Open Letter #31 on 9/11 to the Attorney General of the USA Michael B. Mukasey
Text of fax broadcast:
OPEN LETTER #31 ON 9/11 TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE USA MICHAEL B. MUKASEY
13 October 2008 Happy & Blessed Succoth!
Dear Mr. Attorney General,
In consideration of my constant reminders to you of the Jewish state's motive, means and opportunity to conduct a false flag intelligence operation on 9/11 and Bibi Netanyahu's emphatic claims that 9/11 was "good for Israel," let me go over the concept of expediency, a word whose adjectival form Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (11th edition) defines as "suitable for achieving a particular end in a given circumstance" and "usually implies what is immediately advantageous without regard for ethics or consistent principles."
Setting aside abundant circumstantial evidence that normally would place Zionists under scrutiny with respect to the events of 9/11, let me go back in history to the death of JFK for additional insight on this matter.
Mark Lane, whose efforts to discover the truth about the JFK assassination and to defend Lee Harvey Oswald posthumously are outstanding contributions to the nation, debated Joseph Ball, a lawyer on the staff of the Warren Commission, at Beverly Hills High School on 4 December 1964.
Also in attendance was the California ACLU leader Abraham L. Wirin, a friend of Chief Justice Warren, who addressed the audience and said, "I say thank God for Earl Warren. He saved us from a pogrom. He saved our nation. God bless him for what he has done in establishing that Oswald was the lone assassin."
To which Lane replied, "If Oswald was innocent, Mr. Wirin, would you still say 'Thank God for Earl Warren' and bless him for establishing him as the lone murderer?"
To which Wirin responded, "Yes. I still would say so."
Wirin spoke with perfect confidence that what he had just said would not appear in the news media, a noteworthy circumstance in itself. But Mark Lane's tape recorder and commitment to history caught up with Wirin. (See Mark Lane's 1991 book Plausible Denial, page 52)
It may also be that Wirin knew something that Lane didn't at that time (1964), and that history is also catching up to Mark Lane. Seymour Hersh, in his 1991 book The Samson Option, in chapter 8, A Presidential Struggle, revealed that JFK was adamantly opposed to the Zionist state's nuclear weapons program, and that there was a bitterly intense behind the scenes struggle between JFK and David Ben Gurion, and that Ben Gurion resorted to outright lies about what was going on at the nuclear weapons installation at Dimona in the Negev desert.
Meyer Lansky, a friend of David Ben Gurion and an integral part of the CIA's Praxis of Evil, was well positioned to take care of the matter and get JFK off the Zionist state's nuclear file. Interestingly in light of today's contrived controversy over Iran's nuclear file, the Shah of Iran toasted the news of JFK's death.
But if Americans had only known, these ruthless individuals certainly would have had reason to fear pogroms! Instead, they bamboozled the Warren Commission staff into thinking they were saving the USA from a nuclear war with the Soviet Union. By comparison, "Dallas" was a sitcom and J. R. a cream puff!
Also fearing pogroms were Jack Ruby, who assassinated Oswald to prevent discovery according to the requirements of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, and his sidekick, George H. W. Bush, whose joint efforts to establish Oswald's false and misleading public persona as a pro-Castro agitator are described in my letter to Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist which you can read at http://www.show-the-house.com/id6.html.
1991 witnessed not only the publications of Lane's Plausible Denial and Hersh's Samson Option, but the more widely observed release of Oliver Stone's movie JFK. Together, these three masterpieces represent three quarks tending toward a unified whole, with two of them not so subtly suggesting the CIA was entirely to blame for the JFK assassination, and the third passively providing grounds on which one may infer a Zionist motive dominating all the other motives to kill JFK. We certainly cannot ignore the end result; namely, the end of JFK's "two way street" diplomacy conducive to a Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction.
Lane said years ago that he wrote his last book on the JFK assassination, so we can safely assume he will not tread the path leading to Lansky and the Zionist connection as set forth by Michael Collins Piper in his 1993 book Final Judgment.
Lane's decision appears to be in keeping with the conspiracy of silence enjoined by the Talmudic Law of Moser, whereby a Jew is prohibited from informing directly or indirectly on another Jew to a non-Jew under penalty of shunning, despoliation and even elimination. Moreover, the recent revelations of convicted spy Morton Sobell serve to remind Jews of the strong efficacy of the Talmudic Law of the Moser, which prevented the Rosenbergs from informing on others in their spy ring when doing so would have been strong grounds for life-saving clemency.
So how do the dynamics of expediency and a Talmudic conspiracy of silence among Jews affect our considerations of 9/11? Last week I saw Mayor Bloomberg and he had a worried look on his face. I don't think the financial crisis was foremost in his mind, for Bloomberg well knows how he helped downplay evidence before the 9/11 Commission of explosions inside the World Trade Center complex, which makes him and his minions at the very least accessories after the fact.
Will a third term as mayor secure Bloomberg's fate? The Internet has changed the game since the time of JFK. Now, even Barry Jennings speaks from the grave about explosions inside WTC 7 on 9/11. Just google "Fabled Enemies" and hear him!
For more on the Talmudic Law of the Moser visit http://www.show-the-house.com/id10.html.
Stehen M. St. John
Post Office Box 449
Rockefeller Center
New York, NY 10185
