Gerald Toben wins his legal fight against extradition after judge throws case out of court
By Charlotte Gill
30th October 2008
An alleged Holocaust denier has won his fight against extradition to Germany.
Dr Gerald Toben, 64, is accused of publishing anti-Semitic material on his website.
The Australian academic is wanted in Germany to stand trial for posting the alleged items between 2000 and 2004.
The German authorities claim they are 'of an anti-Semitic and/or revisionist nature'.
Suspected Holocaust denier Dr Gerald Toben walked free from court today in London after a judge threw out an extradition bid from Germany where he is wanted for publishing anti-Semitic material on his website.
In the European Arrest Warrant issued in October 2004, he is accused of approving of or playing down the murder of the Jews by the Nazis.
But District Judge Daphne Wickham ruled the warrant invalid today at the City of Westminster Magistrates' Court in London, saying it contained inadequate detail about the offences.
It neither states the name of the website nor where the propaganda is said to have been published from - only referring to the 'world-wide internet'.
After discharging Toben, Judge Wickham granted him bail pending an appeal after imposing strict conditions which include a £100,000 security.
Other conditions include residence at an approved address, written confirmation from the Australian High Commission of which passports he holds, and not to access the internet.
He is also banned from giving press interviews.
Judge Wickham added that she had not been required to decide at this stage whether the alleged crimes were valid extradition offences.
Grey wavy-haired Toben, smartly dressed in a suit, appeared pleased on hearing the judge's decision from the glass-fronted dock at City of Westminster Magistrates' Court.
The public gallery was packed with supporters of Toben.
Toben claims he will not get a fair trial in Germany.
The controversial author was reportedly jailed in 1999 at Mannheim prison for breaching Germany's Holocaust Law Section 130, prohibiting anyone from 'defaming the dead'.
Toben's Adelaide Institute website has drawn criticism for many years.
In 2000 he fought an order by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission in Australia to remove its 'offensive' content.
The commission claimed it breached Australia's Racial Discrimination Act.
Toben completed his Dr of Philosophy course at the University of Stuttgart in 1977 and taught schools and colleges all over the world.
He founded the Adelaide Institute and is the author of at least eight books on education, political science and history.
At an earlier hearing he accused the 'world press' of wrongly portraying him as 'horrible, terrible, vicious...I must respond to that, because this is nonsense.'
Attempting to reassure the court he would not jump bail, he added: 'The world is my prison. 'I'm well known and to suggest there's no honour in my person is to slander me.'
The Never Ending Story of Jewish Violence
Holocaust revisionist seized in London
I'm adding some comments on blogs about this case, as follows...
It's appalling that Britain is conniving with the crooked holoco$ters even to the extent that Dr Toben must put up bail of £100,000 cash, report to police daily, reside at a specific address approved by the police, and is prohibited from using the internet, attending public meetings or giving press interviews. And these restrictions of his human rights are after the case was thrown out by a judge!
Whatever happened to Magna Carta?
The Toben case proves that the authorities certainly will sell out - if the price is right!
Part of the crooks' abuse of power derives from the European superstate, which was originally peddled as merely a "Common Market".
The only people who still swallow or purport to believe the traditional tale of "Nazi gas chambers" are slack-brained, uneducated, unsophisticated borderline retards; those who have been on another planet for the past ten years; sloth-brained types with zero intellectual curiosity; technophobes or Scrooges who cannot or will not use the internet; and fraudsters with a vested interest in the scam - whether business or political.
The purpose of the "six million" hoax - which was conceived in the 19th century prior to Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise's June 1900 statement about how "six million" dead or dying Jews would be a pretty good argument for Zionism - included provision of a sanctuary for swindlers and mass murderers (Palestine) which would be out of the reach of other states; exploitation of the criminals' own sovereign state as a base for weapons (some of which have turned out to be nuclear) for additional bargaining power; and the extortion and swindling of trillions of dollars and trillions of marks from the US, Germany, etc.
In the wake of the Zionist Mafia's staging of terror attacks (for which "suicidal" Muslims were framed) such as 9/11 and 7/7, Britain has been transformed into a neo-Stasi state in which "anti-terror" legislation is abused by local authorities spying on residents suspected of 'serious' crimes such as putting rubbish out too early or living outside the catchment area for a school.
Our forefathers were led to believe they were fighting for freedom. In reality, they were fighting for the swindlers' long-standing megalomaniac plans for global despotism.
Its truly disgusting to see this excuse for "justice", Judge Daphne Wickham (is she a JEW?), plunder a persons rights in this manner.
WHERE are all the human rights defenders in Britain NOW?
WHY haven't they played hell in the press to and in protest to get this man his BASIC rights restored to him?
WHO are these so called human rights defenders in Britain? Are they jews?
WHAT in that case are ALL the human rights defenders in Britain DOING for gentiles? WHAT corruption had made gentile law lords permit this gross breach of rights to occur?
WHEN will human rights be restored in Britain?
HOW did this occur in the first place?
AND HOW did police arrest this man on the international territory of an in-transit airport terminal with an extradition warrant for a crime which is not a crime in Britain?
Those of you who read this here today should be aware that if this "stalking horse" extradition is permitted, then ALL persons traveling via or living in Britain will be extraditable to ISRAEL for ANY thought crime ISRAEL decides to enact, regardless of whether they are a crime in Britain or not.
KC