New England Town Prints Up Its Own Currency

Monday, February 26, 2007

Every time Cheney opens his twisted lip the dollar takes a powder

Feb 26, 2007

That's Just My Opinion

By Mike Whitney

Gold traders love Dick Cheney. Every time he opens his twisted lip and barks out another threat to Iran, the dollar takes a powder while gold futures shoot to the moon. Maybe that’s the way Cheney likes it. After all, he dumped about $25 million in euro-bonds before he took office. Judging by the way he and brother-Bush have flogged dollar, he must have doubled his investment by now.

What I am wondering is that if the banks and bankers are looking to increase their wealth with the interest, which is the same money that is simply the number digits on the computer, why can't they just create their wealth by creating digits on their computer without loaning and collecting? Isn't the interest money that borrowers return to the bank the same useless money they borrow (to the bankers)? Can we consider the bankers 'wealthy' because they have a lot of digital money, or do they have to go through this loaning-collecting process in order to convert their digital money to "tangible" asset? If I have a fraction of their, I can consider myself wealthy, because I have no way to create that money other than working like an ass.

Bankers do not just need digital money, they need customers who want it and need it too. This gives them power over their customers or those who use Banks and Bank money, and they can manipulate them.

They do turn their digital money into real assets and gain greater control, they create monopolies and oligopolies, cartels and trust funds and they have total power.

If they did not bother with the loaning of it at interest, they would have no power, no one would be dependent on their services or fake money and they could not control anyone or buy up real assets. They have to distort 'value' and create the illusion that they are 'necessary' and 'good'. They distort value by introducing thie services and fake money....suddenly money can be 'expanded' and 'contracted' by a small band of men with vested interests.

Expansition of money supply and interest rates distort societies views about value...spending and saving and what to spend it on.

I may save my money, but knowing that it will become worth less in 10 years time (inflation), unless I spend it, I may buy consumer products that I do not really need, or invest in stocks and shares in companies that will look good on paper....they do not necessarily produce useful goods or services for society, they may just be a firm of Accountants, Lawyers of firms which use the Banking System and its digital system to create a speculative economy unrelated to the real economy.

It is a deep subject and distorts everything in society, I believe it destroys it from the foundations up if it remains unchecked. Distorts all morals until people do not even know what is right and what is wrong anymore.

So even through a financial analysis, we arrive in the same conclusion that banks are NOT financial institutions. A financial institution to me is an organization that strives for profit, not control of the society.

Banking makes massive profits for those who control it, by this they also gain power.

All the labor, goods and services created by individuals in a society...ends up with a large cut in the hands of the bankers.

a $200,000 dollar loan from a bank plus interest, means a worker needs to work, sell their labor in the job market, to pay back the banks who do nothing, except ex-nihilo create digits representing money on a computer. This power is total and it makes every individual beholden day and night from the cradle to the grave to the bankers. People may work long hours, have two jobs, become more ruthless, attempt to find another source of income like drug dealing, prostitution etc. just to pay the banks back. The whole of society degenerates, our human feelings and empathy for others becomes jaded, dog eat dog. The Zionists and Banking elite thrive on this....their films and TV promote such attitudes and further foster selfishness, mistrust, adultery, and conflict within families between children and parents and spouses. The bankers grow rich and fat, everyone else starts chasing the dollar and walks over anyone and anything that may get in the way, including morality, love etc. Everyone becomes less human, de-humanized, anyone going against the flow is alienated made to feel isolated as if they do not belong, being un-selfish and altruistic in such an environment causes suffering, people take advantage. People may become depressed, put on an act, become manipulative themselves...just so they 'fit in', they may take drugs, drink alcohol, gamble to try and escape and find a way out.

Criminals who become rich through criminality, theft and ruthlessness are admired and presented as heroes, those who should be emulated.

Only a God can save us from our own selves and the rebelliousness and egotism within our own souls. Bankers and Zionists only exploit our egotism, greed and anxiety about provision and fear of poverty, we become willing slaves to their system.

in the name of God the Witness
Have you ever thought about
the real meaning of GDP per capita? Do you americans know that with your hight GDP per capita you can save money in 10 years to have realy good lives for 100 years in some parts of the world. You still think that the problem is domination. You still think that jews are trying to subdue you. NO. We are all enslaved years ago. The problem is now the FLOG. After capturing a slave in order to force him to work you must use either a FLOG or a threat of starvation. We must be in debt,we must be afraid of future,we must be wary for the medics costs,we must be without any kind of support.We must be hanged in sky. Then we accept to work,work ,work harder. They have all the money of the world,but they don't own a single neuron in our brains,and they know that.
Satan is weak,so weak, We
grant him our lives.
I think the day has come to
sell ourselves to the One who dosent need us at all.

Central banks are nothing but counterfeiting monopoly's enforced by corrupt power structures. They enact tax schemes on their worthless fiat script to give it a LABOR backing. Worthless script is exchanged for labor and vice versa.

Since the worthless script to pay the interest is never printed, a perpetual cycle of debt is created UNLESS a hero emerges - a counterfeiter who circulates his worthless script at zero interest creating the funds to pay the interest on the central bank debt or a Constitutional currency emerges backed by assets or a digital wizard.

Preventing heroes is the duty of the secret service - their only duty.

Rothschild on the cover of Time right after the Kennedy Assassination

I totally agree with your description. In a sense capitalism and communism are both [98+2] systems : 2% of the population controls the other 98%. They both strive towards the same goal : destruction of personal ownership. If I am not mistaken, only 5% of home owners have paid off their loans and really own their homes. Even tangible assets (also investments, bonds, securities, etc.) are worth any thing only if you can sell them at a price. The price obviously means the worthless money again! So in order to survive, your assets (talent, labor, belongings, money, bonds, etc.) MUST appreciate at least a tad more than they depreciate. And THIS, inevitably, turns you into a monster and the society that we are witnessing now.

Ohhh, the Rothschilds are pure Khazar Aristocracy, proof is nearly ready and to be posted in a spectacular blog, stay tuned ...

"The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing."
William Paterson (Founder of Royal English Bank in 1694).

Maier Amschel Rothschild said:
"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation and I care not who writes its laws"

"We will find many 'useful idiots' to further our cause" - N. Lenin

"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"...Voltaire

In my opinion the root of the problem lies in private central banks. We must not allow any private organization or group of organizations to determine a nation’s money supply and prime interest rates. Indeed, we must not have interest rates at all. The Catholic Church used to believe this until Jews infiltrated it. Now Islam is the only religion that forbids usury.

Without interest-bearing loans, the chains come off. An economic boom ensues. Everyone becomes optimistic. Money becomes a servant of the masses, rather than the other way around.

QRS points out that whenever any loan is made with interest, the lender becomes “superior” to the borrower, even though the loan is funny money. Once you become a borrower, your self-esteem drops. Your become depressed. Your marriage crumbles. You do all manner of desperate things. You never escape from debt.

It’s all because the Federal Reserve is a private organization that, like any such organization, seeks to make its members rich at everyone else’s expense. It knows no ethics, patriotism, or social responsibility. It regards everyone as objects to be exploited. It pumps money into the system (in the form of low interest loans) until resources become developed, and then crashes the system by taking money out of circulation. It does this by raising its interest rates so high that no one can afford to borrow. This causes money to “dry up.” Prices plunge. Economic depression sets in. Then the private banks buy everything for pennies.

Private banks say their function is to maintain economic stability. In reality, they create instability for their own profit. They control and exploit the “business cycles.” They deliberately cause wars. They are the true power in a nation.

The USA is controlled by a private bank. So are the 27 countries in the European Union, through the European Central Bank in Frankfurt. So are Canada, England, Australia, Denmark— have you noticed that countries with private central banks are the same countries that support Zionism? I maintain that private central banks, plus interest, are the ultimate reasons why Israel and Zionism continue to survive. Almost all the American “statesmen” who pushed for private central banks have been Jews, starting with Alexander Hamilton.

There is nothing wrong with a central bank, or even with fiat currency. (All currency is fiat currency.) The killer is a private bank.

Many historical figures have considered it insane to let a private entity control a nation’s money. Aristotle, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, etc, etc. The Czar of Russia refused to allow central private banks. So did Otto Von Bismark.

A “gold standard” is irrelevant. Through fractional reserve banking, banks always lend more than the gold assets they have. They create funny money out of thin air, and charge interest on that funny money. In this way they buy all real assets. And since they create money out of nothing, they can bribe any politician, thereby controlling the laws.

As soon as private ownership, fractional reserve banking, and interest enter a nation, they steadily kill that nation. They doom the masses to a lifetime of debt. They create hell on earth.

It is all based on a mass illusion. QRS notes that if you give a small child a piece of paper with the words “one million dollars” on it, the child will assume the paper is actually worth a million dollars. Likewise, when the Federal Reserve gives out a piece of paper with the words “one billion dollars” on it, adults believe it is actually worth a million dollars.

The Federal Reserve has become so good at hiding its scam that the masses cannot imagine a world without debt. Meanwhile the main job of economists is to conceal these simple facts.

IT IS INSANE TO HAVE A PRIVATE CENTRAL BANK.

John Beaty: 'The first action to regain control of our own country, is to regain control of the currency: suppress the Federal Reserve Bank'.
I agree, usury (meaning lending money at an interest, however small that is) must be abolished, real money should be lent at 0% interest. This will slow down any economy considerably, but that's what the planet needs to survive and what the Goyim need to begin shaking the New Tartar Yoke off their backs.
"Indeed, we must not have interest rates at all. The Catholic Church used to believe this until Jews infiltrated it. Now Islam is the only religion that forbids usury".
Very wise words, the corrollary is to abolish the Catholic Church as well. It has become a traitorous organization and must perish.

Thanks for your observations.

I don’t believe the economy would slow down if interest were done away with. We only need liquid to keep flowing through the system, which is extremely easy to arrange.

Just before the American war of independence, the colonies issued a currency called Colonial Scrip in proportion to the demands of trade and industry, so products would pass easily from producers to consumers. Everyone had money. Nothing was lent at interest. It was just paper (fiat) not backed by gold or silver. Benjamin Franklin explained the process to the British when Franklin was living in London. When the private bankers in England heard this (mostly Jewish) they panicked. The colonists had learned the secret of money, and their knowledge could spread throughout Europe. Hence the private bankers got the British Parliament to hastily pass the Currency Act of 1764, which prohibited the colonies from issuing scrip, and demanded that the colonies bow to the private banking system in England.

According to Ben Franklin, this was THE reason for the War of Independence. He said taxation was irrelevant. The colonists rebelled when the Jewish bankers in England demanded control over the colonies’ currency. The colonists had broken away from the private British banking system, and did not want to go back to economic slavery.

By the end of the war, the Continental Congress was desperate for money, so in 1781 they allowed Robert Morris, their financial superintendent, to start the Bank of North America, a private bank closely modeled after the Bank of England. The new bank was allowed to practice fractional reserve banking, lending out money it didn’t have, and to charge interest on the funny money. Alexander Hamilton (Jewish) was one of the architects of this scam. The bank’s charter required Robert Morris to put up $400k in assets, but Morris couldn’t raise any money, so he had the fledgling U.S. government put $400k worth of gold into his bank. The gold was on loan from France. Thus, like all private bankers, Morris, plus Hamilton and several others in the bank became filthy rich by using other people’s money.

Very quickly, Americans were all in debt to the new bank. Eventually it was defeated, but Hamilton and the others created a new one, identical to the previous one.

In 1811 a bill was put before congress to renew the charter of the private “First Bank of the United States” in Philadelphia. However, in those days the press was free, and it attacked the private bank as a den of vipers. Nathan Rothschild threatened to plunge the USA to war if the charter was not renewed, but James Madison was President, and opposed private central banks. Hence the Rothschilds sent the British to attack America (War of 1812) with the intention of plunging the USA into debt, making America ready to accept private bank control. The Rothschild plan didn’t work, however, because the British were also busy fighting Bonaparte, who also opposed private banks. After two years, the British withdrew from the USA. Andrew Jackson, a lifelong foe of private banking, knew the British had come to impose control by the private Bank of England, and he used this point to ralley his men. Hence they stomped the British in the Battle of New Orleans.

Then Jackson became the first Presidential candidate to take his campaign on the road, basing his platform on his opposition to private banks. The Jews dumped $3 million into the candidacy of Henry Clay against Jackson, but this was before electronic voting machines, so Jackson won in by landslide in November 1832.

In the following years, the USA prospered, and a culture of freedom and independence was born. Free from control by a private central bank, America quickly became so powerful that the London bankers were terrified.

Lincoln also opposed private banking. In 1862-63, he printed $450 million worth of new bills, called greenbacks, which worked beautifully, and incurred no debt for the government or the people. Nothing was lent at interest. In this way, Lincoln said, money would cease to be the master of humanity, and would become the servant, since no one is in debt. (Lincoln’s words.) He said government should print all money.

Unfortunately by 1863 during the Civil War, Lincoln desperately needed more money, but he was afraid that if he pumped more greenbacks into the systemm, it would trigger hyper-inflation. Therefore Lincoln passed the National Bank Act, which gave power to private banks. Greenbacks continued to circulate, but were not increased. Lincoln later said he considered this by far the worst mistake of his entire life.

After the war, Lincoln tried to undo the damage, but the bankers assassinated him. In 1934 during the great depression, Canada’s Gerland McGeer, a Canadian attorney, said he could end the depression overnight if it were not for the private central banks. The only thing needed was to have liquid (i.e. currency) pumped into the system. McGeer said he had evidence that international bankers hired John Wilkes Boothe to assassinate Lincoln. The bankers feared that Lincoln would set up the U.S. economy so it would have no private bank. Anyone who thinks this is a "conspiracy theory" does not understand the power of private central banks. The scam is so powerful, and so monstriously lucrative, yet so fragile, that private bankers will liquidate anyone who gets in their way. They cannot afford to have their con game exposed, for it would collapse overnight.

The Czar of Russia also opposed private banks. He sent ships to San Francisco to help the Union, so it wouldn’t fall into the hands of private bankers.

After the Civil war, the private bankers engineered a series of mini-depressions, trying to get Congress to okay a central private bank. They created a series of panics to convince the masses that only a private central bank could provide economic stability. The final blow came with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

Since then we’ve all been slaves.

Garfield also tried to set up a currency system that did not include central banks, and he too was quickly assassinated.

MY POINT is that we do not need interest at all. We only need currency, issued in proportion to the needs of the economy, without fractional reserve banking.

QRS says there is nothing wrong with lending, since lending can be a charitable act. The problem, QRS notes, lies in interest, which makes an act of charity Satanic.

Thank you for a beautiful introduction to US economic history! All we need, then, is a new Authority recognised by 'The People' (not necessarily by The Government) issuing New Scrip. And an Army to protect the president and other employees of the Scrip Authority. One would need to convince the people that Scrip is acceptable and useful, especially at 0% interest when taken on loan. Large sections of the population would need to be paid in Scrip, how can this be achieved when so many of the current employers are Gentile serfs of the Khazar bankers?
I do believe Lincoln and the others were murdered by the Khazar bankers, this means these bankers control the british economy since the early days of the british empire. This is entirely possible, the Uyghurs (cousins of the Khazars) controlled the Mongol Empire of Genghis Kahn and Tamerlane by being the Empire's administrators, scribes, law-makers. It would be interesting to understand how the Mongol Empire collapsed and the Uyghurs became redundant, one should attempt doing the same with the british and american (its continuation) empires and the Khazars.
Hamilton a 'jewish' name, are you sure? This has a good number of implications ...

How does it work exactly?

Fiat currency, in the control of a few people is very dangerous, it is a short step to manipulation and control of the whole of society.

How is it decided how much money should be printed (quantity)?

How is this money made available to society by the authority?

If money is simply handed out whenever someone wants it....it ceases to be money, no one will work for it and there will be no penalty for laziness, mis-management and stupidity.

Money needs to be intrinsically valuable and historically Gold and Silver have played the best role as money. It cannot be manipulated by men.

Banks are bad news, there is no need for them at all. Sure you can have a honest person look after and stores peoples gold and silver for a fee, but they not be allowed to print receipts for gold/silver.

A central bank = manipulation by a central authority, a bottle neck, a single point of control of the whole...it is socialism / communism.

Banks destroy community, without banks 'reputations, honesty and good character matters in a community'. A honest person with a good reputation will be able to gather capital from others and use it is socially positive ways. Banks do not care whether someone is honest or good, if their proposed porn or gambling enterprise is likely to make a profit the bank will lend it money.

In a community without a bank, a person proposing to loan capital to open a porn or gambling enterprise would be treated like a vile criminal and a anti-social miscreant, and they would not receive any funds.

see:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/5005374.stm

Hamilton is a Gentile name. He was born in the Caribbean island of Nevis to James Hamilton, a Gentile from Scotland, and Rachel Lavien from Denmark – Lavien being a Sephardic variation of Lavine. Hamilton concealed his Jewish identity in order to freely move among the Goyim, as did Churchill, FDR, and the rest.

His father, James Hamilton, was a laird in the Scottish feudal system. That is, his father issued grants of land in return for military or other services. People who were granted land made sub-grants for other services and so on. The laird retained a legal interest in the land, but the Crown ultimately owned it all. Thus, Hamilton’s father knew how to conduct “central banking” based on real estate. (The Scottish feudal system was not completely abolished until November 2004.)

Alexander Hamilton became George Washington’s chief of staff for four years, handling paperwork, drafting orders, and negotiating with subordinates. Thus, Hamilton was a typical Jew who became a right-hand man to a ruling Goy. Since Hamilton was not a Goy, he had long-term plans of his own, but was not sure how to implement them. However, he was close to Washington, the top Goy. Therefore Rothschild agents approached him from Europe, and explained how the game works. Hamilton was so dazzled (understandably) that he spent the rest of his life pushing for a private central bank, with Rothschild agents instructing him all the way.

In 1781, Hamilton convinced the Continental Congress to let Robert Morris, their financial superintendent, start the Bank of North America, the nation’s first private central bank. Morris had become wealthy through war profiteering, and he worked closely with Hamilton, who implemented the scam, designed by Rothschild agents. The Bank of North America was allowed to practice fractional reserve banking, i.e., lending money it didn’t have, and charging interest on it.

With fractional reserve banking, you don’t need much money to start a bank. All you need is a gullible public who will believe there is gold in your vault, and then you make loans at interest, getting rich and buying real assets in the process. In the Bank of North America’s case, the $400k worth of gold in its vault was lent by France to the U.S. government. The gold did not belong to the bank, although the bank made loans as though it did own it.

Hamilton served in the Congress of the Confederation from 1782 to 1783, getting rich through the Bank of North America. In 1784 he opened his own private bank in New York, which still exists today (the Bank of New York).

Meanwhile the Bank of North America plunged everyone into debt, and became godlike. Therefore in 1785, the U.S. government did not renew the bank’s charter.

Hamilton did not give up. In 1787, he became the first delegate to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, and demanded an end to state governments, and for the U.S. President and Senators to hold office for life. In this way a private central bank would have politicians in its pocket forever.

Hamilton’s “Federalist Papers” aimed to consolidate laws under a private central bank. His opponents, by contrast, feared central control of trade, and especially central (and private) control of currency.

Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were staunchly opposed to a private central bank, but Hamilton bided his time. In 1789 he became Secretary of the Treasury. In 1790 he convinced the Continental Congress to open a new private central bank, the First Bank of the United States, an exact duplicate of the previous bank (the Bank of North America) with the exact same criminals involved, including Hamilton, and the exact same city as headquarters: Philadelphia. That same year, Amschel Rothschild said in Frankfurt, “Let me issue and control a nation’s money, and I care not who writes the laws.”

The new bank was started in 1791. As with the previous Bank of North America (and the Bank of England) investors were never made public, and never had to put their own money into the vault. Instead, Hamilton had the U.S. government put $2 million worth of gold into the vault, and then the bankers made loans at interest.

Over the next five years, they lent $8.2 million in funny money to the U.S. government, and caused prices to rise by 72%. Inflation and the national debt got out of control. This made the bank seem even more necessary, even though the bank was deliberately causing these problems. Meanwhile Hamilton and his co-criminals continued to get richer all the time.

Jefferson tried to stop all this, but could do little until 1800, when he narrowly defeated John Adams to become the third U.S. President. In 1803, Jefferson paid $3 million in gold to Napoleon Bonaparte for the Louisiana Purchase. Bonaparte used that gold to march across Europe, smashing private central banks as he went. The Jews in the Bank of England financed every nation in Napoleon’s path. Prussia, Austria, and Russia went heavily into debt trying to stop Napoleon.

In 1807, with Bonaparte’s main army in Russia, Nathan Rothschild in London smuggled gold to the Duke of Wellington in Spain to finance an attack against Napoleon.

Meanwhile in 1811 Hamilton put a bill before congress to renew the charter of the private “First Bank of the United States” in Philadelphia. The press opposed this, however, and attacked the bank as a den of vipers, so Nathan Rothschild threatened to attack the USA if the private bank's charter were not renewed.

It didn’t work. By now James Madison was President, and – like Jefferson—he opposed private central banks. The bank was defeated in 1811. Five months later, Rothschild had England attack the USA (War of 1812), but the British were busy fighting Napoleon, so the Rothschild war against the USA ended in a draw in 1814.

In 1815, Bonaparte was defeated at Waterloo. Immediately Hamilton and his Rothschild masters once again convinced Congress to allow them to start yet another private central bank, the “Second Bank of the United States.” As with the previous two banks, the Federal Government paid to get it started, and all shareholders were secret. A third of them were known to be Europeans (Rothschild agents). Once again the bank plunged Americans into severe debt.

In 1828, Andrew Jackson was swept into office by virtue of his opposition to a private central bank. The “Second Bank of the United States” had a charter that ran until 1836, but in 1832 it asked congress to renew its 20-year charter, four years in advance. This was necessary to defeat Jackson, who was up for re-election. The bankers figured that Jackson was vulnerable, and would bow to them in order to get re-elected --but they got a surprise. Congress obeyed the bankers, but Jackson vetoed Congress, noting that foreigners owned $8 million in bank stock, and had no allegiance to the USA. The bankers howled with rage. They issued bribes and threats, but could not manage to force a Congressional override.

Hamilton was especially enraged. He told Nicholas Biddle (president of the “Second Bank of the United States”) to reduce the money supply and crash the economy. Biddle blamed Jackson for the crash, and the masses bought it, since by now the Jews owned many newspapers, all of which blasted Jackson. Hamilton then instructed Congress to hold an emergency meeting, during which they censured Jackson, the first time a U.S. President had ever been censured. However, the governor of Pennsylvania supported Jackson, and Biddle was caught boasting in public about the private bank’s plan to crash the economy. An investigating committee went to the bank with a subpoena in hand, but Biddle would not let them see his books, nor his correspondence to congressmen he had bribed.

Jackson was vindicated, and the bank’s charter was not renewed. Then Jackson paid off the national debt—the only president ever to do so.

This made Hamilton and his Rothschild masters more furious than ever. On January 30, 1835, they paid Richard Lawrence to assassinate Jackson, but both of Lawrence’s pistols misfired. Alexander Hamilton then helped represent Lawrence in court, and got the assassin off by “reason of insanity.” Afterward, Lawrence bragged that he worked for powerful interests in Europe, who promised to protect him if he were caught. This was why he got off.

Despite all this, the Second Bank of the United States was defeated. Andrew Jackson considered this his most important accomplishment. The moneychangers had to wait until the Civil War to start their evil again.

The Rothschilds dreaded the United States, because America served as an example to the world. Whenever the USA defeated a private central bank, it prospered, and attracted immigrants that were full of hope, optimism, and an enterprising spirit. The Rothschild clan feared the USA might become a world power, so they set the stage for a Civil War. They did this by cutting Southern imports of cotton to Europe, and used the Jewish-owned media to blame the North. The Rothschilds also lined the Canadian border with British troops, and the Mexican border with French troops in order to exacerbate tensions. Meanwhile the South became desperate. A war was almost unavoidable.

QUESTION: how could the Jewish moneychangers be so patient? What makes them come back again and again, no matter how many times they are defeated?

ANSWER: The power of a central bank is so extreme, and so unassailable, that it is perennially intoxicating. Its agents are above "rich” and “poor,” even above, “good” and “evil.” They can’t break the law, for they are the law. They are the ultimate con men, getting rich using other people’s money, while incurring no personal risk.

Goyim think that Jews have a genius with money, but the game is so simple it requires no genius. All it takes is absolute ruthlessness, and a complete lack of ethics. This is why QRS holds that a private central bank can only succeed among a Godless or faithless people.

When you have sole power to print money and control interest rates, you control everything. The moneychangers, being Jewish, have no allegiance to any country, and certainly not to any Goyim. Indeed, they regard their endless atrocities as a defense against the Goyim. This is how they rationalize all their crimes.

Their game is so simple, yet so fragile, that they live in fear of being exposed, despite their godlike power. Hence they are always on the lookout for any awakening among the Goyim (i.e., for “anti-Semitism”). To control the media, they give “loans” (funny money) to other Jews, who use the money to buy all media assets. The Jewish media moguls don’t have to pay it back, since it’s funny money.

Jesus understood all this. That’s why the only time he showed wrath was in the Temple when he saw the moneychangers.

Mohammed (PBUH) understood this as well.

QUESTION: how do Jewish moneychangers manage to convince the Goy again and again that a private central bank is needed?

ANSWER: Using funny money, the bankers bribe politicians to write laws. Meanwhile the Jewish-owned media convinces the mass Goyim that a private bank will stabilize the economy. “Let us handle your monetary affairs for you,” the Jews say, “and we will take care of you.” The Goyim buy this lie, and are immediately enslaved. “Put us in charge of storing supplies,” the Jews say, “and you will never starve, or go through cycles of feast-and-famine.” And indeed the economy remains stable, so long as the Goyim continue to go farther and farther into debt to the bankers.

Whenever the Goyim start to wake up, the Jewish bankers apply pressure to politicians, and use media outlets to distract the Goyim. If that doesn’t work, the Jews use a private central bank to cause so much economic strife that it makes politicians and the mass Goyim desperate. “Save us!”

No one can oppose the bankers, since bankers use funny money to buy all the politicians. You don't think that bribe money comes out of the bankers' pockets, do you?

If all else fails, the bankers use a false flag operation to trigger a war, which makes the government so desperate for money that it again bows to the Jewish bankers. After the war, the nation will be in debt---to the bankers.

Again, the amazing thing is that it’s all done with funny money, created out of thin air. Hence the absolute power of a private central bank.

During the Civil War, the moneychangers printed truckloads of counterfeit bills in the North and South, intentionally debasing the currency. In the South they used a Jew named Judah P. Benjamin, the Rothschild agent who was in charge of all Confederate banking.

Inflation was soon rampant in both the North and South, but far worse in the Confederacy, since the Jewish bankers had chosen the Confederacy to lose the war. As the end neared, Confederate citizens lost all confidence in their currency, and came to rely on the bank notes from Northern Jews. By the end of the war, Confederate notes were worthless, and the Jewish bankers issues certificate in return for silver and gold, thus filing Jewish vaults with precious metals.

During the Civil War, half of all U.S. paper currency in circulation was counterfeit, printed by Jews. The Jews told Lincoln they would take care of the matter if they had a private bank, so Lincoln let them have it in 1863, and created the U.S. Secret Service to protect it on July 5, 1865. The Secret Service, acting on orders from the Jewish bankers, seized currency. The new bank had a monopoly, and used it to plunge the USA into a depression after the war, always consolidating the bank’s power.

Lincoln realized his mistake and tied to stop them. Therefore Rothschild agents recruited John Wilkes Booth in Montreal, and used him to assassinate Lincoln. Then Booth was quickly eliminated, a la Jack Ruby after the JFK assassination. Agents of the Meyer Linsky gang assassinated JFK because JFK was closing in on the gang, and opposed nuclear weapons for Israel, and was preparing to destroy the Federal Reserve as a private cental bank.

Conspiracy theory? No. Remember . . . the power of a central bank is so unassailable that it is intoxicating. The banks had no trouble getting help in their plots against Lincoln and Kennedy. Yes, Jews were behind it all.

In 1933, when the country faced a severe depression and a banking crisis, the public began to demand gold in exchange for their bank notes. The Jewish bankers panicked, so they put one of their own into office (FDR). Roosevelt quickly made it illegal for any private citizen to circulate gold. (Absolute chutzpah.) Private circulation did not become legal again until 1974.

Today the Bureau of Engraving and Printing churns out all our bills, under direct control of the Jews in the Federal Reserve.

By the way, it is pointless to analyze “Freemasonry” images on the bills. That’s all a distraction. The real issue is private control of the central bank.

What’s the solution? Very simple. No private central bank, no fractional reserve banking, and no lending at interest. This is why Mohammed (PBUH) made these principles central to Islam. Private control of money is evil. It kills faith, hope, and charity. It kills everything. It is the direct route to Satanic despair.

Jackson, Jefferson, Madison, and many others understood this.

All we need is to have the government print money in a completely transparent process. The U.S. Secret Service can protect against counterfeiters, and will work for the people, not for private Jewish bankers. Government officials will be forced to control inflation in a manner that serves the people, since they will be elected, and not owned by private Jewish bankers. Morover they could not be bought with funny money, since everone would know where the money is at all times (the currency system would be transparent). They would have to earn their office.

When everyone is free of debt, they will become optimistic. Money will cease to become the end of life, and will be merely a tool to pursue one’s dreams. We won’t concentrate on getting rich; but on realizing our dreams, which is the only true “wealth.” An enterprising spirit will return. The economy will take off. Each dream that is realized will open the door to a bigger dream, and a bigger one. Everyone will “rock and roll.”

Some people will become rich, because they have an especially “kick ass” dream. However, since there will be no debt, everyone will push his own “kick ass” dream. Competition will allow the best dreams to come out on top—but the door will always be open to new dreams.

Do you think this can’t happen? Do you think we cannot have a world without debt? IS THIS ALL A UTOPIAN FANTASY?

NO!!! This "utopian fantasy" has happened whenever private central banks have been removed from power!

Example: when Julius Caesar emerged triumphant, he got rid of private moneychangers (Jews) and minted enough coins to boost the economy. Debt was erased. Everything took off. Then the private bankers had Caesar assassinated.

When Octavian took over, he allowed the Jewish moneychangers back in, and allowed the Jews to charge interest, but did not allow them to own too much assets from their funny money.

The Jews patiently worked on the emperors, reducing them to absolute corruption, until Marcus Aurelius defeated them again by circulating government money. Aurelius’ son Commodus was depraved, and gave all power back to the moneychangers. After that, the Empire slid toward oblivion, as the USA is doing now.

Yes, it’s all very simple. No private central bank, no fractional reserve banking, and no lending at interest.

We don’t need to attack Jews. We don't even need to mention Jews. We simply need to oppose a private central bank, as any sane person would. Once the Federal Reserve is gone, Jewish power will steadily evaporate, and Israel will be annihilated. We won’t need taxes or an IRS, since the elected representatives will be forced control how much money is in circulation. At least we won't be slaves to Jewish bankers.

If you think this all sounds too simple, then you have been hypnotized. The Jewish bankers have wormed their way so deeply into the Goyim mind that the Goyim cannot imagine a world without them. Certainly they can't imagine world without debt and interest rates.

Yes, it really is that simple. No private central bank, no fractional reserve lending, and no lending at interest.

Not only will this work; it will make the economy take off, as happened many times in past history.

Let’s go over your questions….

Fiat currency, in the control of a few people is very dangerous, it is a short step to manipulation and control of the whole of society.

There is nothing wrong with fiat currency. All currency is ultimately fiat currency anyway, including gold, which is only valuable because people say it is. Nor is there anything wrong with banks. The problem is with private ownership of the central bank, and with fractional reserve banking, where banks lend more money than they have assets, and charge interest on the funny money.

What if you and I started a country in which we gave one group of people the power to print all money and control all interest rates? It would be insane. The group would control everything, including you and me. This is the situation with most developed countries today.

How is it decided how much money should be printed (quantity)?

The same way it is decided now, except it would be decided publicly, not secretly by private bankers. Money would be issued through banks in accordance with the needs of the economy, and no loans would be given out at interest. Instead, banks could charge a one-time nominal fee for the use of extra money, and they could also charge a percentage of the profits, thus incurring risk. A corporation that employs ten thousand people would be given more money than a private individual – but again, this would all subject to public scrutiny. The people in charge would be elected officials. If they screw up, they get booted from office.

How is this money made available to society by the authority?

The same way it is now -- through banks -- but the central bank would not be a private, secretive corporation that exists to make a profit at everyone else’s expense.

If money is simply handed out whenever someone wants it, it ceases to be money, no one will work for it and there will be no penalty for laziness, mis-management and stupidity.

It would be handed out with controls subject to public scrutiny. There would be laws to prevent the government from handing out money in ways that would show favoritism or cause inflation. Everything would be very similar to the way things are now—except there would be no private central bank, and no interest.

Money needs to be intrinsically valuable, and historically gold and silver have played the best role as money. It cannot be manipulated by men.

Forgive me, but money does NOT need to be intrinsically valuable. Again, all money is ultimately fiat currency, including gold.

In 1100 AD, King Henry I of England took power from the goldsmiths (Jews) and invented the “tally stick system,” in which tally sticks became the currency. To this day, Jews cite this as a particularly horrendous example of “anti-Semitism,” because it took their power away. The tally stick system worked because it was the form of currency the central government accepted taxes in. It worked beautifully for 726 years until 1826, when the Jews made the Bank of England private.

Also, gold prices can indeed be manipulated. A private central bank decides what everything is worth, including gold. It controls everything. Nothing happens in this world unless money changes hands, and the Federal Reserve is God over every transaction. It’s okay to have central control, as long as the controlling party is not private and secretive.

Banks are bad news, there is no need for them at all. Sure you can have a honest person look after and stores peoples gold and silver for a fee, but they not be allowed to print receipts for gold/silver.

There is nothing wrong with banks. The problem is in private, secret control of the money supply and interest rates. Today, all banks answer to the Jews of the Federal Reserve. We are all their slaves.

A central bank = manipulation by a central authority, a bottle neck, a single point of control of the whole...it is socialism / communism.

There is nothing wrong with socialism, so long as it is balanced with capitalism. Too much socialism leads to an intractable bureaucracy. Too much capitalism leads to a monster that treats everyone as disposable commodities – as we have today. A privately owned, secretive central bank is radical, absolute capitalism.

Don’t buy into this anti-socialism crap. Corporations and their shills use that rhetoric as camouflage while they rape and pillage. Socialism means we pay attention to the public good, and not just the good of a private corporation. When we quest for a balance between socialism and capitalism, we seek the good of the public at large AND the private individual. The balance can never be perfectly achieved, but it is a worthy goal to pursue; a star that would guide the ship of state.

Banks destroy community. Without banks 'reputations, honesty and good character matters in a community'. An honest person with a good reputation will be able to gather capital from others and use it is socially positive ways. Banks do not care whether someone is honest or good. If their proposed porn or gambling enterprise is likely to make a profit the bank will lend it money.

Again, this all occurs because the central bank (Federal Reserve) is private and secret. Jews use the Fed to destroy a sense of community among the Goyim.

Banks can lend money to a porn enterprise if they want, but they must not be allowed to charge interest, or evade risk, or use funny money conjured up by the Federal Reserve. The money would come from the bank’s ”own pocket.” It would be like one individual lending money to another.

If all this seems impossible, it is because the Fed has hypnotized everyone. “You can’t survive without us.” Yes we can. Not only can we survive without you, we will PROSPER without you. Society does not need interest. We can have “credit,” but not interest. We need a central bank in order to stabilize the national economy, but not a private, secret bank like the Federal Reserve, run by Jews for Jews.

In a community without a bank, a person proposing to lend capital to open a porn or gambling enterprise would be treated like a vile criminal and a anti-social miscreant, and they would not receive any funds.

If you lent me ten grand to open a porn shop, would you be a vile criminal? No, it would be a private deal between you and me. In a world without the Fed, the government would control money, but bank loans would (in principle) be the same as personal loans. They may charge a percentage of the profits, but they may not charge interest. Thus, they would have to share the risk. This, incidentally, is the Islamic ideal. To share the wealth, you must share the risk. The Federal Reserve takes no risk whatever. It wins no matter what, because it controls all the money.

Again, everything would be very similar to the way it is now, except there would be no crushing debt, nor would a handful of people get rich off funny money.

The key? Get rid of the Federal Reserve. Get rid of its private, secretive monopoly over currency, and get rid of charging interest on loans. Have everything more or less the way it is now, but not with a private central bank.

Sound too simple? Again, that’s the hypnosis speaking. Satan (the Jews of the Federal Reserve) says, “You can’t live without me!”

Yes we can. The ideas I describe here are exactly the same as those held by Jefferson, Madison, Jackson, and others. They were not utopian thinkers. They were realists.

Thanks for reading.

Boy....this was a great education. Thx all. Some where I read there are only four countries in the world that their central banks are not integrated into "the chosen" banking system. I only remember two of them: Iran and Libya. (the other two, Venezuela and N. Korea?!)