Open Letter #10 on 9/11 to Attorney General of the USA, Michael B. Mukasey

Text of fax broadcast:

OPEN LETTER #10 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY

Dear Mr. Attorney General, "Shock & Awe" did not begin in Baghdad on 19 March 2003; rather, it began on 9/11 and continues with British bombers dressed as Arabs, two of whom were caught in the act by the Iraqi police in Basra on 19 September 2005. So how did this "Shock & Awe" tactic originate? How does it continue to promote the "Grand Chessboard" strategy (otherwise known as the Zionist Neoconservative ideology of world domination) with invasions of the Middle East?

In January of 2004 former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill revealed President Bush's intention of putting American muscle on Mesopotamian patrol, which he expressed at his very first high level meeting in February, 2001, more than six full months before 9/11. President Bush's thoroughly illegal intention to initiate aggressive war in the Middle East had been totally disguised during his 2000 presidential campaign. Inasmuch as 9/11 presented Bush with an opportunity to go ahead with his plan, would it not be logical to examine the President's Foreign Affairs adviser during that presidential campaign? Has the Department of Justice ever interrogated that man, Dov Zakheim?

Exactly one year before 9/11, Zakheim signed a document published by the Project for the New American Century which suggested that "a new Pearl Harbor" would help speed the implementation of its stated goal of global military dominance. Is this not evidence enough that Zakheim and his Zionist Neoconservative peers were prompting Bush toward invasion and occupation in the Middle East? Is it not apparent that their plan required secrecy at least until Bush occupied the Oval Office? Don't O'Neill's revelations suggest the possibility that the "new Pearl Harbor" of 9/11 might have been staged as a false flag intelligence operation to create a pretext for war? And when you consider that at least two of the aerial vehicles involved in the attacks exhibited trajectories more in keeping with guided missiles than flight students on their maiden voyages, wouldn't Zakheim's background in remote control and missile technologies be deserving of close scrutiny? Answer!

Please visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id8.html and scroll to fax broadcast for 17 September 2006 for more information on British bombers in Basra, and 3 March 2008 for Paul O'Neill's testimony.

Stephen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
Rockefeller Center
New York, New York 10185

http://www.show-the-house.com/