Another (literally) incomparably brilliant interview. NOBODY fighting harder than DBS.

I wonder how many people are hearing this stuff now that he's on this station.

Two or so errors I need to correct from a previous inane blog posting I made re: daryl's criticisms of John (and even Mike). just watched what I was able of the formmers new video.. and, from what I saw (and after qualifying my comments by asserting that I wasn't able to watch/ hear the whole thing, and so reserve final judgment), it WAS very bad and wrong/ bs (much like his previous sons of Liberty one, which I heard the audio to on Og's show, and which I thought must probably be a fluke of sorts -- a bad effort or day. One word came to mind, as I recall: "lame". But wa busy tasking, didn't pay enough attention I think.. in fine, it seems very probable now that D was entirely right. Which brings me to my other error -- caused by my usual poor communication skills and inveterarte case of writer's blockhead: I said that DBS wasn't always right. And he's not -- nobody is.. but I should have completed the statement to insist that he's probably right 99% of the time -- which is a good sight better than I can say or do, obviously. And so farewell.

P.S. I WILL figure it out.

is bad because instead of specifying Zionists or Israelis it just says Jews the whole time, & basically implies that ALL Jews are bad & were in on 9/11. So normal people won't respond well to it.

The "myth" of the good jew?" (title and subject matter of John's new video.) Give me a fecking break. This vid and message is more ignorant and lamer than the last one. Besides the obvious fact that there are good jews (and anglos/ blacks, &c.) everywhere (along w/ no shortage of bad ones of every race, everywhere), what about such people as Jack Bernstein and Freedman (well and correctly featured by Mike D. himself), Myron Fagan and and David Cole, &c. -- that's four good names, and we seem hard-pressed to muster many more honest goy names than even that . I still like and trust Prothink, for the most part -- but I don't trust his judgment re: his good faith in John. Needs to disassociate from him, I think -- for if the guy's not indeed being intentionally bad, yet he is doing some incredibly bad work (apart from the VERY good '9-11 missing links' video, which is/ was Prothink's work to begin (and end?) with.

My opinion, obviously..

because even though it's factually accurate & provides a ton of good information & is really good for the most part, it goes by the philosophy that guy uses in the no good Jews video. So I'll feel weird handing it out to people where as if they just stuck with Zionist, which is the accurate term for a Jew or anyone else who supports Israel which is who is behind 9/11, I wouldn't. I'll probably hand out the Fabled Enemies video instead even though it won't be nearly as hard hitting.

By definition historically there never were any good jews because once they became jews instead of Israelites when they began practicing the oral tradition, the filthy talmud. Before that they were Torah Israelites and were probably ok.

& believe in that stuff. Just like I don't adhere to the Christianity of my parents.

The Rabin assassination has split Jews into two distinct, visible factions. Eighty-five percent or more of the Jewish people support peace with the Arabs and the return of their lands in Israel. This huge majority of Jews also demands the destruction of the ADL and JDL and its murderous Halacha assassins both in America and Israel.

--- From #20, Judges Whose Names Do Not Appear On the Ballot, Wean .pdf.

I'd say the same holds true today.

Also, I'm suppose I'm somewhat forced to denounce the 9/11 missing links video (in fact, i think it only has about two good segments anyway) -- a few of its makers and/or contributors have indeed exposed themselves as agents provocateurs and saboteurs, &c., &c., &c.

Isn't that about the same rate as there are Ashkenazi joos?
It sounds really nice to hear of that many being against zionism, and all it's terrorist, treasonous groups.

I'll believe it when i see it; i wish it were true.