Open Letter #04 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
Text of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #04 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY
Let me turn, Mr. Attorney General, to the aerial vehicle that hit the south tower, WTC 2. A colleague on the 37th floor of the Federal Building at Duane and Broadway told me shortly afterwards that he had seen this jet making its approach over New York harbor; he repeated with great emphasis that, at first sight, one wing pointed almost straight down to the ground and the other straight up to the sky; his eyewitness testimony of the attacking jet's highly unusual attitude in New York City airspace is corroborated by, among others, eyewitness testimonies of air traffic controllers in the control tower at Newark Airport who saw a sharply banking jet turn across the harbor and slam into WTC 2.
Soon after 9/11, a retired US Army field officer with long experience at high levels inside the Pentagon convened a group of military, civilian and commercial aviation professionals, and their conclusion was unanimous: the flights that hit WTC 2 and the Pentagon could not possibly have been piloted by flight students on their maiden voyages with training limited to routine procedures on flight simulators. Donn de Grand Pre's group pointed to remote control as the best explanation for the unerring descending arc made by the jet at a speed normally reserved for high altitude cruising; the G-forces brought to bear would have posed an insurmountable challenge to a human being.
So you see, with no airport video surveillance evidence, and no names of alleged hijackers on airline manifests, and bogus cell and air phone calls, this highly improbable scenario of aerial acrobatics over New York harbor needs a much better explanation than the outrageous conspiracy theory we have been offered. Considering that the attacking jet was headed right for the USAF office on the 37th floor of the Federal Building, that 9/11 Commission Co-Chairmen Kean and Hamilton expressed doubts about the credibility of USAF testimonies, that President Bush has a history of gaming the upper echelons of NORAD from his air national guard days, and that he says he saw the first jet's surprise attack on WTC 1, I ask, can you, a Bush appointee, pursue 9/11 truth and justice?
Stephen M. St. John
http://www.show-the-house.com
Bench 7PM daily NE Corner Central Park Great Lawn, USS Liberty Ballcap
No planes wreckage outside the towers: NO PLANES! (NO wings, NO tail, NO fuselage, NO seats, NO baggage, NO NOTHING). The truth is plain to SEE!
Ooops........a perfectly intact, paper passport! ;)
________________________________
"We hold these truths to be self-evident"
NO (airliners) wreckage at the Pentagon or in PA, either!
NO surveillance videocam footage of airliners, either!
_______________________________
"We hold these truths to be self-evident"
Cadaver dogs can detect dried human blood and flesh as old as 10 years yet were aloof and found nothing when sniffing the Pentagon destruction for what should have been gallons of splashed and soaking human blood. They detected NOTHING.
Does anyone know of the existence/publication of any authentic photo or video, taken at any of the 3 crash sites and showing an airliner - or parts of an airliner - taken on 9/11/2001? Forget anything shown on MSM TV. Has even 1 verified part (with an authentic serial # or other ID #) from any of the airliners, verified to have been recovered from any of the crash sites, been documented anywhere? What verifiable piece of evidence (from an airliner), recovered from a crash site, exists? If the answer is NONE, what makes anyone believe that airliners crashed at these sites?
_________________________________
"We hold these truths to be self-evident"
Do we now live in a 'make believe' world?
You betcha!
Zionists and the MSM are trying to make the whole world believe exactly what they want everyone to believe. The truth is an entirely different story. Believe it!
_________________________________
"We hold these truths to be self-evident"
is that apart from maybe two or three surviving spouses and/or family members of all the "passengers" that day (who pick no bones with the governments official conspiracy theory) you NEVER hear a peep from the families, spouses, etc.. Bollyn writes about the "out of court settlements" and the avoidance everyone else gets when trying to have their "day in court" but WHO are these people? Of the several surviving spouses who speaks publicly, one is Linda Gay, wife of Peter Gay, a VP at Raytheon Corp. Calif. who was supposedly aboard flight 11. Gay even stated, recalled Linda, that he was particulary "reluctant" about this otherwise routine Tuesday morning business trip. That is an amazing publicly offered insight from his wife considering Mr. Gay had followed this routine weekly for the last year. "Coincidentally" Raytheon is a leader in remote control technology of commercial grade aircraft and does business with the Pentagon. What could have possibly bothered Mr. Gay about this particular Tuesday?
And one MSM originated tv newscast out of Cleveland which reported that flight 93 had actually landed at Cleveland, taxied to the far end of end of the airport and everyone was herded off into a nearby hangar, was immediately pulled from the public domain and apart from a luckily archived instance of that broadcast along with a buried article clipping from a local paper, not a peep further was ever heard. Hmm.
Is it possible that there is no outrage from these families because those "passengers" were perhaps, given back to the families in exchange for keeping quiet? Does anyone here know any of those families? Or any of the passengers for that matter? This is in direct contrast to the way the families of those who died in the towers that morning, have been reacting. Committees and organizations have formed with activism, outrage and public demands to state and local government, the Bush administration, health services, airports, airlines, etc.. What is so different?
The perps behind this atrocity think the make believe spectacle they put together that morning and attempted to follow up with their fantasy conclusions, would, like their many false flag successes of the past, fade from the public conscience and predictably slip into the "oh well" basket, the effect time often has on the events of yesterday. But 911 is turning out to be different. Very different. The audicity is in a league of its own. Blinded by narcissistic arrogance and drunk with the lust of power AND blood, the perps severely underestimated the intense insult they've actually ended up handing out to what they expected to be another spectacular bamboozling. This one has ended up exposing the perpetrators for the amateurs they really are and has set in motion a criminal investigation by the private sector which WILL be resolved.
Hey, Jerry - those are very interesting observations! The chutzpah of these 'people' is truly amazing. To pull this off in broad daylight and with so many inconsistencies and mistakes shows extreme confidence that they expect to 'get away' with this hoax. Once they control the MSM, they think they have the power to control 'reality' forever. I beg to differ. They WILL be exposed and then the REAL Holocaust will begin. The tragedy will be that legitimate anti-Zionism will morph into illegitimate anti-Semitism!
If these 'people' are so smart, they must know that exposure is looming and it's just a matter of a little more time before their 'gig is up'. They must have a follow-up plan for that inevitability. My personal opinion is that 9/11-II follow-up is being readied for execution. Lots of noises in the MSM (McCain and Lieberman, for example) about that. Of course, they call it 'another terror event' but it's really the trigger to bring a full-fledged American Police State into existence (along with the much-hypothesized attack on Iran).
Perth seems to be a nice place to be when TSHTF (Grand Depression, WWIII, Armageddon, etc.). If you're at all curious about the 'etc.', visit my website:
http://novalight.org
________________________________
"We hold these truths to be self-evident"