You are here

Is This WHAT REALLY HAPPENED at the Pentagon on 9/11?

Is This WHAT REALLY HAPPENED at the Pentagon on 9/11?

The Pentagon 911 We Know

One of the four sites "targeted" by the alleged 9/11 hijackers, the Pentagon may be the thickest part of the thicket. First we have the official flight path, a tight circle and descent that defies Boeing 757 capabilities, and certainly those of an amateur pilot like Hani Hanjour. Then we have a 16-foot hole in the wall of the building, with no verifiable plane wreckage and no damage to the building from the plane's wings. Then we have the witnesses.

(If a Boeing 757 that has a 124 FOOT wingspan did crash into the Pentagon, then shouldn't those huge wings damaged the walls or at least left some paint scratches?

You can barely scrape a brick or concrete wall with your car door and it leaves paint smudges, so where's that type of evidence in the above picture?)

Enter the work of two stalwart young men from California, known as CIT (for Citizen Investigation Team). Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis have obtained and recorded many eyewitness accounts of a white low-flying jet and an explosion ensuing thereafter. Did the plane strike the Pentagon, or was this a psy-op flyover intended to make people THINK the plane had flown into the building, with explosives doing the rest of the work? 9/11 was in its entirety a "psychological operation" -- designed to radically change the views and emotions of Americans, conditioning them to give up freedoms and experience fear as never before.

Visit the CIT website.

CIT's newest video is getting a ton of attention ... but major 9/11 websites make no report of it. Why?

We finally have the Pentagon evidence tightly and succinctly laid out, in fatal conflict with the government's story, and nobody wants to talk about it. Makes you wonder!

Look at the picture above. You see two plane approaches -- one reported by the government and the other reported by independent witnesses. Here you have the witnesses' own drawings of the plane's trajectory (see yellow lines). The little white circles in the red flight path (south side of the Citgo gas station) are the famous "downed light poles," which were official "proof" that Flight 77 struck the Pentagon. Yet the independent witnesses reported seeing a plane come in from the north side of the Citgo station, and some said it then "pulled up." Look at the north side approach -- it misses the light poles altogether.

What did the white plane do ...? "Pulling up" means it passed over the building, just as a big fireball and explosion went off at the Pentagon itself. (Watch CIT's "North Side Flyover" DVD for the full witness interviews.) What happened to the real American Airlines Flight 77? No one knows. It was lost from radar as early as 8:56. Could the white plane that witnesses saw have been Flight 77? No. American Airlines planes are silver; witnesses reported seeing a white or off-white plane. Did anything hit the Pentagon? See CIT's new website www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com for the the best information collected to date on 9/11 and the Pentagon.

The Flight Path

The official story tells us that a Boeing 757 (allegedly American Airlines Flight 77) swooped in from south side of the [former] Citgo gas station and knocked down five light poles before hitting the west side of the Pentagon. (Interestingly, this was where an investigation into the $2.3 trillion missing from the Pentagon's coffers was taking place, and it also happened to be a region of the building that was undergoing renovation.) But 13 independent witnesses unanimously say they saw a plane coming in from the north side of the gas station. The famous "downed light poles" cited by authorities as proof that a plane struck the building are in line with the south-side path, as was all the "physical damage" we were shown. Questions remain ... Why is there no damage to the Pentagon's lawn, and why do witnesses insist that the plane they saw was on the north side?

Craig Ranke Interviewed - September 2009

Here you have it -- eyewitness evidence that CRUSHES the official story of the Pentagon attack. Watch this interview with CIT's Craig Ranke and make up your own mind.

Craig Ranke on Matrix News Network part 1

Lloyde England, the Cab Driver

The plot gets weirder. Here is an elderly black taxicab driver who claims his Lincoln Town Car was struck by one of the falling light poles as the Boeing 757 headed for the famous Pentagon strike. (Remember, this is nowhere near where 13 witnesses place the plane.) Lloyde England was interviewed extensively by the media on national TV and considered a hero of 9/11. (His wife, interestingly, works for the FBI.) The story is that Lloyde's car was headed south on Washington Boulevard, traveling at 40 miles per hour when it was hit. He slammed on his brakes, coming to a skidding stop on the side of the road.

Lloyde claims the streetlight was sticking out of his car when he stopped. His story is that a silent stranger came over to help him pull the enormous metal pole out of it. Amazingly, there is not a SCRATCH on the hood of Lloyde's car, and nor did the light pole mar the upholstery, as shown by the photos below. A pole like this is about 40 feet tall and weighs some 250 pounds.

England's Car and Pentagon

Telling Excerpts from Lloyde England

Watch this 9-minute YouTube video from CIT that got 20,000 hits over a single weekend ... Here, the Pentagon cab driver admits the whole event was planned and he was "a small man ... in it." (For the full interviews, watch the DVD "Lloyde England and his Taxicab: The Eye of the Storm")

Lloyde England and His Taxi Cab - The Eye of the Storm

This video was originally released on 10/29/2008 as a follow-up to the presentation "The First Known Accomplice?" It chronicles Citizen Investigation Team's (CIT) surreal, intense, and disturbing personal experience with the famous (now infamous) taxicab driver Lloyde England who claims that the windshield of his cab was speared by a 40 foot, 247 pound light pole that was allegedly hit by the plane that allegedly hit the Pentagon on 9/11, yet did not even leave a scratch on the hood, even while he was allegedly pulling it out of the car with (according to him) the help of a silent stranger who "didn't say a word".

There is not a single photograph or eyewitness corroborating Lloyde's claim that the pole was ever in his car.

In light of the proven fact that the plane approached from the north side of the gas station we now know why Lloyde's story simply doesn't add up: the plane did not fly anywhere near that light pole.

FBI Withholding 84 More Tapes of Pentagon on 9/11

Comments

That first image is a punch-out hole on ring 3, not the site of the impact.

It is highly likely to have nothing whatsoever to do with the impact, having been created by construction workers, as is suggested by the markings on the wall in this close-up.

As far as I am concerned, the misrepresentation of this photo as the impact site calls into question everything in the article.

Pentagon Punchout

I've said this before, the how of 9/11 is of minor importance when compared with the who and why.  

Sullivan, I think the videos have the more important info. 

I think we know who did it, yes?  Why is also clear, yes? 

How is interesting and far from settled.  The video interviewing of Lloyde England is disturbing and throws into question the official story (as if being the official story were not in itself sufficient) which some insist is what really happened

Disinfo "eyewitnesses" were in prepositioned to explain the  the Twin Towers collapse.  The same is surely true for the Pentagon. 

If you can explain Mr. England's weird testimony, please do.  If you haven't heard him, give it a listen.  It's the second vid.

Yes, I'll give the second vid a watch. However, I'm not going to participate in any anti-Rivero circle-jerk. I evaluate information on the basis of the information itself, not where it does or does not come from. Also, even if Rivero is wrong, he is wrong about something that is entirely insignificant in the greater scheme of things. He gets the why and who right, which is enough for me.

Sullivan, Rivero's a smart guy which is why I find it oeculiar that he makes such an issue of the plane or no plane thing.  I agree that the who and why are far more important, so I'm puzzled. 

Mike says:

As we get closer to the 10th Anniversary of the 9-11 false-flag attack, government propagandists are trying as hard as they can to push the no-plane nonsense to the forefront of the 9-11 truth movement, so that the media has a quick and easy means to ridicule and dismiss those who do not accept the official story.

and

I will sign off this discussion by reminding you all once more that while the US Government will not hesitate to lie, cheat, steal, and hoax you, they never do it without a good reason. As I stated before, there is not reason for the government to substitute a missile for the crashing plane at the Pentagon. But there is plenty of reason for the US Government to trick you into thinking that they did!

A couple of comments for those interested. 

First, I'm not aware of a major effort to push the no-plane theory to the forefront.  I'm well out of the loop, but am curious if others share Mike's opinion, or if Mikey's calling the kettle.

Second, if it is impossible to fly a 757 in the manner required by the official story (and the official story is ALWAYS bullshit in such cases) then there is EVERY reason for the government to substitute a missile.  I don't know for sure, but Dov Zakheim's involvement in Pentagon cash and remote control technology stinks to high heaven. 

Finally, Mikey, it's NOT the fuckin' "US government".  IF Mikey ever took an interest in the longer historical record he would not repeat such Chomskyian nonsense.  He has no problems mounting the pulpit to reiterate that "no government can serve two masters" when he excoriates members of Congress, but then he can turn around and assign blame to the US. 

Simple question: is the centuries old international Jewish conspiracy documented and referred to by people such as Ford, Churchill, Freedman, Webster, Pound, Mullins, Ramsay, etc. conspiracy theory or conspiracy fact?

Circle jerk?  The evidence from 9/11, the Holohoax, and the Federal Reserve banking system make the case beyond any doubt in my opinion. Funny that Mikey's 9/11 page doesn't link to All the Proof in the World.  He does manage a pretty impotent spasm of Nazi booga booga. Natch.  Old thing for AJ, I guess.

PS - David Irving's Goring has Hermann cleaning out multiple caches of hidden Rothschild art treasures.  Yep, them Nazis were the ultimate evil no question. 

Reply for Sullivan, in a humble way I share this with You, because you are asking who and why? not sure how familiar you are with NESARA? But September 11, 2001 at 10am FEd chairman Greenspan and Military  officials, were going to do the announcement of the Prosperity Funds been release and it had to be done at that time because of the trading in Europe and it was going to announce the new currency backed by gold and the reinstitution of the Original Constitution, and Civil Law; the forgiveness of all debts etc... all this was done by special forces Delta Force, under gun point Clinton sign the agreement a year before, and father Bush, did not  want that. Delta Force team  were waiting for the announcement at their headquarters office in the Pentagon, where it was hit by a missile.

Since then, NESARA had to regroup and there have been more groups coming aboard like 911Truth movement,Oath Keepers,White Hats,White Dragon Society etc.. there is far more going on than just 9/11. there is more info on a youtube video:

Change is on the Horizon- farmers claim program.

When I saw It, it made sense for me.    

First, I'm not aware of a major effort to push the no-plane theory to the forefront.  I'm well out of the loop, but am curious if others share Mike's opinion, or if Mikey's calling the kettle.

Lately, I have seen a lot of the "no plane" theory crap coming out, as well as the "there were no victims" horse crap.  The no victims nonsense got started by some dimwit NY Congresswoman named Maloney, who claimed that the victims were not showing up in the Social Security Death Index.  She said she got "conflicting reports" about why this would happen from the Social Security Administration. 

Roots web, which is an ancestry site, goes over why people don't show up in the SSDI.  I cannot find the link, but there are a lot of reasons why that would happen.  The main one is that a death does not have to be reported to the SSA. 

Both my parents got reported because 1) My father died when I was in grade school, so we needed to tell SSA in order to get the Social Security Survivor Benefits and 2) my mother was receiving SS checks, and they had to be told to stop sending them.

Have you heard of cases where someone else cashes the deceased's SS checks?  Those dead did not get reported to SSA - that would count as another reason not to report.  Foreigners without SSN's would also not be reported.  And I'm sure there are a number of other reasons.  But that information does not stop the proponents of the "no victims in the towers" theory. 

Fester, are you seriously suggesting that the US government were absolutely unaware of what was going to happen on Sept 11th 2001?  Mike Rivero doesn't play down the Israeli involvement in events of that day, so why are you getting on his case?  Why are you always on his case? Is there something else we don't know about? 

Second, if it is impossible to fly a 757 in the manner required by the official story (and the official story is ALWAYS bullshit in such cases) then there is EVERY reason for the government to substitute a missile. 

First of all, trajectories that are impossible for most human pilots to fly can sometimes be flown by wire. If it was impossible to fly the official trajectory by wire, then why substitute a missile?  Just change the flight plan to suit.

On April 23, the date of the Virginia earthquake, Mike Rivero made a comment on his radio show that:

"Whatreallyhappened's CONTROL ROOM IN FREDRICKSBURG, Virginia wasn't reporting any damage from the quake."

A slip of the tongue under duress for sure, revealing that WRH is a NSA cointelpro operation.

Also, WRH inadvertantly linked to VT blog:

Breaking: Israel and ADL Coverup of 9/11 Exposed (Press TV Video)

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09/03/breaking-israel-and-adl-coverup-...

It makes a strong case for a missile strike on the Pentagon.

I now remember why I don't post here anymore.  This editor is a nightmare.

Theme by Danetsoft and Danang Probo Sayekti inspired by Maksimer