- No demonstration before attack on US Consulate, source says
- Libya lawmaker says Benghazi attack planned
- Libyan president tells NBC: 'Foreigners' involved in US Consulate attack
- Sudan rejects US request to beef up security at embassy
- At least 5 Americans injured in attack on US consulate in Libya: US official
- How Democracies Die
- US blocks Russian proposal to UN on peaceful Bani Walid solution
- NYPD use informants to 'bait' Muslims
- Venezuela More Democratic than USA?
- Professor Obama Lectures the Muslim World
- Morris Interviews Imran Hosein September 20
- Scarborough: Everyone In The Muslim World Hates America
- Why the Mideast Exploded, Really
- U.S. groups helped fund Dutch anti-Islam politician Wilders
- Brian Lilley: The MSM is lying about the muslim riots

Comments
Re: Libya rejects American-style Democracy?
Tom, I hope this is RT’s claim, and not yours. RT is very gullible, and frequently echoes NATO disinformation.
In the video above, Walid Phares claims that “Islamists” attacked the US consulate in Benghazi.
This is to be expected. Phares is a textbook example of a media shill. A Christian Lebanese, he favors the pro-imperialist March 14 Alliance, and his nonsense is often reprinted by right-wing propaganda mills, plus militant Jewish outlets such as “Front Page.”
“Front Page” claims that “Salafists” did it. Yes, the same Salafists that worked as NATO mercenaries against Gaddafi, and now against Assad.
“Front Page” also says the US military should start bombing Libya again. It whines that the FBI will conduct the “investigation” into the consulate attack.
A Jewess named Caroline Glick claims that al-Qaeda did it. Yes, the same Al-Qaeda that the USA admits is conducting a civil war against the Syrian people, in service to the USA. To claim that al-Qaeda suddenly turned against their employers in Libya defies all logic, especially since pro-US Libyans helped US personnel to safety and to hospitals after the consulate attack. However we can rationalize our illogic by saying, ""We don't know the full picture. Therefore al-Qaeda did it."
Tom Sullivan suggests that ambassador Christopher Stevens “knew too much, and this whole event is another tactical ‘Swiss knife’ designed to shut him up, further demonize Islam, and draw attention away from whatever is happening in Syria.”
Wow. Stevens had been pro-imperialist all the way. If he was eliminated because he “knew to much,” then Clinton, Obama, and the rest would also have to be eliminated.
As for the obvious truth, it doesn’t matter, since Gaddafi loyalists don’t exist. Right?
Folks, please stop believing everything the corporate media says.
Re: Libya rejects American-style Democracy?
Yes, of course it is RT's claim. I believe no such thing!