http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/BBC-ex.mov

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/BBC-BUSTED-WTC7-911.wmv

Why was Google compelled to remove this video from their servers minutes after it appeared?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

BBC Reported Building 7 Had Collapsed 20 Minutes Before It Fell
Revealing, shocking video shows reporter talking about collapse with WTC 7 still standing in background, Google removes clip

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet
Tuesday, February 27, 2007 (UPDATED 5:36AM CST)

RELATED: BBC Responds to Building 7 Controversy; Claim 9/11 Tapes Lost

RELATED: Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance

RELATED: After This Fiasco, How Can We Trust Anything They Told Us About 9/11?

An astounding video uncovered from the archives today shows the BBC reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. The incredible footage shows BBC reporter Jane Standley talking about the collapse of the Salomon Brothers Building while it remains standing in the live shot behind her head.

Minutes before the actual collapse of the building is due, the feed to the reporter mysteriously dies.

This amazing clip was on Google Video (now back again here), but was removed within hours of the story breaking. However, hundreds of people had already managed to download the clip and it has gone viral on the Internet and the censors won't be able to shut the lid this time. A You Tube upload is available here but we fully expect this to be removed soon. You can watch it for the time being at this link and also here. A WMV link is here (on our server) and a Quicktime here. Bit torrent versions of the file can be found here. An avi version can be found here.

To be clear, the Salomon Brothers Building is just a different name for Building 7 or WTC 7. Skip forward to around the 14:30 minute mark.

Although there is no clock or time stamp on the footage, the source claims the report was given at 4:57pm EST, 23 minutes before Building 7 collapsed at 5:20pm. While the exact time of the report cannot be confirmed at present, it is clear from the footage that the reporter is describing the collapse of WTC 7 while it clearly remains standing behind her in the live shot.

Here are some further screenshots from the video.

The fact that the BBC reported on the collapse of Building 7 over twenty minutes in advance of its implosion obviously provokes a myriad of questions as to how they knew it was about to come down when the official story says its collapse happened accidentally as a result of fire damage and debris weakening the building's structure.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv. Thousands of special reports, videos, MP3's, interviews, conferences, speeches, events, documentary films, books and more - all for just 15 cents a day! Click here to subscribe!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As we have documented before, firefighters, police and first responders were all told to get back from the building because it was about to be brought down. It is widely acknowledged by those who were there on the scene that warnings were issued for people to evacuate the area in anticipation of the building's collapse, with some even stating that a 20 second countdown preceded the collapse of the 47-story skyscraper, again clearly suggesting that it was taken down by means of explosives as the video footage of its implosion illustrates.

Alex Jones' film Terror Storm documents how Thermate was the likely culprit for the implosion of the twin towers and also explores the collapse of WTC 7.

In a September 2002 PBS documentary, the owner of the WTC complex Larry Silverstein discusses Building 7 and states that in the late afternoon of September 11, the decision was made to "pull it." The term "pull it" is industry jargon for controlled demolition, but Silverstein denied charges that WTC 7 had been deliberately brought down.

This newly uncovered video confirms that the collapse of WTC 7 was no surprise, because television news stations were reporting on it before it happened!

This footage is absolutely amazing and should provoke a firestorm of new questions aimed both at Silverstein and the BBC. Who told the BBC that the building was going to collapse before it did and why were they reporting its fall in advance of the event actually taking place?

Many have speculated that some kind of press release was leaked too soon and AP wires, radio stations and TV news outlets prematurely reported on WTC 7's collapse.

The video also severely undermines the credibility of the BBC who recently caused controversy by airing a 9/11 hit piece that sought to debunk questions that bring the official story into doubt.

Calls have already been put through to the BBC reporting the "mistake," click here to listen to an MP3. The BBC have promised to "look into it."

Moronic commenters on Digg are already trying to bury the story, yet none of them have an answer as to why the BBC reported the building's collapse before it happened. Click here to add your own comment and counter the debunkers.

ACTION: E Mail the BBC and ask them to clarify exactly why their reporter is announcing the collapse of Building 7 before it has collapsed.

BBC WAATC 7 Video -- & -- Larry Silverstein CONTROLLED DEMOMOLITION Video

Both of these CONFESSION VIDEOS AIRED IN PUBLIC are VERY SIGNIFICANT.

Think about the implications.

Follow the links and save a copy to your hard drive.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

(1)

Larry Silverstein (owner of WTCs) EXPLAINS IN LENGTH why it was necessary to 'pull down' the WTCs --- Not only that, he THOROUGHLY EXPLAINS HE MEANT CONTROLLED DEMOLITION --- watch the ENTIRE video to understand.

(2)

BBC newsreporter reports that IN ADDITION TO WTC 1 & 2, that WTC 7 ALSO COLLAPSED.

Make no mistake, she didn't mistaken WTC 7 for 1 &/or 2 --- she specifically said WTC 7 ALSO COLLAPSED ---

---- 20 MINUTES BEFORE IT HAPPENED.

Download & Save Video to understand the implications.

BBC & Google are media arms of the KhaZars....

Another Smoking Gun? Now CNN Jumps the Gun: On 911 CNN Announced WTC 7 "Has Either Collapsed or is Collapsing" Over an Hour Before it Fell

Posted Feb 28, 2007 09:08 AM PST
Category: 911

Both before and after 9-11, no steel-framed building had ever collapsed from a fire. The First Interstate Bank building in Los Angeles had, as one example, burned right down to the frame without collapsing.

So who was telling BBC and CNN that the building was going to collapse, and how could they possibly know that, absent a deliberate demolition?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=20521

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc7.html

Another Smoking Gun? Now CNN Jumps the Gun: On 911 CNN Announced WTC 7 "Has Either Collapsed or is Collapsing" Over an Hour Before it Fell

Chris | Information Liberation

Digg it!

Be sure to vote for this article here.

Reddit!In an amazing redux, new video has been unearthed of a CNN report on the day of 911 in which a CNN anchor announces they have received word that WTC 7 is on fire and "has either collapsed or is collapsing." The problem with this is that WTC 7 is clearly visible behind the anchor.

This report was carried at "about 4:15 eastern daylight time" (according to the anchor), over an hour before the building actually collapsed at 5:20. Who told them the WTC 7 building "has either collapsed or is collapsing."? Keep in mind he did not say it was going to collapse, he said it either had or was in the process of doing so. The anchor says is "we are getting information now", who is giving him this information? If you pay close attention you can see after the anchor announces this he turns around and sees the building as clear as day still standing, he then proceeds to backtrack on the initial information which informed him clearly the building "has either collapsed or is collapsing."

This report is doubled in significance seeing as it comes on the heels of a report that BBC announced that WTC 7 had collapsed over 20 minutes before it actually fell. Both of the anchors were told the building had collapsed, the question is who told them?

Surely, some will say they knew the building was going to collapse because it was on fire. This claim holds no water due to the fact no steel building has ever collapsed due to fire. For example in 2005 the Madrid Sky Scraper was a towering inferno for hours on end and it did not come close to collapsing.

FULL CONTEXT

In order to understand the full significance of this video it needs to be put in context.

Firstly, a poll was conducted in 2006 which showed 42% of Americans were unaware a third building, WTC 7, collapsed on 911(PDF). Considering how many thousands of times the twin towers were shown collapsing on television, that in itself is extremely significant. There is, of course, a reason 42% of Americans do not know the story of WTC 7. If you watch the video below you will find out.

Secondly, there is smoking gun video of the owner of WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, admitting on a PBS documentary he ordered the building "Pulled" which is an industry term for demolished.

Larry Silverstein made billions off the collapse of the building as reported here.

Larry “Lucky Larry” Silverstein

You’ve got to be lucky to make $4 Billion killing on a 6-month investment of $124 Million.

Larry Silverstein is the New York property tycoon who purchased the entire WTC complex just 6 months prior to the 9/11 attacks. That was the first time in its 33-year history the complex had EVER changed ownership.

Mr. Silverstein’s first order of business as the new owner was to change the company responsible for the security of the complex. The new security company he hired was Securacom (now Stratasec). George W. Bush's brother, Marvin Bush, was on its board of directors, and Marvin’s cousin, Wirt Walker III, was its CEO. According to public records, not only did Securacom provide electronic security for the World Trade Center, it also covered Dulles International Airport and United Airlines — two key players in the 9/11 attacks.

...Continued here.

Additionally, Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who was in WTC 7 before it collapsed, admitted on ABC news he was warned the buildings were going to collapse.

I .. I went down to the scene and we set up a headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was gonna' to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit, got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.

This is just a small sampling of the evidence for those who want to know the truth of what happened that day. For those who wish to avoid the truth I leave you with this quote to ponder...

"People avoid the truth because the first bit of truth uttered and lived would draw more truth into action and so on indefinitely, and this would rip most people right off the customary tracks of their lives. But people, basically, know what is true and what is not, even if they so often render help to the lie. They support the lie because the lie has become a crutch without which life would not be possible. Therefor, in common human intercourse, the truth, and not the lie, is suspected as being phony." - Wilhelm Reich, "The Murder of Christ"

Spread the word

Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance

Posted Feb 28, 2007 07:40 AM PST
Category: 911

Both the announcer in the clip and the lower third banner report the collapse of WTC-7. The time stamp shows 21:54, or 9:54 PM British Time. (During the summer, British "summer" time is one hour ahead of Greenwich Mean or "Universal Time".)

Since the US is also on "Daylight Savings Time" in September, 9:54 PM British Time is 4:54 PM East Coast Time. That is roughly 20 minutes before WTC-7 actually came down.

What seems to be emerging here is that Flight 93 was planned to crash into WTC-7. When Flight 93 had to be shot down instead because the crew regained control, WTC-7 still had to come down or the pre-placed explosives inside would have given the whole game away. What seems likely is that a time was set for the demolition and sent out to agents in the media, but there was an unexpected delay to clear responders from the building, which is why WTC-7 is seen still standing behind the female announcer even as she reports the building as destroyed.

http://rattube.com/blog1/2007/02/26/the-smoking-gun-wtc7-bbc-jumps-the-g...

February 26, 2007
THE SMOKING GUN WTC7, BBC JUMPS THE GUN !!!

9/11 Building 7 Collapse - WTC7 23 Minute Warning - Salomon Brothers Building

BBC Error ! Huge smoking gun of pre-knowledge collapse of WTC7 *911blogger.com

“On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.

This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST.

9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7.

What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder.

Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails.

So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.

Building Seven was 47 storeys, modern in design with structural steel throughout, yet symmetrically collapsed in 6.5 seconds, was someone leaking information.

No steel framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire, before or after 9/11, most people who find out about WTC7, believe it was brought down by a controlled demolition, even demolition experts agree.” *911Blogger.com

Rat says: It’s here!!! The smoking gun of 9/11 that can not be disputed. BBC reporters jump the gun reporting the collapse of WTC7 until they cut the feed just 5 minutes prior to the actual demolition. People, the news is choreographed, this proves it and shows how wide spread the disinfo goes. No more denial, this is it….. they have to strike now. I can’t wait for the spin on this blunder, it will be extremely brazen. The timeline is indeed accurate given the anchor’s comments at 00:17:30 into the video where he states “it has been some 8 hours since the attack.” 9 am plus 8 equals 5 pm !!!!! If this clip is faked, then they did an excellent job and we need to know who did it.

**EDITORS NOTE**… PLEASE SOMEONE MAKE A DUPLICATE OF THIS VIDEO IN CASE IT IS PULLED!!!

update 6:49 pm eastern time, Google has pulled the video completely from their site. I have access to a crude copy and will work diligently to get it back on. CRUDE VIDEO

ORIGINAL VERSION BACK UP:

00:25:43

BACK UP VIDEO IF THEY PULL THE ABOVE AGAIN:

00:07:15

ANOTHER BACK UP CLIP CLICK HERE

AND HERE:

00:07:21

Filed under 911, WTC7, Blog by Rat

Great Job, TGR ! Keep up the feed ! Many have thought, for some time now, that regardless of a plethora of minutiae around 9-11, the Building 7 debacle would prove to be the real Achilles Heel of the cover-up. Now that finally appears to be exactly the case. Likewise, it has always seemed to me that WTC 7 must have been scheduled for a "hit", although that eventuality only throws another monkey wrench into the mix. If the "Wizard" had been quite well aware of such a hit never coming off as planned, how then to go ahead and pre-report a collapse that occurred for no obvious reason ? See what I'm 'hitting' at ? This had to be an outrageous SNAFU on the media's part, and some unfortunate soul has to be presently getting their sorry arse removed, for sure. The scenario for the waylaying of Flight 93 seems to play into this somehow, but - I wouldn't jump to any conclusions about the true fate of the 'passengers', or 'crew'... Nice job, Oh Great Revealer, and please, keep it comin' ! Nail those Khazar BeeBees to the Wall !

The real question is why do "they" refuse to release the architectural plans for the WTC complex? Were the explosives designed into the buildings as a "pullable plug" to keep them from falling sideways into Manhattan? Or were they planted in the many security system upgrades in the days before 911? The demolition case is made, either way.

There were two seperate sets of events that day: Planes hitting buildings and buildings imploding. It's the magician's art of misdirection to make the audience connect the two and believe the illusion.

The black boxes were recovered. Like so many things, the FBI is concealing the evidence.

Now is the time to concentrate on the planes and who controlled them. And who set up the patsies.

Claymore et al.... A couple of 'moot points' might be in order at this stage. First, let the "demolition case" be made. Upon mere examination of the manifold visual evidence alone, demolition becomes quite clearly evident, notwithstanding the abundance of all other documentation. The demolition of Building 7, being a smaller structure, 'appears' to fall INto a traditional mode of IMplosion, likely accomplished with conventional means. The Towers, however, upon mere examination of the visual evidence alone, 'appear' to fall in a rather obvious mode of EXplosion, as opposed to IMplosion.

Being such massive and substantial structures to begin with, it would seem obvious that unconventional means, as well as traditional methods, would necessarily have been employed in their destruction. Most prominent demo experts and other authorities are still quite at a loss to explain that particular methodology more specifically, in light of it's bizarre combined effects, notably, the degree of pulverization, or liquidation, of material, and how to account for it. Thermate alone could not have accomplished the micronic pulverization of concrete and other non-reactive material.

Bollyn has some good leads on a possible repository of thermate, planted in the form of auxiliary batteries, in the Fuji Bank area around the 80th floor of one of the towers . But thermite or 'mate was probably employed primarily as a cutting agent, or "cutter charge", to accomplish dissembly of the structural skeleton in portable segments.

So as not to go on too much at further length,and wanting only to stress a few 'moot' points, I might only add here that, in my purview, the time to "concentrate on the planes, and who controlled them" has really come and gone long ago, and a great deal of valuable time has already been lost in that pursuit. Those answers must eventually come from the perpetrators themselves, if ever at all.

I do believe however, with this fortuitous turn of events surrounding the 'Achilles Heel' of Building 7, the time is certainly at hand for nailing some of the perpetrators, while we have them on the run, while such tantamount evidence continues to be forthcoming.

One more moot point, that you can take as an absolute given. MOSSAD set up the PATSIES, after first setting up the FBI, by totally compromising all their communications. But the FBI is certainly an accessory after that fact...Cheerio, 'mates !

http://www.iamthewitness.com/Bollyn_intro-to-911.html
9-11 Through Eyes of an American Skeptic

Rabbi Dov Zakheim delivered a dvar Torah at a 2002 gathering of Chabad Lubavitchers on the Pentagon lawn to commemorate the centennial of Menachem "the Rebbe" Schneerson's birth. Zakheim, a dual nationality Israeli-American and rabid Zionist, was Pentagon Comptroller as Rumsfeld announced on September 10, 2001 that $2+ trillion of Pentagon transaction could not be accounted for. Zakheim had co-authored "Rebuilding America's Defenses", a position paper by the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) in 2000, which called for a new "Pearl Harbor" type of incident which would provide a pretext for US military moves to boost its global hegemony. At the very end of the PNAC paper, note that Zakheim's name appears as Dov Zakheim (of) System Planning Corporation. The other signatories on the document included neocons I Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Paul Wolfowitz, and William Kristol. Rabbi Zakheim's career included various posts at the Department of Defense (DoD), foreign policy advisor to George Bush, and also in the private sector on defense and consultancy. In the years running up to 9/11, he was corporate vice president of System Planning Corporation (SPC) and chief executive officer of SPC International Corporation. SPC is a manufacturer of highly sophisticated military specification technology such as its "Flight Termination System". FTS includes SPC's Command Transmitter System. It enables remote operators to control up to eight planes simultaneously, from a single position either on the ground or airborne (or, say, in WTC Building 7). The technology provides the capability to take remote control of aircraft already in flight. Zakheim's SPC remote control technology was used to steer the alleged AA 11 and UA 175 into the Towers, and was supposed to steer UA 93 into WTC 7 if the Air Force hadn't shot it down.

The Pentagon strike (with the fictitious "AA 77") appears to have employed alternative technology, with operational planners eliminated to prevent them talking. Those claimed as having perished on "Flight 77" include Raytheon employees and Boeing engineers:

The list included Charles Burlingame, a former Navy fighter pilot who used to work in the section of the Pentagon that was struck on 9/11, and who had formulated a response for the eventuality of an airliner being flown into the Pentagon; Wilson "Bud" Flagg, a retired American Airlines pilot and Navy Admiral; Stanley Hall, a Raytheon engineer; Bryan Jack, a senior Defense Department executive; Chandler Keller, a Boeing propulsion engineer; Barbara Olson, wife of a Solicitor General who pretended to have received cell phone calls from "Flight 77"; Ruben Ornedo, a Boeing satellite communications engineer; and Robert Penniger, an electrical engineer with BAE Systems. And we are supposed to believe that it was just another bizarre 'coincidence' that all these people just happened to be on a nearly empty flight. Give me an official conspiracy theorist, and I'll show you someone who's become detached from reality.

This link shows another dozen "Flight 77" passengers' with links to defense and government. Add the four Raytheon employees supposedly killed on AA 11, plus John O'Neill at the WTC, and that's up to twenty-five who can be deducted from the list of conspirators who had to be silenced. The moral is: don't get involved in this type of operation - it's not conducive to good health.

There appears to be a mini-conspiracy (Bush admin Pentagon Strike) within the larger Khazar WTC Demolition operation. Although Flights 11 and 77 were unscheduled and do not appear to have flown on 9/11, that is an optional part of the theory. Critics will ask "what happened to the passengers?" All four flights could have been running complete with passengers; three were taken over (by SPC and/or Raytheon technology), one was shot down, and WTC 1, 2 and 7 were subject to controlled demolitions. Some ask why the need to demolish buildings if planes are going to hit them, or the converse, why have planes hit the buildings if they are to be blown up. Firstly, it was necessary to guarantee that the buildings collapsed; the probability of a skyscraper collapsing after being hit by a plane is somewhere between one in a thousand and one in a million. If it has only been hit by a few flying pieces of paper, it is not going to collapse - or leave partly evaporated steel members and pools of molten iron. Secondly, people would be even less likely to believe that "Muslim terrorists" would be able to walk in and plant the bombs. Moreover, the "war on terrorism" and measures such as Guantanamo Bay were supposed to be justified as actions against a lethal foe, a new breed of terrorist who were prepared to kill themselves (albeit for no apparent reason apart from attempting to get to Nirvana). Since the demise of the Cold War, the Khazar Cabal has been promoting the concept of "Islamic suicide bombers", with "suicide hijackers" a minor variation on the theme.

Magnificent ! And now, for that Great Gaonim of the Talmud, our Most Rabbinical Rebbe Zakheim, we reserve a special 'Mud' Room of the elite 'Executive' Suite at our all exclusive Hotel Gomorrah, by the Dead Sea, where he can bathe 24 / 7 ...... ad infinitum - in his own boiling hot excrement.
http://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/jpg/fr-390-110.jpg
Rebbe Zakheim