It's Israel that incites hate
March 11, 2007 12:36 am
BETHLEHEM, Palestine--I am surprised that you find so terrible some of the quotes you record ["A steady diet of hate for kids in Palestine," Feb. 11] from Palestinian textbooks, such as "Palestine will be liberated by its men, its women, its young ones and its elderly."
Surely something of this sort was said by Americans fighting for their independence during the Revolutionary War. Their desire to sacrifice for freedom echoes some of our first generals: "[A]ppealing to Heaven for the justice of our cause, we determine to die or be free" (Joseph Warren, American account of the Battle of Lexington, 1775).
I spent three months in Palestine and Israel. I have been a witness to injustice that rarely makes it to mainstream news in the U.S.
I have spent time with families whose houses have been demolished; families who are left with no means of income after their fields have been destroyed; men who have been tortured in prison and who are nevertheless seeking a nonviolent way to resist; children who have been shot while playing; children who have been beaten by soldiers; and children whose siblings are in jail simply for being members of a political party.
The lives of Palestinians are devalued at the expense of Israelis. Palestinian children have little or no access to play areas, because of Israeli building restrictions and continued confiscation of land. While settlements atop hills in Palestine use water for swimming pools, gardens, and open spaces, Palestinians must pay four times as much to Israel for water.
Sewage from these settlements often runs directly onto Palestinian farmland.
Palestinian children in refugee camps face raids, where soldiers come in the middle of the night, break into their houses, and sometimes make an arrest or simply break things and leave.
You state that Palestinians do not learn about the Holocaust. Well, Israelis are not taught in school about the history of their country beyond the Jewish perspective. It is not taught, for example, that in the 1948 war more than 400 Palestinian towns were destroyed, and thousands of Palestinians were expelled or killed.
I have found that Israeli soldiers know little about why they receive orders, and Israeli civilians are ignorant of what happens in the West Bank. Please consider the following typical examples:
The first week I was here, I met a Palestinian family whose 11-year-old son was shot from a watchtower while playing on his porch.
I told an Israeli girl in her 20s about it. Her reply: "That couldn't have happened. It would have been on the news."
Two weeks ago we received a phone call from a family whose sons, 17 and 18 years old, had been beaten and arrested by the Israeli Defense Force in the village of Budrus.
I called the spokesperson for the IDF. I did not get in direct contact with the general. Instead I talked to an office worker. His response: "This doesn't have to do with us. We just talk to the media. But soldiers do not hurt innocent people. I am really sorry."
Last week I asked an Israeli soldier if he knew where the Green Line (the internationally recognized border that gives Palestine 22 percent of its original territory) is--since bulldozers, 12 kilometers away from this border, removed 700-year-old olive trees, the livelihood of 200 people.
His answer: "I don't know where the border is. I am just following orders."
There are actually many schools in Palestine that teach about Israelis and Palestinians living peacefully together. The Hope Flowers School near Bethlehem works to bring Palestinian and Jewish Israelis together to teach about reconciliation.
This school faces a court order--from Israel--that its cafeteria be demolished to make room for a security road. In addition, the school's water well will be taken. This school is even denied the right to repair the road that leads to the school.
Palestinians do not need to learn hate from textbooks. They can learn it when they see what happens to their friends and families, their schools, and their land. They learn it by having dignity and rights taken away.
The Web site Palestinian Media Watch teaches Americans to hate. It turns the parents and teachers of Palestine into caricatures of terrorists whom we can easily blame.
Every parent and teacher I have met here is struggling to meet basic needs--and at the same time is teaching children that education is the key to freedom. But you cannot tie a cat down and ask it to make peace.
It would be much more useful if the Web site were devoted to America's role in unilaterally supporting Israel and how we can reach a solution that is just.
It would also be helpful if Americans came to visit Palestine, to see for themselves.
Caroline Borden, from Catlett, works in Bethlehem, Palestine.
Copyright 2007 The Free Lance-Star Publishing Company.
Posted in - mparent7777's blog
- Login or register to post comments
Claymore....ZIOSTAN ! Has a nice exotic ring to it !
History Worm will just love it, I'm sure.
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/705#comment-3231
Stans
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/718#comment-3262
Turkestan to Bantustan ?
Chief Chertoff's Department of Homeland Insecurity has designated the AIPAC Conference currently taking place
in Washington, D.C, as a "National Security Event" !
Latest Bullet-in Here:
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/wmrpodcast31207.wav
wmrpodcast31207.wav (audio/x-wav Object)
(includes latest bullrushes on Israeli Ambassador in Bondage)
Claymore ! All you had to do was imagine it, and ALIKAZAN ! It magically appears! In living color! -
BEAUTIFUL ZIOSTAN !
http://thx1138.wordpress.com/2007/03/13/beautiful-ziostan/
Beautiful Ziostan « AGAINST ZIONISM
Ziostan is a well chosen name, but do remember that Bantustan is also a misnomer (like anti-semitism is ...): there is no Bantustan on the maps and there's no sense in calling the S.African Black Homelands a 'Stan' (turkik word meaning 'land of').
I have already termed the Zionist Entity 'New Khazaria', for that's what it is. An alternative name, for those of you who like apartheid terminology, would be Khazarstan. How about that? Anyway congratulations to Claymore for making the point about Ziostan (aka Israel) so clear.
Looks like I'll have to make a new picture, this one for Khazarstan.
:-)
AZ - If you do that, you will also have to make another one for all the little "Palestans" that have been fractured off into nothing but miniature "Bantustans" by the formation of Greater Ziostan, or Khazarstan, as H.W. would have it. But that would be quite 'beyond the Pale',in my opinion. And it wouldn't even begin to anticipate the fullest implications of a Zionist plan for 'Eretz Israel'.
Let the 'Smashing Turtle Turks' save their Turkik "stans" for their own steppe wastelands, not the lands of the Arabs.
The term "Bantustan" was most likely coined by some Afrikaaner Dutch Jew in the late 40's, to instill a sense of being Turanic property, while denigrating the Bantu tribes in the same breath. It was a favorite derogative of Ariel Sharon's,
and is still used in a pejorative sense, not unlike the term "apartheid", which is of Afrikaner origin as well.
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/718#comment-3312
BANTUSTANIZATION
But this is all mere semantics, a geodemographic Scrabble game. And it's Claymore's Word, guys, and it's just about the shortest and sourest one I've heard. It just simply sounds the worst ! ( and AZ's picture is astounding ! )
( what do you have to say about
'ConSTANtinople', History Worm ? )
Peace Now: 32% of settlement land is owned by Palestinians
Last update - 11:16 14/03/2007
By Nadav Shragai, Haaretz Correspondent, and Agencies
A report issued Wednesday by Peace Now claims that 32 percent of land held for settlement and outpost use is private Palestinian property, as is 24 percent of the land on which the settlements are actually built.
The organization says the report is based on "official figures" from the Israel Defense Forces' Civil Administration....
Try 100% of land israel squats on is Palestinian. 100%.
Palestine IS coming!
First you take D.C. Then you take New York.
Jewish member of Israeli parliament says the Wall was built for political purposes of colonization, not for security
Jewish member of Knesset: Wall built for political purposes of colonization, not for security
Ash Sharq Al Awsat
Wednesday, 14 March 2007
During a field tour passing through a number of areas afflicted by the Wall in the West Bank, Jewish member of the Israeli Knesset, Dov Hanin, said the Wall was built for the political purposes of colonization.
Hanin agreed with what Palestinians have said for years. The real aim of the Wall is to divide the West Bank into cantons and abort the Palestinian state, replacing it with the “State of Nablus and Ramallah,” and the “State of Hebron and Bethlehem.”...
Israeli High Court rejects bid to open Gaza crossings to humanitarian aid
Last update - 20:33 13/03/2007
High Court rejects bid to open Gaza crossings to humanitarian aid
By Yuval Yoaz, Haaretz Correspondent
The High Court of Justice on Tuesday rejected a petition to open all crossings between the Gaza Strip in Israel for the transfer of gasoline supply, medication and humanitarian aids....
To me Israel is New Khazaria, or KhazarStan if you like. Zionism is just the ideological instrument of conquest, now expansion, but it's not as an ideology here to stay long. KhazarStan is here to stay, with hundreds nuclear warheads you wanna bet it's here to stay.
As for Palestine, probably a new BantuStan like Quasimodo fears. Why fear? It's already a Bantustan!
"( what do you have to say about
'ConSTANtinople', History Worm ? )"
Ah, Quasimodo ... I'd rather look up I-STAN-bul! Constant-ine is a name coming from the Latin equivalent of 'constance'. Nothing to do with turkik lore, though the Byzantine Empire did make important alliances with the Turanians. With the Khazars of history, that's known for sure (one byzantinian emperor was the son of a khazar khatun (or princess) married to the Basileus, his name was 'Leo the Khazar'). Later with the Pecheneghs, the Danube Bulghars etc. etc. And it's all the fault of of Rome, of the Catholic Church, for Charlemagne (Karl der Grosse, he was a Frank) did consider in the IX Century marrying the byzantinian emperess, thus re-unifying Europe and the Roman Empire once again. But who opposed such a plan, who else? The Pope. So, instead of a New Roman Empire made up of a strong German-Greek alliance against the Turanic invasions, the Church of Rome delivered us (the Byzantinians in a horrible way), in practice, to the Turanians. That's what Roman Catholic Christianity did for us, folks! AND IT'S DOING IT AGAIN RIGHT NOW. The 'little' incident of Ariel Toaff's book on the veridicity of the 'blood libel' is proof - what did the Catholic Church do to withstand jewish pressure for the withdrawal of that book? Nothing, it allowed intellectual censorship on a very important chapter in the history of Church-Sanhedrin relations.
... I understand it could be called Khazarstan because it's made mostly of Khazars (originally).
But 'Israelis' do not identify themselves as Khazars, but as 'Jews', and thus they took Zion and built a state there. They could've built their Khazarstan anywhere, but the reason they went for Palestine is because of supposed (and baseless, since they're not even Jewish) Biblical reasons.
I don't buy that today's 'Jews' are motivated by their Khazarian ancestry. They are motivated by their self-deceiving identification as God's chosen, which has lead to a tribalism to develop among them over centuries that non-Jewish Khazars and Turks simply don't have. Even if many are now secular/athiest, the tribal identity has been instilled, and they consider themselves (by-and-large) ethnic 'Jews'.
And those Jewish supremacists among them that are nationalist/Zionist, they built a state on stolen land: Ziostan describes it well.
Cheers, ClaymoreMind.
Of course present day Jewry wants to forget all about Khazaria ... except that they once controlled a vast Empire in the Steppes when they screwed every other tributary tribe for all they could. So, conveniently they have erased their steppe origins from their collective memory, whilst at the same time maintaining those ways of the steppes. It's quite common for this to happen to individuals, even more devastatingly so when this happens collectively. So they are wolves in sheep's skins, Turanians thinking of themselves as Semites. All made possible by the adoption of Talmudic Judaism. It's as if the Uyghurs, being Muslims, started to think of themselves as Arabs. Fortunately, because of the missing dogma of the 'chosen race' this cannot happen to Muslims so easily, or to Christians.
But it happened to the Khazars. The step to identifying themselves as Hebrews was easy, becasue as members of the 'Celestial Turks' Empire the Khazars also thought of themselves as Tengri's chosen already. Yet, the 'Jews' know perfectly well they had a previous life on this planet. ALL, I say ALL the information I have about the judaised Khazars I have acquired in THEIR libraries!
"They could've built their Khazarstan anywhere"
You see, this is a common misconception (like that where people believe Byzantium was brought down by 'Muslims', when in fact they were Turks). The Ashkenazis wanted to resurrect Khazaria in the Soviet Union. Bolshevik Soviet Union was in fact just that, then having to come to terms with other central-asian tribes (who also cooperated in bringing down Czarist Russia) they tried to resurrect it in Crimea (Quasimodo: Spetzoperazye). Why? A nice place, it used to be called 'Little Khazaria' or Gazaria at the sundown of the Khazar Empire when the Crimea was vital to control trade with Central Asia. But nothing is as magnetic for anyone as greedy and callous like this steppe tribe as Palestine. No, not because of Judaism and the 'chosen race' myth, which helped and helps only to con the Goyim. It's because Palestine is a major crossway of geopolitical interests, oil control - power, immense power, solong as we Goyim keep being happy with gazzling down their filthy brew.
"They are motivated by their self-deceiving identification as God's chosen"
Ah, but it's only a convenient act, powerful enough to mesmerize the Christian Goyim who now think of the 'Jews' as their 'elder brothers in the Faith'.
"which has lead to a tribalism to develop among them over centuries that non-Jewish Khazars and Turks simply don't have.
That's another great misconception, sorry. Turks, all turkish and turkik tribes, have a TREMENDOUS sense of tribalism. This is what I've been screaming all along in this forum! Do you see the turkik tribes in-fighting, like the indo-european ones have done over the centuries? No, they simply form a compact, tribally-linked constellation of peoples, please go read this Turan history site and be amazed! How do you explain Turkey siding with KhazarStan, East Turkestan (chinese Singkiang) meddling with KhazarStan, all the Stans of Central Asia ralling against the (Pashtun, hence Iranian) Talibans?
Cheers, h_w
The Illuminati Complot Theory is just a decoy, the real puppeteers are Members of the Ashina Turanic Ruling Clan.
I take your point history_worm, but Jews or not Jews, Khazar or Turkik its all the same to me. They are a tribal people affiliated together possibly just the upper sections and the lower ones are just used as willing 'sheep' wittingly or unwittngly, and they are 'satanic'.
The Talmudic teachings possibly suited their temprement and honed them and refined them even more, but they have no desire for anything except power, wealth and control at whatever cost to others.
Turkey was taken over by the secular Khazars and most of the central Asian states are also under their control, however not every one in those areas sides with them, many reject them and real Muslims and Islam are being suppressed by them. Some face extreme torture.
see: http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/
As Britain's outspoken Ambassador to the Central
Asian Republic of Uzbekistan, Craig Murray helped
expose vicious human rights abuses by the
US-funded regime of Islam Karimov. He is now
a prominent critic of Western policy in the region.
I will spread this excellent article around. I know just the sites to take it to. I've just started spreading the article around about the one by Joshua key. I'm sure the zionists will have a bit of a temper tantrum, but nonetheless, this is an excellent article. The truth is in these very words. I guess people have to be peace activists and other types of volunteer workers doing their duty in the Palestinian territories to understand what is really going on.
The spirit of Rachel Corrie is no different than the spirit of Jesus, or the rest of the prophets for that matter.
"The Palestinians must recognize Israel's right to exist!" This is what we hear all the time, and to the ignorant public it sounds logic.
However, in this perspective is it logic that Israel has always refused to define its own borders, that its military does not even bother to find out where the supposed borders are, that Israel assumes legal authority over building permits, water tariffs etc. in what should according to UN be an independent Palestine, etc. etc.?
This reality is becoming clear to more and more people in spite of the fact that little news emerges in the largely Zionist controlled media. This article is a sober and valuable contribution.
By Zionist blackmail and corruption of the US political establishment we shall soon witness an attack, possibly a nuclear attack, on Iran.
That will mark a dramatic turn of events. Whether it will result in a true Holocaust on a global scale is difficult to say, and should indeed be deplored, but it should not be precluded that Iran's prophesy that the current racist regime in so-called Israel will not last just like the Soviet Union did not last.
Let us join the true Torah Jews of Neturei Karta in the hope that the dismantning of Israel will be peaceful and be achieved with a minimum of lost lives. So let there be no doubt about it: This is not written in the spirit of hate but in the hope that Israel will join the civilized world.
Israeli economy based on land theft
vendredi, mars 09, 2007
Israeli Real Estate Market on Blood Soaked Palestine Land - High-End Redefined
the Israeli's Badly Battered Economy
Hiyam Noir PalestineFreeVoice Sunday Mars 11 2007 - 01.20
Foreigners - Americans Jews and Jews settled in other countries are not interested in restoring and returning the possessions to the right owners - the Palestinians. The second settler generation now invading Palestine lands have the same obsession - to make profit on other peoples possessions - as had their predecessors - the Zionists whom invaded and settled in Palestine 60 years ago. The new generation of Israeli settlers - citizens of other countries - ( many with dual passports) - are in search to re - settle for a second home on Arab land. - And they demand it all - and the very exclusive : Preferably settle in old landmarked Palestinian Patrician villas - or else in the old Arab quarters of old East Jerusalem - or in an old Arab village by the sea, or rule over fertile Palestinian Arab farmland....
Monday, March 12, 2007
VIDEO: Cheney sells the country out to the Israel Lobby
I refuse to even use the term Israel anymore because it perpetuates the myth that the zionists occupying Palestine are remnants of the ancient hebrews that Rome swept from that land like the vermin they were.
The correct term for the occupation of Palestine that has no declared borders, no constitution to govern its behavior, no accountability to the world for it's unlawful behavior, and no valid historical claim upon that land is ZIOSTAN.
I won't allow the zionist monsters to dictate the terms in the language war.
Coinkydink?
---
Related
President 2008: Top Zionist Tells Us Why We Should Elect Ron Paul
---
Texas congressman announces White House bid
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, announced Monday that he will seek the GOP presidential nomination.
Paul, who ran for president in 1988 as the Libertarian Party nominee, made his announcement on C-SPAN's call-in program "Washington Journal." The congressman established a presidential exploratory committee with the state of Texas in January, and will create a federal campaign committee today, according to his campaign.
He was elected to his 9th full term in November 2006, and has served in Congress off and on since 1976.
---
Ziostan, has a certain ring to it, Claymoremind
Monday, March 12, 2007
Tell Your Senator: Don’t Sign the AIPAC Letter