DIGG.COM & Wikipedia EXPOSED!!!

The Great Revealer succeeded again!

Now, I'll put my sources together to demonstrate BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT HITLER HIMSELF WAS A KHAZAR -- and my job will be done ;)

But, you readers will have to wait --- not for anything in particular, but wait till QRSWAVE can make it so it's easier for us to upload PHOTOS & VIDEOS & SOURCE EVIDENCE on this website.

No, I prefer not to post it on other 'websites' and link to them. I know it takes up expensive bandwidth (especially if Zionists start attacking this website) --- but, the goal is to have EVERYONE KNOWLEDGEABLE.

And the best method is share our knowledge with each other AND to share the source documents and EVIDENCE.

But for now, I mentioned that wikipedia, Google were Zionists-owned & operated. Also that there were Zionist Agents working 24/7 at SLASHDOT & DIGG.

Well, GOOD NEWS! I'm not the only person to have realized this OBVIOUS TRUTH.

Read on!

PS: I was correct about OBAMA as well ;)

So far a 'perfect' record ;)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

http://whatreallyhappened.com

LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE
A Previously Gullible World Opens Its Eyes to Wikipedia's Potential for Fraud.
Posted Mar 3, 2007 04:42 PM PST
Category: COVER-UP/DECEPTIONS

The main reason I am posting this article is that back when Wikipedia still had articles about myself and whatreallyhappened.com, they were filled with errors which I repeatedly would correct, only to have my edits erased and the original (and erroneous) claims put back in. When it became known that the person trying to correct the article about Michael Rivero WAS Michael Rivero, Wikipedia simply deleted the entry.

On the basis of this personal experience with Wikipedia, I have to give this account the benefit of the doubt.

http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Essjay

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

http://www.infowars.net/articles/march2007/020307Digg.htm

Is Digg Rigged?
Reports this week have suggested that the online news community digg may be suffering abuse at the hands of a group of users that are burying Digg stories they find ideologically unappealing.

Rumours are flying around the internet that these so called "bury brigades" could be more than just a group of geeky self appointed censors and that it may actually be Digg themselves, or even agencies of the government, that are censoring stories and preventing the information from going viral on the net.
Posted Mar 2, 2007 04:38 PM PST
Category: COMPUTERS/SECURITY

http://www.pronetadvertising.com/articles/the-bury-brigade-exists-and-he...

http://www.lemieuxster.com/digg/expose/

http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,72832-0.html

http://infowars.net/front.html

http://infowars.net/articles/february2007/200207Digg.htm

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

OTHER INTERESTING LINKS (please read them)

http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=22185&Disp=35

Posted in

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

PARTIAL LIST OF THE EXPOSED:
_____________________________

(1)

Michael "THE MOLE" Moore --- "Jewish" (KhaZar) Zionist Agent

(2)

Jim "THE LAPDOG" Cramer --- Zionist Mouthpiece and 'supposed' financial expert

(3)

Paula "THE WEASEL" Zahn --- another KhaZar mouthpiece, and "member" herself

(4)

Jim "I-SO-DESPERATE-FOR-A-HOLLYWOOD-GIG" Carrey --- what more to say?! Man sold his soul.

(5)

'Prime Minister' of Canada - Stephen "THE RACIST" Harper --- True Zionist to the core. Upholds ALL Racist Zionist beliefs and the one RESPONSIBLE for getting Canada to attack Afghanistan (and Iran soon) and the "Missile Shield". Fooled a great deal of Canadians to 'voting' for him but using KhaZar controlled-media to "dirty talk" the Liberals.

(6)

Peter "HARPER'S DOG" McKay --- Stephen Zzzzzarper's right-hand-man.... also responsible for wiping Harper's butt, cleaning up after him, giving him occasional moral-boosting compliments, etc.

That's all I have for now, please help me add to this list

Cheers!

;)

The Great Revealer | Sun, 2007-03-04 06:45

(6)

Peter "HARPER'S DOG" McKay --- Stephen Zzzzzarper's right-hand-man.... also responsible for wiping Harper's butt, cleaning up after him, giving him occasional moral-boosting compliments, etc.

......giving him occasional moral boosting compliments.......

should that read:

......giving him occasional moral boosting blowjobs.......

??????????????????!!!

All joking aside, that Harper is Canada's SHAME!

The Great Revealer | Sun, 2007-03-04 07:13

Here's the comments (currently at 40 since 2007-03-03)

Good to see there is a great deal of people waking-up-from-their-slumber ;-0

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I agree with Joe. Only because I'd love to see a website go down in flames. Where can I get tickets for that?
Stang | 03.03.07 - 8:02 pm | #

Just stop going to the web site. If everyone ignores the site it goes down in flames. Pass the word...it has already reached the world audience.
How much longer can they exist?
Joe | 03.03.07 - 7:45 pm | #

Dear pp,
You must of missed my warnings about dig!!

It was a set-up by the controllers of the mainstream media. And now you have wasted the time of millions of people signing up to dig before you can even vote.
Its called Psycic Vampirism.
They get the masses to invest time and Consciousness on them, and thats how a Psycic Vampire feeds, off of your consciousness. If a system requires anybody to sign in before leaving a comment, then its not open.
If its not open its secret. If its secret its corrupt.
Don't waste your time or ours PP, because we ain't playing games. this is a struggle for freedom of the world. Learn the lessons. and move on.
107 | 03.03.07 - 6:10 pm | #

I have a hard time understanding why this digg story seems to have become so important on prisonplanet. Considering the conspiratorial nature of prisonplanet, I'll go one step further and ask if perhaps there might be some sort of connection between the websites in light of the all the attention you have recently shined onto digg?

Straight off of digg: "Digg is a user driven social content website. Ok, so what the heck does that mean? Well, everything on Digg is submitted by our community (that would be you). After you submit content, other people read your submission and Digg what they like best. If your story rocks and receives enough Diggs, it is promoted to the front page for the millions of visitors to see." IN OTHER WORDS: THE USERS MANIPULATE THE DATA.

Straight off of digg: "What can you do as a Digg user? Lots. Every person can digg (help promote), bury (help remove spam), and comment on stories... you can even Digg and bury comments you like or dislike." IN OTHER WORDS: THE USERS MANIPULATE THE DATA.

Stick with what you are known for Alex: exposing those that manipulate the TRUTH rather than exposing those that plainly state the truth on their "about" page. This is not a story, this is not news, and it's definitely not an exposition. This is merely redundancy and to point out to your readers over and over again that what is suspected of happening at digg is exactly what is expected to happen at digg is the same as telling us absolutely nothing.

Rather than waste your efforts gathering this seemingly invaluable material of enlightenment, editing it, posting it, etc...why not just give your readers a link to digg and take the rest of the day off? Perhaps in your recreation you might actually rethink what it is you were trying to convince us of that digg has not already admitted to on its "about" page.
Stang | 03.03.07 - 4:41 pm | #

start a new website called www.exhume.com that lists all the articles www.digg.com buries? Hey I just threw away a million dollar idea! Go get!
abc | 03.03.07 - 2:19 pm | #

To finalize all this ranting(at least about this Digg,Rig stuff) I'm sure I don't have to tell YOU boys, but for those that might not have it all figured out,...Truth is the most wonderful of all the food and drugs.
jeh | 03.03.07 - 1:32 pm | #

Maybe you could name your site, myDrug.com, and you could have two buttons, one for 'take' and the other for 'leave'. Since we can almost recognize that everything in this life IS a mood altering substance, you know, FOOD, RELATIONSHIPS, VIDEOS, BOOKS, MARIJUANA, BEER, AND ALL THE WONDERFUL DRUGS (LEGAL) THAT THE DRUG COMPANIES ARE PUSHING AT US
ALL THE TIME!!! All of it can be seen as Food, and all of it can be seen as DRUGS! We don't just stuff our mouths with material sustanance, We 'eat' shit (and good things too) with our ears,our noses, our mouths, and our consciousness. In fact, even when we are asleep, our dreams are our food and drugs.
Of course, most of our social orders are peopled with individuals addicted to junk, and you are going to have a hard time weening people from their bottles filled with junk, conceptual and physical.
jeh | 03.03.07 - 1:19 pm | #

My only connection with digg came after reading from YOU that it was going to 'revolutionize' something. Dig and bury,..don't these two words
have some sort of affinity for one another? You dig? Dig was grabbed, way back when, to mean 'something was cool', appearantly , in the New, old, Newspeak, it has reverted whenever an arcticle ruffles our feathers, to being used to mean, Dig, as in dig yourself into a hole,..hmm,..something just like, 'bury'!
Ruth says ignore them, thats what I suggest!
If Infowars is looking for Digg.com for help,..it is therewith showing weakness,..fuck digg.com..
The Information War is real, Alex! Maybe sometimes you just need someone to remind you that it is!

What I would suggest is starting your own site that WOULD in fact bring a revolution to newscasting.
jeh | 03.03.07 - 12:45 pm | #

Articles that have high Diggs that should show up in lists don't. Digg's a waste of time anyway because many sites will link to the same aticle or re-publish it while posting their own Digg counter thus splitting the votes for the same article. The BBC WTC 7 article should have had at least 3500 - 4000 but was limited because of linking and splitting. Not to mention the government pussies that bury the stuff anyway. Why don't you just send the guys in black skimasks to take our computers away. Ca'mon, let's get it overwith - I'm ready for you.
RebelYankee | 03.03.07 - 12:34 pm | #

I just got off reading a lot of stories about Digg (on Digg lol) and even the people who work for Digg are saying in that list of buried stories, their name is listed as having buried certain stories, when they did not do bury them. Man Digg is corrupt.
Tim | 03.03.07 - 12:34 pm | #

Real Time Digg activity
1. Digg Spy http://digg.com/spy
2. Digg Swarm http://labs.digg.com/swarm/
3. Digg Stack http://labs.digg.com/stack/
Tim | 03.03.07 - 11:55 am | #

Jesus, the Digg plot thckens.
1. http://www.usersubmitter.com/
2. http://lukewelling.com/2007/03/0...-usersubmitter/
3. http://phillmidwinter.wordpress....om-application/
Tim | 03.03.07 - 11:46 am | #

The Digg guys say they are "fixing" the problem and plead ignorance.
http://digg.com/tech_news/ Kevin_...ocking#c5525568
Tim | 03.03.07 - 11:26 am | #

guy wheeler. PERFECT MATE NAIL 2 HEAD. THE MAIL I GOT BACK WAS LAUGHABLE FROM THEM DIGG. COME ON THE TOP STORIES ARE ABOUT POPCORN BULLSHIT, MUCH LIKE THE NETWORKS, AND THE BRITISH BULL CRAP NEWS, LOST TAPES, THEIR BIG FAT NAZI SALUTING ASSES THEY DID. REMEMBER THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED, THEY'RE HARDLY GOING TO REPORT ON NEWS THAT UNDERMINES THEIR CREDENCE ANYWAY IF THEY DID, WHO BELIEVE THEM. THEYRE DOING ONE ABOUT THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING TOMORROW, LET ME SEE IF I CAN USE SOME OF THEIR PROGNOSTIC POWERS (PS REMEMBER THEY HAVE DIRECT DECENDENTS OF NOSTRODAMUS WORKING FOR THEM) ALL EVIDENCE POINTS TO ONE MAN AND A TRUCK AND A GRUDGE! IGNORE THE LIVE FOTTAGE AND THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND THE FEDS REPORTING ON THE OTHER BOMBS! AND THE LACK OF CCTV FOTTAGE X 12 CAMERAS NATOINAL SECURITY, ANYWAY IF THEY REINVESTIGATE THEY PROBABLY LENT THE TAPES TO THE BBC AND THEY LEFT THEM WITH THE 9 11 TAPES AND YOU ALL NO WHAT HAPPENS TO WORLD CHANGING IMAGES, THEY ARE............... LOST.... HIMINEZ GUY ON THE TUBE...... MISSING.......DIANE TUNNEL WORKED FOR 24 YEARS...... BROKE...........9/11 ALL DAY.....................GONE OH YEAH NOT CONSPIRACY..... JUST AN INNOCENT COCK UP..... OH ALL THE PLANETS MUST HAVE ALINED AND JUPITER WAS COMING OUT MYANNUS..... PEOPLE WAKE UP IF IT SMELLS LIKE SHIT AND LOOKS LIKE SHIT WOULD YOU THINK THAT IT WAS SHIT OR DO YOU NEED TO LICK IT TOO? THERE ARE STILL A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT THERE LICKING IT. SWITCH THE BBC OFF FULL STOP... THEN DUMP THE TV AND START THINKING FOR YOURSELF. DID YOU REALLY WANT THAT PHONE, THAT CAR, THAT HAIR, PRODUCT.. THEIR TREATING US LIKE MUSSROOMS.... KEEPING US IN THE DARK AND FEEDING US SHIT.
MOROPATROL | 03.03.07 - 10:59 am | #

Well, I've thought about it and have come to my conclusion:

F*** DIGG.

If a bunch of hardcore gay atari-t-shirt-wearing pus-filled freaks want to make themselves feel powerful by burying stories that don't fit with their ideology, let them.

I don't think Digg is worth worrying about. I'm sure there must be a similar outlet somewhere else on the net for discussing content like this, FREELY and... y'know.. like a democracy.

The best thing we can do to really make a diffence now is BOYCOTT Digg (and encourage people to do the same). If they start losing a lot of traffic because of their policy of censorship, it may just make them think twice about it.

Right now I say we should look for an alternative 'news site' similar to Digg and just use that instead. The undemocratic policies of one site isn't worth worrying about too much, spreading the truth IS.
cp833 | 03.03.07 - 10:10 am | #

What a load of rubbish!! The whole point of Digg is that you promote stories you like and bury those you don't!!

We do the same when we Digg stories about 9/11!

Conspiracy is everywhere sanity is scarce.
Darren | 03.03.07 - 9:33 am | #

This very same problem reared it's ugly head over at AboveTopSecret and the old ATSNN section. My suggestion back then, which was apparently adopted was to only allow positive voting. That way the best stories rise to the top and there is no mechanism for burying worthy stories by negative votes.

When you think about it, there is no need to have negative votes. If a story is poor it will not garner enough positive votes to get any prominence. That is the truly democratic method for sites such as Digg. We dont get to vote "no" and "yes" for who we supposedly vote for in elections now do we?
subz | 03.03.07 - 6:29 am | #

Pete from Missouri is right, and the same folks doing Digg are working over the KOS site as well. Same MO. Such a group has been reported to be working out of the CentComm group
Pete from WI | 03.03.07 - 6:20 am | #

Is it likely a bunch of saddo losers are doing this? As many know, pathetic little individuals - lets face it there are a lot of them on the net - with too much time on their hands, wielding a little power, turn into self appointed policemen.
kag9000 | 03.03.07 - 6:11 am | #

There is an other possibility regarding an online "bury" group, and that would be not the govt. directly, or an agency such as the CIA or DIA or NSA etc. but rather some group RECRUITED AND PAID by an agency, perhaps even using a corporate front as a paymaster.

There are scads of accent-free English speakers throughout the third world who are paid a tiny fraction of what customer service workers on the phone USED to be paid here in America, ya know, the phone guys who handled lower level customer support and technical support for 8 to 14 bux per hour, who had their jobs handed over to folks in India and elsewhere who will do the job for 2 to 3 bux per hour. Anyways, there are scads of these english speaking phone-bots that would be thrilled $#!+less to do digg buries over the web for, say, 12 bux an hour, with part of their condition of hire being absolute confidentiality.

Pete
Pete from Missouri | 03.03.07 - 5:38 am | #

Guys, I'm really sorry for censoring Prison Planet stories. I'm just going with the flow you know.... the American Empire and all. And all the fiat currency I make doing it.... WOW! Gettin' a porche next week. And you should see all the T&A I get. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA. Listen, you guys are the losers. I am a winner. There is no God or accountability. Take what you can get while you can if you want to be a winner. Karma doesn't exist. It won't come back on you. Steal, lie, block, hack... whatever you can to stay a winner and impress your buddies and get the girls. Then you won't be a loser. You can't stop me. Don't even try sending e-mail to Digg. On second thought.... do it.... we sit down everyday after we fuck our receptionists, read your mails, and laugh our fucking heads off. HAHAHAHAHHAHA.
Asshole Editor from Digg | 03.03.07 - 5:22 am | #

Perhaps Digg should just come straight out and rename itself Rig.
Guy Wheeler | 03.03.07 - 5:16 am | #

The snowball will rollover mainmedia Digg,Youtube google and all the censorship. Support other advertisers instead of the media that is controlling whats on the news and if it fits their agenda. I used to think censorship was about violence and porn but now I know it is the bias.
Max | 03.03.07 - 1:55 am | #

Ignore Digg. Hit them where it hurts - in their wallets and pocketbooks. Show these self-important assholes that they are not the only game in town.
Eric | 03.03.07 - 1:53 am | #

Diig is rigged, now i can't comment on youtube.
Max | 03.03.07 - 1:45 am | #

Digg the fine art of shoveling BS.
Anonymous | 03.03.07 - 1:41 am | #

On second thought, why even bother with digg?
I never heard of them until I visited prisonplanet.com.
ruth doyle | 03.03.07 - 12:54 am | #

So does gold-eagle.com
As soon as someone posts a comment not to the silent moderators liking, they pull it.
No surprise.
ruth doyle | 03.03.07 - 12:52 am | #

Same as gold-eagle.com.
The moderator buries all comments not to his personal liking.
That's the problem with these sites, silent moderators either don't post or immediately yank comments that don't fit their ideology.
ruth doyle | 03.03.07 - 12:51 am | #

There are scores, if not hundreds of sites similar to digg, though I can't remember ever finding one that was excellent... or even much better for that matter. Perhaps, if you really believer there is a grand conspiracy to suppress this stuff, the wisest move would be to create your own conspiracy related digg-style news service. Somehow I actually think something like would do fairly well, strangely enough.
tsoldrin | Homepage | 03.02.07 - 10:45 pm | #

I only signed up for digg when the 1st story broke concerning prior knowledge of building 7.
After tracking that story alone for a few hours, i was convinced that it was being 'skewed'. It is only to be expected, there is enough money and greed for people who wish to work for the beast.
I've allready burried digg, tisc tisc.
Jock | 03.02.07 - 10:22 pm | #

Please digg the infowars.com story on this page and bury the debunking911 conspiracy story on this page:
http://digg.com/politics/upcoming/most

Check the homepage if you dont see them,

Thanks!!!
Steve | Homepage | 03.02.07 - 9:42 pm | #

Sheesh folks are DUMB. Military networks folks. You just visit. You will not be allowed to do ANYTHING against the state. Even Alex will not be all to bring down the beast. You have to pull the plug. Plug=Calvert Thermal Station.
Masher1 | Homepage | 03.02.07 - 9:06 pm | #

Don't care 'bout the gravediggers. If it's meant to go viral, it willl. Truth eventually wins!

Dave L.
Dave | Homepage | 03.02.07 - 8:45 pm | #

It's not Diggs; It's not Google, It's not the gov't.
It's all of us "the people" allowing this to happen!!!!
Winston Smith | 03.02.07 - 8:29 pm | #

Use you power people. Use it know with all of your mouse power make a resolution never to click on a Google ad, a You Tube ad, a Digg ad. Never. Or go the other way and attack now and brig down the ad server for this assholes bastards. It is now or never. Attack people. You have the power. Its a mouse.
Mouse Vader | Homepage | 03.02.07 - 8:03 pm | #

When I read the box telling me "digg it" I just digg it. Sorry.
unnamed | 03.02.07 - 7:43 pm | #

I think that digg box is too tempting. People just use it for fun.
unnamed | 03.02.07 - 7:42 pm | #

Stick to your guns. You are giving digg too much credit. Some of your articles are getting hundreds of diggs, others get a handful. It's just dumb luck. I have posted dozens of stories on digg and some have gotten hundreds of diggs (one was concerning Chinese mobile execution vans) and others only get a couple of diggs. I think it is a reach to suggest a coordinated effort against "truthers". Stick to the truth and what you do best.
Anonymous | 03.02.07 - 3:11 pm | #

The Great Revealer | Sun, 2007-03-04 07:17

...in 2005 because it's considered derogatory by the uptight, snooty PC administer.

The banned user account (no posting privilege) in question is "Siegheilneocon".

I put up the number of links on the user page that give credence as to why username is justified and not specifically insulting normal, run-of-the-mill conservative. Only the comparison between the extremist aspect of Nazi ideology and the Straussian Neoconservative movement.

I've noticed Digg is useless in trying to bring the issues to "light", even the informative ones, such as "Leo Strauss' Philosophy of Deception" which only got 4 digg points since introduced nearly three months ago. The new posts in Political News & Opinion topic end up being buried unless it's something Little Green Footballs and Jawa Report parties find appealing to keep 'digg'ing to the newly popular or top ten posts of the day.

The essay Is "Digg Dumbb...Or Just Bustedd?" hits the nail on the head. The most "dugg" stories are the standard fare garbage for the technophiles and other types, except the few noteworthy discoveries and articles such as the warehouse of a huge vintage vehicle collection discovered by the new property owner in Portugal and a weird Google Map satellite shot of the flying Tomahawk missile in the southwest region of Utah.

Digg and Wikipedia are often biased if it involves political matter that prompt constant war of change and censure. That's why these two web sites, however influential, give the wrong impression in being authoritative when it comes to the truth and the need to bring to light certain news and well-formed opinion pieces.

Sad, isn't it? Not surprising that there are extremists that wield the power of change and suppression running wild in America, Israel, Canada and even Australia & UK...they are aversive to the concept of critical examination for truth and commit censorship out of fear, ignorance and fundamental socio/psychopolitical belligerence.

--

My blog Last Throes of US Empire

Nepos Libertas | Sun, 2007-03-04 07:53

Slashdot is an okay website.

Free Software (GPL) is good.

The problem is one (at least one) of the KEY MODERATOR is a Zionist.

Which one?!!! That's easy. Search for each one's submitted articles, and you'll notice a pattern --- the Zionist is found by his actions.

I'll leave this exercise to the curious!

;)

The Great Revealer | Sun, 2007-03-04 12:09

My guess at curiosity level. 2.5 min.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

Masher1 | Mon, 2007-03-05 01:54

digg, reddit, wikipedia, cbs"news", abc"news", foxPropaganda, meetup, ect.

I have been kicked off and/or blocked from ALL these sites by IP Address. For saying the word "Fascism" apparantly too many times.

That was over a Year ago. Are you Guys just now realizing this?

fascistUSA | Mon, 2008-04-28 00:43

The zOOs definately don't like the word fASCism when it's applied to THEMSELVES!! LOL.

Yet that is where it has always been best applied! Even the mARXists are yet another one of their fucked up shisms. All godless systems to empower the beast, and subjugate humanity to it.

ooh, the irony.

Full circle it has come, my friends.

That pendulum looks mighty sharp.

Keep up the Good^Work!

Grim Reaper | Mon, 2008-04-28 01:43

http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article9474.shtml

" A pro-Israel pressure group is orchestrating a secret, long-term campaign to infiltrate the popular online encyclopedia Wikipedia to rewrite Palestinian history, pass off crude propaganda as fact, and take over Wikipedia administrative structures to ensure these changes go either undetected or unchallenged.

A series of emails by members and associates of the pro-Israel group CAMERA (Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America), provided to The Electronic Intifada (EI), indicate the group is engaged in what one activist termed a "war" on Wikipedia....."

MonkeyZerg | Mon, 2008-04-28 02:05

WHAT ARE ZIONISTS, AND THEIR ILK BEST AT?

Grim Reaper | Mon, 2008-04-28 02:08

unclesam wakeup

How much “MONEY” exists on Earth?
Take a WILD guess!

US Gross National Debt

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator