Insurers stiff “The Demolisher” Silverstein!
I have always wondered why the insurers paid the claims for the demolished WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7. I figured they were in on the plot and were getting a backend payoff. But lo and behold the truth comes out!
They haven't paid and it's a sure sign that they know the story is unraveling. Can you say "INSURANCE FRAUD"?
WTC builders tell 2 insurers to pay up
Associated Press
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
World Trade Center builders rallied with hundreds of construction workers Monday to protest stalled payments by two insurers, saying their failure to pay is jeopardizing ground zero rebuilding.
Trade center developer Larry Silverstein, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey executive director Anthony Shorris, lawmakers and labor leaders rallied outside a midtown Manhattan hotel where the National Association of Insurance Commissioners was meeting, saying insurers Allianz and Royal & Sun Alliance UK are delaying rebuilding.
The two insurers are among those that have not agreed to pay their part of $4.6 billion (€3.5 billion) in insurance money being used to design and rebuild five office towers on the 16-acre (6 1/2 hectares) site, the officials said. Allianz and Royal owe about $800 million (€608 million), said Edward J. Malloy, president of the Building & Construction Trades Council of Greater New York.
Said Silverstein: "The insurers will fight tooth and nail to avoid paying legitimate debts. ... We will not stand by while they duck their obligations to New York and this nation."
Can you believe the balls on this zionazi!
WTC 1,2&7 (aka Salomon build) is an OUTSIDE JOB (not inside, since KhaZars haven't integrated themselves with their host country).
Remember the more time they elongate, the better since more and more people will be exposed to the FALSE FLAG 9/11.
The "jews" (especially Henry Kissinger & Larry Silverstein) are SHAMELESS HYPOCRITES.
That is a classic picture.
Pick me a winner!
First you take D.C. Then you take New York.
...but didn't the insurers already pay for the 'double terrorist attacks'?
I think here their trying to get out of paying for rebuilding the complex ON TOP of paying for insurance for the destruction.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but...
...but didn't the insurers already pay for the 'double terrorist attacks'?
I think here their trying to get out of paying for rebuilding the complex ON TOP of paying for insurance for the destruction.
MonkeyZerg | Thu, 2007-03-15 02:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MZ, you may be most correct. That would fit with the TYPICAL "CHEAP & PETTY" (and False Flag) nature of "jews" (i.e. KhaZars).
KhaZar's 5 steps to untold riches:
_____________________________
(1) Step 1: Pull off a false flag attack on a property you put insurance on.
(2) Step 2: Use your 'jewish' connections in law and politics and business to 'garner' what you 'deserve.'
(3) Step 3: Repeat Step 2, or find more ways to SWINDLE / MONEY LAUNDER more money from the Stupid Goyim Chattle.
(4) Step 4: GO TO STEP (1)
He could walk away with the cash. They don't pay and then pay to rebuild. They give the insured the money owed and they do as they want with it. At least with every claim I've ever seen.
Claymore- Looks like Uncle Heinz turns out to be a real "Boogie Man" after all.
And speaking of Silverfish, and having worked in the insurance industry, I certainly know how to say INSURANCE FRAUD . Do you know how to say JEWISH FIRE SALE ?
Allianz in Mediation with WTC Developer Silverstein
I read this article earlier today and was just dumbfounded. Only a zionist criminal, like Silverstein, could get away with this crap with a hoard of supporters backing him. But, don't hold your breath regarding the insurance fraud. Do you believe for one minute that anyone will stop him? He managed to blow up three buildings murdering thousands of Americans on their own soil without a whimper from Washington for his heinous deed. Consequently, if Allianz or Royal
& Sun decide to buck this zionazi it will be equivalent to a slap on the hand.
That they are refusing to pay the claim.
However, the report does not detail - WHY?
It seems that rather than indicate that the insurers think that Silverstein is 'about to go down' like the building he admitted to helping demolish on 9/11, that they may simply be trying to rely on a technical reason for why they shouldn't have to pay.
I single out WTC 7 because there is no incontrovertible evidence that he was involved in the demolition of the twin towers, merely a geat deal of suspicion.
With WTC 7, however, he is recorded on National TV, as having helped 'decide' that the best thing to do was 'pull it'.
I think it's safe to say, he has something to do with it.
---------------------------------------
"Money" has no value - people do.