Open Letter #03 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
Text of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #03 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY
To continue, Mr. Attorney General, I recapitulate: you were appointed by "a man of vision" who says he saw on TV as it happened what no other man on earth saw; namely, the first hit on the north tower WTC 1, and you now preside over the priesthood of the ineffable mysteries of the 9/11 airport surveillance tapes, the US Department of Justice. That's quite a distinction, isn't it? As a skeptic who sees no credible evidence showing that any of the passengers said to have boarded the ill fated flights of 9/11 were even at these airports, I cannot help but think there was a high tech framing of Arabs afoot as a pretext for putting American muscle on Mesopotomian patrol. Do you understand?
Of course people not bothered by President Bush's darkly mysterious utterances and the sheer lack of routine video surveillance evidence at the airports are also not bothered by the omission of the names of the alleged hijackers in the passenger manifests published by United and American Airlines. Their fallback position is to cite cell and airphone calls cited in the official conspiracy theory.
But a Canadian university mathematics professor, A. Kee Dewdney, conducted experiments ruling out the possibility of cell phone calls from commerical jets. A USAF Public Affairs officer at an outdoor Boeing exhibit at Rockefeller Center in 2003 told me he reached the same conclusion after he and colleagues had conducted their own informal experiments. Dewdney brilliantly infers the use of real time digital voice morphing as the only possible explanation of these "cell phone calls," and his examination of transcripts of such calls, in the manner of the great literary critic I. A. Richards, concludes that the "cell phone" impersonators were not top drawer. See http://physics911.net.
The renowned 9/11 skeptic David Ray Griffin likewise disposes of one key airphone call by pointing to trial exhibits indicating Barbara Olsen's call to her husband Ted, then the Solicitor General, did not connect. Your own people at DoJ have strong prima facie evidence that Ted Olsen is a liar! See http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/flights/P200054.html.
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
New York, New York 10185
Resume: http://www.show-the-house.com/id31.html
(Inoculated against the Qualifications!)
OPEN LETTER #03 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY
To continue, Mr. Attorney General, I recapitulate: you were appointed by "a man of vision" who says he saw on TV as it happened what no other man on earth saw; namely, the first hit on the north tower WTC 1, and you now preside over the priesthood of the ineffable mysteries of the 9/11 airport surveillance tapes, the US Department of Justice. That's quite a distinction, isn't it? As a skeptic who sees no credible evidence showing that any of the passengers said to have boarded the ill fated flights of 9/11 were even at these airports, I cannot help but think there was a high tech framing of Arabs afoot as a pretext for putting American muscle on Mesopotomian patrol. Do you understand?
Of course people not bothered by President Bush's darkly mysterious utterances and the sheer lack of routine video surveillance evidence at the airports are also not bothered by the omission of the names of the alleged hijackers in the passenger manifests published by United and American Airlines. Their fallback position is to cite cell and airphone calls cited in the official conspiracy theory.
But a Canadian university mathematics professor, A. Kee Dewdney, conducted experiments ruling out the possibility of cell phone calls from commerical jets. A USAF Public Affairs officer at an outdoor Boeing exhibit at Rockefeller Center in 2003 told me he reached the same conclusion after he and colleagues had conducted their own informal experiments. Dewdney brilliantly infers the use of real time digital voice morphing as the only possible explanation of these "cell phone calls," and his examination of transcripts of such calls, in the manner of the great literary critic I. A. Richards, concludes that the "cell phone" impersonators were not top drawer. See http://physics911.net.
The renowned 9/11 skeptic David Ray Griffin likewise disposes of one key airphone call by pointing to trial exhibits indicating Barbara Olsen's call to her husband Ted, then the Solicitor General, did not connect. Your own people at DoJ have strong prima facie evidence that Ted Olsen is a liar! See http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/flights/P200054.html.
Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
New York, New York 10185
Resume: http://www.show-the-house.com/id31.html
(Inoculated against the Qualifications!)
nice one