"TV fakery" seems sure enough (I reckon), but there is nothing that supports the no-brain "no planes" nonsense "theory". (They was planes that hit those towers, sho' enough, and they were remotely-controlled -- go ask Rabbi Dov Zakheim and his cronies, &c.).

The videos were faked, so the obvious question arrises why were they faked? Look into it deeper & you'll find that the people who claimed to have seen the planes on tv that day were fakes, some of them professional actors such as Gary Welz. Yes Dov Zakheim's company developed that remote controlled plane flying technology but that's not proof that planes hit the towers. Most people think that something hit the towers but that the image of planes were edited in over it for television via 'blue screen' technology type of thing.

but then say 'Al-Queda' must have put in the bombs. No one wants to deal with this information because it's too outside of their belief system. Similiar to how most of the no-planers want to argue that the Vatican or mysterious boogiemen did 9/11 rather than the Zionist criminal network. The truth is that Zionists did 9/11 & faked the videos of the planes because aluminum planes would not have punctured the building deeply enough, if at all, for the official story to be sold. It would have mainly exploded on the outside & not damaged the interior of the building & then when they brought the towers down it would have looked like a blatant demolition & been impossible to sell as a collapse. There's research that's been done on this by people like 'Killtown' that seems to be pretty solid in cooberation with all the blatant evidence that the plane videos were faked as well as the plane witnesses. & a lot of people on tv that day who were not actors also said they saw no planes.