So Nicky Boy, the calls to nuke Iran are just a ruse? Radical Islam, the famed Isalm-o-Fascists are secretly in control of the US government. I get it, you twit!

ONE shitty little country pulled the strings to make 9/11 happen:
www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmithInterviewsBollyn.html
www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmithInterviewsBollyn-Simon.html
www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmithInterviews_Chris.html

The same shitty little country led us by the nose into Iraq and now is BELLOWING for us to attack Iran.

Refer to Prof Shahak for the ME roadmap when you righthand is next free:

Iraq: Iraq, rich in oil on the one hand and internally torn on the other, is guaranteed as a candidate for Israel's targets. Its dissolution is even more important for us than that of Syria. Iraq is stronger than Syria. In the short run it is Iraqi power which constitutes the greatest threat to Israel. An Iraqi-Iranian war will tear Iraq apart and cause its downfall at home even before it is able to organize a struggle on a wide front against us. Every kind of inter-Arab confrontation will assist us in the short run and will shorten the way to the more important aim of breaking up Iraq into denominations as in Syria and in Lebanon. In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as in Syria during Ottoman times is possible.

So, three (or more) states will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish north. It is possible that the present Iranian-Iraqi confrontation will deepen this polarization.

www.freearabvoice.org/ZionistConspiracy_DivideTheArabWorld.htm

What a week.

First you take D.C. Then you take New York.

Fester: Here's yet another well rounded observation
for the Distinguished Professor Shahak to gloat about:

Death Toll Hits 'Million'
Updated: 16:38, Sunday March 18, 2007

The number of deaths in Iraq since the start of the conflict could be as high as one million, according to a new estimate.

An Australian scientist published the figure using four sets of independent data, including information from the United Nations Children's Fund and the UN's population division, as well as medical literature.

Dr Gideon Polya's figure is far higher than the previous biggest estimate of 655,000.

"Using the most comprehensive and authoritative literature, and UN demographic data yields an estimate of one million post-invasion excess deaths in Iraq," he said.

A spokesman for the Stop The War Coalition said the figure was "astonishing".

He added: "Four years after the start of the conflict in Iraq we can now see what a disaster the war has been.

"Everything that the Stop The War movement predicted would happen has taken place - but it has been far worse than we feared."
----Sky News ---- More on This Story:
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?in_article_id=41623&in_page_id=...
[ Iraq - the Numbers Just Get Bigger ]

-( I always thought the Johns Hopkins Study back in October
came in a bit low...let's see now, ONE MILLION DEATHS ....

I bet the Professor would concede that's a real benchmark.
Would he ever think it begins to qualify as a Holocaust ? )

Quas, Shahak was appalled by the Zionists and worked to reveal their mindset and plans to the herbivores in the goypen. Do take a look at his Jewish History, Jewish Religion when you get a minute. Peace, Fester

Fester - With all due respect for the man's work, and in light of his recent passing, it may seem unfair to raise a ghost.
But if Shahak will live on in his writings, he will still be judged by what he has written.

I only meant to refer to him in passing, for what you quoted of him, which to me is quite revealing, and the overall tone is not encouraging, however 'honest' it might be. I also referred to him in the context of his being a very well known exponent, and 'survivor' of a certain Holocaust.

You can take up that subject with Smith, and see how far you get with it, considering he refuses to discuss it, for certain 'practical' considerations of getting locked up in France.

Quas, I should have made clear that Shahak provided the translation of the document which I excerpted. Apparently, he thought it would be useful for non-Zionist/non-Hebrew readers to know what they were up to.

DBS ain't going near the Holler-Cuss and no need for him. I'll do a little digging and see in Doc Shahak ever questioned the big steamer or not.

Fester - I wanted to pass along a few short lines from
Robert Faurisson, one of the foremost so-called Revisionists, who dared to deny the existence of that "Big Steamer", and has all the scars and bruises he ever needed for proof...

a brief excerpt from Journal of Historical Review
[ The Arabs and the Muslims ]

-"To be sure, within the Jewish community there have occasionally been efforts on the part of a few clear-sighted spirits such as Noam Chomsky and the late Israel Shahak, author of Jewish History, Jewish Religion , to warn the zealots, but these have gone unheard. That said, Chomsky, like Shahak, has always endorsed the great Jewish myth, thus authorizing Israel to continue to employ, with an untroubled conscience, its best argument and the number one weapon in its arsenal: the "Holocaust," of course. The Arabs, the Muslims, and the entire Palestinian people are today the principal victims of this weapon and this argument fashioned from a lie"...

Unfortunately for Shahak's legacy, his best intentions may be undermined for posterity by his inability to come to terms with this essential problem.

He is almost always invariably introduced in the same breath as an obligatory -"a Holocaust survivor", and though he has made many pronouncements about it, you will be hard put
to find an instance where he really attempts to deny it,
as Faurisson has actually done.

Peace - and here's the rest of that Faurisson piece:
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:Ev4aHVEIH-gJ:www.ihr.org/jhr/v20/v2...

Quaz, thanks for the Faurisson piece. I am a fan and trust that he's followed Shahak closely.

It was puzzling to see him describe Gnome Chomsky as a "clear-eyed spirit." Faurisson seems to still think that Osama got us on 9/11. I hope someone will point him in the right direction.

Fester - Thanks for checking it out. Keep in mind that Faurisson actually wrote that piece in the weeks directly following 9-11, and dated it Oct. 8, '01. It is interesting to note how much he was really up to speed on, concerning 9-11,
for that short of a time frame.

If you go back and check the context for his 'Osama bin Laden' remark, it goes like this:

-"A kind of holy alliance has been forged against the turbaned pariah from whence all the evil: Osama bin Laden, to call him by name. Once upon a time, his name was Adolf Hitler..."

My understanding of that is that Faurisson knew, even at that point, that bin Laden was being set up as a pariah, ( by a "kind of unholy alliance"), "from whence all the evil" could be said to originate.

"Once upon a time", he is saying, as if he's referring to a fairy tale of sorts, "his name was Adolph Hitler."

That appears to me to be a veiled commentary on the overall demonization of Hitler, especially pertaining to a monumental event known as, well, you know...

In other words, he is generalizing, and making a metaphor to explain how we all need to have a villain to vilify. If my reading of this is correct, I don't believe he was crediting bin Laden with the dirty deed at that point.

There are a number of other boners that pop up here and there, but overall, I see it as a very perceptive essay for it's own time.

Maybe YOU can straighten him out on that "clear-sighted spirit" known as "the Gnome", Chumpsky. Good Luck.