything remotely euro-centric.

A it is part responsible for the mess that has been created on the other six continents for the people of color

Would those 'people of colour' include the Arabs you love to hate so much? The mess has many, many causes, one of which is, undoubtedly, euro-centrism.

—along with your other family members the Khazars.

Still at it, are we, Fahim? You must really feel like you are losing to be employing such a lame tactic.

Now! AIPAC agent you have to come better than that. You are a Eurocentric Racist

Not at all, Fahim. I just don't like your pompousity, your afro-centric racism and your apparent love of all things masonic.

hiding as the IP and probably monitoring the posters for your paymasters. "BY WAY OF DECEPTION"

Explain 'hiding as the IP'? Who are my paymasters? Why am I not yet rich?

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Yawn!

Sullivan | Sat, 2008-06-14 20:14

Glad to hear you are denouncing your Eurocentric views that is a good start to some meaningful dialog. You probably have never thought your views were Eurocentric, but they come across as such. I have blogged on many different angles on this site. This week I felt like discussing Freemasonry, Now! Your co-workers and staff are running towards your defense. You are nothing but an Irish Jew and covert AIPAC agent. You can send your entire staff my way; it does not make a difference. I am up for the challenge. Thus, when you call people semi-literate; in particular people of color that is atypical white supremacy lexicon and a Eurocentric perspective. You really desire to say "Africa is the Dark Continent". No, I am not against Arabs, I am against fanaticism, pan-Islam and pan-Arabism. Thus, in fact I am against all formal and organize religion, which include your NO GOOD POPE that sits as the head of Christianity. He is the Chief Cult Leader in the world. I am against them hypocritical Wahhabi Muslims who sits over in Mecca, Saudi Arabia. There you have it; you now know what I am against. I am for FREEDOM, JUSTICE AND EQUALITY.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

PS. Give me the Origin of that Jew name you have "Sullivan"

 

 

fahimknight | Sat, 2008-06-14 21:41

You are nothing but an Irish Jew and covert AIPAC agent

wth... where is this coming from...

your NO GOOD POPE

As qrs said, "You're imagination is in overdrive."

The delusional are coming out of the woodworks these days...

aZiXx | Sat, 2008-06-14 22:03

Glad to hear you are denouncing your Eurocentric views that is a good start to some meaningful dialog.

Did I denounce something? I must have missed that. Then again, you probably imagined it, just like you imagined visiting Ghana while you were still in N.C.

You probably have never thought your views were Eurocentric, but they come across as such.

I guess I'll have to take an intellectual colossus like your good self at your word. I guess I must be euro-centric.

I have blogged on many different angles on this site. This week I felt like discussing Freemasonry, Now!

You don't discuss, you preach, and badly at that. If you want to preach freemasonry, funny handshakes, rolled-up trouser-legs and that other esoteric bullshit, you are free to do so, just as I am to comment on your 'contributions'.

Your co-workers and staff are running towards your defense. You are nothing but an Irish Jew and covert AIPAC agent.

Wow. Such debating power! I'm floored!

You can send your entire staff my way; it does not make a difference. I am up for the challenge.

No you are not. You are defeated as soon as you press the 'Submit' button.

Thus, when you call people semi-literate; in particular people of color that is atypical white supremacy lexicon and a Eurocentric perspective.

Not at all, it is an academic perspective. I expect academics to be able to communicate well and accurately.

You really desire to say "Africa is the Dark Continent".

Don't put words in my mouth, bozo. My friends from Cameroon, Niger and Uganda would fall about laughing if they read this nonsense of yours.

No, I am not against Arabs, I am against fanaticism, pan-Islam and pan-Arabism.

That is not how you have come across in previous posts.

Thus, in fact I am against all formal and organize religion, which include your NO GOOD POPE that sits as the head of Christianity.

Is the Pope mine? I wasn't informed.

He is the Chief Cult Leader in the world.

Is this another example of your reasoning and arguing prowess, Mr. Professor?

I am against them hypocritical Wahhabi Muslims who sits over in Mecca, Saudi Arabia.

"Them Muslims who sits over in Mecca"? You are making my point for me, Mr Knight.

There you have it; you now know what I am against. I am for FREEDOM, JUSTICE AND EQUALITY.

So you are for freedom, as long as it is not the freedom to be a Wahhabi Muslim? Or a Roman Catholic? You are a pathetic hypocrite, Knight.

PS. Give me the Origin of that Jew name you have "Sullivan"

You are a researcher, or so you claim. Do your own research.

Sullivan | Sat, 2008-06-14 22:19

You better laugh some more. Some of the moves Mr. IP Sullivan has made is right out of the Zionist Play Book. To the last poster, I am not going to entertain  your off the wall and foolish comments. You do not qualify to be in this discussion. I read your foolish position on another blog. I want to expose that Irish Jew Sullivan---that you all do not know. He is on AIPAC payroll and he is keeping Dossiers on each  EACH OF YOU INCLUDING MYSELF. How about it Mr. IP?

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Kmight

fahimknight | Sat, 2008-06-14 22:23

You better laugh some more.

I am, believe me, I am.

Some of the moves Mr. IP Sullivan has made is right out of the Zionist Play Book.

I take it you have a copy of that book for 'reference purposes', Fahim? LOL.

To the last poster, I am not going to entertain your off the wall and foolish comments. You do not qualify to be in this discussion.

I am the 'last poster'. You probably mean aZiXx though. He could chew you up and spit you out before you could cobble together one of those syntactic strangenesses of yours that passes for a sentence. Anyway, who the hell are you to say who can or can not discuss things here? Who do you think you are, Mr Knight? Who died and elected you as a god?

I read your foolish position on another blog. I want to expose that Irish Jew Sullivan---that you all do not know. He is on AIPAC payroll

I never got my pay cheque. Perhaps that is because you spelled my name wrong when you entered it into the AIPAC personnel system? I'm laughing my ass off here, Fahim. You are top-class entertainment.

and he is keeping Dossiers on each EACH OF YOU INCLUDING MYSELF.

Don't flatter yourself. Even if I was so inclined as to keep dossiers, I wouldn't be including you in them. It really wouldn't be worth the effort.

How about it Mr. IP?

Still pissed that I exposed your 'trip to Ghana' lie, are you? Get over it already.

Sullivan | Sat, 2008-06-14 22:48
Grim Reaper | Sat, 2008-06-14 22:56

Since you are ignorant about Afrocentricism relative to Eurocentricism let me school you a little. Afrocentric thought was popularized by a professor named Dr. Molefi Kete Asante who authored a book titled, "Afrocentricity" in the 1980s and is a tenure professor at Temple University. The Afro-Centric movement was a strict academic movement and nothing else. It was designed to combat white supremacy being taught in the academic classroom on all levels; in particular in the United States and the Caribbean. And was not based on accessing power. This concept was mere intellectual in intent and scope. But institutionalize racism is the chief ingredient that embodies the philosophy of Eurocentric mindsets presently and historical. Thus, associated with the Eurocentric mindset was power (war machines) and acting in concert with other nations to rape, rob, enslave, etc., people of color.  Moreover, they always sent their Christian Missionaries, Merchants and the Military in that order to finish off the indigenous people of Africa, Central and South America, Asia, New Zealand and Australia, etc. This is an example of Eurocentric ideology which is manifest and associated with the ability to carry out imperialism and oppression based on Power. You can not equate Afrocentrism with Eurocentrism there are some distinct differences. Look at the United Nations Security Council—one nation of color China (China is there because it has the War Machines and two billion people to deal with the west) Africa is the second largest continent in the world and has no representative on the UN Security Council. You see there are some distinct differences between Eurocentric thought and Afro-Centric thought you can not equate two. You got lost in sub-level discussion of Nationalism, but the primary object has very little to do with Nationalism--Eurocentric ideology is tied to Power and the ability to subjugate others. Please read Frantz Fanon book titled, "The Wretched of the Earth" and do your homework on Afrocentricism before you make ill informed assessments. There is Zionist Jew named Mary Lefkowitz she attacked the Afro-centric movement and your arguments are closely related. Her book is titled, "Not Out Of Africa". I praise North Korea, they told Europe and Bush come on and get me, but North Korea has Nuclear weapons. Those cowards chose a little pasty nation of Iraq to attack.

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

 

fahimknight | Sat, 2008-06-14 23:43

Love that melody Grim, reminds me of that Inspector Gadget "this is the police" techno song from a bit back.  The gnomes are indeed out...

aZiXx | Sat, 2008-06-14 23:49

REALLY!!! You exposed me. LOL!!!. I know you AIPAC agents are powerful and resourceful, but it is good to hear you admitting it on this blog. The Next Trip I take to Ghana, I would like for you to go as one of my STUDENTS. So we can help you with respecting other people who you classify as "semi-literate" because they are perhaps non-European. Grim Reaper, you have a bad taste for music. Thus, was that the music you played at your mother's funeral. Now! you know that's not right to expose something so solemn. You have my condolences. I prefer hip-hop; revolutionary hip-hop you have any of that?

Stay Awake Until We Meet Again,

Fahim A. Knight

 

 

 

 

fahimknight | Sun, 2008-06-15 00:05

REALLY!!! You exposed me. LOL!!!.

Oh come on Fahim, is your memory that bad?

I know you AIPAC agents are powerful and resourceful, but it is good to hear you admitting it on this blog.

You need to reposition the tinfoil beanie, Fahim, it is obviously not working.

The Next Trip I take to Ghana, I would like for you to go as one of my STUDENTS.

The next trip? Your next trip will be your first. You flatter yourself when you suggest that I could be one of your students. You really are a comedian. Perhaps you should develop that talent.

So we can help you with respecting other people who you classify as "semi-literate" because they are perhaps non-European.

Other people. No. My remarks were about you, the one who claims to be an academic.

Grim Reaper, you have a bad taste for music.

Ah, so now you are a music critic? Is there no end to your expertise, Mr. Knight?

Thus, was that the music you played at your mother's funeral.

You like the word 'thus', don't you? It is a pity you don't know how to use it in context.

By the way, did you spot the hip-hop reference?

Sullivan | Sun, 2008-06-15 00:41

THE AFRICAN CENTERED MOVEMENT: CRITIQUE OF DR LEFKOWITZ 'NOT OUT OF
AFRICA'"

by FAHIM A. KNIGHT

I purchased a book titled, "NOT OUT OF AFRICA", authored by Mary Leftkowitz thus, prior to me purchasing this book, I heard about some of the controversy, which was centered on this book. I as an African living in America have a great deal of respect and appreciation for the African Centered movement and its scholars, but before I rendered an opinion or critique of this book, "NOT OUT OF AFRICA" it was only intelligent that I read the book objectively in order to examine the credibility of the scholarship.

In assessing the "Foreword" and "Introduction" section of the book, it was clear that this research was aimed at being critical of the African Centered movement, which critical analysis is not all together a negative thing and I would be the first to agree that all leaders, organizations, movements, scholarship, etc., should be subject to critical evaluation.

There are many Africans in America that do not fully embrace, agree nor accept all the intellectual contentions espoused by the African Centered Movement. But a large segment of the Africans in America do respect the African Centered scholars' efforts to rescue African history from white definition and interpretation.

Thus, this book, "NOT OUT OF AFRICA" seeks to discredit African Centered scholarship as being emotional and lacking the scientific and empirical methodology required under the guidelines for those such as historians and social scientist who write scholarly studies.

Lefkowitz accuses the African Centered movement of being politically motivated, as opposed to being treated as an intellectual school of thought whose mission is research, she never clarified what she meant by describing the African Centered movement as being politically motivated. However, I am of the opinion, that all scholarship and social ideas in America are somewhat politically inspired; thus, so why make the African Centered scholars appear as of committing an unpardonable sin.

Lefkowitz perhaps was challenging black people's right to self-determination of ideals and we had no right to develop independent thoughts without white scholars' approval.

This book gave the impression of perhaps having a Zionist Jewish agenda, no different than the Anti Defamation League (ADL) or the Simon Wiesenthal Center type propaganda. I consider, "NOT OUT OF AFRICA" as being reactionary scholarship with a political objective of discrediting the contributions black people made on the stage of human history.

In the "Foreword and "Introduction" Lefkowitz is attempting to incite university officials and administrators, as well as politicians to think about formulating policy and is covertly challenging the concept of academic freedom, which is granted to professors, scholars and academicians that have met the stringent requirements to be designated as a tenure professor.

This proposed new policy will allow universities and colleges the latitude to structure professors contracts, specifically tenure professors by granting the university the power and authority to terminate and rescind a tenure and non-tenure professor's contract ,if he/she expresses theories and/or academic concepts deemed to be controversial or goes against the popular view.

The professors' tenure status and academic freedom clauses no longer will able to protect the employment status of a professor that goes against the status quo. These reactionary theories were aimed at destroying the First Amendment Right and controlling disagreeable speech, as well as the concept of Academic Freedom.

But what led Zionist controlled University officials and politicians to this desperate measure was a speech delivered by Minister Khallid Abdul Muhammad of the Nation of Islam on November 29, 1993, on the campus of Kean College in New Jersey, titled, "The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews". Whites and Zionist Jews denounced and repudiated Muhammad's controversial speech as being racist, anti-Semitic, homophobic, etc., they felt Muhammad's speech on the college campus had gone to far and the Zionist denounce the Kean College officials for allowing this radical spokes person on the campus. Although, the university environment is suppose to be a place where ideas are shared and debated and has never been a place comfortable with censorship. The United States Congress even drew up a resolution censoring and repudiating Dr. Khallid Abdul Muhammad.

Lefkowitz cited Dr. Leonard Jeffries Empire State College speech as being academic irresponsible in 1991, but she did not mention her Jewish colleague Michael Levin who is also along with Dr. Jefferies on the faculty of City College and/or condemn him (Levin) for his racist and anti-black perspectives. I guess in her mind she found Dr. Levin's views acceptable and they met the requirements suitable for an academic environment.

In Lefkowitz conclusion it is clear that she desires to curtail and control outside controversial speakers from having access to young fashionable and impressionable black minds on college campuses. But more importantly these evildoers did not want public and private monies coming in the form of honorariums to black academics, scholars black leadership, spokesperson, etc., to be used in financing organizations and movements, which the ADL and their white puppets establishment do not approve.

This is the larger argument and debate when it comes to black scholars such as: Cheik Anta Diop, George G.M. James, Khallid Abdul Muhammad, John Henrik Clarke, Yosef Ben Jochannon, Molifi Kete Asante, etc., who represent the African Centered persuasion. Whites historically have always shown fear of black people through out history that dared to define themselves.

White scholars have been collectively irresponsible and it is my belief that Zionist scholars and/or their white counterpart can't morally offer black students scholarly or intellectual direction. We can detect from this book that Zionist Jews and blacks are at war for the hearts and minds of black people; moreover, this dissertation, "NOT OUT OF AFRICA", is an open declaration of war in the arena of ideals.

Lefkowitz attacked the training and schooling of African Centered scholars, which to bring into question their academic credentials and dismissed them as being pseudo historians and researchers not worthy to be taken serious as scholars.

She claim to be concern about anti-Semitism and racism in all forms, but Lefkowitz did not mention Charles Murray's book (author of the "Bell Curve") as also deserving condemnation. Her mentality is the same of Jensen, Shockley, Bakke, etc., these racist scholars claimed to offered scientific data as proof that blacks are intellectual inferior to Europeans. Also, U.B. Phillips, a post slavery racist historian held the same contention that Africans contributed nothing towards human civilization.

The Honorable Elijah Muhammad asked the question, "who is the original man"; ANSWER, "the Asiatic black man, the maker, the owner, the cream of the planet earth God of the universe." Lefkowitz is attempting to limit the black man's history to about five to ten thousand years. The black man's history has no beginning or ending, we can go back millions of years and our documentation for this claim is written in the stars and on the walls of the pyramids.

European history only goes back 6,000 years, thus the white man and the Zionist Jew are infants on the planet. How can Greece and Rome logically speaking compare to their fathers and mothers of civilization? Her arguments are emotional and subjective, possessing half-truths, distortions, outright lies and propaganda.

I view her as a Zionist Jew, whose making a last ditch scholarly effort to rescue a dying white supremacy society. She has forgotten for centuries  western society propelled it-self on false superior premises, which led to the oppressing of darker skinned people physically, psychologically, and intellectually around the world.

And in the late 20th century ex-slaves started to intellectually challenging a system of white supremacy and her writings serve as evidence that the former slave masters children are dismayed that the ex-slaves have uncovered and rediscovered the knowledge of self.

Her research did not include European scholars such as Gerald Massey who authored the monumental book titled," Ancient Egypt the Light of the World", He maintained that African contribution, specifically Kemet (Egypt) fed the entire world with its enlightenment. African Centered scholars were only quoting and documenting what European scholars had discovered a long time ago and the bases of their philosophy rest on these documented truths.

Lefkowitz deceitfully rearranges ethnic assignments; moreover, if a fact of history favored black people she would determine that the said contributions must be attributed to Semites, but she was actually pointed to the Khazars and the Ashkenazi Jew, which is the European imposter Jew (who were the Semites Arabs, Jews, Africans and other people of color?). But be scholarly truthfully the term Semitic is defined as a body of Mediterranean languages and has nothing to do with race, but her designation was geared towards discrediting Africans of their place in history by disguising significant contributions under the code name "Semites".

Those who are Biblical scholars and students of the Bible know that Prophet Noah so-called had three sons Shem (Semite lineage, the so-called Jews), Ham (Hamities, the so-called African lineage) and Japheth (Japhites, the so-called Caucasian lineage). Noah was of African descent, so what does that tell you about the above race classifications?

Lefkowitz refers to Egypt as being geographically part of the Near East, but to my last viewing of the world's map, it was clear to me that Egypt sits on the continent of Africa, which is north east Africa and in reality, there is no place on the map called the "Near East" and only the man made Suez Canal separates Africa from the so-called Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula.

Her knowledge of Freemasonry, its history, philosophy, mission, ritual, etc., were treated very poorly and left the readers with a confused and vague understanding of this complex fraternal order. The Ancient Arabic Order Imperial Council Nobles of the Mystic Shrine was incorporated on June 6, 1876.

If she would have thoroughly done her homework, she would have found as indicated in the Masonic (Shriners) name stated above, which is associated with higher degree Masonry; specifically those that have acquired the 32nd and 33rd degrees put more philosophical emphasis on Mecca, Medina, Jerusalem, etc., as opposed to Egypt.

The Muslim (the religion of Islam) and/or Islamic Holy Kaaba shrine is somewhat revered on this (high degree Masonic) initiation level much more than Egypt. The High degree Masonry known as Shriners claim to have originated in 644 A.D. along side Prophet Muhammad's son-in-law Ali Ibn Talib, the so-called founder of Shia Islam. So the Egyptian Stolen legacy concept was not indigenous to true Masonic teachings.

Every High Degree Mason's (shriners) goal is to pay respect to Allah, the God of the Muslims by making the holy Pilgrimage to Mecca and like the Muslims circumambulate the Kaaba in ritualistic form (I will at some point Post the relationship between Islam and High Degree Masonry) . George G.M. James was not influenced by Masons because most African Centered scholars would not accept Mecca because of its Arabic and Islamic cultures, which may be perceived as being alien to the African Centered audience, but Ancient Egyptians of antiquity are perceived as being black.

Most African Centered scholars and scholars in general, view Egypt as pre-dating Mecca in valor and civilization. I said all of that to say this; Egyptian Mystery Schools were not patterned after Masonic initiation rites as Lefkowitz maintained, but all of Africa operated off a system of MAAT (JUSTICE, MORALITY, BALANCE, RECPROCITY, etc.) that stems from greater universal laws.

It has been European aggression and their inhumanity to man that fostered a George G.M. James or a Molefi Asante into existence. She fail to understand that African Centered thought is an answer to white intellectual racism that has always described Africa as
the "Dark Continent" and black historians through out history have always rose to challenge this type white supremacy ideology.

We are historical and present day victims but "NOT OUT OF AFRICA&