Haaretz: Israel Defense Forces are taught Nazi SS Tactics to use against Gaza

Your rating: None

"Choose your enemies carefully, for you will become like them."

If the Nazi's had Israeli weaponry, like the advanced F35 fighter, an open spigot of money from abroad and political backing at world organizations, all given gladly to that apartheid, Jews only state of Israel by the Vichy USA Congress and the quislings in the White House, we'd probably be speaking German today.

The Israeli's have former PM Sharon's "Grand Plan" for the extermination of Palestinians. Sounds terminal, like Israel has developed some sort of final solution to remove the Palestinians from their indigenous homeland.

One of the many Israeli built, IDF staffed blockade entrance checkpoints to "STALAG GAZA".

"The 1948 war ended in the expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from their villages and homes. Israeli settlers moved in to occupy their land and the Palestinian refugees found themselves in refugee camps, or in neighboring Arab countries. Today there are nearly four million Palestinian refugees -- and they want the right to go home. Their problem is the greatest and most enduring refugee problem in the world.

Ninety-three percent of the land is now characterized as Jewish land, meaning that no non-Jew is allowed to lease, sell or buy it."

Genevieve Cora Fraser once wrote from Ramallah and asked the question that needs no answer. "Is America a Servant to the Will of Israel? Is America a servant of Israel's Will?" She went on to state,

"Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians since 1948 has also been to regard them as "untermenschen" sub-humans and never more so than today. In January 2001 Ha'aretz published an article by Amir Oren, "At the Gates of Yassergrad" which cites an Israeli officer's statement that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) studies the 1943 military tactics of the Nazi SS against the Jewish resistance in the Warsaw Ghetto, for application against the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza.

Even without the Ha'aretz article, casual observation of the incarceration of the 3.5 million men, women and children of Palestine in concentration camp conditions within the confines of the Apartheid wall, electrified razor wire fence, Israeli-only roads, and nearly 900 checkpoints and roadblocks is a tip-off that something is up. When you add in the destruction of a million olive and fruit trees, farmlands, livestock and beehives, enforced starvation (bombing of the UN food warehouse and refusal to allow in food aid) and dehydration (reservoirs, wells and roof top water tanks destroyed by the IDF), curfews that spread into weeks and sometimes a month or more, plus 24/7 IDF assaults on civilians whose defense is the use of rocks, confiscated rifles and homemade bombs, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand why the term neo-Nazi is common graffiti at certain protest sites."

IDF "Storm Troopers" being awarded medals for showing uncommon bravery while shooting Palestinian children in the head.

At the gates of Yassergrad 00:00 25/01/2002

By Amir Oren

In order to prepare properly for the next campaign, one of the Israeli officers in the territories said not long ago, it's justified and in fact essential to learn from every possible source. If the mission will be to seize a densely populated refugee camp, or take over the casbah in Nablus, and if the commander's obligation is to try to execute the mission without casualties on either side, then he must first analyze and internalize the lessons of earlier battles - even, however shocking it may sound, even how the German army fought in the Warsaw ghetto.

The officer indeed succeeded in shocking others, not least because he is not alone in taking this approach. Many of his comrades agree that in order to save Israelis now, it is right to make use of knowledge that originated in that terrible war, whose victims were their kin. The Warsaw ghetto serves them only as an extreme example, not linked to the strategic dialogue that the defense establishments of Israel and Germany will hold next month.

At around the same time, Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer will visit Washington, and one of his interlocutors there, Secretary of State Colin Powell, will appear in two consecutive days of hearings before the foreign relations committees of the Senate and the House, where he will face trenchant questions about the Palestinians and terrorism in general and about Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat in particular. Ben-Eliezer may find himself flanked on the right concerning the Palestinian issue, so much so that he will be left without ammunition for another item on his list of missions - Israel's reservations about the Americans' sale of advanced weapons (particularly the latest model of the Harpoon sea-to-sea missile) to Egypt.

The old and ludicrous slogan of one of his predecessors - "I came to strengthen and I emerged strengthened" - threatens to be manifested in Ben-Eliezer: the Americans are competing with the Israelis in taking an aggressive, suspicious attitude toward Arafat. The transfer of power from Ehud Barak to Ariel Sharon turned out to have less of an influence than George W. Bush's climbing into the hot bed of Bill Clinton.

The two most important dates in the history of the present confrontation between the Israelis and the Palestinians are January 20, 2001, when Bush took office, and September 11. Now even the skeptics admit that Arafat made a colossal blunder in his reading of the world map, from the American point of view.

The shares could fall

Despite the images of the armored raid in Tul Karm; despite the headlines, in the wake of terrorist attacks, about an Israeli decision to get rid of Arafat and bring about the collapse of the Palestinian Authority; despite the frequent warnings about Ariel Sharon's "grand plan" - the fact is that all these interpretations have been proved wrong so far, and not by chance. Even more than Sharon hates Arafat, he loves himself. Sharon wants to stay in power and be prime minister until - and after - 2003. A full-scale war in the territories, or even a constant display of impotence in defending Israel's cities and citizens against terrorist attacks, will not achieve that goal for him. In the shadow of the gap between the wish and the decision lie the constraints, external as well as internal. Instead of devouring Arafat whole, as he would do if there were no constraints, Sharon is nibbling at him, nibbling and gnawing.

The dispute between the proponents of the Sharon school of thought (of which Chief of Staff Shaul Mofaz is the major embodiment, though his summations in discussions are less militant than his opinions) and that of Ben-Eliezer was sharpened in the past two weeks in the wake of Israel's seizure of the weapons ship Karine A. The subject on the agenda was the entry into the "working plan" of the Central Intelligence Agency chief, George Tenet. Palestinians who are close to Arafat and object to his policy urged the Israelis to take advantage of the sharp downturn in violence - and the easing of the situation for the population - that followed the terrorist attack at Emmanuel and Arafat's speech on December 16, and take up the Tenet plan. They argued that the plan, which includes a degree of mutuality in the operations of both sides, would enable them to demonstrate equality, as distinct from capitulation.

The moderate school in the defense establishment found this proposal positive: the mutuality is one of principle rather than quantity (the burden on the Palestinians is four times as great as that on the Israelis), Arafat is at a low point, the emissary Anthony Zinni is demanding vigorous, quantifiable deeds from him.

Sharon rejected this approach. He has grown fond of the continuing sight, the result of chance - no one planned it - of Arafat under siege in Ramallah and his strength running out. He wants to wait a little longer, exert more pressure, extract the maximum from the situation - he's like an investor who follows the fluctuations in the stock market and refuses to be tempted into buying cheaply a stock that is falling in value, because tomorrow it will be even more worthwhile.

It was into this policy of refusing to shift policy that the assassination of Raed Karmi fell. As with the dozens of assassinations that preceded it, its major dimension - without which assassinations are not authorized - was the effort to preempt future terrorist attacks. To obtain intelligence information and to reduce the risk of revenge, arrests are preferred over assassinations, and hits are limited in terms of surroundings (innocent individuals in the immediate area), level and context. As a rule, there are no assassinations of individuals who are either too senior or too junior - in military terms, no one below the level of platoon commander or above brigade commander. Abu Ali Mustafa ,the secretary-general of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, was most senior individual to be targeted, after it became apparent that his political activity could not be separated from his direct responsibility for terror attacks.

The leader of the Tanzim militia in the West Bank, Marwan Barghouti, is defying, by his involvement in terrorism, the ceiling of assassination targets. His main flak jacket now is not Israeli fear of revenge at his death, but Israel's desire to maintain a layer of Palestinian leadership, militant in its methods but moderate in its demands, for the post-Arafat era. Barghouti, who earned the reputation of a fighter through terrorist attacks but does not insist on the right of return as a condition for a settlement with Israel, is considered an acceptable potential candidate.

The assassination of Raed Karmi spawned two conspiracy theories. One holds that it was intended to foment the escalation that Arafat was in fact seeking, but in the form of a deterioration of the situation that would prevent him from rehabilitating his force and obtaining rockets and other weapons. Alternatively (or in addition), the Karmi hit is intended to thwart the attempt to get the sides back onto the negotiating track. Both interpretations are incorrect, or purport to rely on telepathy. The decision on whether to go ahead with an assassination is based on discretionary judgment, not on malice. In the discussions that preceded the Karmi assassination, the small number of people involved talked about the operational opportunity and the need to take out Karmi for instructing his people to plan and execute attacks. One of the generals warned that the intensity of the Palestinian reaction would depend on the display of Israeli responsibility. An official denial, he said, even if it is received skeptically, will reduce the risk of revenge attacks - as was the case with the mysterious explosions that occasionally killed terrorist activists even before the start of the current confrontation in September 2000. If he had thought that in the Israeli reality the policy of plausible denial (according to which Karmi's death was due to a "work accident," meaning a bomb of his own making that accidentally went off) would collapse within hours, the general said this week with regret, he would not have backed the assassination.

The IDF was taken somewhat by surprise by the meager resistance to the forces that entered Tul Karm. Things will be different next time, the IDF believes, especially if Arafat reaches the conclusion that there is no longer any prospect of getting the Americans back into his fold. Logic dictates that this will be the IDF's line of thought: The U.S. successes in Afghanistan were achieved without an Arab or Muslim alliance. The Karine A weapons ship exposed Arafat's two-faced posturing (and no less grave in American eyes, his contacts with Imad Mugniyeh, who works for the Iranians and Hezbollah and was behind the car bombs that took 260 American lives in Beirut). General John Keane, deputy chief of staff, U.S. Army, this week cited the attempt to destroy Israel and establish a Palestinian state in the same breath with terrorist crimes against the United States. After all these developments, Arafat is liable to entrench himself in Ramallah and establish a Yassergrad there as a trap for IDF armor.

He may well order tens of thousands of armed members of the Palestinian Authority security units (and the thousands of armed members of Tanzim and Hamas, whose help he enlisted by ignoring both his commitment under Oslo and the American demand to uproot the terrorist infrastructure) to launch a war of
desperation.

Submitted by Greg Bacon on Sat, 2008-12-06 10:47
Greg Bacon's blog

Login or register to post comments

67 reads

Idiotic and tangeantial

It always goes back to the Jews doesn't it? Even when the premise posed put the Jews aside. The only valid point so far in this hide and duck nostalgia of Nazi realities, which centers on the query involves the contention that these non-Jewish variables can only add succor to the Zionist cause--enabling them to continue using the holocaust to keep the world captive and frame the debate according to their perspective. Granted these statistics can be construed along those lines.

Nevertheless, anti-Zionism is grounded and solid enough to withstand the test of truth. Don't you folk think that's the case? There in no need for circumspective arguments that miss the point--step up and face the facts.

Now if one of you would address the query and stop resorting to its Judaizication it would be appreciated. Your opinions are important moreover, your expertise in the matter may be instructive.

_____________________

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." –Albert Einstein.

Stern Gang | Mon, 2008-12-08 02:28

Asinine

Oh yeah, I almost forgot, some of these truth seekers and freedom of speech champions all of a sudden become advocates of censorship and silence--quite telling.

So, two people or factions disagree on a certain approach or modus operandi and all of a sudden it's claimed that one faction wants to "silence" the other, or even 'censor' them. More bullshit from Stern Gang. This is an open forum - there is no censorship here.

It's "quite telling", is it? What does it tell you? Let me guess: that half of us are 'Zionist agents'. How fuckin' boring and predictable and paranoid and stupid.

You can keep helping the kehillah propagate its image as the innocent victim of history if you like, Stern Gang, but I'll have no part in it. Those nasty Nazis made them do it. Suck up that Zionist propaganda boy, yum. Don't think, just do it.

Crimes of Zion | Mon, 2008-12-08 01:55

The Ancient Modus Operandi of the Jews

Stern wrote:

Circumvention and banal comparison seem to be the tools of the Hitlerites. War is hell, n'est ce pas mon ami? Schlomo Ben Schlomi made them do it, pas vrait? Admittedly, none has so far contravened the assertion that German National Socialism slaughtered 6 million non-Jewish, non combatant civilians.

---etc---

See how he claims those who say what does not please him are "Hitlerites" who want to murder 6-million jews.

One does not leave enemies roaming at large behind one's back. Jews are the enemy, and we don't need to read The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, or the Talmud, or five DVDs' with supporting quotes from Jews and Jewish documents to prove that the Jews are the enemy of humanity.

The most basic and simple case for Jewish enemity to all mankind is found in the Jew's Torah, in first five books of the Bible. Just read the hate-filled book of Joshua.

Here's much more on the topic.

The Universal Enslavement of the Non-Jew: The Ancient Jewish Plan for World Domination Found in the Old Testament by Christopher Jon Bjerknes

Some gentiles who have been programmed by Jewish ideas tell us not to mention Hitler or the facts about WWII because they claim it detracts from the main goal of saving ourselves today. However, these topics furnish a sort of Touch Stone and people who are not willing to look into touchy subjects will not be of much use in any real endeavor. We must name the enemy before we may act together neutralize the enemy. The enemy is Judaism, lock, shlock, and shylock! LOL

That will be my last contribution to this thread.

Have a nice day!

-- Leif Oldhart

"Conservative:" Loves his money better than your freedom.

"Liberal:" Values temporary security more than your liberty.

leif_oldhart | Sun, 2008-12-07 20:01

Confront the query, love Hitler, but do answer

Circumvention and banal comparison seem to be the tools of the Hitlerites. War is hell, n'est ce pas mon ami? Schlomo Ben Schlomi made them do it, pas vrait? Admittedly, none has so far contravened the assertion that German National Socialism slaughtered 6 million non-Jewish, non combatant civilians.

What did these millions of innocent people have to do with the Jewish boycott of Germany, the Jewish bankrupting of Germany, the Jewish balknaization of Germany, and all the other Jewish ills attested by the National Socialists? Moreover, what is the justification for the master race ideology, which materially drove the system of destruction wrought by your heroic Nazis beyond the Jewish question unto undesirables--humans not fit to be humans?

Hopefully, one or two herculean "truth seekers" will step forward head long and tackle the questions unrelated to Jewry?

Oh yeah, I almost forgot, some of these truth seekers and freedom of speech champions all of a sudden become advocates of censorship and silence--quite telling.

_____________________

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." –Albert Einstein.

Stern Gang | Sun, 2008-12-07 18:18

They protest too much

That gave the Roosevelt what he had desired, American entry into the European conflict.

Roosevlet has Jewish heritage, so he's one of them, right?

So why did HItler give the Jews what they wanted?

- GB

They gave only what was demanded and threatened for by the zionists. Some leaders were less threatened, while other leaders were greatly threatened....some lost their lives.

And all these movies, books, docu-dramas, etc etc etc....about Hitler. Stands to reason that the zionist machinery doth protest too much.

If anyone is worshipping and adoring Hitler it is the zionist jews. Look at the untold millions upon millions the zionist machine has made on his name.

Rhiannon | Sun, 2008-12-07 17:18

I'm not sure, Greg.

Tell me this: If Hitler was fighting the Jews from taking over Germany and the world, then why did he declare war on the US a couple of days after the Japs attacked Pearl Harbor?

That gave the Roosevelt what he had desired, American entry into the European conflict.

So why did HItler give the Jews what they wanted?

It's true that we should not argue with Jews, or their supporters, as it's a waste of time and resources. Some of the above illustrates that very well.

However, Greg Bacon asks a reasonable point question.

I don't know, Greg. Why does anybody do anything? Especially under perssure. Obviously he made a serious mistake.Wasn't he involved in a pact with Japan? If so, maybe he should have ignored it.Can an honrable man ignore his given word? Did Washington give King George the opportunity he wanted? Did Lincoln give the bakers the opportunity they wanted?

Whatever the case, what is relevent is that the reflexive, pavlov-like anti-nazi bleating by brain-trained "Americans" does not help solve the problem; it actually contributes to the problem by encouraging folks to take leave of their ability to think and reason.

That said, I'll take this chance to refer interested men and women to the Yamiguchy site, to read an interesting paper by Ezra Pound: Jefferson and/or Mussolini. Have a look. Maybe you'll learn something useful, though thinking isrequired, as in most important occupations! Remember, folks... you can't be ignorant and free!

-- Leif Oldhart

"Conservative:" Loves his money better than your freedom.

"Liberal:" Values temporary security more than your liberty.

leif_oldhart | Sun, 2008-12-07 17:02

There is no worship, no adorataion of hitler

As to the rape of the German women in the aftermath of WW2. Have you read Alfred-Maurice de Zayas? James Baque? John Sack?

The ONLY three books available on the German Holocaust by the winners of WW2, 9 million civilian+POW victims, defenseless people. Who else in this forum knows about this?

The wholesale rape of German women resulted into about 2 million illegitimate births, fatherless children of untold violence and misery. That rape, you know it, was instigated by 'jewish' hero Ilya Ehrenburg and his fellows. So every war entails that kind of abomination? Maybe at the time of Genghis-Kahn! Let me remind you that the nazi soldiers besieging the USSR indulged in romances with the Russian women, not rape, which was severely punished (on racialist grounds).

- HistoryWorm

Not anymore. Not ever. Equalizing the evil between Nazis and zionist jews, I will not do that, nor will I go for that, and I never have. jews and their puppets in control of governments, media, military, central banking, huge corporations, have surpassed any ugliness and moral decay beyond Nazi Germany. And besides, it is that ugliness and moral decay which created Nazi Germany in the first place.

Rhiannon | Sun, 2008-12-07 16:57

Worship HItler? No Thanks, he was just another power grabber

Tell me this: If Hitler was fighting the Jews from taking over Germany and the world, then why did he declare war on the US a couple of days after the Japs attacked Pearl Harbor?

That gave the Roosevelt what he had desired, American entry into the European conflict.

Roosevlet has Jewish heritage, so he's one of them, right?

So why did HItler give the Jews what they wanted?

Was Mein Fuhrer outsmarted by some Krakow Ghetto Rats?

HItler and Bush are one and the same, desparately grabbing power using a false-flag as an excuse to shred civil liberties.

Greg Bacon | Sun, 2008-12-07 12:24

Butchery

Nevermind the Jews for a moment (Zeig Heil!) can you help me dispel my Jew (Jüden) induced Nazi Party skepticism, numbness loathing and daze over the many other millions of non-Jewish civilians that were systematically butchered by the maniacal oops 'saintly' National Socialist Party Reich?

Now there's some bullshit for you. The implication is that refusing to assist the Zionists in demonising Nazi Germany is tantamount to loving the 'saintly' Nazis, or even being one.

The Nazis 'systematically butchered' no more civilians than the British or the Russians or the Americans. You must be still stuck on that good-guy bad-guy trip. War is war, no country was the good guy, but we do know that Germany was forced into conflict by the Jews.

Nazi skinheads and punks are fuckwits. They use that shit to facilitate their idiocy and angst and provide a basis for their vacuous pseudo-creed. But it doesn't change the facts about WWII, or provide umbrella justification for unduly deriding Nazi Germany in line with Zionist-manufactured horse manure propaganda.

Crimes of Zion | Sun, 2008-12-07 11:15

Nevermind the Jews for a moment (Zeig Heil!)

Nevermind the Jews for a moment (Zeig Heil!) can you help me dispel my Jew (Jüden) induced Nazi Party skepticism, numbness loathing and daze over the many other millions of non-Jewish civilians that were systematically butchered by the maniacal oops 'saintly' National Socialist Party Reich? Can you teach me to hate with the aim to love, indoctrinate me into the heights of proper Reichstag lag drag stag fag Führer tag dominatrix -- martyrdom? Freedom? Condom?

I'll even accept cited material from internet sites run by short stomp little boys with pot bellies who unwinttingly Zeig Heil, while adoring their extensive Hitler memoriabilia like tourrets syndrome sufferers, Zeig Heil! Although, I must admit, that little mustache is rather cute and stunning!

Dead Kennedys - California Uber Alles

"California Uber Alles"
By Dead Kennedys - Album: Fresh Fruit for Rotting Vegetables

I am Governor Jerry Brown
My aura smiles
And never frowns
Soon I will be president...

Carter Power will soon go away
I will be Fuhrer one day
I will command all of you
Your kids will meditate in school
Your kids will meditate in school!

[Chorus:]
California Uber Alles
California Uber Alles
Uber Alles California
Uber Alles California

Zen fascists will control you
100% natural
You will jog for the master race
And always wear the happy face

Close your eyes, can't happen here
Big Bro' on white horse is near
The hippies won't come back you say
Mellow out or you will pay
Mellow out or you will pay!

[Chorus]
California Uber Alles
California Uber Alles
Uber Alles California
Uber Alles California

Left: Untermenschen - The nouveau Nazi diet plan, after all, America is one obese nation man!

Now it is 1984
Knock-knock at your front door
It's the suede/denim secret police
They have come for your uncool niece

Come quietly to the camp
You'd look nice as a drawstring lamp
Don't you worry, it's only a shower
For your clothes here's a pretty flower.

DIE on organic poison gas
Serpent's egg's already hatched
You will croak, you little clown
When you mess with President Brown
When you mess with President Brown

[Chorus]
California Uber Alles
California Uber Alles
Uber Alles California
Uber Alles California

_____________________

"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe." –Albert Einstein.

Stern Gang | Sun, 2008-12-07 08:05

Well said Old Hart - I agree

As mentioned elsewhere on the blog, tom cruise will star in the pathetic valkrye. How loathsome, tedious, and disgusting. The memory of Hitler to be impaled once again. The typical parasitical cash cow, courtesy of USA bleeding hearts.

And I found this comment to be true and informative.

Bottom line, EVERYONE should be taught WHY they should not have any debates with jews. As Joe Goebbels wrote “One cannot fight the jew by positive means, for he is not an honorable opponent.

Jews, with their crafty play on semantics, can be harmful to those who are awakening to the jewish problem.

Hitler specifically did not want people to argue with jews, rather to ignore them, as I have found out here in jew-infested Delray Beach, FL.

- Andrew

VNN - Vanguard News Network

Rhiannon | Sun, 2008-12-07 07:43

Totally agree

Denigrating Nazi Germany and portraying it as quintessentially evil only buys into Zionist propaganda and reinforces Jewish lies about WWII and the 'holocaust'.

Crimes of Zion | Sun, 2008-12-07 04:57

Let's Stop Bashing the German Nazis

Agreeably, bashing the Nazis and comparing them to the IDF furnishes an analogy that the typical brain-dead, dumbed down, self-stupified Americano bubble-headed bobble-head can comprehend. But be warned: Right will not be built upon a foundation of lies and distortions. Will it?

Isralie IDF resembles German Nazis? No way!

The Germans were fighting for their own homeland, previously owned and occupied by them and their ancestors. The NSDAP wanted a "German Germany," There were about 24 other very reasonable points in their platform, points that are not mentioned in the big best selling "History" books about the time, including "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich," written by a Jew (of course).

What that means: So the Nazis were fighting for their own land. Not land they'd stolen.

What's more, some parts of Germany had actually been taken away from them... by the Jews, no less (Treaty of Versailles).

One such piece of land was the so-called Danzig Corrider, where "Polish" partisans (many Jewish or Jew-influenced marxists) had been abusing German people for many years prior to Hitler's decision to send in his troops.

Finally, just prior to the German "invasion," tens of thousands of German natinals had been murdered by the "Polish."

What that means: Jews and Jew-sheeple were treating many German people similar to the way the Jews and their American useful idiot shabbos Goys treat Palestinians today.

Another thing. Although Hitler and his party may well have been financed by the Jews for use in starting a second world war, so have many other groups and leaders, many of them honest and honorable (compared to the Jews, at least).

The rise of the NSDAP was a healthy and desirable thing for the Germany of that day. Hitler in no way "wanted to take over the world." He wanted a "German Germany" and his people wanted land, much of it once in German possession.

If German had won the war, Jew-dazed shabbos-sheeple love to say we'd all be speaking German. Actually, most of us already do (English and even French are Germanic languages spoken by Germanic people, right?). But I digress. A German "Win" would have meant stopping the Reds in the East and driving the Americans off the continent and back to America, where we belonged. That's all. For the God's sake, how could tiny Germany, with 80 million people, "conquor the world?" Oy vey! Were they going to place a luger weilding "Kraut" on every street corner?

Remember as well that Jews and Jew-dazed shabbos goys had caused no end of troubles in post WWI Germany. Many were outsiders who had swarmed in from the East to organize revolution. Others were foreigners who had used foreign money to buy up distressed German land, farms, and businesses for pennies on the "dollar." The Nazis had little option other than to concentrate the Jews in the work camps, where they were treated with kid gloves until near the war's end, when spread of disease and lack of food -- often caused by Allied bombing of non military targets -- caused the poor Jews in the camps to suffer as much as the German people had already been suffering. Oy, such a sin!

Resolved: The German People were more similar today's Palistinians than to the IDF. Plus, German soldiers were among the most honorable and most honest in the world... a far cry from the so-called and self-styled IDF. Aldolf Hitler was a good and remarkable man, and compared to Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt, he was probably angelic.

If you don't like the Holo-Hoax and its uses, stop spreading lies and disinformation about the German NSDAP. Stop distorting history.

You may find all the supporting documentation you need to the above and other facts right on the Internet.

Please get your facts straight before continuing to post nonsense like the above!

-- Leif Oldhart

"Conservative:" Loves his money better than your freedom.

"Liberal:" Values temporary security more than your liberty.

leif_oldhart | Sun, 2008-12-07 04:23

Haaretz: Israel Defense Forces are taught Nazi SS Tactics to use against Gaza

Submitted by Greg Bacon on Sat, 2008-12-06 10:47Greg Bacon's blog Login or register to post comments 67 reads

Navigation

Submitted by Greg Bacon on Sat, 2008-12-06 10:47
Greg Bacon's blog

Login or register to post comments

67 reads