I'm sure he's sincere and he probably believes he's a good man with benevolent intentions, but I desperately want to wring his chicken neck and bash in his smug face.

He essentially admits that security has usurped defense, and that force can and should be projected anywhere that doesn't integrate with "free trade" practices. In other words, he takes what those of us who know about deep history and flat out says it's a great thing that the military works for Wall Street. That's borne out by his work as a strategic consultant for the so-called Y2K project with Cantor-Fitzgerald (CEO one "Lucky" Howard Lutnick), which included bona fide war game scenarios run "atop the World Trade Center." He brags about how when the towers fell (well, really kinda atomized in mid-air) their scenarios "went live." In other words, it was the New Pearl Harbor needed to justify dividing the world according to his paradigm of the "functioning core" and the "non-integrated gap."
http://www.thomaspmbarnett.com/pnm/map_index.htm

Basically, any entity that does not adhere to the rule-sets of "free trade" is targeted for regime change and nation-building. On a global scale, this is exactly the nightmare scenario of global predator forces roaming the world whacking anyone that doesn't fall in line with the way the ones with the biggest guns define it.

There are many more subtle and complex implications of what this, ahem, individual espouses that I cannot articulate without ranting, so hopefully other members will take a look into these materials and discuss in more detail.

Source: Kolnidre info underground

Topics covered:
Thomas Barnett
Cantor Fitzgerald
Military Enforcers
Oppression
Peak Oil
Cold War
The Guardian Class
The Administrators
http://theinfounderground.com/ftp/lav/oft14.mp3